ML20137A777
| ML20137A777 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1984 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137A745 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-663 PROC-840229, NUDOCS 8511260097 | |
| Download: ML20137A777 (57) | |
Text
..
r L
TURKEY POINT PLANT I
PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM L
PRESENTED TO r
L THE US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IE: REGION 11 FEBRUARY,1984 BY FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY i
~-
..= -
m\\
/iTi;,
I
,. b E
g.,
.. ' b {t. p;. '0h))&*f.'.
d'-
'lV c;..S
.' V>
- i. f1 :Q[7.;j Q.
f T
N I.
!,t A
'I u, :.
'.e 5% v' sop'([f. t.
c.w
- ~ ~
s
"?;by " ??,,
,, - p ',. C,I{3NNy }
.y
., h 8
vs
+*r f
- n..,..,) _, - Q 4
.,,n
,;, nun c >
w G,. ;JjguG.;;'%
l 4. : :
~
r'
,~
'4j, h
f p-
.t;.
% Q,,
.ss x."
,s
~
, ' *[, ;
,,"<:t:tllz
,, 1
?w;
. ' ~
,y g ',ns r
?:.-
.s >,%
.. ~
s:>,<-
,w
,N
W
. f.5
-, f
~,, _ '
. s. s h
., y Q As
'N - '
J 4 e, tr? s:S~.- g v
3
']
zm-s
,+5 e
)- s i
.,q
';.; r
- .. +
- s Yb{
lf, ;
j
. c f y^
y
, :1 l-
..m.Hy g,a; 7.
f.
p-g' n.
,g,, ;h l"
- ( -
.< <;,,w 1,
(p c+r u
- i.,, i.",, a*j 4
r.
s-w -
8511260057 851112 1'
i TURKEY POINT PLANT PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM l
l l
l l
l
~_..-
l
' TA8LE OF CONTENTS 1
1.
INTRODUCTION l
II.
PURPOSE III.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION IV.
PROGRAM CONTROLS 3
V.
SUMMARY
ATTACHMENTS:
1 PROGRAM SCHEDULE 2
PROGRAM ELEMENTS i
i i
I i
l.
1 i
4
.-,-,g_-_.
9
,,ye-.-,m u
,e s
,i.,,._w,-gy.
9.w9-,..
-9_.,-,.yg.
-,.+
y u--
wy
-g.
ym,-
m,,
veg,w+.
pyyy
+-
I.
INTRODUCTION This document represents Florida Power and Light Company's program to upgrade the performance of our Turkey Point Pl ant.
The program is designed to address the performance and programatic problems that have resulted f rom extensive pl ant modi fications and repai rs ' and to upgrade our system to the current corporate and regul atory requi rements.
The various elements have been brought under one broad program to enhance coordination ef forts, better utilize resources and provide the proper management control to ensure accompli shment of all objectives.
The program's scope is broad and covers pl ant and corporate aspects of operations.
This document is specific to Turkey Poi nt Pl ant however, where appropri ate, the results and lessons learned will be applied to the St. Luci e Pl ant.
3-II.
PURPOSE Thi s report presents FPL's pl ans for a Performance Enhancement Program to be developed and impl emented at the Turkey Poi nt Pl ant.
The Program pl ans are the culmination of an extensive analysis of the pl ant's existing operations, present and future needs, on-going improvement acti vi ti es, and new design enhancement areas.
The scope of the analysis covered a wide variety of pl ant activities and included all major departments.
In addi ti on, r.an ag ement support activities at FPL's General Of fices vere also ex ami n ed.
The Performance Enhancement Program presented in this report reflects FPL's continuing commitment to provide for the safe and ef ficient generation of electric power.
In effecting this commitment through the development, i mpl ement ati on, and maintenance of this Enhancement P ro g r am, FPL has taken measures to assure its success, including:
Commi tment of dedi cated resources - The exi sti ng and addi ti on al resources necessary to accomplish the program objectives are being evaluated and allocated.
Assignment of specific responsibilities - The program objectives have been transl ated into a number of di screte projects and tasks with specific i ndividu al s responsible and authority assigned.
Corporate integration - The program, while focused primarily on the Turkey Point Pl ant, represents a corporate commitment and, as such, extends beyond-departmental bound ari es.
FPL's objectives in developing the program plans were based on a consolidated approach to implementing the program el ement s.
The advantages of such an approach over separate impl ement ation of individual action items are to focus dedi c at ed and timely attention to program objectives, optimize resource us age, and provide for an ef fective means of managing the program.
In addition, this approach provides for the integration of activities between projects.
The resultant attributes of the Performance Enhancement Program are that it is:
Comprehensive - The scope of the program is broad and af f ects corporate and pl ant performance.
The program provides for the enhancement of many aspects of nuclear operations including f acility conditions, control processes, personnel development and system interaction.
l 1
l
. Det ailed - As di scussed l ater i n the report, the program objectives have been transl ated i nto speci fic proj ects, t asks, and subt asks th at are discrete, measurable, and deliverable.
This level of det ail will allow for a structured and monitorable approach to impl ement ati on.
Coordi nated - The program impl ement ation pl an i s structured to allow for communication and coordination in the accomplishment of individual elements.
This will minimi ze duplication of ef forts, f acili t ate impl ement ation, and promote st and ardi z ati on.
Attainable - The development of the tasks to be accomplished and the schedule for thei r accomplishment was based on an objective assessment of priority and resource considerations. This will assure the timely and thorough completion of program objectives.
Sust ai ni ng - FPL strongly believes that the ennancements developed and implemented as a result of this program must continue to be ef fective and responsive.
As such, speci fic manageri al and administrative controls have been pl anned to ensure that these enhancements are ef fectively maintained and upd ated.
I
_i.,_.-.
_ _ -. ~.. _ _,
-S-
- III, PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Turkey Point Pl ant Performance Enhancement Program was developed to meet four specific objectives:
Continued safe and reli able pl ant operation Improved pl ant and site materi al conditions Increased emphasis on quality performance in systems, controls and personnel Continued responsiveness to regul atory requi rements and corporate goals Since these objectives are interactive and expansive, a task force comprised of key pl ant and corporate management personnel was convened to develop the program.
Through detailed analysis and problem solving sessions, it b ec ane l
apparent that the program objectives could be ef ficiently achieved by consolidating the many new and existing projects into four primary areas:
Facility / site Betterments c
System Interaction Personnel Development Management Controls Once these major areas were defined, the task force had to ensure that the scope for each area was consistent with the objectives, compatible with ongoing ef forts and m an ageabl e.
As such, it became necessary to further segment the areas into distinct projects; with each project headed by a designated Project Manager.
