ML20137B239
| ML20137B239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/23/1985 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-2347, NUDOCS 8508210561 | |
| Download: ML20137B239 (14) | |
Text
hdAS - Q.5D y
?
D
'}
fl]Y GT VI S$
1 5
') 3 M
y l
c A
0 4
i s.
lW dI E h*,
W.J CERTIFIED MINUTES t
DATE ISSUED: JULY 23, 1985 MINUTES OF THE JtiNE 15, 19GS JOINT MEETING OF THE ACRS SiiF COMf1ITTEES ON HUMAN FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE
- t. rat: T ICES AND PROCEDURES, WASHINGTON, D.C.
F-u r n c,n.> :
I t.
wh 9,ibc en,mi t tees on Human Factors and Maintenance Pr., c t i c e t: sna Procedures met on June 18, 1985 at 1717 H
$treet, N.W.,
Washinyton D.C.
20555 in Room 1046.
The purpom of the meeting was to e>:pl ore the use of natural eq. i ) La.ie :-,el er t i on procedur es, tests, and evaluations.
F re wnta ci ons were made by Alf red Mancitti of the Wisconsin E] w tr i c Power Company and David Kleinke of the Edison El eci r ic I n.: t t t.t t e.
They also presented data on the current uw of EEi tests in the nuclear industry.
Notice of the meeting, published in the Federal Register on Friday, May 31, 1985, is reproduced and shown as Attachment A.
The schedule for the meeti og is Attachment B.
Sign-in sheets of meeting attendees are contained in Attachment C.
Attechment D contains a list of meeting handouts kept with thr-office copy of these minutes.
The entire meeting was open to the public.
Mr. John Schiffgens was the assigned ACRS taff me:nb er for the meeting.
A)tundeos:,,
ACR5 NRCOSta+f D.
A.
War d, Chairman G.
Cwalina, NRR W.
Kerr, Member J.
Kronenberg, IE C.
J.
Wyli e, Nember N.
K.
Eaton, C:4RI G.
A.
Reed, Member l
}.
L.
Gimmy, Consultant Other_
R.
A.
Cushman. Fel1ow J.
Nurmi, EFM M.
K.
De, Fellow E.
Desterle, Bechtel J.
F1ack, Fel1ow S.
Seth, MITRE J.
.'Jeffries, Fellow 8508210561 850723 PDR ACRS 2347 PDR Meet i nacth gjl ghts. GA_greements. GandGReauests:
li DESIG'bm) 021G11%
.u a
,,l J
.1 l
.p y
jb Certified 27_
HUliAtJ H4C10RS MEETING July 23, 1985 JUNE 18, 1985 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES Opening Statement D.
Ward Mr. Ward introduced Mr. Kleinke, Manager of Psychologi-cal Services at the Edison Electric Institute, and Mr.
Mascitti, Snpervisor of Supervisory and Prof essional Placement at Wisconsin Electric Power.
EE1 Employee Selection Testing Projects D.
Kl ei nke M.
Kleinim begsn with a brief history of EEI work in ti.is area.
In the mid-1970s, a number of utilities saw a need to improve their employee selection procedures by tenting applicants in addition to interviewing them and reviewing their backgrounds.
EEI responded by sponsoring the development and validation of employee wl oct i on tests on n voluntary basis.
Mr.
Kl ei ni:e said that EEI had 7 selection testing projects: Plant Operator Selection System (POSS);
Power Plant Maintenance Positions (MAST);
Physically Demanding Jobs Project; First Line Supervisor Selec-tion Project (Blue Collar and White Collar);
Clerical Positions and Meter Reader; System Operator / Power Dispart.hing Positions; and Industry Testing Implementa-tion Project.
According to Mr. Kleinke, the oldest and largest of the EEI testing projects in POSS.
A total of 73 companies contributed to the initial devel opment of POSS, and about 55 currently use it; however, only 20 use it for nucl ear positions (i. e., about half of the 39 nuclear utilities that participate in EEI).
POSS was first given at 3 utilities in February 1982.
He said Mr.
Mascitti would describe POSS in detail later in the meeting.
Mr. Kleinke poi nted out that the Power Pl ant Mainte-nance Positions Project (MAST) is relatively new.
The positions covered by this project include electricians, mechanics, and instrument and control repairers, among others in nuclear, fossil, hydroelectric plants.
It was formally implemented in October 1984.
