|
---|
Category:INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
MONTHYEARML20137N2871986-01-0707 January 1986 Forwards Summary of Review of Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Rept.Detailed Investigations Needed to Identify & Define Extent of Solution Cavities in Bedrock Beneath Site ML20138Q9041985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions IA-85-362, Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions1985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions ML20127C2941984-11-0707 November 1984 Comments on Applicant 841019 Motion to Dismiss Crbr Proceeding.Differences Between NRC Approved 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan & Doe/Tva/Project Mgt Corp Site Redress Planning Task Force Rept Dtd Jan 1984 Encl ML20140C6121984-06-18018 June 1984 Advises That Time for Commission to Review ALAB-761 Expired. Commission Declined Review.Decision Became Final Agency Action on 840611.Served on 840618 ML20127B5921984-04-30030 April 1984 Submits Proposed Mods to 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan. Redress Plan Should Be Revised to Reflect Alternative Use If Site Retained.Doe Should Rept Status of Site Prior to Starting Final Filling,Grading & Redress ML20138Q8991984-03-23023 March 1984 Requests That NRC Contact Be Identified & That Ode Be Advised Who Will Be Responsible for Followup Work Re Commission 820817 Memorandum & Order Concerning Site Redress.W/Three Oversize Encls ML20062G8321982-08-0606 August 1982 Clarifies Previous Response to ASLB Inquiries Re Computer Codes Used in Review of Site Suitability,Atmospheric Transport & Diffusion Calculations ML20062H2701982-07-28028 July 1982 Forwards Revised Crbr Rept,Initially Submitted on 820722 ML20058F7381982-07-26026 July 1982 Notification of 820805 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr PSAR Chapter 9.3, Auxiliary Liquid Metal Sys. Proposed Agenda Encl ML20058E4481982-07-22022 July 1982 Forwards Crbr Plant Rept, Re Request for Authorization to Conduct Site Preparation Activities.Rept Identifies Technical & Policy Issues & Summarizes Background Info & Applicant Position.No Recommendations on Merit Made ML20058E4921982-07-20020 July 1982 Provides Cost Analysis of Crbr Proposal.Applicant Cost of Delay Estimate on Basis of 10% Real Discount Rate Evaluated. Table Depicting Present Worth Analysis of Anticipated Project Expenditures Encl ML20058A8581982-07-16016 July 1982 Notification of 820723 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Probabilistic Risk Assessment Review NUREG-0786, Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable1982-07-13013 July 1982 Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable ML20054M7621982-07-12012 July 1982 Forwards Commissioner Ahearne Questions for Applicants ML20054N0081982-07-0909 July 1982 Provides Status on NRC Preparation of Assessment of New Info Since Fes Issuance in 1977.NRC Still Evaluating New Info. Decision on Whether Suppl Needed to Be Made Shortly ML20055B2011982-07-0202 July 1982 Forwards Testimony in Facility Proceeding on Contention 6 Re Environ Impact of Fuel Cycle,Per 820623 Request ML20054L4271982-06-30030 June 1982 Notification of 820708 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Hydrology Review ML20054H7791982-06-22022 June 1982 Forwards Supplemental List of Questions on Steam Generator Design.Conference W/Applicant on Design Suggested ML20054H3931982-06-16016 June 1982 Notification of 820630 & 0701 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054F7331982-06-11011 June 1982 Forwards Site Sutitability Rept Re Site Suitability from Point of Radiological Health & Safety Concerns.Rept Supersedes NRC Mar 1977 Site Suitability Rept,Reflecting Changes in Info.Conclusions Remain Same.W/O Encl ML20055B2881982-06-10010 June 1982 Forwards Proposed Input to Chapter 9 & 10 to Crbr Fes Suppl. Info Reflects Comments Discussed Re Preliminary Draft ML20054G0271982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of Canceled 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054E8061982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054E7971982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820622-24 Meetings W/Doe,Util & Project Mgt Corp in Oradell,Nj to Perform Seismic & Structural Engineering Audit of Calculations ML20054H3371982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. DOE Rebuttal to Rept & Description of Test Program Encl.W/O Encl ML20054H3341982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. Also Forwards DOE Steam Generator Testing Program.W/O Encl