ML20138H636

Staff Exhibit S-143,consisting of Rev 1 to Section 2.20, General Project Requirements Reporting Significant Deficiencies Federal Regulation 10CFR50.55(e), . Change Notice GPRM-171 Also Encl

ML20138H636
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	08/13/1985
From:	BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
References
OL-S-143, NUDOCS 8510290108
Download: ML20138H636 (20)

Text

)

SOUTH TEXAS PRO [ECT 00Lf E,TED

~EF FECTIVITY DATE 06-01-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES '85 Qg gg g3 i FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

ENERaY i

,y g

g CORPORATION PREPARED BY DATE APPROVED SV DATE APPROVED SY' OATE g.R.b s.e.s*

d. w. w sA>/sif A M

,A sce i/ s+

j 1.0 PURPOSE To define Bechtel South Texas Project responsibilities for identifying, evaluating, and reporting to Houston Lighting and Power (HL&P) conditions, which may be significant according to Federal Regulation 10 CFR 50.55(e)

I requirements and HL&P direction.

2.0 APPLICABILITY The requirements described herein apply to potentially reportable significant deficiencies discovered during design, procurement, construction, and testing of nuclear safety-related equipment, components, structures and systems, including deficiencies discovered in released documents, construction /

manufacturing activities, deviations from perfomance specifications / tests or a breakdown of elements of the quality assurance program.

3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Federal Regulation 10 CFR 50.55(e) imposes a requirement on holders of construction pemits for nuclear power facilities to notify the NRC of deficiencies found in design or construction which, if they were to remain uncorrected, could affect adversely the safety of operation at any time throughout the expected lifetime of the facility.

3.2 When the HL&P design, procurement, construction management and preoperational testing is done in part or whole by Bechtel, it is required tha,t the Project notify HL&P of deficiencies for which the Project has direct or indirect responsibilities.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 PROJECT PERSONNEL 4.1.1 Upon discovery, it is the responsibility of the person finding a deficiency, which may be significant, to notify the Project Quality Assurance Engineer (PQAE) or designee and to initiate a Deficiency i

Evaluation Report (DER) (Exhibit A) which provides a description of the deficiency and pertinent details.

Il00STON OFFICE ISSUED 13 B510290100 0 499 PDR ADOCK O DR iNF0WTiON 0.RY G

STP 14026 y,.y

+ ;

srPao<a unen

e

+

1.

e l

d l

i

(-

=e t

d I

O ee E

o e-o

% _ W W

W y

b E U 7 W

b*

w b

O

$h J

Q

= s D

a

=

J

• w i

"Esa v K

5 w.

D m.

.=

= =

A-o -

g a

U t

y C. u 2: 5 e

n 6 u.

s n 2 e e e e

3 0 352 005 E

m 0

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EEs"IfN1-84 GENERAL PRNECT REQUIREMENTS s

secHTet 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES no.

1 E E FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

,9 4.1.2 Perfom evaluations according to the direction of the Project Engineering l

11anager (PEM), or Project Licensing Engineer (PLE). The person finding a l

deficiency which may be significant may request the assistance of the i

Project Licensing Engineer, project personnel, or off-project tecnnical I

specialists, as appropriate, to aid in classifying the deficiency as a l

substantial safety hazard.

l 4.2 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER (PQAE) OR DESIGNEE l

4.2.1 The Project Quality Assurance Engineer, or designee, (with project,

personnel assistance, as necessary) reviews and evaluates the the description of deficiency to determine whether the deficiency may be significant.

4.2.2 If the review indicates the deficiency does not warrant a DER, any existing deficiency shall be corrected using the appropriate project document for dispositioning and correcting the deficiency.

4.2.3 If the review indicates the deficiency warrants a DER, the PQAE I

validates the DER (s) and distributes, logs and controls the DER (s).

1 Exhibit B provides a flowchart showing the path of the DER.

l 4.2.4 Record required data in the DER log (Exhibit C).

l 4.2.5 Deliver copies of the DER to or notify the Project Manager, Project l

Engineering Manager, and the Project Quality Assurance llanager or i

designated alternates before noon of the following working day.

Include l

available pertinent infomation/ documentation.

I 4.2.6 Issue a Nonconfomance Report or a Stop Work Notice, when appropriate.

l 4.2.7 Distribute copies of the DER and associated reports according to project i

requirements.,

l 4.2.8 flonitor status of project evaluations, and keep the Project Quality l

Assurance Manager infomed as to the status of the deficiency investiga-l l

tion.

l j

4.2.9 Concur with Project Engineering's final evaluation of reportability.

1 4.2.10 Verify corrective action implementation according to the requirements I

and schedule described in the DER or related documentation.

l 4.3 PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGER OR PROJECT LICENSING ENGINEER l

4.3.1 Direct and assist the project in the evaluation process.

4.3.2 Assure that a determination rela' ting to reportability (Block 13 of I

the DER) is made and documented by the project uithia i n -,%g aays l

I of the validation of the DER by the PQAE.

