ML20137P464
| ML20137P464 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/1985 |
| From: | Jens W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| VP-85-0219, VP-85-219, NUDOCS 8512050024 | |
| Download: ML20137P464 (8) | |
Text
_
ptnB
. w2yn. H., hens
'c vu President
- L Nxtear Operatons PRIORITY ROUTIN6 4 i r s_t puul.
Dehoi!
. 1: "-.
g 3
Edison t : r""""
- f.g
=,
P DR4 0
PAD FILE #m s 7
November 27, 1985 YP-85-0219 Er. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Dear Mr. Keppler:
4
Reference:
- 1) Femi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43
- 2) Detroit Edison to NRC letter, " Reactor Operations Improvement Plan", VP-85-0198, October 18, 1985
- 3) NRC to Detroit Edison letter, " Requesting i
Quantitative Criteria for Measuring'
'i Improvement Plan Effectiveness", November 8, 1985 l
Subject:
Additional Information Regarding the Reactor Operations Imorovement Plan
.l In response to your letter of November 8, 1985 requesting quantitative-criteria for monitoring ' the Reactor Operations Improvement Plan, is provided herewith for your information.
The goals identified in this plan are ones which are indicative of a nature operating plant. Positive trends indicating that Fermi 2'is approaching these goals can be observed in Attachment' 1.
Management
-expects these positive trends to continue and will monitor them on a periodic basis. Any deviations away from the desired trend or goal will prompt management review and corrective action, as appropriate, to assure that progress toward the objectives of the Reactor L
Improvement Plan continues. It is anticipated that as the' Fermi 2 L
operating experience increases, we will move even closer to these l
goals.
21985hi py8%fo'ci Phji DEC 3goj e
T
- g Mr. James G. Keppler
, November 27, 1985 VP-85-0219 Page 2 It is important to note that these goals may require adjustment, either up or down, should management determine that the goals are too limiting or are otherwise not achieving the desired results. As an example, during the course of the recent outage to complete the 3L panel installation and Equipment Qualification work, trends were observed away from the desired direction. This was not only planned but also expected so that tasks could be completed prior to return to service.
Since these trends have been shown to be in the positive direction and because management will continue to monitor to assure progress in the positive direction, Detroit Edison requests that it be allowed to operate Fermi 2 at levels in excess of 5% power.
'If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely, cc:
Mr. P. M. Byron Mr. M. David Lyunch Mr. G. C. Wright USNRC Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 6 GOAL'A Minimize number of open PN-21's (Work Orders)
Obj ctives:
150 Management Attention Level TOTAL 110 Expected TOTAL i
N I
l OUTAGE 85-01 l
U i
I M
400 l
l D
l l
381-37 (-
366 E
l l
362 l
C l
l 33 l
l 1
g O
300 l
l P
l l
E I
I 250 N
I I 218 6
)1 1224 W
200 l
187 178 l
l 0
l R
l_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ l ___BaDagemeut_1508tteDiioD_LcYdL_.I K
l 9
l l
l- - - - - - - - - - I -
'IO Exyected l
0 100 I
R l
l D
l l
l E
l l
I R
I l
l s
0 l
i I
I I
I l
l l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I l
I 5
22 29 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 01 September October November Dec NOTE:
Includes plant system related PN-21's (work orders) only.
During an Outtge greater than one week in duration, total numbers can be increased by e fcctor of 2.5.
Page 2 of 6
' GOAL B:
Minimize number of EDP's which remain open after work has been gomoleted, i.e. field complete.
Objective -
EDP's open 30 days
- 15 Management Attention Level after field work 7 Expected complete 1
200 l l
1 80 i Number 1
of 160 i Field l
Complete 140 l EDP's l
120 1
100 I open I
Past 80 1 30 1
70 70 Days 60 l h
40 l
'45 1
20 l l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _%Basie. Jnra t..At. isatipp_ Lty.Fl_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
10 l l____________________Es s3nd___________________________
_7 0 l 1
I l
l l
l l
1 1
I l
l I
I I
l I
l l
l September l
October l
November l December l
l
-.. - - ~,.. _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _. _. - - _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _.., _.. _ _.
Pag 2 3 of 6 GOAL C:
Minimize number of inoperable or continuously alarming annunciators in control Room.
Objective Number of lighted, non-functional annunciators 15 Management Attention Level 10 Expected l
l 100 I l
90 l Outstanding l
80 l Control I
70 l Room l
60 l
_J6s Problem
- l 5r 44 [
55'4(
50 l Annunciators l
46-47 36 30 l I
20 l l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ thniscelt 31te.nt!.ca Js.vs k ----------------
l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Emid _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
10 10
)
l I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l l
September i
October l
November l December i
Problem annunciators are all inoperable, nuisance, setpoint, logic, etc. related annunciators.
Pag 2 4 of 6 GOAL D Perform Surveillances on time minimizina usina arace Deriod Obiective Surveillances completed on time - 994 Management Attention Level including grace period 1004 expected Surveillances not completed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of reaching 7/ week Management Attention Level the grace period 5/ week Expected i
101 l l
Surveillances l
100 11 0 100 100--100 100 Expected - 100 M b
-100 Completed l
- - - - - - - - - - - -Management Attention Level - 99 99 l on Time l
98 l Including l
97 l Grcce Period l 9.5 96 l (t)
I 95 l l
1 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
l l
l l
l l
I 1
I l
September i
October l
November l December l
l 10 l
Surveillances l
Not 8
l
-7 Completed l--------------- M M G M M DSD-@VfA----------------
Within 6
l 24 Hours l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - D t ed-------------- -5 cf entering 4 l
~3 the Grace l
y Period 2
l r
(No./ Week) l
/
0 I
I I
I I
I I
V l l
l I
l i
I I
l l
I l
September l
October l
November i December l
r Page 5 of 6 OOAL E:
Minimize the number of outstandina time sensitive LCO's Objective -
Number of dated -
5 Management Attention Level LCO's outstanding 3 Expected i
10 l l
9I I
Number 8l l
of 7 I I
Dated 6l 5 ! ---------------------- ""DMSDl W20!i " 41*l----------
5 LCO's l
4l 4
i OutCtanding 3
l----------------
D 1Y----------------
3 l
2l 2
\\1-(0-0 1
l i 1
l/l l
I I
l l
1 1
I I
I I
I I
l l
l l
I 1
September l
October l
November i December 1
y.
Pag) 6 of 6 GOAL F:
minimize the na=her of renortable operational occurrences
- Objective -
Number of Licensee 2/ week Management Attention Level Event Reports (LER's) 1.5/ week Acceptable mn i
5 1 5
j 2.
l 4I I
I Number l
31 3
3-3 1
I Cf I
2l 2 ----+ - ---- 2 ----- 2 -- #J D
-al &t*3EtlSR.L*19l----- - 2.0
'l l---
MoseL40s-------------- - 1, 5 LER's l
1l 1-1 1
/
0 1 0 ---O --0 l
I I
l l
l l
I I
l l
1 I
l l
l 1
I l
l September l
October l
November i December i
Note: Reportable Operational Occurrences do not include Security-related LERs.
.