ML20054F2771982-06-0808 June 1982 Notification of 820623 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Fuel Failure Monitoring Sys ML20055B2841982-06-0707 June 1982 Forwards Gao Final Ltr Rept Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk, in Response to Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations,House Committee on Energy & Commerce Request.No Response Required ML20054M7861982-06-0202 June 1982 Notification of 820727 Meeting W/Doe in Madison,Pa to Discuss Chapter 5.5 Topics for Crbr.Agenda Encl ML20055B2901982-05-27027 May 1982 Discusses Proposed Changes to Chapter 11 of Fes Re Cost Estimates.Crbr Offers Least Cost Solution in Meeting Programmatic Objectives of LMFBR Program ML20055B2921982-05-10010 May 1982 Forwards Antitrust & Economic Analysis Branch Input to Accident Impact Section of Captioned Des ML20055B2931982-04-16016 April 1982 Responds to Interrogatories Set 19 Re Const Cost of Crbr ML20055B2941982-01-22022 January 1982 Comments on DOE Response to Question 9 of Applicant Responses to Questions Set Forth in Commission 811224 Order Re Estimate of Cost of Delay ML20133C7741981-12-0404 December 1981 Discusses Whether Requested Exemption to Allow Site Const in Advance of Environ Impact Analysis Would Significantly Affect Environ Under Nepa.Definition of Significant Discussed ML20065Q3961981-09-0202 September 1981 Advises That Listed Mods Made to Contac & Concept Computer Codes to Improve Usefulness & Accuracy of Concept Code 1986-01-07
[Table view] Category:MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20137N2871986-01-0707 January 1986 Forwards Summary of Review of Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Rept.Detailed Investigations Needed to Identify & Define Extent of Solution Cavities in Bedrock Beneath Site ML20138Q9041985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions IA-85-362, Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions1985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions ML20127C2941984-11-0707 November 1984 Comments on Applicant 841019 Motion to Dismiss Crbr Proceeding.Differences Between NRC Approved 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan & Doe/Tva/Project Mgt Corp Site Redress Planning Task Force Rept Dtd Jan 1984 Encl ML20140C6121984-06-18018 June 1984 Advises That Time for Commission to Review ALAB-761 Expired. Commission Declined Review.Decision Became Final Agency Action on 840611.Served on 840618 ML20127B5921984-04-30030 April 1984 Submits Proposed Mods to 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan. Redress Plan Should Be Revised to Reflect Alternative Use If Site Retained.Doe Should Rept Status of Site Prior to Starting Final Filling,Grading & Redress ML20138Q8991984-03-23023 March 1984 Requests That NRC Contact Be Identified & That Ode Be Advised Who Will Be Responsible for Followup Work Re Commission 820817 Memorandum & Order Concerning Site Redress.W/Three Oversize Encls ML20062G8321982-08-0606 August 1982 Clarifies Previous Response to ASLB Inquiries Re Computer Codes Used in Review of Site Suitability,Atmospheric Transport & Diffusion Calculations ML20062H2701982-07-28028 July 1982 Forwards Revised Crbr Rept,Initially Submitted on 820722 ML20062E2281982-07-26026 July 1982 Staff Requirements Memo Re 820721 Affirmation/Discussion Session Approving Order Directing DOE to Respond by 820728 to Allegations in Petition for Investigation,Filed by NRDC on Sierra Club ML20058F7381982-07-26026 July 1982 Notification of 820805 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr PSAR Chapter 9.3, Auxiliary Liquid Metal Sys. Proposed Agenda Encl ML20058E4481982-07-22022 July 1982 Forwards Crbr Plant Rept, Re Request for Authorization to Conduct Site Preparation Activities.Rept Identifies Technical & Policy Issues & Summarizes Background Info & Applicant Position.No Recommendations on Merit Made ML20058E4921982-07-20020 July 1982 Provides Cost Analysis of Crbr Proposal.Applicant Cost of Delay Estimate on Basis of 10% Real Discount Rate Evaluated. Table Depicting Present Worth Analysis of Anticipated Project Expenditures Encl ML20058A8581982-07-16016 July 1982 Notification of 820723 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Probabilistic Risk Assessment Review NUREG-0786, Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable1982-07-13013 July 1982 Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable ML20054M7621982-07-12012 July 1982 Forwards Commissioner Ahearne Questions for Applicants ML20054N0081982-07-0909 July 1982 Provides Status on NRC Preparation of Assessment