The MAST test battery uses essentially the same aptitude tests as the plant operator bettery, but has a different
-measure of personal characteristics.
, T,he power-plant maintenance jobs are among three job groupings for which companies use the physical abili-t'ies tent.
The physical abilities test is the major product of the Physically Demanding Jobs Project.
The physical. abilities test measures arm strength, arm speed, equilibrium, and flexibility.,
9
HG ;. W 'ACTRO MEETING July 23, 1985 4 -'
JUNE 10, 1985 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES 6
1 Mr. Kjuinte sei d that the two projects for selecting t
first line supervisors, one for blue collar jobs and the other for office and-technical jobs, are un'ique among the EEI projects in that existing programs were i,
adopted for them, while other EEI projects were custom developed.
Meter r eaders and clerical workers were grouped into one pr oject because they were considered to need about the =.=aw knowl edge, ski 11s, and abi1itius.
The Syr. tem Operator / Power Disp:atching Positions Project developed a test battery f or the sel ection of energy control center employees.
The Industry Testing Impl ementation Project provi des a mechanism for ensuring the unifarmity of testing and storing pr ocedures, as well as for the security of
. tests, test scores, and' test results.
The project outlined the administrative structure, and the training for tm. ting coo dinators and administrators.
EEI trains and certifies a manager in'each-company to be te=L.nu coordinator, and requires that each company n u.e a pol. icy 1evel offici.1 to bear overalI responsi-tility +nr eel testing within the company and.a testing speci a} i st, a psychologist, t o advise the others on technical and ethical issuou. Mr. Kleinke emphas1:ed the importance of consistency of administration and scoring ior test reliabi1ity.
Mr. Wylie asked wnere eng) neering support personnel
{
would fit under these projects.
Mr. Kleinke replied that none of the projects cover engineering.personne].
Test Development and Validation D.
Kleinke Among the first steps in test development is the sel ec t i on Job and Task. Analyses.
The analyses are formal job investigations for task identification,, task frequcocy, and task importance.
They also are to identify the knowledges, skills, abilities and other 3
characteristics necessary for entrance to the job.
These analyses are simpler than those done for training purposez, since +or seloction, the test developers need only knuw the entrance skills, not the skills necessary for independent functioning on the job.
In response to
~ Mr. Wards-request for clarification on the nature of Job and Tesk Analyses, Mr. Kleinke gave the example of a' mai ntenance worker who has to read exploded diagrams.._ - '
'For sel ection purposes, you would want to measure his ability to visualize three-dimensional figures.present-ed in two dimensional space.
For training purposes
_3-
HuMm e9t,4 Oh6 MEETING July 23, 1985'
.uW 18, 1985 FROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES (i.e.,
at the end of training), you might want to meatst f e hi s ability to r ead an exploded diagram or
.,t blueprint, perhaps with specific notations, lettering QQ
~
anti labri i ng convent ions on them.
- r The information obtained from the Job and Task Analyses was uwei to sel ec t a sample of examinees, to construct t,
ana/or select performance appraisal materials, and rienstr or t and/or sel ec t ex peri mental tests.
The first v id : ommo3 L consideration for the enpurist. ental testu i9 t h ei t thoy rneat,ure the knowledge, ski 11 s, abi1ities, and ether ch.3rsctertstics identified at the job and t ank.a.al ywn 5.1 a u e as being i mportant t o the job.
In addition to test. results, reliable examinee work per 4 ve rcar.ce appraisals ( i. e., reliable criteri on) are r eato r ed for Lest validation.
Company performance appirisals are poor c r i t er i on measures even in a one-corapeny study, according to Mr. Kleinke (i. e., they sejdom pr ovi de the variability in scores that are nes ded).
The objective is to identify the tests which cor rel at e most hinhly wi th work perf ormance and ref' lect the knowle Jgen, Ski 1I s, abi1ities, and other charact or istics known to be ess-enti al for the job.
Mr. Ward asked for clarification on why supervisory appraisal s were not used.
Mr. Vleinke replied that a parformance appraisal is given to at least one supervi-t.or tor eath exami nee for on-the-job appraisal, but t h -. t it is EEI custom-designed for the project rather th.9n a company form, s
Mr. Kl einke said that there were 3400 operators, of whoa. 600 were nuclinar, who participated in the valida-Li on of FOSS.
For about 95 percent of these, two performince appraisals were received.