This effort produced an integrated Performance Enhancement Program consisting of:
AREA:
FACILITY / SITE BETTERMENTS PROJECTS:
Site Facility Upgrade Operations Enhancements AREA:
SYSTEM INTERACTION PROJECTS:
Procedures Configuration Control Program AREA:
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS:
T r ai ni n g Management Action Pl an AREA:
MANAGEMENT CONTROLS PROJECTS:
Li censi ng QA and QC Maintenance Management Sy s t em
-.-._ -._ =. -,. - -
To increase control and ensure thoroughness, objectives for each project were defined.
These objectives were based upon mitigating symptomatic concerns encompassed within the project and accounting for actions previously taken, currently underway or projected for future i mpl em en t ati o n.
For each objective, a di screte set of clearly defined measurement criteri a was establi shed.
These criteri a ensure that each project will remain focused on the objectives and that progress will be monitorable.
Once the project objectives and measurement criteri a were specified, the projects were further subdivided into tasks and subt asks, as appropri at e.
The tasks and subtasks represent the base components for project control.
As each task and subt ask was identi fied, estimates pert ai ni ng to requi red resources, current st atus, durati on, interfaces, and constraints were made.
These estimates were input into a computeri zed scheduling system resulting in living project schedules that are considered to be both accurate and achi ev abl e.
Att achment 1 depicts the overall Turkey Point Pl ant Enhancement Program schedule.
4 to this report provides the detailed program el ements includi ng:
Project objectives Project measurement cri teri a Project el ement s Project schedules
.. IV.
PROGRAM CONTROLS An important f actor in the success of the Performance Enhancement Program is the application of adequate controls l
to assure the effective and timely accomplishment of prog r am obj ecti v es.
Collectively, these controls provide the mechanisms to:
Delineate responsibility Report progress Monitor program accomplishments Perform independent veri fi c ati on Ensure accurate and timely updating Sustain program objectives f
The specific control measures to be applied to this program are:
I i
Identification of Deliverables - For each Project Task / Subtask there are discrete project deliverables i denti fied i n the Measurement Cri teri a.
Proj ect st atu s will be monitored and reported based upon criteri a 4
st atus.
Internal Audits - FPL will schedule periodic audits by the Quality Assurance Department to provide for
]
verification of program status and accomplishments.
l These audits will review the project measurement criteri a and current schedule status against act u al i
accomplishments.
Maintenance of Schedule - The schedule presented in this i
report will be maintained throughout the program development and implement ation phases.
Use of the computerized scheduling system will allow the generation of summary progress reports at the subt ask, t ask, and i
project levels.
This will provide the appropri ate level of monitoring detail for each manageri al level.
Program Man agement - In addition to the project managers and task managers identified in Section III, FPL has committed organi zational resources to focus senior j
m an ag ement attention on the development and l
implementation of this program.
The program management l
organizational structure is depicted below:
i I
I l
h 9
Vice President of Nuclear Energy
( J. W.
Wi lli ams) 4 P rog r am Support Staff i
l i
Project Project i
Project l
Project Manager Manager M an ag e r Manager l
i
-Task
-Task
-Task
-Task Manager M an ag e r M an ag er Manager
-Task
-Task
-Task
-Task Manager Manager Manager Manager Total of 9 project managers.
I The organizational responsibilities will be as follows:
I The Vice President of Nucle'ar Energy will have overall authority for the implementation of the program and shall be responsible for successful completion of the program.
i The Project Manager shall be responsible for l
coordination and completion of all task elements involved in the applicable project.
He shall assure that all project objectives are met and shall veri fy I
ef f ective impl ement ation.
He shall report project status on a monthly basis directly to the Vice President of Nuclear Energy.
The Task Manager shall be responsible for completion of assigned task elements on schedule and f or meeting or exceeding applicable standards of quality.
He shall report directly to the Project Manager.
The Program Support Staf f shall be responsible for co-ordinating activities between projects, consolidating project data for Vice Presidenti al and Executive Committee review and maintaining overall program schedul e.
Addi ti on al ly, as part of the overall management review process, a summary status of program progress shall be made a scheduled agenda item for the semi-annual Executive Revi ew Commi ttee meetings.
--,-_----n--
_g.
V.
SUMMARY
The Performance Enhancement Program i s a broad _ based integrated ef fort to promote the safe and ef ficient operation of the Turkey Point Pl ant.
The program, as presented in this report, consolidates a substanti al number of enhancement ef forts, both ongoi ng and newly i niti ated,
into a single, coordinated, and ef ficient pl an.
FPL has and will continue to focus the appropri ate management attention to assure the timely success of the program.
The program's success is further strengthened by the following f actors:
The program is responsive to identified concerns as well as future pl ant needs.
Dedicated resources have been or will be allocated to accomplish the program objectives.
Ef fective program controls have been instituted to monitor progress.
The program is being controlled by senior management personnel.
The program is self-sustaining.
It should be noted that the results and lessons learned f rom the implementation of the Enhancement Program will be applied, where appropri ate, to the St. Luci e Pl ant.
FPL will continue to evaluate the ef fectiveness of the program during the development, implement ation, and mai ntenance phases.
This will be done to assure that the program remains a dynamic and vi able mechanism, responsive to changi ng needs and envi ronments.
i l
1 i
ATTACHMENT 1 PROGRAM SCHEDULE
S N
I 9
A C
R H
G 3P Ma f
O A
f E
R Sc n
P T
2f N
T
/t A
da N
I L
CM e
P E
AC M
E E
E DR C
L T
C RA A
U N
N PS i
D I
A E
O N
H P
R C
E S
Y E
E R
C R
N ll l
U lN A
T t
7 s
8 F
7 n
9 e
J 8
F 1
R l
R E
0 A
P l
6 l
l 1
1 N
f t
0 6
f l
C 6
M 1
m S
E 8
0 M
l D
V A
0 O
4 6 lJ 3
N E a 8
0V 1
l 6
Fl 9
J
/ A 1
7 M
EE Df A
D9 l
M1 M
l F
l E
J t
ll 6
u D
0 M
E l
8 H
E J
S i
4 C
T 0
A l
S J
G l
5 Y
S W
l 8
S 0
l i
3 i
4 A
l l
l 5
1 G
A 5
5 e
8 lJ C
T W
P R
8 8
9 J
0 N
0 3
T G
G N
1 2
l 2
E U
M 4
4
)
J 2
1 I
A P
R D
l D
E 8O R
A J
3 T
E A
E A
M VR P
3 5
A O
M 4
G M
l R
E OT 2
M C
8 2 A U
F 3
N 4 4
1 T
60 0
A F
l N
R sll P
N E
A 0
J U
A 2 C R
S M
1 O
i l
T G
E l
t 7
L N
f 4
4
)
U 2
E D
0 T
E 0
A R
f l
I 1
C l
M P
C S
N S
M l
L S
S T
T L
A A
A 4
I 4
E 4
3 L
N RA 8
i J
4 C
4 0
4 R
R 4
G 4
E 4
N COC 9 l
9 A
8 1
8 U
U 8
N 8
M 8
E I
RV 1
J T
PO l
B F
B T
B D
G B
B E
B S
1 N
I M
E E
4 E
E I
E 4
E 3
E 4
2 Z
I E
F A
F E
0 E
l F
E F
R F
C F
F M
A I
A A
C
/
O N
N E
I T
1 I
C 1
I I
4 M
M A
A P
R 0
R A
l I
M l
1 m
F 3
J 2
F 1
J E
l l
l l
4 S E
5 6
7 48 8
2 3
44 I C 1
N A 8
8 R
N A
M A
LR B
B P O M
F E
E
!I 2
F F
E la P 1
I P
T E
R RU I
47 8$
BR EA F M 86 8
mo l
l fEL RP A M I O SC 8
0 9
E PPF EE4 PP1P e T irP E I
f C
f E
O JT OOm RL U PPF 4
ATTACHMENT 2 PROGRAM ELEMENTS
PRIMARY AREA 1 FACILITY / SITE BETTERMENTS SCOPE:
To enhance the working environment and system controls to promote a more p ro f es si on al atmosphere.
