ML20137H168

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99901014/85-01 on 850521-22 & Notice of Violation
ML20137H168
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/23/1985
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Lilly G
KENNETH G. LILY FASTENERS, INC.
Shared Package
ML20137H172 List:
References
REF-QA-99901014 NUDOCS 8508280211
Download: ML20137H168 (2)


Text

o 8[ pus

<. o g

o UNITED STATES

' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r, g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

..... August 23, 1985 Docket No. 99901014/85-01 Kenneth G. Lilly Fasteners, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. Gary Lilly President Post Office Box 6005 Newark, Delaware 19711 Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by N. J. Miegel of this office on May 21-22, 1985, of your facility at Newark, Delaware and to the discussions of our findings with you at the conclusion of the inspection.

The purpose of this inspect. ion was to assess the adequacy of control over material traceability at Kenneth G. Lilly Fasteners, Inc., (KGL) for components destined for nuclear power facilities.

Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

The finding concerned KGL's failure to comply with 10 CFR Part 21.

The enclosed Notice of Violation is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. You are required to submit to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

I t

85002hhh 01014 W IS MioCENSING original document not available to M oertified bykfAAAi NR

. . _ _ _ . . . _ - - - .. . - - _ =

Kennet'h G. Lilly, Inc. August 23, 1985  :

The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, 1 ORIGINAL StGfffD BY

GARY G. ITCH Gary G. Zech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Notice of Violation
2. Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99901014/85-01 i

Distribution:

j DMB:IE:09

VPB Reading i DQAVT Reading f

NMiegel 1 EMerschoff j GZech BGrimes 4

)

l v 15< AfhVPB 213fT:VPB IE:DQ  : :DOAVT:VPB . . T:VPB NMi e

'lcth EMerschoff ch rimes l .

5 0(/)V85 @/AV85 Y.0.1/-f89-

T 75 l

. _ - - _ . _ . - - . - - . - . - _ . .