For approximate-ly 4. 5 per cent, there was one performance appraisal, and ior
.5 par cent there was none.
Mr. Masc i t t i expres. sed the opinion that a good selec-tion system which measures abi1ity or aptitude.results in_a higher ealiber employee, which in turn has many brue f i t s, inc1uding better safety performance and 1ower t ur nover.
He said that he had no research statistics
-to support this view, only his enperience.
, M,r. Kerr: asked to what extent something like mechanical aptitude is trainable.
Mr. Kleinke said that to some d6 gree what are called-aptitudes are prcbably tuscepti-.
ble-to training, since they think they are susceptible to atr ophying through disuse.
Mr. Kerr asked, if mechanical aptitude in teachable, can it be taught -
. ~ -,., _
'use
'#'8
^
FUMAN iACTORS MEETING July 23, 1985
.ENE 18, 19 7 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES within a reasonable period of time or only over something lite 20 year s.
Mr. Mascitti replied that in his opinion i t ; ]gg;,
i is something that cannot be learned.
Mr. Kleinke offered an g s illustration from their clerical test series, which includes ~~ '
s'*
an aptitude bat.tery and a skills battery.
They found no differences among entry (i.e.,
the first six months) level, _ _ _
journey level, end senior level in the aptitudes, however, ^ ' "'
g in the skills ( i. e., typing and stenography) they found that seniors did best and entry did worst.
Mr. Kerr sai d that his coacern comes from the acknowledged differences an es imr t opinion about whether intelligence tests measure i nt el l i gence, something supposedly inherent, or cultural
.n training or educetion.
Mr. Mascitti said backgr ouad that, i r.
th-ir experience, the aptitudes they define do not significently change with time (i.e.
training).
Plent Oper alot Selection Syst em (POSS)
A.
Mascitti Mr. fla st. i t t i said that the tests used for maintenance er u al most identical to those used for operations.
The tests are paper and pencil tests in a multiple choice formst.
They aru machine scorable or the can be hand scor ed with plastic overlay stencils.
POSS is com-nrised of theee components:
Aptitude I ndem ; Ex p er-i ence Index; and Personnel Index.
The first component, Aptituon I nde:f (used in both POSS and MAST), is com-prised of five aptituden: 1) Reading Comprehension; 2)
Spat i al Rel a t i ons; 3) Mechanical Concepts; 4) Mathemat-ical Uwage: and 5) Perceptual Speed and Accuracy.
1)
The first test in the aptitude component is a test of reading comprehension.
This test is to measure a person's abili ty to r ead anU understand the type of material found in power plant training manuals.
The Le -t not only measu'res a person's recall of specific facts presented in the material but also
+
evaivates a person's abi1ity to apply a technical or scientific concept which is explained in the mat er i al.
2)
The second test, on spatial relations, measures tho abi1ity of an individual to visuali:e the prope-assembied form of an object.
The spatial relations test is a crucial measure of an appli-cant 's abili ty to f ollow instructions in assem-bling and disassembling parts of machinery, tools, etc., to understand and conceptually visualize the innor workings of a system, and to read instru-ments and gauges.
3)
The third test, dealing with mechanical concepts,
HUMAN FACluRS MEETING July 23, 1985' JUNE 18, 1985 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES is also a measure of mechanical comprehension.
This test measures the ability of an examinee to understand mechanical principles.
The test was constructed based on an analysis of the tasks per f ormed on the job.
Previous research has shown that manual workers who have a good understanding of mechanical principles have fewer accidents and
.I are less prone to error.
4)
The iourth test, on mathematical usage, measures abilities i n sol ving and manipulating mathematica1 '
relationships.
This test (containing 46 multiple choice items) was developed based on an analysis of job duties in training material (i. e., the aptitude required to complete training successful-ly and effectively function on the job).
b)
The fifth test, on perceptual speed and accuracy test, measures the speed and accuracy in reading tables and graphs.
Mr. Gimmy asked if the tests covered non-linear graphs, round graphs or ribbon meters.
Mr. Mascitti said no.
The aptitude tests f ocus heavily on mechanical compre-hension and spatial relations.
The research validation found that these abilities are the most significant requisites of successful performance of operating and maintenance personnel.
With regard to the Experience Index, it results from a questionnaire containing 92 questions related to a candidate's previous experience in school, work, and recrea ti onal situations.
The questionnaire is scored against a number of scales that measure past patterns of overall effectiveness in areas of vocational inter-est, work orientation, stability, and tendencies toward potential weaknesses in coping with stress.