of New Info Since Fes Issuance in 1977.NRC Still Evaluating New Info. Decision on Whether Suppl Needed to Be Made Shortly ML20055B2011982-07-0202 July 1982 Forwards Testimony in Facility Proceeding on Contention 6 Re Environ Impact of Fuel Cycle,Per 820623 Request ML20054L4271982-06-30030 June 1982 Notification of 820708 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Hydrology Review ML20054H7791982-06-22022 June 1982 Forwards Supplemental List of Questions on Steam Generator Design.Conference W/Applicant on Design Suggested ML20054H3931982-06-16016 June 1982 Notification of 820630 & 0701 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054F7331982-06-11011 June 1982 Forwards Site Sutitability Rept Re Site Suitability from Point of Radiological Health & Safety Concerns.Rept Supersedes NRC Mar 1977 Site Suitability Rept,Reflecting Changes in Info.Conclusions Remain Same.W/O Encl ML20055B2881982-06-10010 June 1982 Forwards Proposed Input to Chapter 9 & 10 to Crbr Fes Suppl. Info Reflects Comments Discussed Re Preliminary Draft ML20054E7971982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820622-24 Meetings W/Doe,Util & Project Mgt Corp in Oradell,Nj to Perform Seismic & Structural Engineering Audit of Calculations ML20054E8061982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054G0271982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of Canceled 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054H3341982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. Also Forwards DOE Steam Generator Testing Program.W/O Encl ML20054F2771982-06-0808 June 1982 Notification of 820623 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Fuel Failure Monitoring Sys ML20054H3371982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. DOE Rebuttal to Rept & Description of Test Program Encl.W/O Encl ML20055B2841982-06-0707 June 1982 Forwards Gao Final Ltr Rept Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk, in Response to Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations,House Committee on Energy & Commerce Request.No Response Required ML20054M7861982-06-0202 June 1982 Notification of 820727 Meeting W/Doe in Madison,Pa to Discuss Chapter 5.5 Topics for Crbr.Agenda Encl ML20055B2901982-05-27027 May 1982 Discusses Proposed Changes to Chapter 11 of Fes Re Cost Estimates.Crbr Offers Least Cost Solution in Meeting Programmatic Objectives of LMFBR Program ML20055B2921982-05-10010 May 1982 Forwards Antitrust & Economic Analysis Branch Input to Accident Impact Section of Captioned Des ML20055B2931982-04-16016 April 1982 Responds to Interrogatories Set 19 Re Const Cost of Crbr ML20055B2941982-01-22022 January 1982 Comments on DOE Response to Question 9 of Applicant Responses to Questions Set Forth in Commission 811224 Order Re Estimate of Cost of Delay ML20133C7741981-12-0404 December 1981 Discusses Whether Requested Exemption to Allow Site Const in Advance of Environ Impact Analysis Would Significantly Affect Environ Under Nepa.Definition of Significant Discussed ML20065Q3961981-09-0202 September 1981 Advises That Listed Mods Made to Contac & Concept Computer Codes to Improve Usefulness & Accuracy of Concept Code 1986-01-07
[Table view] |
Text
g; h .
~~
JAN 0 71985 RES FilnS Subj ect FH n 'J a. . ---
n a, - ..
ne -
Pn, -
MEMORANDUM FOR: A. Thomas Clark N -
Advanced Fuel and Spent Fuel D" -
Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle &
E 2 "'
W"
~\
=
Material Safety, NMSS Patun .
to D. > I,._,, b_ ,
~
~"~ ~
FROM: Leon L. Beratan, Chief -
Earth Sciences Branch Division of Radiation Programs &
~
Earth Sciences, RES
SUBJECT:
MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE (MRS) FACILITY, CLINCH RIVER, TENNESSEE We have reviewed the Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Report to determine if there is a potential for solution cavities in bedrock beneath the site. Enclosed is a summary of our review.
The proposed foundation levels presented in the report are above or within the badly weathered zone in rock, and there is a possibility that cavities are present in carbonate rocks beneath the site. The planned Receiving and Handling Building straddles the unconformable contact between the Knox Dolomite and the Chickamauga Siltstone. This contact is known to be highly irregular and to contain numerous paleakarst features (cavities or other solution features preserved from an earlier geologic time) within the Knox Dolomite. Detailed site investigations will be needed to identify and define the extent of cavities and to detennine their significance to the site.
