ML20138D115

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Commission 840725 Discussion in Washington,Dc Re Need & Stds for Exemptions (SECY-84-290/290A) from Regulations in Light of Shoreham Decision (CLI-84-8)
ML20138D115
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/27/1984
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Dircks W, Plaine H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML19276D006 List:
References
FRN-50FR16506, REF-10CFR9.7, RULE-PR-50 AB93-1, CLI-84-08, CLI-84-8, M840725A, NUDOCS 8512130155
Download: ML20138D115 (1)


Text

__

' E N RESPONSE REFER

, #*%v TO: M840725A

[d UNITED STATES 3g,y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS O ACTION - GCunninggaS. ELD /

n J

g W ASHIN GTON. D.C. 20555 k

,4 /

, *g g

Cys: Dihcks' July 27, 1984 Roie OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY StellO DeYoung MEMORANDUM FOR:

William J. Dircks, EDO Herzel H.

laine, General Counsel FROM:

Samuel J ilk, Secretary

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - DISCUSSION OF THE NEED AND STANDARDS FOR EXEMPTIONS (SECY-84 -290/ 290A) 10:00 A.M.,

WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1984, COMMISSIONERS" CONFERENCE ROOM,

~~~

DC OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

The Commission ~ met'to discuss the need and standards for exemptions from the regulations in light of the Commission's Shoreham decision CLI-84-8.

The staff discussed the problems that they have in interpreting the Commission's Shoreham decision and in applying it on a generic basis to other situations.

(S ECY-8 4-290/290A)

The Commission, by a 4-1 vote (commissioner Asselstine dissenting) directed that

~

(1)

For the near term the staff read the Shoreham decision as applying to Shoreham only and thus continue with its past practice in authorizing exemptions and imposing license conditions on licensees in accordance with existing regulations.

(2)

For the longer term, an intensive program of re-examination of the exemption process should be

$g undertaken with the goal of providing the Commissioners g

with an analysis and proposed changes in approximately 9

30 days.

(ELD /OGC/NRR)

(SECY SDSP,ENSE:

8/25/84)

(3)

A brief analysis of any problems that would be caused by adoption of Commissioner Asselstine's proposal (that the exemption process would not apply to schedular changes for operating licenses and that "as safe as" be read as "substantially as safe as") be provided to the Commission within z

seven (7) days.

3@

(ELD /OGC/NRR)

(SECY SUSPENSE:

8/1/84)

A c ~ ~ l L 7l 9 l %

B

/( p/

n ~~ ~

n cc:

Chairman Palladino e) mj Commissioner Roberts Rec d 0 E pg Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal

' Da: -

/.*h @.d] ?'

Q Commissioner Zech D.*0-

,g gg OPE

-z ASLBP 848128

$8 ASLAP PDR p@@