PROJECTS:
1.
Site Facility Upgrade 2.
Operations Enhancement w
)
1-1 PROJECT 1 PROJECT:
Site Facility Upgrade PROJECT MANAGER:
H.E..Yaeger PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
To develop and implement a site f acility upgrade that will assuage our concerns and enhance the following:
Prof essional work envi ronment Communi c ati on s Mo r al e/ at ti tud e Centrali zed Site Management control Ef fective utilization of manpower On-Site training f acilities Fossil / Nuclear separation Document control storage f acilities Adequate departmental f acilities Dep artment al interface
1-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Construct a new Nuclear Administration Building and associ ated support f acilities
-Relocate personnel into the new f acilities Convert and refurbish vacated f acilities in accordance with the overall pl an (Project Elements)
Eliminate temporary f acilities (t r ai l ers )
PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Facility Ev alu ati on Study H.
E.
Yaeger 1.1 JPE Revi ew H. Jabali 1.2 Develop Initi al Budget H.
E.
Yaeger 2.0 Si te Preparation H.
D.
Mantz 2.1 Engineering S. Br ai n 2.2 Budget / Schedule M. Wilburn 2.3 Construction G. Gram 3.0 Nuclear Admi ni.stration Building H.
E.
Yaeger 3.1 Engi nee ri ng H. J ab ali 3.2 Budget / Schedule H. D.
Mantz 3.3 Contract P ack age H. J ab ali 3.4 Construction H. D. Mantz 3.5 Personnel relocation H. E.
Yaeger
1-3 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
(continued)
Task No.
Task Task Manager 4.0 Phase IV Upgrade 4.1 Provide decontamination shower f acility To be assigned 4.2 Provide new HP control facility To be assigned 4.3 Convert N.M. Building from HP to To be assigned Maintenance f acility 4.4 Convert Contractor Entrance Building To be assigned to security complex 4.5 Convert existing Maintenance Building to To be assigned Ch emi s t ry and apprentice training f acility 4.6 Provide technical training f acility To be as si gned 4.7 Provide new HP training f acility To be assigned 4.8 Provide struct.ure for simul ator To be assigned 4.9 Evaluate the need for additional f acilities To be assigned for stores and PGM 4.10 Provide a contaminated motor overhaul To be assigned f acility 4.11 Personnel relocation H. E.
Yaeger 5.0 Phase V Impl ement ati on H.
E.
Yaeger 5.1 Remove temporary f acilities H.
E.
Yaeger
.-=
I PROJEC f Pf PPEP sfAtt
't FFBa4 f uRatt P0aul PL Agf
$dNM A4 f WOR 4 $N G SCHf DOL E PROJECfr2 e48J M00f O'FE 9 AR CHARf CR APHICS PLOT PfrPEP COMPLtt104 an0(C87 PERFORMA4CE ENHANCFMf MI PROCR AM si f f F Arill t f UPCR ADF 90Rf COOFS 2345 luf(RW A6 y MDWIMi$p PACf 9
$HF(f 3 Rom DAff s 3Figge 1984 1985 1986 i
FlNlA M lJ lJ A lS l0 N j0 J
F lM l A N lJ lJ A lS l0 N lD J F lNl A M lJ lJ : A lS l0 N l0 I
IFEB84 ll IF EB84 l
101 ACl _ITY EVA _UAT ION 3TUD f IFEB84 l2 6DEC 84 102 51TE PRE ' ARA Il0N l
IF EB84 20 jab 86 i 103 1UCL IAR 4DMI 41ST RAT 1 0N BlJILD ING i
l 1JAN85 30 DECE 61 104 PHASE IV UPGR/,DE I
I J At 85 30 DECE 6l 105 PHASE V IMPLEMENT /,TIOb 4
h PROJECT SCHEDULE f
SITE FACILITV UPGaADI 14 9
I
2-1 PROJECT 2 PROJECT:
Operations Enhancement PROJECT MANAGER:
C. J Baker PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
To enhance the safe reli able operation of Turkey Point by continued and augmented manageri al and administrative programs that include:
Completing the manning studies and adjusting shif t complement accordingly Reviewi ng communication channels between all pl ant departments and implementing i'mprovements Revi ewi ng and enhancing the present Independent Veri fi cation Program Continuing to enhance the present Equipment Identi fi cation Program Revi ewi ng and enhancing the Operations Turnover P rog r am Refining and increasing pl ant management interface with all levels of pl ant personnel Augmenting the present Housekeeping Program Enhancing Regul atory and Procedural Compli ance PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Administrative support in the Control Room Adjusted shi f t complement based on evaluation results QIP sessions dedicated to improving interdepartment communi c ati on s Revi sed Independent Veri fication procedures Personnel trained on Independent Veri fi c ati on Program for Equipment Indenti fi c ati on Mark and veri fy all selected equi pment Shi f t Turnover Sheets Shi f t Turnover Trai ning
2-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
(continued)
Management Action Pl an f or Pl ant Manager Housekeeping standards
' Housekeeping Base Line established Train all personnel in Housekeeping expectations Train applicable personnel on Regul atory and Procedural Compli ance i ssues 0
4 L
.I fl 1
2-3 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Operations Sh ft Manning T. A.
Fi nn 1.1 Provide Administrative Support to T. A.
Fi nn Control Room 1.2 Complete Manning Evaluation T. A.
Fi nn 1.3 Adjust Shift Compl ement T. A. Fi nn 2.0 QIP Sessions Dedi cated to Communi cations W.
K.