Questions concerning this review should be addressed to R. McMullen (Ext 74318) of the Earth Sciences Branch, h
Leon L. Beratan, Chief Earth Sciences Branch Division of Radiation Programs &
Earth Sciences, RES
Enclosure:
Review of the Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Report Distribution /R-2811:
CV4/Chron 'i RMinogue EConti pC,/POR S Dross LBeratan E3B Sbj/Rd ller urphy RMcMullen ESB:RES:pf ESB: SB:RES RMcMullenf4N AMurphy Beratan
/ / 3/86 / /ut/86 / /g/86 e60203o014 060107 ADOCK 0500 7 PDR A
~
s, _
POTENTIAL FOR KARST FEATURES IN BEDROCK BENEATH THE PROPOSED MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE (MRS) FACILITY AT THE FORMER CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR SITE Bedrock beneath the proposed MRS Facility near Oak Ridge, Tennessee consists of alternating sedimentary rock strata of sandstones, siltstones, and carbonates (dolomite and limestone). The strata dip to the southeast at about 30* and greater, and outcrop at the surface in wide bands that are oriented (strike) in a northeast-southwest direction. All of the rocks are severely weathered and contain solution features in the upper few feet to several tens of feet down to a maximum depth of 73 feet in limestone and dolomite. The weathering and solu-tioning has taken place along joints and bedding planes. At depth the joints become less frequent and tighter, and solutioning is uncommon.
The different rock formations have variable susceptibilities to weathering and solution activity depending on their content of carbonate material. For example, the more pure dolomites and limestones are more susceptible to solutioning than the siltstones and sandstones.
At ground surface, from northwest to southeast, the bands of rock are comprised of strata from the Knox Group and the Chickamauga Group. At the site the Chicka-mauga Group has been subdivided into a lower siltstone unit (Unit A) and an upper limestone unit (Unit B). In vertical section, from bottom to top, the sequence is also the Knox Group overlain by the Unit A and then the Unit B Chickamauga Group.
During the early investigations for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor (CRBR),
TVA and then Law Engineering conducted geologic site selection studies and determined that the Unit A Chickamauga horizon was the most suitable for siting the CRBR from a foundation stability point of view than either the Knox Group or the Unit'B limestones because it possesses superior engineering properties, has been less effected by weathering and solution activity, and subsurface 01/03/86 1 REVIEW
SUMMARY
MRS SITE
ea .
conditions are more predictable. More detailed, site specific investigations conducted later confirmed that conclusion.
Excavation for the CRBR was made well below the maximum depth of weathering into continuous high quality rock. The MRS facility lies over portions of the former CRBR area, but it also extends well into the area underlain by the Knox dolomite, an area that is relatively unknown. The proposed elevations for the cask pads in the storage area and the foundation level for the Receiving and Handling Building will be above or within the zone of extensive weathering and solutioning, therefore, the potential for cavities in the rock beneath the facility is high. A relatively detailed exploratory program will be required to locate and define the extent of cavities and determine their significance to the site.
The Receiving and Handling Building is situated above the unconformable contact between the Knox and Chickamauga Groups. The surface of the Knox Group, which is now tilted to the southeast at an angle greater than 30*, had been exposed at ground surface for a long period of time during the Ordovician Period. A well developed karst topography formed at that time. Surface solution features and cavities were later filled with material of the Chickr.cauga Group, forming what are known today as paleokarst features. In addition to the standard site investi-gations that are going to be undertaken to identify solution cavities in the upper rock weathered zone, studies should also be conducted along this interface to confirm the assumption that the paleokarst features beneath the site are completely filled with rock.
01/03/86 2 REVIEW
SUMMARY
MRS SITE
~
JAN 0 71986 MEMORANDUM FOR: A. Thomas Clark Advanced Fuel and Spent Fuel -
Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle &
Material Safety, NMSS FROM: Leon L. Beratan, Chief Earth Sciences Branch Division of Radiation Programs &
Earth Sciences, RES
SUBJECT:
MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE (MRS) FACILITY, CLINCH RIVER, TENNESSEE We have reviewed the Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Report to determine if there is a potential for solution cavities in bedrock beneath the site. Enclosed is a summary of our review.
