ML20137T236
| ML20137T236 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/10/1997 |
| From: | Black S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Liparulo N WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900900 NUDOCS 9704160038 | |
| Download: ML20137T236 (2) | |
Text
_.
e gR CE!
'4 UNITED STATES j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-0001
- /
April 10,1997 N.J. Liparulo, Manager Equipment Design and Regulatory Engineering Westinghouse Electric Corporation Energy Systems P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355 i
SUBJECT:
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS), REVISION 2 Dear Mr. Liparulo-We have completed our review of the proposed Revision 2 to the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit (ESBU) Quality Management System (QMS) quality assurance k pical report j
submitted by letter dated February 20,1997. OMS, Revision 2, describes the Westinghouse quality assurance program and attendant commitments to address the requirements of both i
10 CFR 50, Appendix B. and the Intemational Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001. The revision primarily described the recent ESBU organizational changes in Section 1.0, Management Responsibility. Several other changes were delineated in Revision 2 including:
1.
A description of the quality commitments for ESBU and the Westinghouse Pensacola Plant (WPP), and an amendment to include the Process Control Division (PCD) and the Govemment Technical Services Division (GTSD).
2.
A generic organization description and clarification of the duties and responsibilities of the ESBU Qua!ity Systems Director.
3.
The QMS was updated to include the requirements of the 1994 revision of ISO 9001.
Your original QMS, Revision 2, submittal was supplemented by a second submittal dated April 1,1997 that, in response to a March 25,1997 telephone conference with the staff, provided cicrification pages to address issues of independence of engineering design reviewers in Sections 4.1, Design Control; an explicit statement requiring approval of design inputs for adequacy by engineering organizations in Section 4.3, Design input; amended wording to
[y remove the conditional phrase "as applicable" f om Section 9.1, Process Control; and corrected typographical errors regarding paragraph and page numbering. A page replacement submittal was also provided by facsimile on March 27,1997.
Based on our review of the information provided, we have concluded that QMS, Revision 2, M-h continues to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and can be utilized to control the quality ofitems and services provided by Westinghouse ESBU, the Pensacola Plant, the Process Control Division, and the Govemment Technical Services Division.
pw m u &,n veaon NRC FILE CENTER COPY 1Rnnno 9704160038 970410 PDR GA999 ENVWEST 99900900 PDR
N.J. Liparulo April 10, 1997 Please incorporate a copy of this letter into the published edition of QMS, Revision 2, and forward one copy to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4. Any questions on the above should be directed to Edward J. Ford of my staff on (301) 415-1149.
Sincerely, Original signed by: Suzanne C. Black Suzanne C. Black, Chief Quality Assurance and Maintenance Branch Division of Reactor Controls and Human Factors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
Mr. Dale Harmon Westinghouse Electric Corporation Energy Systems P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355 Docket No. 99900900 DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files HOMB R/F l
K. Bohrer (TAC M98167)
GCwalina PUBLIC DOCUMENT NAME: P:\\wstinhse\\w-eval.ejf
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE T2 receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures N" = No copy l 0FFICE HOMB/DRCH l
HOMB/DRCH c, HOMB/DRCH l A/
HOMB/DRCH l l
l NAME EFord RGramm 4 6J F SBlack *2TD l DATE 4/8/97*
04//d/97
/
04/h>/97 04/ /97 04/ /97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
/
w