Sterett 3.0 Independent Veri fi c ati on J. A. Labarraque 3.1 Revi ew and Consolidate Independent D. W. Haase Verification Process 3.2 Revise Procedures D. W. Haase
- 3. 3' Train Personnel W. C. Miller 3.4 Audit Impl ement ati on M. J. Cri sler 4.0 Equipment I ndenti fi c ati on J. Webb 4.1 Development Equipment Id enti fi c ati on To be assigned P rog r am 4.2 Mark Selected Equipment To be assigned 4.3 Audit Impl ement ati on M. J. Cri sler 5.0 Operations Turnover T. A. Fi nn 5.1 Develop Turnover Sheets J. Crockford 5.2 Issue for Tri al Use J. Crockford 5.3 Train Operators J. Crockford 5.4 Audit Impl ement ati on J. J. Crisler 6.0 Man agement Action Pl an C. J. Baker 6.1 PTP Management Meetings C. J. Baker 6.2 Identi fication and Cl ari fication of C. J. Baker PTP Nuclear Policies
~
6.3 Evaluate admi ni strative burden on A. Olivera pl ant staff 6.4 Implement recommendations of study To be assigned 7.0 Housekeeping C. J. Baker 7.1 Develop St and ards/ Programs J.
P. Lowman 7.2 Establish Pl ant Housekesping Baseline C. J. Baker 7.3 Train Personnel Pl ant Supervi sion 7.4 Surveil Impl ement ati on D.
Jones
I 2-4 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
(continued)
Task No.
Task Task Manager 8.0 Reg ul at o ry and Procedural Compli ance C.
J'. Baker 8.1 Revi ew and Consolid ate Regul atory J. A. Labarraque Compliance Issues based upon personnel error 8.2 Develop Training Program on Regul atory W. C. Miller Compli ance 8.3 Train Applicable Personnel W. C. Miller a
l l
I l
R
- f WOJEC f P fit Ei*
STARf e FE904 f uRKET Potal FL Ant SUMMART taoMaIeG SCHEDULE PROJECf /2 0293 PLOf PfPPEP COMPLEfl04 alDEC8F PERFORMANCE ENHA4CFMENT PROCR AM MODE 0/FE 844 CHART CR APHICS RUN DATE 9 3Ff 894 OPERAfl0mS fBHA4CFMFNT SORT C00F$ 2345 INTERWAL* e M0m f M f St PAGE I
$HEEt i 1984 1985 F lh l A N lJ lJ A lS l0 N lD J
F lN l A N jJ lJ A lS l0 IFEB84 30A 'R84
~
201
]PER AT10 4S S ilFT MAN 41NG 2 MAR 84 []30MAY84 202 O IP C )MMU 41CA f10N 3 SE 3SIOi4S 2 MAR 84 l
l 2700T84 2
203 1NC EPEN DENT VER IFIC ATION
- ohhyu,AJ y
/5 bh-
~
lF E[B[84 220C1 85 l 204 EQUI ' MEN f ID ENTI 1CA fION IFEB84 30A 'R84
,205 JPER AT10 4S T JRNO /ER
,, a/ 9/l)N ~ ~
'"D"['
IF EB84 25APR85l 4
206 1ANA 3EME 4T ACT10 4 PL NN IFEB84I I 29JUL84 207 iOUS EKEE 'ING 1FEB84 l' 7SEF 84 208 REGU _ATO RY C JMPL IANC E paoJEct scutoutt OPERATIOR$ ERMANCENENT t.5
l PRIMARY AREA 2 SYSTEM INTERACTION SCOPE:
To provide more detailed systems and controls to fully describe and manage the design and operation of the f acility.
PROJECTS:
3.
Procedures 4.
Configuration Control Program i
s
3-1 PROJECT 3 PROJECT:
Procedures PROJECT MANAGER:
H.
N. Padu ano PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Complete development and implement procedures which neet the requi rements of NOREG 0737, Item I.C.1 Improve exi sting admi ni strative controls for procedures to address:
1)
Procedure format and criteri a 2)
Procedure controls 3)
Techni c al accuracy with the system design 4)
Compli ance with applicable techni cal st andards,
t echni c al specifications and other applicable rules and regul ations 4
Revi se saf ety-rel ated (S-R) procedures 1)
To meet new format, criteri a and controls 2)
To provide user-f riendly presentation of t ech ni c al steps 3)
To include clear acceptance criteri a 4)
To document "as-found" and " as-l ef t" performance i nf ormation, where appli cable 5)
To include human f actors Impl ement modi fi ed/revi sed procedures in a manner which:
1)
Assures personnel knowledge of new procedure f o rm at and controls 2)
Assures persunnel knowledge of technical steps and admi.ni strati on necess ary f or f ull compli ance with the new procedures 1
3-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Impl ement the 37 Phase I procedures Complete the Procedure Generation Package for NUREG 737-I.C.1 and submit to NRC Impl ement revised procedures to meet NUREG 0737, Item I.C.1 i n accordance with the Procedure Generation P ack age Implement procedure control admi ni strative procedures whi ch address procedure format, philosophy, and criteri a to f acilitate procedure revision Implement procedure administrative procedures which provide admin. strative control of all pl ant procedures Revi sion of 5-R procedures in a phased manner to incorporate the new criteri a and administrative controls
3-3 TASK ELEMENTS:
T ask No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Implement Phase 1 Procedures J.
P alme r 1.1 Compl ete techni cal Feedb ack and PNSC
- f. Fi nn app rov al 1.2 Impl ement new procedures J.
Palmer 1.3 Complete commi tment to revise selected H.
Johnson Emergency Pl anni ng Procedures 2.0 Implement Procedures for NUREG 0737 J.
Palmer Item I.C.1 2.1 Compl ete Procedure Generation P ack age J. Palmer 2.2 Revise affected procedures J. P almer 2.3 Conduct t r ai ni ng W. Mi l l e r 2.4 Implement procedures J. P almer 3.0 Impl ement Revi sed Procedure T.
Fi nn Admi ni st r ati ve Cont rol s 3.1 Develop format, philosophy, and J. Palmer criteri a for procedures (other than those in Task 2.0) 3.2 Develop procedural controls H.
N.
P adu ano 3.3 Review / revise rel ated admi ni st r ati v e D.
Jones procedures and impl ement 4.0 Implement Phase 2 Procedure Revisions J. Palmer 4.1 Fi rst priority Operating and J. Palmer Surveill ance procedures 4.2 Second priority Operating and J. Pal'mer Surveill ance procedures 4.3 S-R Maintenance procedures J. Mendietta 4.4 HP procedures P. Hughes 4.5 Remaini ng important Admi ni s t r ati v e J. Palmer procedures 4.6 Remai ni ng S-R Of f-Normal procedures J. Palmer 4.7 Update selected Emergency Pl anning H.
Johnson procedures 5.0 Impl em e nt Ph ase 3 Procedure Revi sions J.
Palmer 5.1 Remaining S-R procedures J.
