ML20136F001
| ML20136F001 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 01/03/1986 |
| From: | Kruse G COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Callihan A, Cole R, Grossman H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#186-662 OL, NUDOCS 8601070179 | |
| Download: ML20136F001 (25) | |
Text
&9 x
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE COUNSELORS AT LAW oavw THREE FIRsT NATIONAL PLAZ cNicAGo, auNoissosce TELEPHONf 312E750o WASHINGTON OFFict a T 3^"i.. E '"
"""M JAN -6 A10 :35
" ' ""'O'fa'"" "
- o WituAMG BEALE, 10BS-19f3 WA$HINGTON. D C 90036 mmeiao 0mti y Ea Jan6hrffgi1986I Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 2055b Washington, DC 20555 Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Administrative Law Judge 102 Oak Lane Oak Ridge, TN 37830 RE:
In the Matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457) OL Gentlemen:
Enclosed you will find an errata sheet for Applicant's motion for summary disposition dated December 20, 1985.
tiost of the errors are typographical and/or clerical in nature.
We regret the fact that these errors occurred and apologize for any confusion or inconvenience.
l Yours truly, QMuuc Gary A. Kruse GAK:cg Enclosure cc - Attached service list i
i l
i l
\\
3 8601070179 960 l
PDR ADOCK OS py6 4
G i
e SERVICE LIST Stuart Treby, Esq.
Mr. William L. Clements Elaine I.
Chan, Esq.
Chief, Docketing and Services Office of the Executive Legal United States Nuclear Regulatory Director Commission United States Nuclear Regulatory Office of the Secretary Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Ms. Bridget Little Rorem
+
Atomic Safety and Licensing 117 North Linden Street Board Panel P.O. Box 208 United States Nuclear Regulatory Essex, IL 60935 Commission Washington, DC 20555 Robert Guild Douglass W. Cassel, Jr.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Timothy W. Wright, III Appeal Board Panel BPI United States Nuclear Regulatory 109 North Dearborn Street Commission Suite 1300 Washington, DC 20555 Chicago, IL 60602 1
Charles Jones, Director Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency 110 East Adams Springfield, IL 62705 i
William Little, Director Braidwood' Project Region III United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i
Jan Stevens United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Phillips Building Bethesda, MD 20014 George L. Edgar, Esq.
Thomas A. Schmutz, Esq.
Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 "L"
Street, N.W.
Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 i
l
V I.
Clerical error resulting in substantive ommission In Applicant's statement of material facts concerning contention item 9.A. a blank was inadvertently left in the second material fact.
The final sentence of that material fact currently reads "The NRC issued an item of noncompliance, severity level as a result of these improper inspections."
The severity level of the item of noncompliance was a level IV.
II.
Clerical error requiring deletion of one page In Applicant's material concerning contention item 5, there is an unsigned affidavit form for Kenneth T.
Kostal's testimony concerning contention item 5.A.
Mr. Kostals' signed affidavit which appears prior to his testimony for the general portion of contention item 5 covers his testimony for 5.A.,
5.B.,
5.C. and 13.B and therefore the unsigned affidavit for 5.A. should be removed from Applicant's filing so as to not create confusion.
III. Editorial insertions needed for added clarity A.
In the statement of material facts for contention item 14.n and accompanying discussion the following insertions are needed:
1.
In material fact 8, in line 4 the word " process" should be inserted after the second word "and";
2.
On page 5 in the second full paragraph in line 5, the word "substantially" should be inserted after l
the second word, " identified";
i f
.ena
I I
l 3.
On page 6 in the first full paragraph in line 3, l
the word " process" should be inserted after the second word, "and";
B.
In the testimony of Thomas E. Quaka on contention item l
14.B, the following insertions are needed:
l 1.
On page 6, in the last line of answer 6, the words
" aspect of the" should be inserted after the sixth word "PCI";
2.
On page 10 in the second paragraph of answer 11 in the second line, the word "substantially" should be inserted after the seventh word, " identified";
C.