1100STON OFFICE ISSUED sw.

.n m INFORMATION ONLY RTP 1 AMR

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Ev's'OY31-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

,,y,

~

eacHTet 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES wo.

1 FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

E RG 8

mos 3 o,

4.3.3 Coordinate DER evaluations with the project manager.

4.3.4 Assist the Project Manager with resolving HL&P and Deficiency Evaluation Working Conraittee (DEWC) coments and dissents.

4.4 PROJECT MANAGER (PM) 4.4.1 Review the DER evaluation with the Project Engineering Manager and notify HL&P if the evaluation indicates the conditica is potentially reportable.

4.4.2 After completion of Block 13, assure that a copy of the DER is hand I

delivered to HL&P before noon of the next working day.

4.4.3 Provide final / interim report to HL&P within 21 calendar days of HL&P's l

l notification to the NRC.

NOTE:

The final evaluation and final report may not be able to be completed within the time requirements specified by the Regulation or HL&P.

In that event the prcject shall prepare an interim report and coordinate an acceptable time extension for the final report with HL&P.

4.4.4 Forward a copy of the DER final evaluation to the Client and the Chairman of the Deficiency Evaluation Working Committee for review.

4.4.5 Resolve DEWC Chaiman's comments with PEM or PLE assistance as required.

4.4.6 Resolve HL&P corxlents with PEM/PQAE assistance as required.

l 4.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER (PQAM) l 4.5.1 Coordinate the processing of DER's with the PQAE.

4.5.2 Notify the Quality Assurance Manager / Projects of initiated DERs and describe the defect and all related facts available.

4.5.3 Ensure the Quality Assurance Manager / Projects is advised of the status of DER's.

l 5.0 OTHER SOURCES 5.1 Proble'm Investigation Reports (PIRs) are generated by LAPD to require I

l project action on possible comon quality problems identified in NRC l

Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins, PIRs from other Divisions, Manage-l ment Corrective Action Requests (MCARs) and DERs from other projects.

Potentially reportable conditions applicable to this project that are I

identified during evaluation of PIRs shall b: recorded er OERs eM I

processed in accordance with this procedure.

HOUSTON OFFICE ISSUED

'" " 288)

INF0PMATiON ONLY STP 14926

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EPPECTIVITY oata 06 01-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS SECHTEL 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES mo. '

1 ENERG,Y FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e) p,

8 Paos 4 o,

5.2 Conditions detected off project by Chief Engineers or their Staff that are potentially reportable shall be recorded on a DER in accordance with appropriate procedures and coordinated with the cognizant EGS for processing per Section 4.0.

5.3 Information received by project personnel from vendors or suppliers /

l contractors relating to potentially reportable conditions shall be l

provided to the PQAtt or PQAEs for processing in accordance with this-l procedure.

l 6.0 GUIDANCE FOR EVALUATING AND REPORTING The following guidance pertains to deficiencies discovered during design, procurement; construction and testing of nuclear safety-related and important to safety equipment, components, structures and systems. The guidance and examples are general. Each deficiency requires special evaluation and analysis before a detemination of reportability can be made.

6.1 EVALUATING A SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FOR REPORTABILITY Reportability is based on a set of conditions, all of which must exist in order for the deficiency to be reportable. These conditions, as defined by the Regulation, are illustrated in Exhibit D and sumarized below.

V Note:

Regardless of the extent and significance of a deficiency, I

if it does not pertain to safety-related component (s),

I structure (s), or system (s), the deficiency is not reportable.

6.1.1 The deficiency, were it to remain uncorrected, could have the potential to affect adyersely the safety of plant operations, and 6.1.2 The deficiency relates to the area of design or construction, and 6.1.3 The deficiency falls within one or more of the four subparts of 10 CFR 50.55(e).

l A.

Breakdown In Quality Assurance Program A significant breakdown in any portion of the quality assurance program conducted in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50; or:

l For example:

ll00STON OFFICE ISSUED IflFOR.".4hTICH DHLY STP.1049 (12431 STP 14926 l

t

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EE M 1-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES 7-1 sacwTat a%smov FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

C " " *"

5 8

o Incomplete or inadequate procedures, incomplete execution of or ignored procedures concerning safety-related components, systems or structures that could make it impossible to detemine whether design or construction activities comply with the requirements stated in the Safety Analysis Report.

Inadequate records keeping system that makes it impossible o

on a broad scale to determine whether the quality of the safety requirements stated in the Safety Analysis Report have been met.

