ML20137X425

Order Directing Applicant & Staff Responses to Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc 860128 Motions to Reopen Phase II Records & Compel Against Applicant,Be Delivered by 860317 & 19,respectively.Served on 860304

ML20137X425
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	03/03/1986
From:	Bechhoefer C Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:	HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
References
CON-#186-296 79-421-07-OL, 79-421-7-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8603060252
Download: ML20137X425 (2)

Text

._

, f4d

SERVED MAR-41986 ,

00LKETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Um NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD W MR -4 P3 :35 Before Administrative Judges Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman 0FFICE < _  : A-Dr. James C. Lamb 00CKET.gf.Wla Frederick J. Shon In the Matter of Docket Nos. STN 50-498 OL STN 50-499 OL HOUSTON LIGHTING AND )

POWER COMPANY, ET AL. ) ASLBP No. 79-421-07 OL

)

(South Texas Project )

Units 1 and 2) ) March 3, 1986

)

ORDER (Response Dates for CCANP Motions)

On February 28, 1986, CCANP filed a fifth Motion to Reopen the Phase II Record, as well as a Motion to Compel against the Applicants.

Under 10 CFR 6 2.730(c), the Applicants' responses would normally be filed on Monday, March 17, 1986, and the Staff's responses on Thursday, March 20, 1986.

Because of the imminence of the seventh prehearing conference on Friday, March 21, 1986, and confirming telephone requests made earlier today, we request the Applicants to deliver their responses so that they will be in the hands of the Board and other parties by close-of-business Monday, March 17, 1986, and that the Staff file its responses so that they will be in the hands of the Board and other parties by close-of-business Wednesday, March 19, 1986. (All three copies for Board members should be delivered to the ASLBP office in Bethesda, MD.) -l

$[0go f e ma

2 {

With respect to CCANP's Motion to Compel, the parties are requested to be prepared at the prehearing conference to_ discuss whether the drug issue which CCANP is attempting to raise falls within Issue C (if not Issue F, as claimed by CCANP).

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD f m02 ku) h Charles Bechhoeffr, Chairm#

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE V Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 3rd day of March, 1986

-