In the testimony of Thomas E. Quaka on contention item 14.B.2, in the first paragraph of answer 5 in line 4, the words "and in 1984" should be inserted after the year "1983".
In the discussion for contention item 14.B.4, the following D.
insertions are needed:
1.
On page 9, in the first full paragraph in line 2, the words " support selection" should be inserted after the word "of" and in line 10 the word
" piping" should be inserted after the word " process";
2.
On page 9, in the second full paragraph in line 5, the words " safety-related" should be inserted after the acronym "PGCo's".
N.
IV.
Typographical errors for each section of the Applicant's Motion for Summary Disposition A.
In Applicant's motion and supporting memorandum the following corrections are needed:
1.
On page 4, at the end of line 9 of the indented quote the word "to" should be' inserted; 2.
On page 5, in the second line of the indented quote the hyphen in " applicant's" should be deleted; 3.
On page 6, in the next to last line of the first full paragraph a "L" should be inserted in the word " buttress";
4.
On page 9, in the last paragraph the words " reviewing portion of" should be replaced with "regarding";
5.
On page 11, in the eighth line of the carryover paragraph the word " dispose" should be " disposed."
6.
On page 11, in line 4 of the first full paragraph the comma after the word " items" shculd be deleted.
7.
On page 11, the sentence which carryovers to page 12 should be deletod.
In the Testimony of James W. Gieseker regarding contention B.
item 3.C. the following corrections are needed:
1.
In line 3 of Answer 6 the eighth word " inspections" is misspelled; 2.
In line 3 of the second paragraph of Answer 6, a i
comma should follow the first appearance of the l
abbreviation "LKC";
_3
4 3.
In line 4 of the second paragraph of answer 6, the comma following the words " Level I" should be deleted; 4.
In the last line of answer 8, the word " construction" should be replaced with the word " contention".
C.
In the testimony of Martin R.
Frankel regarding contention item 3.C.
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In line 4 of answer 3 the words "was in the" should only appear oncer 2.
In line 1 of question 7 the word "of" should be inserted after the word " role";
3.
In the last line of the second paragraph of answer 8 the word "satification" should be " satisfaction".
D.
In the statement of material facts concerning contention item 5, the following correction is needed:
1.
At the end of material fact 1 a bracket should be added.
E.
In the quote of contention item 5.A. which occurs immediately preceding the statement of material facts regarding 5.A., the following corrections are needed: - -
1.
In line 4 of the second paragraph, the first word should be "significant" and the last word should be "was";
2.
In line 7 of the second paragraph, the second word should be "resulted" and the third word should be "in".
F.
In the statement of material facts regarding contention item 5.A.,
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 21, in line 2 the fourth word should be "overall" and the last word, "of",
should be replaced with the word "by";-
2.
In material fact 22, in the next to last line the word "Reanalysed" should read " Reanalyses" and the word "of" should be inserted at the end of the line; 3.
In material fact 27, in line 6 the next to last word should be "are";
4.
In material fact 30, in line 3 the words "each support" should be inserted after the word " install";
5.
In material fact 32, in line 1 the fifth word should be " applicable" and the next to last word should be " explicit";
6.
In material fact 33, in line 1 the fifth word should be " system". <
G.
In the Discussion which accompanies the statement of material facts for contention item 5.A.
the following corrections are needed:
1.-
On page 11, in the second full paragraph in line 5 the next to last word should be "which"; in line 6 the last word should be "in" and in line 9, the word "hd" should be replaced with the words "which had";
2.
On page 11, in line 2 of the third full paragraph the next to last word should be " instances".
3.
On page 12, in the third full paragraph in line 4 the sixth word should be " genuine" and in line 5 the next to last word should be " matter";
4.
On page 12, in the last paragraph the next to last word on the page should be " reanalysis";
5.
On page 13, in the first full paragraph in line 5 the word "a" should be inserted after the word "for" and the fourth word'should be " undergoing";
6.
On page 13, in the third full paragraph, in line 4 the third word should be " system" and the last word should be " discrepancies";
On pcge 13, in line 2 of the last paragraph the fifth 7.
word should be " systems".
i
9 In the Statement of Material Facts concerning contention H.
item 5.B. the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 2, in line 4 the first word should be "carbolene";
2.