P almer
~
t ifAR) i FEB84 fuRKEY Poluf PLA4f SUMMA 4' WOR 4 INC SCHF DUL E PROJECf/2 3293 COMPLEf104 llDECSP PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROCRAM ft00F OiFE 94R CHART cRAPHICS PROCFOURES TONT CODFS 2345 14 f ERW AL 4 MONTHt$1 PACE e SME E I e 1984 1985 1986 F INl A NlJ lJ 4lS l0 N IO J
F lN I A N lJ lJ A lS l0 Nl0 J F IN l A MjJlJ A lS l0 N
IFEB84 l 30A )R84 301
'HAS E1
' ROC'EDURlES 1F EB84 21 0EC851 302 4URE 3 07 37 ( l C. I) PROCEQURES IFEB84 l 29JIJL84 303 REV1 5E P ROCE ]URE ADM IN CONTROLS l 30JIJL84 21NOV85 l
304 l'HASIE2 PROCIEDURIE RE'/ISI ONS l 24 AUG8 5 16NOV86 l
305 PHASE 3 PROCEDURE REVISI ONS PROJECT SCHEDULl PROCEDURES 3-4
4-1 PROJECT 4 PROJECT:
Configuration Control Program PROJECT MANAGER:
W.
B.. Derri ck son PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Manage the Pl ant Change and Modification (PC/M) program to prevent negative impact on s af ety and control Provide improved control over PC/Ms by:
1).
Reducing the li fecycle of PC/Ms 2)
Detailed scoping, including designation of all responsibilities, as early as possible 3)
Identifying and controlling all pl ant-requi red documentation to expedite turnover and PC/M closeout Veri fy and maint ai n as-built st atus on all requi red d r awi n gs Formalize the existing startup and turnover processes to include ef fective controls for:
1).
Testing results document ation 2)
Resolution of design and/or construction defi ci enci es PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Implement the Project Review Bo ard at the site level Implement the PNE/JPM Interf ace Task Report, Rev. 2 into site level admi nistrative procedures Implement Construction Work Permit procedure Complete the backlog of S-R drawing updates Complete the as-built of the remainder of non-saf ety related drawings requi red for operation Implement criteria for control and turnover of no.n-d rawi ng document ati on i
4-2 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 PC/M Program G.R.
Gram 1.1 Establi sh PRB Meeting D ates C. J. Baker 1.2 Develop Flow Chart and Transmitt al Forms G.
R.
Gram 1.3 Establish Construction Work Permit G.
R. Gr am Procedure 2.0 Construction Document ation Ev alu ation G.
R.
Gram 2.1 Establish executive steering committee C. O. Woody 2.2 Intervi ews and f act finding Task Force Ch ai rm an 2.3 Issue Final Report Task Force Ch ai rm an 2.4 Begin implementation of Task Force To be assigned Recommend ati on s 3.0 Generation of FPL PTP Startup Manual C. J. Baker 4.0 Drawi ng Up-Date 0.
Beasley 4.1 Compl ete Saf ety Cl assi fication of all
- 0. Beasl ey D r awi n g s 4.2 As-built Backlog of Saf ety Rel ated PC/Ms W. Nortunen 4.3 As-built Remai nder of Non-Saf ety W. Nortunen Related PC/Ms requi red for operation 4.4 Establish Criteri a for Interim As-builts G. R. Gram of Operator-Requi red Drawi ngs 5.0 Control of Non-Drawi ng Document ation J. Labarraque 5.1 Establi sh and Implement criteri a for J. Labarraque Control of non-drawing document ation (i.e., vendor manu al s, test reports) i
_~>
PROJECT PIPPEP STARI I FE884 f uRREY PotNI PL ANI
SUMMARY
W 0 R et iNC SCHEDUL E PROJECI/2 8253 PEDDE 0/FE BAR CHART CRAPHICS PL0f PfPPEP COMPLEt104 IIDECSF PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROCRAM g
CONFICURAY10N CONTROL PCM SORT CODES 2345 INTERVALS e MONTH (St PACE e SMEET I RVet DATE 13FEB44 1984 F lNl A M lJ lJ ' AIS10 N
IFEB84 ]
1 MARE 4 401 PLANT CHANGE /MODIFICAT ION PROGRAM 2 MAR 84 l
l26NOV84 402 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTA TION REV IEW IFEB84 ](, MARE;4 403 FPL PTP STARTUP MANUAL IFEB84 l29JUN84 404 DRA WING UPD ATE 1FEB84 30A 'R84 405 NON DRAWING DOCUMENTAT ION i
l [-
PROJECT SCHEDULE CONFIGURATION CONTROL PROGRA 4-I
PRIMARY AREA 3 PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT SCOPE:
To improve the training and management programs to provide for more, ef f ective personnel growth and positive teamwork.
PROJECTS:
5.
T r ai ni n g 6.
Management Action Pl an I
.l k
/
5-J PROJECT 5 PROJECT:
T r ai ni n g PROJECT MANAGER:
K. E. Beatty PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
An alyze, design, develop, and implement performance-based training programs for Nuclear Pl ant Personnel Acqui re INP0 accreditation Obtain Pl ant Reference Simul ators Increase employee awareness of thei r accountabilities in regard to procedural compli ance, regul atory compli ance, and quality of work Enhance management's understanding of emergency /s af ety systems associ ated wi th both Nuclear Sites I
i l
L j
S-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Complete Performance-Based training programs for:
1)
All operator positions and Health Physics 2)
Mai nten ance and Chemi stry posi tions 3)
Reactor Engineering, Technical Dep artment and QC Implement Performance-Based training for the above positions Complete INP0 accreditation for the training programs for the above positions Complete a pl an to acqui re a high resolution pl ant ref erence simul ator and submit bid speci fications Take delivery of and oversee install ation of the pl ant ref erence simul ator Impl ement pl ant ref erence simul ator trai ning at the FPL f acility Impl ement an employee awareness training program, including delivery mode for continuing education
( ret r ai ni ng)
Impl ement a training program which describes the basis and methodology for regul atory compli ance and assess retraining requi rements l
~
m,
5-3 TASK ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Performance Based Training Programs K.
Beatty 1.1 Develop and impl ement performance based W.
Mi l l e r training programs for all operator J. Bates positions, and Health Physics techni ci ans 1.2 Develop and implement performance based J. Mendieta training programs for Maintenance J. Wade Journeymen and Foreman / Chief s and Chemi stry techni ci ans 1.3 Develop and impl ement perf ormance based J. Labb arque training programs for Reactor Engineering, D.
Jones Technical Department, and Quality Control personnel whose job functions are import ant to s af ety 2.0 INP0 Accreditation K.
Be at ty 2.1 Prepare for INP0 accreditation of Operator R. Boger and Health Physics training programs and be ready to meet INP0's schedule 2.2 Prepare for INP0 accreditation of R. Boger Mai ntenance and Chemi stry training programs and be ready to meet' INP0's schedule 2.3 Prepare for INP0 accreditation of Reactor R. Boger Engi neeri ng, Techni cal Department, Qu ali ty Control training programs and be ready to meet INP0's schedule 3.0 Pl ant Reference Simul ators John Velotta 3.1 Develop det ailed simul ator speci fications J. Whitehead and di stribute for RFQ 3.2 Select vendor and issue purchase order J. Velotta 3.3 Establish systematic program for J. Velotta overseeing the construction and acceptance testi ng of simul ators 3.4 Take delivery and oversee the installation ' J. Whitehead of simul ators on site 3.5 Develop and implement training programs for-W. Miller the operation and maintenance of simulators
- - ~
5-4 TASK ELEMENTS:
(continued)
Task No.