NOTE: These examples would only be reportable if they could eventually result in design or construction conditions which could affect adversely the safety of plant operations.

B.

Deficiency In Final Design A significant deficiency in final design as approved and released for construction such that the design does not confom to the criteria and bases stated in the Safety Analysis Report or Construction Pemit end requires extensive desiga evaluation; or:

l For example:

o A final design specifying incorrect material thickness or caterial properties for.a safety-related steel support, substantially degrading the performance criteria specified in the Safety Anslysis Report.

o Design deficiencies discovered during the nomal planned design review and verification process are not considered reportable.

j C.

Deficiency In Constru~';o1 A significant deficiency in construction of or significant damage to a structure, system or component which will require extensive evaluation, extensive redesign or extensive repair to meet the criteria and bases stated in the Safety Analysis Report or Construction Pemit or to otherwise establish the adequacy of the structure, system or component to perfom its intended safety function; or-l For example:

II G U S f Q C,~,0.[ ; ; g. g IWG,iM(;.;;, g,17 syp 34935

--m

,m w

e n

~w-

---u-

---1---

ss e

~

w mw-

-s-w

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT sprecTivery oats 06-01-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES 7~-

1 s

sECHTEL FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

ENERGY

>RPORATION g

g PAQs OF g

o Use of incorrect material, incorrect location or damrge to a safety-related structural steel support requiring extensive evaluation, redesign and/or repair.

o Nonconfomances found on installations after final acceptance by quality control engineering.

D.

Deviation From Perfomance Specification A significant deviation from perfomance specification: which wi,11 require extensive evaluation, extensive redesign or extensive repair to establish the adequacy of a structure, system or component to meet the criteria and bases stated in the Safety Analysis Report or Construction Permit or to othemise establish the adequacy of the structure, system or component to perfom its intended safety function.

For example:

A safety-related system which fails to meet pressure / flow requirements stated in the Safety Analysis Report and requires extensive evaluation and redesiCn.

NOTE: When design or construction corrections can be made without extensive evaluation, redesign or repair, the condition is not considered reportable. The NRC defines " extensive" as the expenditure of resources (time, manpower, money) disproportionate with the original design, test, or construction expenditure.

6.2 PROMPT NOTIFICATION 6.2.1 Bechtel is responsible for completing a preliminary evaluation 1

(B1cck 13 of 'the DER) and notifying HL&P as stated in sections 4.3.2, l

4.4.1, and 4.4.2.

Reporting times for Bechtel and the Client are 1

indicated in the Flow Chart, Exhibit B.

l Note: The Regulation requires HL&P to notify the NRC of each reportable deficiency within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after the deficiency is detemined to be reportable by HL&P. Notification must also be l

made for deficiencies which are potentially reportable but which require additional infomation, such as from tests or further evaluations,,which is not imediately available to make a firm deteminatial concerning the deficiency.

HOUSTO.10F.r3 !;;;;,29 IN W r l r '!.y

.m nan Si? un0

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EF F ECTivlTV OAT 06-01-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS secwTat 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES E

1 asanov FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

CORPORATION raos 7 w8 6.2.2 Information provided to HL&P by Bechtel should include identification of structure, system, component or activity involved; nature of the deficiency and its possible adverse impact on operational safety as best determined at the time of the notification; the underlying f

cause(s) of the deficiency as best detemined at the time of l

notificaton; and tentative or proposed plans relative to further I

examination and evaluation of the deficiency and its impact on design and/or construction (such as construction " hold"), as best determined i

at the time of notification.

6.3 WRITTEN REPORT l

Bechtel is required to submit a written final / interim report to HL&P l

witnin 21 calendar days of HL&P's notification to the NRC. The project I

may meet this submittal requirement by submitting an interim report in I

lieu of the final report if sufficient infomation is not available for a definitive final report.

6. 3.1 Interim Report The interim or preliminary report should specify:

the potential problem and reference the notification o

o approach to resolution of the problem I

o status of proposed resolution l

o submittal date of the complete report 1

6.3.2 Final Report The final report shall contain:

o description of the deficiency o

analysis of the safety implications. This should include an identification of interfacing systems and possible interactions.

corrective actions taken and a projected schedule of actions to be I

o taken, if applicable. Corrective actions should be sufficient to l

correct the deficiency and prevent future identical or similar occurrences. To prevent future occurrences, the causes of the deficiency must be adequately explored and identified.

o sufficient infomation to pemit analysis and-ev11untion of the deficiency and of the corrective action.

HOUSTON oppgc& ISSUED I'WM1.MH 9:'LY sn.m nav 0? UC25

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EFFECTIVITY DATE 06-01-84 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2.20 REPORTING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES 1

sEcuTEL FEDERAL REGULATION 10 CFR PART 50.55(e)

G,Y ENE p

Paos 8 w8 o

Identification of the facility or facilities involved.

o Identification of structure, system, component or activity involved.

