ML20138G435
| ML20138G435 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1985 |
| From: | Bloch P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| References | |
| CON-#485-481 79-430-06-OL, 79-430-6-OL, LBP-85-47, OL, OL-2, NUDOCS 8512160325 | |
| Download: ML20138G435 (3) | |
Text
-
e UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPHISSION Yn N!hf Before.. Administrative Judges:
~
'00 Peter B. Bloch, Chainnan RCf3 Dr. Kenneth-A. McCollom 40 25-Dr. Walter H. Jordan Gr t Herbert Grossman, Esq.
00
)
~
- In the Matter of
)
~ Docket Nos. 50-445-OL & OL-2
)
50-446-OL & OL-2
.)
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.)
)_
. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
-)
December 12, 1985 g ggc 131985 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MEMORANDUM (Period for Discovery; Motion for Reconsideration)
On December 6, 1985 TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al (Appli-
- cants) requested leave to file' a. motion for reconsideration concerning the discovery -period set forth in our order of November ~ 25,- 1985,
' LBP-85-47. -_ Although we ordinarily would not grant leave-for filing of a
.e motion to reconsider a decision concerning a motion for reconsideration, we find it appropriate to grant this motion to -file because there.was one aspect of our opinion that was new.
~.
The one aspect. of our decision concerning which a motion for reconsideration is appropriate is our decision to set a new discovery
- period of 50 days.
The purpose of this new period, unexplained in our -
1 memorandum, was to permit Citizens' Association for Sound Energy (CASE) 4
- to analyze Applicants' delayed responses to discovery and to Board f
questions and to make a prompt request for follow-up information.-
8512160325 851212
- DR ADOCK O g5 1
15D1
h
')
Time Period:
2
' Upon consideration of Applicants' motion for reconsideration, we have consequently decided to limit CASE's ~ new period of discovery -to information designed to clarify'or follow-up on infomation obtained by them in response to their questions or.to Board questions.
To assure
'that the Board will see the link between new questions and prior responses, CASE should list one or more discovery responses for each question it asks during this new discovery _ period.
0 R D'E R For all the foregoing reasons and based on consideration of the entire record in this matter, it is this 12th day of December 1985 ORDERED:
LBP-85-47 is hereby amended so that further discovery is limited to questions designed to follow-up on information provided in response to discovery requests or Board questions. Accordingly, discovery requests should indicate what information is being followed-up by each new question asked.
Since this decision was reached prior to the filing of reply briefs, Citizens' Association for Sound Energy and the Staff of the
-- l\\
't Time Period:
3 Nuclear. Regulatory Comission may freely file motions for reconsidera-tion of this decision and Applicants will not be permitted the privilege of response.
o THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
/
I Peter B. Bloch, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland
?