ML20138H461
| ML20138H461 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1985 |
| From: | Goldberg J HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | Halligan D BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| References | |
| OL-I-CCANP-086, OL-I-CCANP-86, NUDOCS 8510290048 | |
| Download: ML20138H461 (3) | |
Text
[0 - W9 V99 UL.
1 - M /d
-k; /rc
}" The Light yA a
Company n -n ugwng u-m n.,umi%,n. iamii m m..nn 83 cci 10 A9 30 r,
April 7, 1982
_,c.
(gInaG'ESNS" gRANCH ST-HL-YB-0507 Mr D W Halligan Vice-President Bechtel Power Corporation P O Box 2166 Houston, Text.s 77252-2166 Re:
HL&P Comments On Bechtel Task Force Report South Texas Project Electric Generating Station
Dear Mr Halligan:
We have completed a review of the Bechtel Task Force Report, "An Assessment Of The Findings In The Quadrex Corporation Report",
}
submitted by your letter of March 15, 1982.
General comments are provided below.
Specific comments are contained in Attachment 1.
Our first general comment is that the Task Force assessment is not clear as to how the project engineering reviews should take into account or address the Generic Findings.
Bechtel should clarify whether, as apparently reflected in the Task Force's comments on the Generic Findings, the Generic Findings will be disposed of primarily through Bechtel's engineering review of related Specific Findings.
Please also confirm that any meaningful information relating to a Generic Finding found in the review will also be identified and resolved.
Our next general comment is in regard to the assessment of Generic Finding 3.l(b) on Page A-4.
The assessment should be clari-fled to provide Bechtel's policy regarding the subject of review of engineering work performed by a major subcontractor or supplier; i.e.,
EDS, Westinghouse, etc.
A final comment is that Bechtel is requested to include Section 4.9 of the Quadrex Report in your Project review of Quadrex concerns even though this section does not contain " Findings" and, as such, was not addressed in the Task Force Report.
As stated in the report preface, the assessments contained in the Report are guidelines for the further engineering review
)
being performed by Bechtel. Bechtel Will necessarily have to verify the accuracy of information that the Task Force relied upon and take 8510290040 050717 PDR ADOCK 05000490
((' g f l h 0
4 s
, v
/*g s*,,7*'
Ih T,,c p+s /,/ ^
e.'
sh
+<, a f
a
- js
,gn g'g,,#
k 4,4p+e#
W 0
s
/,/
.e
$4 x
x N-
'-x N
I h @ ting & Rmer Company '[D W Halligan, Vica-President April 7, 1982 udchtel Power Corporation ST-HL-YB-0507 into account additional Project documentation which was not included in the Task Force review.
Such documentation would, of course, include not only the basic design data but also any other pertinent information, such as any related NCRs, LERs, CARS, 50.55 (e) reports, etc.
We believe that the final dis-position of Quadrex Findings should reflect that such verifica-tion and review of pertinent documentation has been accomplished.
In this connection please note that, although it may not be evident by reading the Quadrex Report due to its lack of explicit detail, three items (Line Items 1, 100, and 146) are also related to deficiencies reported to NRC prior to the Quadrex review.
Very truly yours, T
J H Goldberg, Vice-President
)
Nuclear Engineering and Construction Department JHG/aks i
i Attachments cc Service List (attached)
Messrs S M Dew J G White i
O i
4 l
,_,_ _._ -.._ ____.. ~,--._, _ _
_.. _, _ _