Task Task Manager 4.0 Employee Awareness Program W.
Mi l l er 4.1 Determine best delivery mode (i.e., formal W. Miller cl assroom, video t ape, text, etc.)
l 4.2 Develop program (s) compatible with W. Miller delivery mode selected 4.3 Present programs to all Nuclear Pl ant W. Mi ller i
personnel in a timely f ashion and i ncorporate into G.E.T.
for new employees and retraining purposes 5.0 M an ag ement Trai ni ng Program W. Miller 5.1 Develop topical outline and schedule W. Mi ll e r for a management training program that discusses the functional c ap abi l i ti es,
li mi t ati o n, and regul atory requi rements associ ated with the emergency /saf ety systems at both pl ant sites 5.2 Develop text materi al and ex ansi n ati ons J. Palmer 5.3 Implement p r.og r am W. Miller i
)
1 n
PROKC1 PirPEP SIARI I FEBO4 IURREV PolNI PLANT SumAR T W0RK iNG $CHE DUL E PRQJECI/2 $293 P
PLOT PTPPEP C0tfLEll04 16 MAR 07 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROCRAM MODE 0/FE SAR CHART CRAPHICS RUN DATE 14Ff884 TRAININC 50Rf CODES 2345 INTERVAte t MONTHt$)
PACE I SMEEI a 1984 1985 1986 1987 F {Ml A MlJlJ A lS IO N {D J
F lM l A MlJlJ A lS l0 N lJ J FlMlA M lJ lJ A lS l0 N lD J F lM IF EB84 10M/ Y86 l
501
'ERF JRMA 4CE '3ASE1 TR NINil4G PIRGM 1F EB84 19JUN86l 502
' REP FOR &O 3TAl 4 IN 'O ACCREDIT.
I 1F EB84 16 1AR8 7 l 503 31 MU _AT0 1 AC ]UIS I T 1014 PR;)GRAli IFEB84 l 28AUG84 504 EMPL ]YEE AWA RENE 3S P:ROGRAM IFEB84 30A 'R84 505 1ANA 3EME 4T T LAIN ING 'ROGlRAM PROJECT SCHEDULE TRAINIIIS 5-5 t
m
6-1 PROJECT 6 PROJECT:
Management Action Pl an PROJECT MANAGER:
C. 0. Woody PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Enhance the current nuclear operations organizational ef ficiencies by:
1)
Restructuring the Nuclear Energy Department to:
a.
Ensure a committed source of strategic di rection for Nuclear Operations and Nuclear Licensing b.
Provide consistent and strong tactical di rection and support to operating pl ants c.
Further decentralize responsibility and authority to pl ant management d.
Enhance the use of corporate technical st af f to monitor operational performance 2)
Evaluating the adequacy of Nuclear Energy Department resources and making necessary adjustments 3)
Instituting a Manageri al Development Program 4)
Enhancing Management Information Systems to ensure:
a.
Information flow processes and approval is ef fi ci ent b.
Files / documentation are centrally maintained and acces si bl e c.
Appropri ate information is automated Ensure that personnel motivation remains high by:
1)
Accelerating implementation of the Quality Improvement Program 2)
Providing increased management training for supervisors 3)
Expandi ng 'the personnel recogni tion program
6-2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
(continued)
Expand the corporate management i nvol vement wi th, and oversight of, the operating pl ants by:
.1)
Insti tuti ng programs th at increase senior management interacti on at the Tu rkey Poi nt pl ant 2)
Continuing programs that provide senior management overview of pl ant perf ormance 3)
Impl ementi ng a Pl ant Performance Monitoring System for senior management 4)
Strengthening the Management by Objectives Program 5)
Ch arti ng key pl ant performance parameters and goals at the corporate of fices
6-3 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
An organizational manual that delineates the responsibilities and authorities of appropri ate st af f and line management Adjustment of personnel resources based upon manpower studies conducted in select areas A manageri al development pl an to ensure trained candidates for key management positions An an alysi s report providing measures to optimize i n f o rm ati on flow and storage Adjusted information flow and storage based upon analysis report recommend ati on s Extension of the Quality Improvement Program to all levels of the Nuclear Energy Department Completion of at least one Management Development Course by at least 75% of eligible personnel each year A recognition program for outstanding performance A program for periodic on-shif t evaluations by senior m an ag ement Semi-annu al Executive Review Meetings on site Periodic pl ant / department manager staf f meetings Semi-annual Quality Assurance Committee Meetings An INP0-based Pl ant Perf ormance Monitoring System f or senior management Extension of Management by Objectives Program to fi rst line supervisor level Key pl ant performance parameters and goals charted for the Nuclear Energy Department t
- -w
- ~ - -
6-4 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0
'Org ani z ati on al Issues C. O.
Woody 1.1 Determi ne responsibili ty/ authority of C.
O.
Woody key managers 1.2 Develop organizational manual R. J. Acosta 1.3 Implement manu al C. O. Woody 2.0 Resource Allocation C. O. Woody 2.1 Perform a resource allocation evaluation A. Olivera for select areas 2.2 Develop a Nuclear Energy manpower pl an C. O. Woody 3.0 Manageri al Development C. O. Woody 3.1 Formul ate a manageri al development program C. E. Allison 3.2 Implement manageri al development program C. E. Allison 4.0 M an ag ement In form ati on Systems C. O. Woody 4.1 Analyze and adjust information flow C. F.
Fe rri d ay 4.2 Analyze and implement coasolidated J. H.
Ruby records storage 4.3 Design and implement automated dat a systems To be assigned 5.0 Extend QIP throughout the Nuclear Energy R.
E. D awson Department 6.0 Provide Management Development Courses C.
E. Allison 7.0 Personnel Recognition C. O. Woody 7.1 Develop a program for recognizing R. E Dawson outstanding performance 7.2 Impl ement perf ormance recogni tion program C. O. Woody 8.0 Senior Management Involvement C.
O.
Woody 8.1 Provide periodic senior manager shi f t C. O. Woody coverage 8.2 Conduct on-si te semi-annual executive C. O. Woody revi ew meetings 8.3 Conduct periodic pl ant / department manager J. W. Wi l li ams staff meetings 8.4 Produce a video tape by C 7 orate To be assigned Management on the PTP Enhancement Program for present ation to all department employees I
y w - -.., -.
6-5 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
(continued)
Task No.
Task Task Manager 9.0 Senior Management Control J. W. Wi lli ams 9.1 Conti nue semi-annual QA Committee meeti ngs J.