The third component of POSS, the Personnel Index, "
results from a questionnaire containing 139 statements requiring true or false answers.
Applicants indicate whether they agree or disagree with statements that describe an opinion of personal circumstance.
The questionnaire is to measure aspects of temperament
'found to be related to emotional stability.
'Mr.
Mascitti said that this component did not validate f or
- the nuclee.r jobs, probably due to the fact that nuclear plant persor.nel participating in the research study were already closely screened for emotional stability (i. e., they did not find sufficient range).
_6_
hunAN FACTORS MEETING July 23, 1985' JUNE 18, 1985 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES MAST has an additional component to the aptitude test called the Background and Opinion Questionnaire. (simi-lar to that for experience and personnel indices for operations).
It measures personal characteristics which are shown to be related to effective power plant maintenance work.
For both POSS and MAST, composite scores are calculated for each component and for the overall test battery.
The candidate's standing on an aptitude test is a measurement of his mental abilities that are important to learn power plant work.
The experience and person-nel questionnaires for POSS and the background and opinion questionnaire for MAST provide accounts of a person's history and personal characteristics.
Mr Kerr expressed the opinion that good management comes down from the top and that with poor management, you could have excellent testing for maintenance and operating personnel and still have a poor operation.
Mr. Reed expressed the opinion that good management comes from well sel ected personnel.
Mr. Mascitti reminded the Subcommittee that there is an EEI project for the selection of first line management _.
Mr. Reed wondered if, in the interest of safety, the NRC should require selection testing.
Mr. Ward said the original NRC approach was to assure the competence of licensrd individuals by having them pass examinations.
Then it was decided that some specific training requirements should be added. More recently it was proposed to make the training requirements more detailed; industry didn't like that and said they would take care of it themselves through NUMARC.
Regulation of selection would add another level at the base of the regulatory pyr amid.
Mr. Eaton asked if the EEI performance appraisals spoke more or less directly to safety.
Mr. Mascitti said that he thought that one of the performance factors was a safety factor and that the tests were positively correlated to the perf ormance appraisal rating on safety.
The Subcommittee decided that it would be desirable to have Mr. Kleinke and Mr. Mascitti make a presentation to the ACRS in tne near future, at a mutually conve-nient time.
Future'GMeet i nns:
The next meeting of the Human Factors Subcommittee is scheduled for June 20, 1985.
The ACRS is scheduled'to hear A e
nden a -a..!uR5 MEEl1NG July 23, 1981 J11NE 18 1985 PROPOSED
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES 0
& brief Subcommittee report on Aptitude Selectic,n during the 303rd ACRS meeting, JULY 11-13, 1985.
I w++n++++++****++A fif *T E:
A complete transcript of the meeting is on file in' the Nkt: Public Docunient Room at 1717 H St.,
N.W.,
LO: c h i s ig t on,
D.C.,
or can be obtained from ANN P I L E 'Y x A s ta.l C I A T E S, Court Reporters, 1625 1 St.,
N.W.,
Guate 921, Washington, D.C.
20006. LTele-phone ( 20,r ) 297.-3950]
4
~'k
. :a
.?
O
_ g_
Federal Regirttr / Val, 50. No. 't05 / Triday. biay 31,1985/ Nations k3305 i
operator requali6 cation _ n decide distributed prior to the expiration of the Associated with In. Plant Pressurized s
Cas Storage and Distribution Systeena ta on an appropriate action pena to neso them,and make the necessaar
- f' thirty-day period.
Nuclear Power Planla **
CaTt All comments must be received by Dral statements may be prenanted by - recommendations to ee Comesittua.
Oral statamenta may be presented by the Legal Services Corpora' ion within 30 members of the public with cxmennence hys from the date of publication of this of k Subcomenttee Chatnn=n written members of the
' with the '.- %
nstice.
statements willbe accepted and made concurrence of Seba== ass==.. % -
,,,,,,,7,,,,go,,,,,,,,
available to de Commmee.Recordags Charman, wruses etatements esGIbe accepted and made available to4he Beverly Bunn, legal Services WiU be Permitted only dunng those Corporation. OfSce of Field Services.
