ML20137N044

Forwards Region III 840611 Proposed Enforcement Guidance for QA Program Violations Based on Experiences at Braidwood & Fermi Plants,For Review & Comment.Response Requested by 840720.W/o Enforcement Guidance

ML20137N044
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi, Braidwood, 05000000
Issue date:	07/09/1984
From:	Deyoung R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Jay Collins, Martin J, Murley T, James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML20137N037	List: IA-85-452, Forwards Region III 840611 Proposed Enforcement Guidance for QA Program Violations Based on Experiences at Braidwood & Fermi Plants,For Review & Comment.Response Requested by 840720.W/o Enforcement Guidance ML20137N032 ML20137N044 ML20137N049
References
FOIA-85-452 NUDOCS 8509180080
Download: ML20137N044 (1)

Text

.:

jp .

s,- *: ,.

,e

.a .. .

~~

Yh ,..,q 3,-

L-,'

t : r.

. . . , . . ~

[I 7/# ) 31 . L:_ ~ n - : ,

4, m.'.M _-Ai-_r_.c L

'i

" L

.U' , _.

v.

a

.F;t i C~~r

'(%*M O

MEMCRANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley Region I Administratcr James P. O'Reilij, Region II Administrator I.; .,

Jonn Collins, Fe; ion IV Administrator -2 .x ,

John Martin, Region V Administrator g -

) '- -

FROM: Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement SU5 JECT: PROPOSED ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FOR CCNSTRUCTION VIOLATIONS (SUPPLEMENT II)

r. 1 Jur.e 11,193

• remorande, Regicr. !I: procesec 3r acarr :: e.#orce er-fo r QA program violations based on its recent experiences a: 53 icac:c aric Fe mi . We have reviewec tne approach which was provided in tne form of a Table and believe tha issuance of sorre enforcement guidance in tne construction OA area would be use'ul to all of the Regions. We are, tnerefort, sencS; the Region's prcpose: enforcerert approach to you for reviea 3 r.: c:- r.t.

After we receive your c,rrents, enforcement guidance will be ceulred anc issued.

Although IE review of the proposed approach has not been completed and will continue concurrent with your review, we have the following preliminary corrments which you may consider in your review. The guidance does not appear to address what enforcement action should be taken if the licensee's QA program has fallen i significantly behind the progress of work at the site, or if deficiencies identified in the QA program will make it very difficult to determine the quality of hardware installed at the site. In such situations, we believe civil penalties or Orders should be considered despite the absence of kno,n hardware deficiencies.

Please provide your corm.ents to Jane Axelrad by July 20, 1984 j ./ ,f,/Q""

8509180000 850906 PDR y'. "

FOIA CARDE85-452 PDR Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

As stated cc: g J. Keppler, RIII J. N. Grace, IE g-[ ( gj R. Heishman, IE , p J. Part)ow, IE T. Ankrum. IE s' - 3 r:na