6.3.3 Combined Reports The Regulations permit the reporting of a significant deficiency (10 CFR 50.55(e)) and a substantial safety hazard defect (10 CFR 21) by a single HL&P report. When a single report is used, all the infomatipn required by 10 CFR 21 must be included in the report (See General Project Requirements 2.19).

NOTE:

If the condition is reportable under both Regulations and the Client does not include 10 CFR 21 information in its 50.:iS(e) report, Bechtel is responsible for notifying the NRC. This requirement does not apply unless Bechtel has perfomed the evaluation or another has reported the condition to the Comission.

6.4 NOT REPORTA3LE DEFICIENCIES l

When the evaluation indicates that the deficiency is not reportable, any existing deficiency shall be corrected using the appropriate project document for dispositioning and correcting the deficiency.

i 6.5 RECORDS In all cases in which a deficiency was identified and a DER validated, I

whether or not it was determined to be a reportable deficiency, I

sufficient records must be maintained. RMS/ General Files shall maintain I

the files of all completed DER and Document (Records) evaluations, I

(including those which conclude that no report is required), supporting I

documentation *, and correspondence.

l liOUSTON Or 10E 13 SED

., w v m. n. :.,. -

m.,,,, n am 0TP 140'26 a

D

GPR 2.20 Rev. 1 06-01.-84

~

. DEFICIENCY EVALUATION REPORT

i. aEPeaT NO.

~~ - ~ --

-~

- ~~ -

REv. No.

10 CFR 50.55 (el DATE

' AN D 0 R PACE 08 10 CFR PART 21

2. PROJECT - NAMEtJOS NUMSER

3. UNIT

4. Q CLA55 L REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

4. SEISMIC CATEGORY

7. MoveDisCOVERED

& REOULREMENT p

A S. DESCR6PTiCN OF CONDIT4CN h

12. QA NOTIFICATION T9 CR CELIVERY OF CER TO:

10. R E PC RT,tN IT,t ATO R_ tS_t GN ATUR E)

PRGJ ENG MGR DATE TeME

11. QA VALICATION OF SLOCKS 110 Pmo4 moA cars Tems DATE TowE rmGa ca MGm

- DATE T IM E

~'

13. PRELIMIN ARY EVALUATION YESO

,.o ENo -o,..rt

, R o....,.

1.

POTENTIALLY NO O oATECtiENTMOTiPiEO '

RP

14. FINAL EV ALUATION REPORTAOLE YEtb REPORTA8LE TESO iOCrRai REPORT BY to CFR S0.55 (el go iOCFR21 gg PaoJ ENG MGptoaTE PaoJ MG./oaTE G A CoNCymmENCE DATE

15. VERIFacATION OR CORRECTIVE ACTION TR ANSFERRED TO NCR/ CAR ACCEPTED O NO.

16. DisTRit,UTION LIST SECHTEL CLIE NT

@ RPT iNITI ATOR

@ PROJ OA MGM _.,

PROJ PROC MGR PROJ MGR PROJ FILES C' NST MGa OPaOJaAMcR aA PILE

-~

G PROJ LE h QA MGRIPROJ ~

O G PROJ CE,

@MGMOFCA C OEWC CHMAN l

PROJ LIC WGR

@ PROJ ENG MGR

@ PROJ CAE'IOFFICE)

PROJ ENG I l

5 PROJ MGR

@ PROJ CAE istTEI HAO MGR OF ENG p g:.* * -

<e.y

$ ASST.PM C5

[ APE I

STP 1 17 (5 948 EXHilli A ME 1 M 3 yJ{' j,;jjg n--

GPR 2. 20 Rev. 1 06-01-84 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING A DEFICIENCY EVALUATION REPORT j

PURPOSE:

To orovide instructions for the correct cornoietion of a Deficiency EvWuation Report.

GENERAL:

Recuirements and swidence concerneg 10 CF R 50.55 (el and 10 CFR Part 21 Evaluation & Reporting are defined e GenerW Protect Procedures 2.19 and 2.20. These procedures snould be read carefully for s thorough understandmg of roovirernents and responsibihties.

INSTRUCTIONS BLOCK NO:

j

1. Assign and record reoort and revision nurnber; enter date reoort preparoc Record both numbers in croiect Deficiency EvWuation Report Log.

2. Record proiect name and job number.

3. Record orosect une numeer (s) affected.

4. Record the cuah* r class of system, structure or component, using the project ouahty class designator.

5. Record the tit'r. and number of the goveming documents i.e.. Soecification. Drawing. Code. Standard, etc.

6. Record the seismic category identification of system, structure or component.

7. Give a brief descnotion of how the deficiency was discovered. For exernate.during receiving inspectmen, installation. test. etc. Reference deficiency related documents. i.e. Nonconformance Reports. Corrective Action Request. 5wooher Letter. etc.

