ML20137U966
| ML20137U966 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 02/14/1986 |
| From: | Glasspiegel H CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#186-099, CON-#186-99 OL, NUDOCS 8602190388 | |
| Download: ML20137U966 (3) | |
Text
h
.o February 14, 1986 DOLMETEP U">NRC
'86 8 18 #0:18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFrict,
BeforetheAtomicSafetyandLicensingAppealBoENU[{
i? i :.l In the Matter of
)
)
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC
)
Docket Nos. 50-440CL ILLUMINATING COMPANY, ET AL.
)
0-441 (Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
) For the Appeal Board Units 1 and 2)
) C.04%Jd 2 M -%
Secrebr MOTION FOR EXTENSION Oy Qe Appeal Board APPLICANTS' WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO OCRE MOTION TO REOPEN THE RECORD AND TO SUBMIT A NEW CONTENTION Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.
S 2.711, Applicants respectfully re-quest an extension of the applicable time limit for responding to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy's Motion to Reopen the Record and to Submit A New Contention, dated February 3, 1986.
Applicants request that the time limit for their response be extended one week, from February 18, 1986, to February 25, 1986.
Since receiving OCRE's motion, Applicants' personnel and expert consultants who are most knowledgeable about the January 31, 1986 Ohio seismic event t. ave been occupied in preparing analyses and reports addressing the event, and in presenting findings to the NRC Staff.
The additional time re-quested herein is necessary to enable Applicants to prepare a detailed and complete response to OCRE's motion, which will 8602190388 860214 PDR ADOCK 05000440 Q
PDR O
i e
incorporate the results of Applicants' recently completed anal-yses.
Ms. Hiatt and Ms. Woodhead have indicated to the under-signed that they do not object to the Appeal Board granting Applicants an extension of time to respond to OCRE's motion.
For these reasons, Applicants believe there is good caus'e for the extension requested, and respectfully request the Ap-peal Board to grant the instant motion.
Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE arry 6 epa Jay E.
S lberg, P.C. f
/
Harry H Glasspiegel Counsel For Applicants 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 (202) 822-1000 Dated:
February 14, 1986.
,o UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIORUOLKE1EC ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL'Bb b 16 RER 18 40:18 In the Matter of
)
0 Frac.
)
chp;}'Y '$d-4 40 OL Tile CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING
)
)
50-441 OL
)
.(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units
)
1 and 2)
)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on this 14th day of February, 1986, I mailed a copy (first page only) of the Appeal Board's denial by stamp endorsement of " Applicants' Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to-Respond to OCRE Motion to Reopen the Record and to Submit a New Contention,"
dated February 24, 1986, to each of the following:
Colleen P. Woodhead, Esq.
Terry Jonathan Lodge 618 N. Michigan St.,
Of fice of the Executive Suite 105 Legal Director Toledo, Ohio 43624 U.S.
Nuclea r Regulatory Commission Jay Silberg, Esq.
Was hing to n, D.C.
20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts &
Docketing and Service Branch Trowbridge-1800 M Street, N.W.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20036 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Susan L.
Iliatt 8275 Munson Road.
Mentor, Ohio 44060
_k
% k h, w hc e.)
Secretary 'to the Appeal Bodrd