E. Vessely 9.2 Develop and implement a pl ant perf ormance W. A.
Kl ei n monitoring system 9.3 Extend MB0 program to fi rst line C. O. Woody supervision 9.4 Chart key pl ant performance parameters R.
E. Dawson e
a 1
s.
PROJECT PIPPEP
$fARI I FE984 f uRREY Potal s L Amt suMMARr M0RM l5C SCHEDUii PROJECf/2 0293 PLOT P'PPEP COTLETIO4 IsDECSP ftRFORMA4CE ENHA4CENE%f P"40CI AM MODE 0/*E 944 CHART CRAPHICS I'Um EATE 13FE984 MANICEMEvf Aff104 PROC %AM SORT CODES 23'5 BY T ET W AL 6 i MoufMISI PACE I SMFE1 e i
1984 1985 1986 l
F lM l A M lJ lJ A lS l0 N lD J FjMlA MlJlJ A lS l0 N lD Jl 1
I I
l IFEB84 30A 'R84 601 3RGA 4IZA fION 4L 1 3 SUE 3 l
IFEB84 '
l 28AUG84 602 RESO JRCE ALL JCAT ION l
l l
1FEB84 l 30MAY8 4 l
603 1ANA 3ERI 4L D EVEL JPME 4T i
1F E884 30JA 486 l l
604 1ANA 3EME 4I I 4FOR 1ATI QN S fSTEl1S IFEB84 l2 6DEC 84 i
605 EXTE 4D O IP -
NUC ENE RGY DEPT l
1FEB84 l2 6DEC 84 l
606 1ANA 3EME 4T D EVEL JPME 4T COURSIE l
I 1APRH4 'l l 29J JL84 l
l 607 PERSONNEL RECOGNil 10N IFEB84 30A 'R84 608 3ENI JR M ANAG EMEN f IN /0LVIEMEN f IF EB84 30JA 486 l i
609 3ENI 3R M NNAG EMEN f CO 4TR0l_
f PROJECT SCHEDULE NANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN
PRIMARY AREA 4 MANAGEMENT CONTROLS SCOPE:
To refine the management information and support organizations to provide ef fective communications and control of issues af f ecti ng saf e operation.
PROJECTS:
7.
Licensing 8.
Maintenance Management System l
)
l l
,.:.L__.
7-1 PROJECT 7 PROJECT:
Li cen si ng PROJECT MANAGER:
- 0. F. Pearson PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Enhancement of the ef f ectiveness of on-site and of f-site licensing activities in order to improve coordination and control of al l NRC related activities through:
Development and implementation of an integrated NRC Commitment Control System Development and implementation of a resource based Living Schedule Development and implement ation of admi ni s t r ati v e controls governing the conduct of site and corporate licensing acti vi ti es.
PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
An operational NRC Commitment Control system which includes a functional tracking program with all user and administrative procedures complete and proper commitment pl anning and independent veri fication controls established throughout the of f-site and pl ant li censi ng o rg ani z ati on s.
The completion of a det ailed pl anning and development program for an integrated living schedule for pl ant m ai nt en an ce, repai r and backfit modi fications whi ch include program criteri a, hardware and computer programs and user and administrative procedures.
Administrative systems for communication, coordination and conduct of all on-site and of f-site NRC rel ated acti vi ti es.
i
)
1 7-2 PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Commi tment Tracking System J.
N. Burford i
1.1 Computerized NRC Commitment Tracking System J.
N.
Burford 1.2 Computer User Equipment J.
N.
Burford 1.3 Admi ni s t r ati v e J.
N.
Burford 2.0 Living Schedule J. A. DeMastry 2.1 In t eg r at ed (Living) Schedule J. A. DeMastry 2.2 Program Equi pment J. A. DeMastry 2.3 Ongoing maintenance and review pree, ram for J. A. DeMastry present and future integrated scht uling 3.0 Li censi ng Acti vi ti es J. Moab a 3.1 Administrative systems for on-site and J. Mo ab a of f-si te li censi ng activi ti es
+
' ~ ~ - - "
^ '
+
+-
--w,+
3m,,-g..
.__m m
__.__m l m.
PROJECT PTPPEP
$TARf I FEB84 lURREY PotNr PL ANT
SUMMARY
W0RN IN$ SCHE DUL E PROJECI/2 8203 PLOT PTPPEP COMPLETION 16 MAR 87 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROCRAM MODE 0/FE BAR CHART GRAPHIC $
'UN DATE 14FEB84 LICENSING PROCRAM SORT CODES 2345 INTERVAtt 4 MONTHtSI PAGE t SMEET I 1984 1985 F lN l A N lJ lJ A lS l0 N l0 J F lM l A M lJ lJ A
1FEB84 l 270CT84 701 C0l'MITP ENT TRACKING SYS TEM IF EB84 23A JG85 l
702. _.IVI 4G S JHED JLE 1FEB84 1 28AUG84 703
_. ICE 4 SIN 3 AC fIVI fIES 4
i I i
PROJECT SCHEDULE LICENSING 7-3 I
i i
I 8-1 PROJECT 8 PROJECT:
J. E. '/e s s ely PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Develop an improved overvi ew (i.e., au di ti n g,
inspection, and surveill ance) program that will:
1)
Provi de audi ti ng, surveill ance and inspection activities on a pl anned, increased and consistent basis 2)
Provide reporting to management that will:
a.
Result in effective and timely corrective actions b.
Indicate trends that will highlight potenti al problems to management and provide the mechanism for taking action: to prevent adverse consequences 3)
Provide an organizational structure that will assure that overviews are carried out and that reporting is timely and adequate 4)
Establish quality performance goals and measurements against these goals 5)
Elevate level of communication and review distribution and format of QA audit reports and responses 6)
Improve cooperati on, underst andi ng and communication between line and overview dep artment s on a d ay-to-d ay b asi s Develop det ailed pl ans, procedures, and instructions for implementing the program developed under Objective 1 above Obtain resources for increased ef forts on an on-going basis as determined to be needed Trained personnel and implementation of the programs developed l
l 8-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
A modified auditing process that provides for more re al time overvi ew An expanded inspection and surveill ance program pl an j
th at performs inspections and surveill ances of pl ant operations and maintenance activities on a pl anned, requi red, and consistent basi s.
Reports f rom the above two activities that are timely, reflect pl ant quality level, provide adequate trends to alert management to ch anges, and report distribution to pl ant management, NED staff and QA The establishment of quality performance goals and i ndi c ato rs 1
e j
8-3 j
\\
PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0
' '/4 Su rv ei l l an ce J.
E.
Vessely 1.1 Provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> QA surveillance 7 days /
T. Essinger week 1.2 Reevaluate surveill ance needs at T. Essinger quarterly review 2.0 QA/QC Verification & Inspection Functions J.
E. Vessely 2.1 Evaluate department al rol es and admi ni s-J. E. Vessely tration verification functions 2.2 In.pl emen t changes to provide verification J. E. Vessely functions in the appropri ate departments 3.0 QA Auditing & QC Inspection Programs R.