The proposed foundation levels presented in the report are above or within the badly weathered zone in rock, and there is a possibility that cavities are present in carbonate rocks beneath the site. The planned Receiving and Handling Building straddles the unconformable contact between the Knox Dolomite and the Chickamauga Siltstone. This contact is known to be highly irregular and to contain numerous paleokarst features (cavities or other solution features preserved from an earlier geologic time) within the Knox Dolomite. Detailed site investigations will be needed to identify and define the extent of cavities and to detennine their significance to the site.
Questions concerning this review should be addressed to R. McMullen (Ext 74318) of the Earth Sciences Branch.
h Leon L. Beratan, Chief Earth Sciences Branch Division of Radiation Programs &
Earth Sciences, RES
Enclosure:
Review of the Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Report Distribution /R-2811:
Circ /Chron RMinogue Econti DCS/PER Dross LBeratan ESB Sbj/Rd oller Murphy RMcMullen ESB:RES:pf ESB: SB:RES RMcMullenf6N AMurphy LBeratan
/ / 3/86 / /J/86 / /J/86
POTENTIAL FOR KARST FEATURES IN BEDROCK BENEATH THE PROPOSED MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE (MRS) FACILITY AT THE FORMER CLINC.i RIVER BREEDER REACTOR SITE Bedrock beneath the proposed MRS Facility near Oak Ridge, Tennessee ireists of alternating sedimentary rock strata of sandstones, siltstones, and carbonates (dolomite and limestone). The strata dip to the southeast at about 30* and greater, and outcrop at the surface in wide bands that are oriented (strike) in a northeast-southwest direction. All of the rocks are severely weathered and contain solution features in the upper few feet to several tens of feet down to a maximum depth of 73 feet in limestone and dolomite. The weathering and solu-tioning has taken place along joints and bedding planes. At depth the joints become less frequent and tighter, and solutioning is uncommon.
The different rock formations have variable susceptibilities to weathering and solution activity depending on their content of carbonate material. For example, the more pure dolomites and limestones are more susceptible to solutioning than the siltstones and sandstones.
At ground surface, from northwest to southeast, the bands of rock are comprised of strata from the Knox Group and the Chickamauga Group. At the site the Chicka-mauga Group has been subdivided into a lower siltstone unit (Unit A) and an upper limestone unit (Unit B). In vertical section, from bottom to top, the sequence is also the Knox Group overlain by the Unit A and then the Unit B l Chickamauga Group.
I j During the early investigations for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor (CRBR),
TVA and then Law Engineering conducted geologic site selection studies and determined that the Unit A Chickamauga horizon was the most suitable for siting the CRBR from a foundation stability point of view than either the Knox Group l or the Unit'B limestones because it possesses superior engineering properties, i
- has been less effected by weathering and solution activity, and subsurface l
l l
l 01/03/86 1 REVIEW
SUMMARY
MRS SITE
\
O conditions are more predictable. More detailed, site specific investigations conducted later confirmed that conclusion.
Excavation for the CRBR was made well below the maximum depth of weathering into continuous high quality rock. The MRS facility lies over portions of the former CRBR area, but it also extends well into the area underlain by the Knox dolomite, an area that is relatively unknown. The proposed elevations for the cask pads in the storage area and the foundation level for the Receiving and Handling Building will be above or within the zone of extensive weathering and solutioning, therefore, the potertial for cavities in the rock beneath the facility is high. A relatively detailed exploratory program will be required to locate and define the extent of cavities and determine their significance to the site.
The Receiving and Handling Building is situated above the unconformable contact between the Knox and Chickamauga Groups. The surface of the Knox Group, which is now tilted to the southeast at an angle greater than 30', had been exposed at ground surface for a long period of time during the Ordovician Period. A well developed karst topography formed at that time. Surface solution features and cavities were later filled with material of the Chickamauga Group, forming what are known today as paleokarst features. In addition to the standard site investi-gations that are going to be undertaken to identify solution cavities in the upper rock weathered zone, studies should also be conducted along this interface to confirm the assumption that the paleokarst features beneath the site are completely filled with rock.
e d
01/03/86 2 REVIEW
SUMMARY
MRS SITE
. _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ . - _ - - - . _ - __ _ _ . - - - -