8 Record the requirement as statsd m the governmg document (s).

9. Describe the departure from the governmg document as accurately and completely as possible.

NOTE: Dunne tee initial stages of investigation, a complete descnotion eney not be possible.

H uver, sufficient inforrnation must be available before the deficiency can be evaawated.

9 The 8.orvet Quahty Assurance Engmeer is responsible to wetme an adeouste investigation to determme the vahdity and accuracy of t y descnetion.

10. I gnature of tee recort initiator. (Th.s reay be any individwas

,ed rosect.1

11. The signature m this block attests to the accuracy and complet formation in blocks 1 througn 10.

anager, and Proiect GA Manager.

12. Dehver DER to or notify tne Project Manager Project erm Record dates and times of delivery notificacon. D.

DE its per Block 16.

13. Wnen prehmmary evalwation ind. cates the condi seie. chect "no" boa in block 13 and both "no" bones in block 14. Proiect En ager and Proiect Manager sign in blocks 13 and 14. QA s gns m block 14.

ntially reportable. check "yes" boa m block 13.

When prehmmary evWwation ind; cates cond i n Proiect Engineering Manager and Protec a er si no date. QA notifies chent and records date.

hent representative only. Attempts to notify Notify by hand dehve y of DER co on small be m the followeg decendmg

1. Manager. Engmeerms

2. Supervising Project Eng.

Systems

3. Swoervismg Proiect Engmeer - Licensing

4. Design / Procurement - QA Supervisor

5. Lead Engmeer - Lcenses

6. Senior Engent - Laconsing

7. Engineer - bcensme Distntmate DER copies per Black 16.

14. Proiect Engmeermo Manager and Proiect Manager :ign. date and mark soprooiste "yes" or "no" blocks. When Part 21 aoolies to the condition. identifees who submitted or is responsitie for suomittmg the Part 21 Reoort:Chent, sucoher or Becnte: and ontams QA concurrence. Attach fmW evoustion to tne DER and make distnbution m accordance with Block 16.

NOTE. If neither Regulation is sophcable, but the condition roovices correction, the mformation shW be tt;:nsferred to a Nonconformance Report or other soproonste document. Rafet to block 15.

Use the DER Contmustion Sheet or the interim or final report to describe the cause and corrective action taken or to be taken.

When the condition is determined to be nonreportable, a technical iwstification shell be provided and documented on a DER Contmustion Shut.

15. When DER and tr'e acorociate supohmental documents are cornolete and corrective action has been accomphthed. the QAE shall sign for the verAcation and record tne date m Block 15.

Instances when es deficiency is determined not to be reportaole but reouires reso6ution and tracking shall be transfered to a Nonconformance Report or other approonste document. Notation of such m Black 15 shall constitute obiective evidence of completed corrective action for etcoere. The D ER is considered closed at me coint of transfer.

Distnbute DE R copies per stock 16.

16. Block 16 is pre <mecked for standard distnbutaon. Additional distribution may be made.

EXMIBIT A PAGE 2 0F 3 HOUST00 C:?!N E m o m ? Gin U; M 3.Y STP 1432S a

GPR 2.20 Rev. 1 06-01-84 DEFICIENCY EVALUATION REPORT a: eat ~o 10 CFR 50 55(el at v ho AND'OR a s i, l,, y ~

10 CFR PART 21

.o.....,g,..to. o.w m o =

CONTINU ATION SMEET s

9 d

i t

H00STO?1 LFRCE iCSUM

,,,,y.,.

PAGE30'3 IUF0hi.i.i. tic." O!!LY STP 1402S

GPR 2.20 Rev. 1 06-01-84 s

(

I'3

. u. -

e.g:3 z:

8-1 si s

l{s

!. i eg 8 E.st-I

-v

E-

isinl a

e 3

I II II II R 3 m

a

}

ga rs gs 5 a

,,x:: r y g i

a i

,8 s,r--'

. I

.e c,. i v.ri l :z::1:31 r

i i g gi

g:=

-I!

=O.

i-.;

=

ge

.g:s :: s : 3I:=.=.

ii.

ti_-l L..J 8

i-er E4 I.

Y.

.T. 't T z

-r - -,

o

_s.

g, g l g

t.

e o

as

.ssi a

e 1:

elzi i.s

=-

ici m

.t

s,x-r t...

m

.e v.

s.

2w sar

. a.

a a

tj=

I 8

I gs i

1-I

s=

s1

-u

if

~j

[

ig i

u I

. = -

H00370,*/ '17Frq g.,c,T' D I

EXHIBIT a

{

R EV.1 I v.........