Portion,s of te meeting when a Committas. Racerdues wtB be perspissed, 733 Fifteenth Street.NW., Washington.
tranaenp%
pt.and Was osh danagthose portscas of the N
D.C. 20005, (202) 272-4351.
may be asked o y by members of the meeting when a transcript is bapt.
mMestions may be askedh Shh h suertrututany suronnaisoec Grants Subcommittee.Its consultants and Staff. innd cre awarded pursuant to the Legal p,,,on, u,, mir to make oral Servicss Corporation s announcement of statementsshouldnotify the ACRS staff amoaaltanta, and StaE, Penions deatnas cveilability of funds. Announcement of members as farin advance as to male oral stateaments should motify funding eveilability was made at the practicable solhat appropriate the ACRS staff member named below as f llowmgtimes:(1)For the arrangements can be mede.
far in advance as is practiceWe so that Implementstion of law school civil During the initialportion d the
. appropriate anaagements can be usade.
clinical programs to improve the quality meeting the Subcommittee. along with
, Duringg, %, g,,4 sTlegs) services to elderly persons any of its conenltants who macy be
"*'D3's =* = tunts e m@
(Federe.1 Register, p.11469. M arch 21.
' preseni,maytxchange preliminary any it 1985) (2) for the development of source views te arding matters to be Present may -
- " Prelimiriary meterials on laws a!Iecting elderly consider d during the balance of the views regard g matters to be pers ens) Feders) Register, p.12665, meeting
.considund dnnag ee Mna= d6e March 29.1985) and (3) for the
%e Subcommittee wGl then hear
"'* ti"8-development of plans to encourage the presentations by and hold %=u The Subcommittee wlIl then bear ns private bar to provide higher quality withrepresentatives of the NRCStaff.
Presentations by and bold discussions paid services and to expand pro bono its consultants and otherinterested with representatives of the NRC 9taF progrcms (FederalRegister p.13431.
persons regarding this review.
its consultants,and other interessed Further information regarding topics April 4.1985).
tobe discussed whether the meeting persons regarding this reelew.'
The legal Services Corporetion Further information regarding topics Initnds these grants to increase and has been cancelled or rescheduled, the to be discussed,whether the meeting improve the quality oflegal services to Chairman's ruling on requests for the has been canceDed or ressedaled.the elderly poor persons presently unserved opportunity to present oral statements Chairman's ruhng an requests for the orunderserved. Additionally, funded and the time allotted thereforcan be programs should sensitize and educate obtained by a prepaid telephone call to opportadty to preserd oral statements the present bar and future lawyers to the cognizant ACRS staff member Mr.
and the time aDotted thersfor can be the legal needs of the elderly.
Joha Schiffgens (telephone 2a2/834-obtabsed by a prepaid telephone call to 1414) between 215 a.m. and 5.100 p.m.,
the cognizant ACRS staff member.Mr.
John. C. Meyes.
EDT. Persons planning to attend this John Schiffgens (telephone 202/834.-
Associa ls Director. Ofice of field Service,.
meeting are urged to contact the above 1(14)between 835 a.m. and !kOD p.m t
(FR Doc. s5-13194 hled b30-at 8 45 azn]
named individual one or two days EDT. Persons plumdngto attend this
== i==a coot udn.e before the scheduled mee to be meeting are tuged to contact the above advised of any changesin edule.etc namedindividual one ortwo days which may have owad.
befare the schednied meeting to be advised of any chaggee in ochedule, etc.,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMLSSlON Dated. Msy 23. seas.
which may have occuned.
worson w ta,un, M
i
. hadMes at. 2ms.
Sat gu rds o
ee ir Morten W.1m=41=
Syst:ms;Weetin9 (FR Doc.8bmoo Filed E30-a5M am]
Ass?srant Executire Directorfor hojear suase ccot runs.4ws 3,yj,,,
he ACRS Subccmmittee on Air p h abtsoesFiled bae-es;eres ama)
Systems will hold a meeting on June 17 1985. Room 1046.1717 H Sireet. NW.
Advisory Committee on Meactor suase caos rise.*ws tr ting wl1 be open to f,'.
public attendance.
dvisory Committee on Reactot l
The agenda for subject meeting shall The ACRS Subcommittee on Human Safeguards; Subcommittees on Human Factors will hold a meeting oninne 20.
be as follows:
1985. Room 1046.1717 H Street. NW.
Factors and Maintenance PracWoos Afonday.fune 27. 25WtS-3;30 a.m. until and Procedures; Meeting Washington. DC.
i the conclusion'ofbusiness The entire meeting wC) be open to
%e ACRS Subcommittees en Hmash The Subcommittee wUl review the Public attendance..
