ML20137H986

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Provides Position on Period of Retention for Data & Info Used for post-trip Reviews,In Response to NRC Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2.Data & Info Will Be Retained Pending Resolution of Issue
ML20137H986
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire, 05000000
Issue date: 08/23/1985
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Adensam E, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-83-28, N, TAC-60220, TAC-60221, NUDOCS 8508300092
Download: ML20137H986 (2)


Text

,

DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. box 33189 CHARLOrTE, N.C. 28242 HAL B. TUCKER rat.zenown vion== saman (704) 373-4sas

====,=.oocono-August 23, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attention:

Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4

Subject:

Data and Information Capability for Post-Trip Review - Item 1.2 to Generic Letter 83-28, Catawba and McGuire Nuclear Stations, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 And 50-413, 50-414

Dear Mr. Denton:

In response to Mr. T. M. Novak's letter of June 21, 1985, subject as above, please find Duke Power Company's position on the p'eriod of retention for data and information used for post-trip reviews.

Pending a definitive resolution of this issue by the appropriate ANSI Committee, Duke will, on an interim basis, retain data and information used in post-trip reviews.

Duke feels that this issue needs to be addressed on an industry-wide bases for two reasons.

First, data and information needs to be reviewed on a case by case bases to determine whether or not any useful purpose is served by retention for the life of the plant. Standard generic criteria should be developed.

Second, utility by utility review of this aspect of record retention is not appropriate as there exists a standard ANSI N45.2.9 (1974) that deals with record retention requirements. Accordingly, it may be necessary to clarify retention requirements for post-trip reviews in this standard. Duke will pursue a definitive resolution of this issue with the appropriate ANSI Committee and at the same time would request the NRC to follow a similar course of action relating to this issue.

If there are any questions or problems concerning this matter, please advise.

Very truly yours, dk Ad

~

Hal B. Tucker JWD: sib ge%%8i ***lW Ao55 P

g

'3;

-Mr'.Harald R 'Denton Dira.ct:r

-August. 23,'.1985.

Page Two,,

cc:

Mr. P. H.! Skinner NRC Resident Inspector Catawba duelear Station Mr. W. T. Orders

'NRC Resident Inspector

.McGuire Nuclear Station P

1 m

I

,