ML20138H783
| ML20138H783 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1985 |
| From: | Goldberg J HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | Saltarelli E BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| References | |
| OL-A-061, OL-A-61, NUDOCS 8510290147 | |
| Download: ML20138H783 (2) | |
Text
_
l App. Ex r
h^h? YV?
OL h-Lj-f f W*
- 61 7)//f3 1
~
3 UUM RECEIVED llontos I.ituitisu h I'owtu Cowim g y g g }gg) l 1_
J W BRISKLNj
'd3 g (
s
<.em....
May 6, 1981
- ^ * ~
iG fk Mr E A Saltare111 Brown & Root, Inc HANlE P O Box 3 Houston, Texas 77001 SOUTH TEXAS Ph0 JECT QUADREX ENGINEERING REVIEW
Dear Mr Saltare111:
The following appropriate action shall be undertaken by Brown & Root in response to the findings of the subject review.
(These findings will have been presented both ver-bally and in report form by Quadrex to Brown & Root on May 7, 1981).
1.
Those findings identified as most serious a.
Brown & Root should review these items and report to HL&P in writinJ, no later than noontime on May 8, 1981, whether or not these problems conntitute a potential re-portable problem in accordance with 10 CFR l
50.55 (e). Appropriate rationale shall be provided which justifies your conclusions.
l HL&P in turn will have to make its judg-ment and report any potential 50.55(e) problems to the NRC prior to close of busi-ness on May 8,1981.
l 2.
With regard to all the findings reported from the Quadrex review, Brown & Root should underteke the j
follow'.ng actions i
a.
Brown & Root should identify a plan of action to review each finding ar.d estab-lish a strategy for dealing with the con-1 cerns identified.
j l
1 d
b.
Brown & Root should establish a schedule for conducting the reviewa identified in "a" above.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMillion NO Decket No-flicial Exh. Me-la the matter of Staff ICENTIFIED__
Appi; cant RECEIVED intarvenor REJECTED Cont's Off'r f
W atia.ier DETE Cthat Witnats 7g77 8510290147 850711 PDR ADOCK 05000498 G
f I
- oc.a>. -s page M 1: A Saltarella May 6, 1981 c.
Brown & Root should identify what designs, if any, owing to problems uncovered in the review, require reverificatien, or reanaly-sis and/or redesign. Appropriate stop work orders should be issued to Construction identifying any activities that should be deferred pending completion of the reveri-fication, or reanalysis and/or redesign.
t d.
Brown & Root shuuld feature the impact of these reverifications, or reanalyses and/or redesigns in their reforecastino activity, identifying the cost and schedule impact from both an engineering as well as a con-struction viewpoint.
In view of the importance to take timely and positive action relative to the Quadrex findings, it is requested that Brown & Root Project Management provide a weekly report as part of its meeting with HL&P Project Management, highlight-ing Brown & Root's progress in dealing with the above.
Very truly yours, 0,1,fl.. Tg.'
J H Goldberg JHG/aks cc Messrs G W Oprea, Jr W B Pieper (B&R)
W M Rice (B&R)
J L Hawks (B&R)
J R Sumpter D G Barker J W Briskin J L Blau 1
'q7 I
l
(
--