.: u..

t..

1 6 N * 'f, f,3 i

l

l)

II 1

GN3 N*wo 3 0

=

3f<,

M 04 oCsoweaa h

s.

e l/

=..

e s

e e.

s s -.

seee.ev.

g e,

A 9'

.e e

e w

o, os v

t.

a, at <.

e.

s,.

es w.

a 86 8

8 4

fo D

H 9'

4 9

f s

N l'

A H

eg e

m y

A g

g g

gg g

/y I

g

(

/

l

(

I' l

(

P" l

{

'i

{

F L

?

1 g

nt e

,s s e s

ao e

ps ga r.

g s e e

s e

r e s

vw g

oo e

e ut g

e epo ca e e Haon

~. D ~.;a

~1 u

J) sMz M"

%QCO}O ~ O:.':

e T

C "I

~ '

Cj$.

t.

2; I.

S, c

d.

. ~~P e I

.I3 T'

i :

f

i i.l, Il<!il l

Ii<

I11 i14

,\\lj,'

Ii i

l

GPR 2. 20

' Rev. 1 06-01-84 50.55(e) CH ECK LIST YES NO 1.

COULO THIS DEFICIENCY HAVE AFFECTED ADVERSELY THE SAFETY OF OPERATIONS OF THIS PLANT AT ANY TIME OURING THE EXPECTED LIFETIME OF THIS PLANT 7 AND s.

DOESTHE DEFICIENCY REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT BREAK 00WN O

IN ANY PORTION OF THE BECHTEL QUALITY PROGRAM; OR b.

DOES THE DEFICIENCY EXIST IN FINAL DESIGN AS APPROVE 0 AND RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT THE DESIGN DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA AND BASES STATED IN THE SAR OR CP; OR C.

DOES THE DEFICIENCY EXISTIN CONSTRUCT R CONSTITUTE

]

OAMAGE TO A STRUCTURE, SYSTEM,0R WHICH WILL REQUIRE EXTENSIVE EVALU A E REDESIGN, OR EXTENSIVE REPAIR TO MEET TF l

ND 8ASES STATED IN THE SAR OR CP OR T ESTA8LISH THE

')

ADEQUACY OF THE STRUC OR COMPONENT TO

^

TION:

PERFORM ITS INTENDE D i

d.

DOESTHE DEFICI REP SENT A DEVIATION FROM PERFORM.

ANCE SPECIFICATION ' ICH WILL REQUIRE EXTENSIVE EVALUA.

TION, EXTENSIVE REDESIGN,0R EXTENSIVE REPAIR TO MEET THE CRITERIA AND BASES STATED IN THE SAR OR CP OR TO OTHER-WISE ESTA BLISH THE ADEQU ACY OF THE STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, OR COMPONENT TO PERFORM ITS INTENDED SAFETY FUNCTION.

DATE PROJECT ENGINEERING MAN AGER DATE PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT QUALITY ASSUR ANCE ENGINEER EXHlBIT.o HOUST0!i 0FRCE 1:3U.CD UiTO,7."JiOl ' ' '.'l

..S. _.-

NO. GPRM-171 CHANGE NOTICE 7

g INSERT THIS CHANGE NOTICE IN APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE PROJECT PROCEDURES MANUAL AND RETAIN UNTIL THE CHANGE NOTICE IS REPLACE 0 BY A REVISION TO THE SECTION.

THIS CHANGE NOTICE AFFECTS:

VOLUME SECTION(S)

REVISION 1.

Paragraph 4.5.2 has been deleted.

2.

Paragraph 6.1.3.C second bulleted item, has been changed,

to read as follows:

o Significant nonconfonnances found on installations after final acceptance by quality control engineering if all other conditions are met.

'3.

Exhibit A, pages 1 of 3 and 2 of 3, have been replaced by the attached Exhibit A, pages 1 of 3 and 2 of 3.

4.

Exhibit B, Rev.1, has been replaced by the attached Exhibit B.

Rev. 2.

5.

File this Change Notice and attached pages directly behind tab 2.20.

i!0JSTC.' 'f.

~

r.;ED li;.kL?...;i.::.:.

_/

SIP M9:iB TRAINING REQUIRED:

YES NO W,O QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM COMPLlANCE APPROVAL:

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER APPROVAL:

M APPROVE 0[Mbd~ L u MI APPROVE 0:

/

//-2 F W PROJECT DdARTMENT MANAGER MJEO M AN AGE R STP 1003 (1441 i

GPRM-171 11-30-84 DEFICIENCY EVALUATION REPORT

i. RucaT~o-10 CFR 50.55 (e)

REv. No.