F. Eng1meier 3.1 Evaluate improvements to audit and R. F. Engimeter inspection programs to increase effectiveness 3.2 Impl ement audi t prog ram enh ancements R. F. Engimei er identified 3.3 Implement inspection program enhancements R. F. Engimei er i denti fi ed 3.4 Complete a detailed scoping study for J. B. Harper computerizing quality commitments 4.0 QA/QC Organizational Structure J.
E. Vessely 4.1 Evaluate organizational structure and J. E. Vessely communi cations to improve.ef f ectiveness of QA/QC 4.2 Impl ement org ani z ati on al and admi ni s-J. E. Vessely trative changes identified 5.0 Adequacy of Qu ali ty Indicators A. B ai l ey 5.1 Ex ami ne exi sti ng qu ality i ndi cators and A. B ai l ey recommend additions or deletions to provide an accurate management picture 5.2 Impl ement qu ali ty i ndi c ators ' as A. B ai l ey recommended
8-4 6.0 Communicate QA/QC Program Changes J.
E.
Vessely 6.1 Impl em ent i nterdepartmental interf aces M. Cri sl er to effectively communicate all the above D.
Jones t ask results ' to all appropri at e o rg ani z ati on s.
6.2 Veri fy other department al structures and M. Cri sler administration are implemented to support D.
Jones thei r role in qu ality 9
4 4
+n-.
n
l!
1-PROJECf Pf PPEP sfART I FE684 fuRnEt PO:sf PL Auf
$Umunt uORK ING SCHE DUL E PROJECf/2 8253 PLof PTPPEP COMPLE!10N 16 MAR 87 PERFORMAeCE EwMANCEMEnf PROGRAM MODE 0/FE BAR CHARf GRAPHICS Run DATE 44 FED 84 04/DC SDRT CODES 2345 f uf ERV AL *
- MONTHtS)
PACE 9
$ MEET I 1984 F IN l A M lJ lJ A lS IFEB84 C:ll M Aff84 l
801 OA SURVEILLANCE-24 HR T DA1 b/WP 1FEB84 l 14JUL84 802 REVIEW OA/DC VERIFICATIONi lNSF'EC-T.
IFE884 l28AUG84 803 OA AUDITING & OC INSPEC1 ION PGMS IMA (84 l27SEP84 i
804 OA/DC ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.
16MhY84 l
l27SEP84 805 ADEQUACY OF QUAL 1IY lPIDICATORS l
l 16MAY84 l
l27SEP84 l
306 COMMUNICATE DA/0C PROGRAN CHANGEE PROJECT SCHEDutt
@8E s.s
9-1 PROJECT 9 PROJECT:
Maintenance Management System PROJECT MANAGER:
K. N. Har ri s PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
Generating Equipment M an ag emen t System and Pl ant Wor _i Orders 1)
Develop training program for applicable Generating Equi pment Management System and Pl ant Work Order users 2)
Establi sh Nuclear Pl ant Reli abili ty Dat a Syst em (NPRDS) interf ace criteri a 3)
Evaluate Generating Equipment Management System to improve ef fectiveness in Nuclear Plants Materi al Condition of Pl ant 1)
Enhance corrosion protection program and structural maintenance system 2)
Develop and implement a program to more ef fectively manage and control the Pl ant Work Order backlog PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA:
Generating Equipment Management Sy s t em and Pl ant Work Orders 1)
Develop a checkli st for proper completion and documentation of work activities performed on Pl ant Work Orders 2)
Develop a management tracking system for backlog of work activities by craf t, pl ant conditions, manhours and number of Pl ant Work Orders 3)
In s t al l additional Cathode Ray Tubes at selected locations in the pl ants and Nuclear Energy Department to increase management accessibility 4)
Establish a Generating Equipment Management System training program for applicable personnel 5)
Modify Generating Equipment Management System programs database to produce reports that can be separated by pl ant system, craft, priority, pl ant conditions, number of Pl ant Work Orders, and I
On Hold Status to define workable backlog
9-2 PROJECT MEASUREMENT CRITERIA: (continued) 6)
Impl emen t scheduled system walkdowns to identify and document realistic corrective maintenance
. backlog (Plant Work Orders) 7)
Establish criteri a f or an acceptable backlog level 8)
Revi ew and upgrade exi sting pl ant procedures to improve the quality of Pl ant Work Orders and i
Generating Equipment Management System 9)
Establish a standard distribution of backlog tracki ng systems Materi al Condition of Pl ant 1)
Develop graphs to identify backlog (manual and/or computer generated)
J 2)
Perform engineering evaluation of corrosion protection program 3)
Evalu ate and modi fy Pl ant Work Order scheduling system to ensure that the' proper equipment is being repaired in an acceptable time f rame 4)
Schedule work activities by system, pl ant condition, area or priority to assist in controlling Pl ant Work Order backlog PROJECT ELEMENTS:
Task No.
Task Task Manager 1.0 Gener ati ng Ec ui pment Management K.
N.
H ar ri s System Upgrac e 1.1 Develop training program C. J. Doll 1.2 Trend / Track Backlog R.
E. Wernley 1.3 Applicability to Nuclear Pl ants C. L. Wilson 1
J.
P. Lowman 1.4 Backfit/ Construction interf ace L. C. Huenniger 1.5 Nuclear Pl ant Reli ability Data P.
K.
Green System interface 1.6 Revi ew and upgrade exi sti ng pl ant J. P. Mendieta procedures 2.0 Mater..1 Condition of Pl ant K.
N.
Harris 2.1 Backlog evaluation J.
P. Mendi eta i
2.2 Engineering evaluation for Corrosion J. V. Orlando P rot ecti o n 2.3 Periodic system inspection J.
P. Mendi et a i
.._..m r
1 l
( *#0 JECT PTPPEP
$1ARI I FEB84 IUIHt(T P0lNT PL ANI SU* twt f W 0 A et INC SCHEDULE PROJECf/2 8203
~l I' Pt of PfPPEP CorFLEflom 14DECSF PERFORMANCE ENMANCEMENT PROGRAM MODE 0/FE BAR CHAAF CAAPMICS l
[
RUN DATE 8 3FEBee MAINT FtANAGEFEWI SYSTEM SDRT CODES 2345 INTERVAL > e MoufMtS)
PACE a SMEff I i
i 1984 1985l l
N l A lM lJ lJ l A lS l0 lN l0 Jl
^
j 2 MAR 84 l l 26DEC84 901 GEMS UPGRADE l
l 2 MAR 84:l l25JAN85 Uhe painting. Corrosion prot.Ction, etc. Or 902 MATERIAL C0NDITION OF PLANT U IN"*07'N/,dnU"*'""'"' ' '""'"'"
L PROJECT $CNEOULE MINTEEKE Mm8ENENT SYSTEN 9-3 f
i