ML20138H593
| ML20138H593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1985 |
| From: | Jordan T HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-CCANP-107, NUDOCS 8510290093 | |
| Download: ML20138H593 (3) | |
Text
ffhh dCM)? ff AUDIT Cll 401 C C A /v P Ic) }
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATIOf[ #
e 4-o42 m,sa, HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER O
8 QUALITY ASSURANCE (1) CAR No.
Company CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (2) REVISION d
ESI OC'"'
'#[-ivEs'"REOugD,,
(5) pgSP SE DJE DATE (3) ORGANIZATION c_)
L (6) DOCUMENT VIOLATED REV.
Pg p
p.
g (7) DESCRIPTION OF CONDITIOgDypRSE TO OUALITY j
See continuation sheet.
DATE I5) INITIATOR ge g
g _7,g DATE SUPERVpgAtyAL/OITOg 9_
y (9)
(10) REMEDIAL ACTION None recuired. Construction's compliance to the noted requirement has been verified and documented. This was acco=plished under the guidelines as delineated in Paracraph 5.3.3.1 of OCP-10.10.
i
/
lDATEg 4 l(12) EFFglVE DATE
( g 5tGNATURE ggg (13) CAUSE OF CONDITION section 5.2 " Excavation".
It was identified, by general specification reference in Paragraph 5.3.3.1 which deals with Suberade Preparation.
(14) CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE PCP A3 to 0co-10.10 ( n m-m d 9/7/R4T revised Para 2rach 5.2.5 to clearly identifv the reauirement in the annropriate section of the procedure.
n-h i //
g REVIEW AND APPRO jgg DATEg/g' g l(16) EFFECgiVE DATE J
b Og,E?cgsE
)/
/p/79^
NON DED to.h-9 m EcT (18) CORRESPONDEM NUMBER V
AMENDED SUPERVISOR / LEAD AUDITO[
DATE
RESPONSE
(19) HL&P INITI ATOR C
EPT
,3_ rg-4 gu hg
( 0) VERWC g
D AT g-4' VERIFICATlpyCTbOt.$7AKENe a. 3 * +
- t s '* w z ~ m a u w ~, L L'
/
(21) vw 'n.
WH 8510290093 850001
)
{DR ADOCK 05000498
\\
PDR M >
- 22) HL&P QA CLOSURE (PGAM) s % f_ g DATE y / p /4 4-
9 r~
sQ',b*
\\
.s N
- /
g),
'^
6' c,.+s,,e,
/t
/ $J,f
~+
/
d p
Y-e.
Page of Hl.&# QA CORRECTIVE ACTION REPO AT CONTINUATION
- NI (1) CAR NO.
(2)
REVISION 1
BLOCK (7) DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION ADVERSE TO OUALITY:
(CONT)
P0AP, Rev. 2, paragraoh 10.3 reouires that insoection crocedures provide for identification of characteristics and activities to be insoected.
Contrary to the above reouirement:
QCP-10.10, Rev. 2, " Soils Insoection" does not reauire verification of p
the requirement contained in Specification 3YO69YS0043, Rev. 9, paracraoh 7.3.7.2 which states in part, " Removal of backfill within the cells shall be done in a uniform manner...
Within three feet of the ECW pipe and between the top of the pipe and the spring line, the final elevation difference, just prior to backfilling, shall not be more than 8 inches.
Within three feet of the ECW pipe and between the springline and invert, the final elevation difference, just prior to backfilling, shall not be more than four inches."
V/023/THM m^ -o*
- i " 8 J
__