AND OR 0^78 s '

10 CFR PART 21

CE 08

2. *Rc4ECT - NAwEi.Cs NvusER 1 wNiT

4. o class

s. RutRENcE occuuENrs

6. 5En&Mic CATEGCRY

7. **CW C11CCV ER EQ

4. R EC.iR EM EN T o

9. CE5CR6PTICN CP CCNCITICN I

10. REPCRT INITIATCR t$iGNATURE)

12. CA NOTIP6CATICN TO CR CELIVERY QF QER il anc.ENGwGm GATE Tiw E 11 CA V ALnC ATiCN CF ELCCK3 I iO paoa mGR DATE TAME GATE 7 6M E PNGdGd MGM GATE T a b. E

3. AmEL4MiNARY EVALWATICN PCTENTtALLY TESO

, o.E~o -oR,oA,5 R EPCRTA ELE c.~oa,oArt NO DATE CLIENT NOTtPIED t4 S 6N A L EV ALUATiCN 10 CPR50.73/

REPORTABLE YES R EPC RTA B LE YES aE'CaTAELI TEI 10CPR21 10 CPR SO 15 let NO 10CPR21

'a5 -

No O aErcaI =T NO

• • CJ ENG.CATE

• • CJ VGu t,0A TE CA CCNCURR ENCE CATE IS..ER*FiCAT&CN CP CCRR ECTivE ACTION CCARECTavt ACTION TR ANSPERRED TO NCRtCAR CA CATE REv cATE l

No

18. CISTRIEWTION LIST l

OECHTEL CLIENT Q RPTINIT1ATCR

@ PRO,J QA MGa O *aos PaoC Mca aaosMaa OracaalLE:

@ PROJ LE 5 QA MCR/PROJ CONST MGR O'aosa>Maa OQAal'Ei

@ PROJ CE G MGR CP QA CEWC CMM AN

[,,,J PROM-un

)

@ PRCJ ENG MGM

@ PROJ CAE IOPriCEI PROJENGt i

H00S7It.".--,

p.,:. D

@ PROJ MGR

@ PROJ QAE ISITEI MGROFENG

)

y,.,,

...u.:ault G lLY g

,,E iTP iiiT io,se Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 STP 14926 L

GPRM-171 11-30-84 1

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING A DEFICIENCY EVALUATION REPORT PURPOSE:

To orovide instructions for the correct completion of a Oeficency Evaluation Report.

G ENER AL:

Geouirements and guidance concernmg 10 CFR 50.55 fel and 10 CFR Part 21 Evaluation & Reporting are definedin General Project Procedures 2.19 and 2.20. These crocedures should be read carefully for a thorougrs understandmg cf recuirernents and resconsibilities.

INSTRUCTIONS 8 LOCK NO:

1. Assign and record report and revision number; enter date report prepared. Rocctd both numbers in croiect Ceficency Evaluation Report Log.

2. Record orciect name and jan number.

3. Record orciect unit numeer (s) affected.

4. Record tne cuality dass of systsm, structure of component, using the project quality class designator."

5. Record tne title and number of tne governing documents. i.e., Specificanon, Drawmg Code. Standard, etc.

6. Recore the seismic category identification of system, structure or component.

7. Give a enef description of how the deficency was discovered. For enamote, dunng receiving inspection, installation, test, etc. Reference deficiency related documents. i. Nonconforrmance Reports. Corrective Action Reouest, Sucatier Letter, etc.

S. Record tne recuirement as stated in the governing d en' t

9. Desence the decarture from the governmg r:ce' acci omofetely as possible.

NOTE: Ouring tne initial stages of in i

istion may not be possible.

However. sufficent in*

n fore the deficency can be evaluated.

The Prciect Quali a

4 E.

ee responsible for conductmg an adequate investigation to date.

ne t.

<al, and accuracy of the deficency description.

10. 5:; nature of tne report mitiator. This av be any mdividual assigned to the protect.)

11. The signature m this bicek attest a the accuracy and ccmpleteness of the information in blocks 1 tnrougn 10.

12. Ceiner OER to or note, the Pro;ec.t M nager. Project Engmeering Manager, and Pro;ect QA Manager.

Record dates and times of delivery notificaoon. Distnbute OER copies per 8tock 16.

13. Wren orelimmary evaluation indicates the condition is not reportable, check "no" box in block 13 anc botn "no" taones in block 14. Project Engmeenng Manager and Project Manager sign in blocks 13 and 14. QA signs in block 14 When crelimmary evaluation indicates condition is potentially reportable, check "yes** box in block 13.

Preiect Engmeenng Manager and Project Manager sign and date. QA notifies client and records date.

Not'y by hand de:ivery of DER copy to oes (1) client representative as delineated in separate correspondence by tne client.