NRC Staffs Supplement tc 6e Control The agenda for the subject meeting
. Factors and Maintenance Practices and -
Procedures willhold a combined Room Habitability Working Croup shallbe as follows:
l Report-june 1964.%Is Supplement is Thursday, June 20, t985 e30 o.m. until meetfag on June 18.1985. Room 1048.
1717 H Street NW Weshington.DC.
ta discuss the Staffs survey of Mt)1.
the conclusion of business l
and OR control rooms. Also, the ne Subcommittee willidentify real
%e entire me sting will be open to Subcommittee will review the Stafra and/or perceived problems with the Public attendanca.
i i~
fins! repori on ** Safety Implications l
]
FrrA L
2320G Fe'dcral Registar / Vol. 50. No.105 / Friday. May 31. 1985 / Notices De agenda for subject meeting shall meeting on June 18. Room 1048.1717 H Advisory Committee on Reactee
- be as follows:
Street. NW, Washington, DC.
Safeguarda Subcommittee on Tuesday, June.Js. Iss5-120p.m. until ne entire meeting will be open to Systematic Evaluation Program (San the conclusion of business public attendance.
Onofre); Meeting
. The Subcommittees wi!! explore the ne agenda for the subject meeting De ACRS Subenmmittee se use of natural splitude selection shall be as follows:
Systematic Evaluation Program (Sea
. procedures, tests, and evaluations.
Oral statements may be presented by hesdenJune JA 18656 m until Onofre) will hold a meeting on June 19..,
members of the public with the the conclusion of business 1985. Room 104a.1717 H Street. NW.,
Washington. DC.
concurrence of the Subcommittee ne Subcommittee will review the ne entire meeting wul be open to I
Chairman: written statements will be maintenance and surveillance program cecepted and made available to the plan.
Public attendance.
Committee. Recordings will be permitted he agenda for the subject meeting Oral stakmmts may be presented by shall be as follows:
only during those portions of the meeting when a transcript is being kept, membm oMe puMic e &
concurrence of the Subcommittee Wednesdo3 /un,e 28. Je u antil cad questions may be asked only by members of the Subcommittee,its Chairman; written statements will be the conclusma ofbusmess consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring accepted und made available to the
%e Subcommittee wul review the to make oral statements should notify. Committe* Recordings wul be permitted Integrated Plant Safety Analysis Report th* ACRS steff member named below as only during those portions of the (IPSAR) for San Onofre Unit 1.
far in advance as is practicable so that meeting when a transcript is beIng kept.
Oral statements may be presented by cppropriate arrangements can be made.
and questions may be asked only by members of the public with the During the initial portion of the members cf the Subcommittee,its concurrence of the Subcommittee meeting, the Subcommittee. along with consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring Chairman; written statements wul be cny cf its consultants who may be to make oral statements should notify accepted and made available to the present.may exchange preliminary the ACRS staff member named below as Committee. Recordings will be permitted views regarding matters to be far in advance as is practicable so that only during those portions of the cons d during the balance of the appropriate arrangements can be made, meeting when a transcript is being kept.
Durmg the initial portion of the and questions may be asked only by The Subcommittee will then hear prearntations by and hold discussions meeting, the Subcommit tee, along with members of the Subcommittee.its with representatives of the NRC Staff.
any of its consultants who may be consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring its consultants. and other interested
' Present, may exchange preliminary to make oral statements should notify persons regarding this review.
views regarding matters to be the ACRS staff member named below as Further information regarding topics considering during the balance of the far in advence as is practicable so that r-to be discussed, whether the meeting meeting.
appropriate arrangements can be made.
has been cancelled or rescheduled, the ne Subcommittee will then hear During the initial portion of the Chairman's ruling on requests for the presentations by and hold discussions meeting. the Subcommittee, along with spPortunity to present oral statements with representatives of the NRC Staff, any ofits consultants who may be end the time allotted therefor can be its consultants, and other Inter'ested Present, may exchange preliminary,
cbtained by a prepaid telephone call to persons regarding this review.
views regarding matters to be
+
the cognizant ACRS staff member.Mr.
considered during the balance of the Jahn SchifTgens or Mr. Herman Further information regarding topics meet
% ubcommittee will then hear '
Alderman (telephone 202/634-1414) to be discussed, whether the meeting between 8.15 sa and 5:00 pm. FR has been cancelled or rescheduled, the presentations by and hold discussions Persons planning to attend this meetmg Chairman a ruling on requests for the with tePresentatives of the NRC Staff.
cre urEed to contact the above named opportunity to present oral statements its consdtank, and oen intmst,f individual one or two days before the and the time allotted therefor can be P" sons ngarding tMs %w.
scheduled meeting to be advised of any obtained by a prepaid telephone call to Furtha information regarding topics changes in schedule, etc which may the cognizant ACRS staff member. Mr.
to be discussed, whether the meeting have occurred.