In material fact 20, in line 1, the next to last word should be " minuscule";
3.
In material fact 21, the page reference should be page 7 rather than page 6.
In the discussion which accompanies the statement of I.
material facts for contention item 5.B.
the following corrections are needed:
1.
On page 8, in the third full paragraph in the first line the seventh word should be " minuscule";
2.
On page 9, in the second full paragraph in the second line, the fourth word should be the abbreviation "MIC".
J.
In the testimony of Kenneth T. Kostal for contention item 5.B. the following corrections are needed:
1.
In answer 13, in line 3 of the third paragraph the seventh word should be " minuscule".
2.
In answer 18, in line 4 the procedure abbreviation is "QCP-3" and not "PCD-3". t J
K.
In the affidavit of Richard Leigh concerning contention item 5.B.,
the following corrections are needed:
1.
The part of the title on the first page which is in parens should read " (ON ROREM Q. A.
SUBCONTENTION 5.B.)".
2.
In answer 8, in line 3 the number should be a 7 not 6 and in line 5 the fifth word should be "except";
3.
In answer 9, in line 5 the fifth word should be
" prepared" and in line 10 the number should be 7 and not 6; 4.
In answer 13 the number should be 7 and not 6.
L.
In the statement of material facts for contention item 5.C.
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 7, in line 2 the third word should be " assured";
2.
In material fact 10, in line 2 the last word should be " commitments".
M.
In the discussion which accompanies the statement of material facts for contention item 5.C.
the following corrections should be made:
1.
On page 4, in line 3 of the second full paragraph there should be a parens inserted after the abbreviation "AISC". --
N.
In the testimony of Kenneth T. Kostal on Contention item 5.C.,
the following correction is needed:
1.
In question 7, in the second line the inspection report number should read "84-43/39".
O.
In the statement of material facts concerning contention item 6.F. and the accompanying discussion, the following corrections are needed:
1.
For material fact 14 the page references to Mr.
Boone's affidavit should be pages 12-14; 2.
On page 6, in line 5 of the first full paragraph a period should be inserted after the number "20";
3.
On page 8, in line 5 of the last paragraph the word "a" should be inserted at the end of the line.
P.
For the testimony of Michael A. Gorski concerning contention item 6.G.,
the following correction is needed:
1.
In question 6, in line 1, the last word should be
" purchases".
Q.
For the statement of material facts concerning contention item 6.I. and the accompanying discussion the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 6, the page reference to Mr.
Stewart's affidavit should be pages 2-3 and not 3-4.
_9_
L
2.
On page 6, in the first full paragraph in line 3, a comma should be inserted after the word " personnel" and in line 4 a comma should be inserted after the word " condition";
3.
On page 7, in line 2 of the first full paragraph the abbreviation "ALAM" should read "ALAB".
R.
In the testimony of James R.
Stewart concerning contention item 6.I.
the following corrections are needed:
1.
On page 2, in line 5, the name of Mr. Stewart's employer should be spelled "Weirich" and not "Weirick";
2.
In answer 6, in the second paragraph, in line 3, the word "by" which follows the word "with" should be deleted.
S.
In the testimony of David A.
Boone concerning contention item 6.I.
in answer 12, in line 3 the word "is" should be the word "was".
T.
In the statement of material facts concerning contention item 9.A. and the accompanying discussion the following corrections are needed:
1.
For material fact 8, in line 4 the words "how many" should be deleted; 2.
For material fact 10, in line 6 the sixth word should be " fit-up";
3.
On page 2, in the second full paragraph in line 7 the abbreviation "NRC" should be "NCR".
U.
In the testimony of Fred D.
Forrest concerning contention item 9.A.,
in answer 7 in line 4 the inspection report numbers should read "546/84-21 and 50-547/84-20" and not "546/85-21 and 50-457/85-20" and in the indented quote the first number should be "120" and not "127".
V.