Distribute DEA cocies per 81oca 16.~

14. Proieet Engmeenno Manaoer and Project Vanaaer sign, date and mark apprognate'*yes"or "no" blocks. When Part 21 acclies to the condition. identify who (Client, supplier or Bechteil submitte.1 or is respontible for sub-mittng the Part 21 Report and obtains CA concurrence. Attach final evaluation to the OER and make dittn.

bunon in accordanceLwith Stock 16.

NOTE: if neither Regulation is aceticable.but the condition requires correction, the information shall be transferred to a Nonconformance Report or other appropriate document. Refer to block 15.

Use the OER Contmustion Sheet or the mtenm or final report to describe the cause arid corrective act:en taken or to be taken.

When tee condition is determined to be nonreportable, a technical lustification shall be provided and documented on a OER Contmuation Sheet.

15. When DER and the accroonate supplementalttocumerits are complete and corrective action has been accomokshed, the CAE shall sign for tr'e ven ication arvi record the date i i Stock 15.

r Instances when the deficiency is determined not to be reportable but recuires resolution and tracking shall be transferred to a Nonconformance Report or other accropriate document. Notation of such in Block 15 snatt constitute objective evidence of completed corrective action for closure The OER is considered closed at the comt of transfer.

Distnbute OER copies per Block 16.

16. Block 16 is cre<hecked for standard distribution Additional distnbution may be made.

HOUSTGM OK":E 13150 m J.MTG OdLY Exhibit A Page 2 of 3

GPRM-171 11-30-84 o

w a

-l c

I3 f*.I.

I I.53 3' 3 s

yy

• 53 II:

t:

I

!=-

gas c;:=

. *.. i. I I E

33 3

V E! E 3 =g ! I s t

I assiass3

e I

!. ! !. ! !. ! i. ".

=. =. c

==3 a

=.

rf.

r i

3i I;".=!:

j-. i vi I 2".*e 58 e= * :

g s: 313*-

j s

3. : i *3:.

33

="

e i

2 2

fa I 9it L-J 2"tz i

e<

. Y ?

-?

U

.r-7

?"

!!i R

-tz

i a

e l==

o O, :s i i

w g

gs.

c e-s

==

gt:g L..J 5i

=s" I

rix 3

c.S

i. 3.

• y$

c

.i I 2 c' i

ad

=

pc 23 e

tw

<w o

3e I:s

-se

: e=

g gs:

=

w tz 2

e rt 3

o a

2 2

1 w

E 9

u2

-e-,

a o

E3

$l I 8.;

E' l si s. ' -

E 1

a:

i :" - i

!.talE i s -l 3

N I

r. e is:

rt i

i: = i s

==s

=

E I I

!=g i

e 333 s-El

[

EEE 3

ff

'- J y

L.*J g

t.

I E.!

t a

=

or e-z

= I,

.E. I

-I

<,i

= =,

ge---

c',. e

=,

c' i

a.

i ~i!!

i:i:!

i

=

s i

Gl:!l i!

I E'

l*i 1

3 g

sg l

'- J 8

6.

J gj E

It I

E 3-n!

EXHIBIT B IOUSTGI!C.V.'C'10 SUED REV.2 r.8.6i....l..-u,-.in.

I

.4 1 esti STP 149E6

GPRM-188 N O.

EFFECTIVITY 05-24-85 DATE CHANGE NOTICE I

I PAGE 0F INSERT THIS CHANGE NOTICE IN APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE PROJECT PROCEDURES MA AND RETAIN UNTIL THE CHANGE NOTICE IS REPLACED BY A REVISION TO THE SECTION.

THIS CHANGE NOTICE AFFECTS:

VOLUME I

SECTION(S) 2.20 REVISION I

1.

Paragraph 4.2.8 - This paragraph has been revised as follows:

Monitor status of project evaluations, and keep the Project Quality Assurance Manager informed as to the status of the deficiency investigation.

If a determination relating to reportability (block 13) is not made and documented by project within ten (10) working days of the validation of the DER by:;;? f:2 ?.g POAE, a t:r ('0)

..:r' 'r; ty', 'r:

? f &if

c' t':

1Mg t -codr ~ '-ce "c;:'t (MP ), the DER shall be marked as

@g Processing of the DER after g ' potentially reportable by PQAE.this action shall be in accordance with applica this procedure.

2.

File this Change Notice directly in back of Tab 2.20.

llDUf TF, '

'l !"RQ

( U T C.i c.'....'. [ '..i!i ST?1eD26 X

NO TRAINING REQUIRED:

YES QUALITY dSSURANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE APPROVAL:

b,, A N A f /J //

o,,

o N/A HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER APPROVAL:

nw Nw L

A /d /d#STAPPROVED:

A APPROVED:

U MOJE'df DEPARMENY MANAGER ph0hCTMMg AGE R STP 1003 (1441 3076c/0118e

.