Herman Alderman (telephone 202/634-has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Dated: May 23.19e5.
1414) between 8:15 am and 5 00 p.m, Chairman's ruhng on nquets for the Morton W.ubaAin, EDT. Persons planning to attend this Assistant L ecutive Directorfor Project meeting are urged to contact the above opportunity to present oral statements and the time allotted therefor can be 1tarie w.
Individual one or two days before the obtained by a prepaid telephone call to
[R Don 85-13098 Filed 5-30-as. a.45 am) scheduled meeting to be advised of any the cognizant ACRS staff member.Mr.
changes in schedule, etc., which may Herman Alderman (telephone 302/6H-aumo coes tseess.es I
have occurred.
1414) between 8:15 am and 520 p.m.
Advisory Committee on Reactor Dated: May 23.1985.
EDT. Persons planrdng to attend this Saf; guards, Subcommittee on Morton W.uberkla.
meeting are urged to contact the above
- 1 l
Maintenance Practices and Assistant D ecutive Dinctorfor Project named individual one or two days Procedures; Meeting fteview.
before the scheduled meeting to be l
%e ACRS Subcommittee on
[m Doc. a5-130e9 filed 5-as-as, s.45 mm) advised of any changes in schedules.
etc, which may have occurred.
Maintenance and Procedures will hold a maAses caos -
U
June 4, 1985
. x..-
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR THE JUNE 18, 1985 5[.*3h$/;
JOINT MEETING OF THE ACRS SUBCOMMITTEES.ON
- ^
HUMAN FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES
., 4.,
~.., _
1:00 p.m.
Opening Statements D. Wa~rd
.10 Min.
1:10 p.m.
Development / Organization D. Kleinke 20 Min.
EEI Employee Selection Testing 1:20 p.m.
EEI Employee Selection D. Kleinke 25 Min.
Testing Projects 1:55 Test Development and D. K1'einke 45 Min.
Validation BREAX 2:40 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
Plant Operator Selection A. Mascitti System (POSS):
45 Min.
Components 3:45 p.m.
Validation 20 Min.
25 Min.
4:05 p.m.
Experience 4:30 p.m.
Current Use of EEI D. Kleinke 20 Min.
Tests in the Nuclear Industry 4:50 p.m.
Closing Statements D. Ward 10 Min.
5:00 p.m.
' ADJOURN O
ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON HUMAN FACTORS /MAINTENANE PRACTICES LOCATION ROOM 1046 at 1:00 PM
.4~. p.-
DATE JUNE 18,1985 ATTENDANCE LIST PLEASE PRINT:NAME AFFILIATION
?f KS kmaa, S 25 MM me-A-CRS k.Ykac1 A<2M 0 L. 6. %,a OS S 4dO5v, n
L
(? An nien d
TGWT HL"4AN FACTORS / -
lRS SUBC0d.MITTEE MEETING ONMAINTENANCE PRACTICES _ AND PROCEDURES PCAT13.h ROOM 1046
/f @ [ ///
(TE:
JUNE 18,1985 ATTENDANCE LIST
(.EASEPRINT:
NAME BADGE NO.
AFFILIATION 3dIY# W-I.69F 7
'IC.
OESTEtt.E
/f.#Sd>-rii Fo12 4 Da Et - /9 we r L
. /(teingc-Eo9/'t c5 e7 c
n N u A lt t a i
/dr> / 23 Iff /A Jh >bdo Q
%O kmq kse. web buy ~sl1i M L r-wi a W Eo96 Ac4s O :
.Ce&'
O Di pu rRC e
e O
m
ATTACHENT D JUNE 18,1985 ACRS SUBCOPt(ITTEES ON HUMAN FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES HANDOUTS I
1.
EEI Employee Selection Testing for Nuclear Power Plants I
+
,. ~
_