ML20137J550
| ML20137J550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/13/1997 |
| From: | Clint Jones NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Sherbani S NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137J522 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-97-66 NUDOCS 9704040062 | |
| Download: ML20137J550 (1) | |
Text
i l
2 i I t
1 From: Cynthia - NMSS Jones (Cynthia - NMSS Jones) !
To: SXS2 M M Date: 2/13/97 4:20pm
Subject:
Sewer solubility -Reply -Reply I agree with the licensee Cerac, Inc.. We (NRC) have gone on record before that if a licensee uses a 0.45 micron filter to filter the waste water, then this meets our definition of solubility as
" defined" in the IN.
It is no different than our agreeing to let INS sample at 20 microns & then allowing them to discharge. If someone sampled at a lower pore sample size, and point activity, we could not cite the licensee for failure to meet the regs; the allowance by NRC was 20. No more, no less.
Same thing with AMS. The sewer disctnct could always sample longer & find activity, but if filtrad teru a 0.45 micron filter, it met the definition in the IN & indeed satisfMxt the NRC risquirement. Bob Fonner & Boby Eid as much stated this in earlier questions when the IN went i out.
CC: CHD1.CHP2.MML i
l i
I l