In the quote of contention item 9.C. which precedes the-statement of material facts for 9.C.,
in the first line the abbreviation "CRF" should be "CFR".
_W.
In the statement of material facts concerning contention item 9.C. and its accompanying discussion, the'following corrections are needed:
1.
For material fact 4, in line 2 the eighth word should be "dispositioning";
2.
On page 4, in the first full paragraph the last letter should be "B";
3.
On page 6, in the last paragraph in line 1, the word "in" should be deleted.
X.
In the testimony of Randall L. Kurtz concerning' contention item 9.C., in question 10 the first word should be "Does" rather than "is".
Y.
In the testimony of James W. Gieseker concerning contention item 9.C., the following corrections are needed:
1.
For answer 4, in line 2 of the indented quotation, the abbreviation "CRF" should be "CFR";
2.
For answer 11, in the second full paragraph in line 2, the seventh word should be " discrepancy".
In the introduction to the statement of material facts Z.
for item 9.D., in the next to last line the word " item" should be inserted after the number 5 and in the last line a period should be inserted after the word " Staff".
In the statement of material facts for contention item AA.
9.D., the following corrections are needed:
1.
On page 3, in material fact 4, in line 4 the next to last word should be "use" not "used";
-2.
Or. page 5, in material fact 9 in the carryover paragraph in the next to last line, the sixth word should be " recurrence";
3.
On page 6, in material fact 1 in the next to last line, the fourth word should be " instrumentation".
BB.
In the discussion concerning contention item 9.D.,
on page 5, in line 9 of the first full paragraph the words "the absence" should only appear once.
CC.
In the testimony of John D. Carlson concerning contention item 9.D.,
in question 17, in line 2 the inspection report number should read "50-546/84-17" and not "50-546/84-12".
DD.
In the testimony of Cedric Reynolds concerning contention item 9.D.,
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In answer 6, in line 3, the fourth full word should be " Massachusetts";
2.
In answer 24, in line 10 of the second paragraph the second word should be the abbreviation "QC" not " ORC".
EE.
In the quotation of contention item 12.E. which precedes the statement of material facts for 12.E.,
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In the first paragraph, in line 6 the words " identified and corrected" should appear only once and in line 8 the fourth word "cause" is misspelled.
FF.
In the statement of material facts for contention item 12.E.,
in material fact 7, in line 4, the ninth word i
should be " noncompliance".
I l
i GG.
In the statement of material facts for contention item 12.F._and the accompanying discussion, the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 1, in line 2 the eighth word, " dimension",
is misspelled and in the last line a parens should be inserted at the end of the line.
2.
In material fact 6, in line 4 the words "the same of" should be deleted and replaced with the words "some of the;"
3.
In material fact 7, in line 4 the words "in which it was asserted" should be inserted after the word
" Force";
4.
In material fact 8, in line 6 the words "rereviews were told" should be deleted and in line 13 the word "not" should be replaced with the words "were not to";
5.
In material fact 9, in the last line, a period should be inserted after the word " started;"
6.
On page 6, in line 9 of the second full paragraph the first "the" in the line should be replaced with the word "that".
HH.
In the testimony of George Orlov concerning contention item 12.F., the following corrections are needed:
1.
In question 5, the following sentence should be inserted after the indented quote: "Are you familiar with the facts underlying this matter?";
2.
In answer 6, in line 6 the word " existence" is misspelled and the word "of" should be inserted just before the word " alternative";
3.
In answer 18, in the first line the first "the" should be capitalized; 4.
In answer 20, in line 5, the first "were" should be replaced with the word "where".
II.
In the testimony of Neil P.
Smith concerning contention item 12.F. the following corrections are needed:
1.
In question 11, in line 2 the fourth word should be
" invalidating" rather than " invaliding";
2.
In answer 11, in line 2, the word " invalidating" is again spelled " invaliding";
3.
In answer 12, in line 2, the word " invalidating" is again misspelled and the sixth word should be "justi-fications."
JJ.
In the discussion accompanying the statement of mater,a1 facts for contention item 12.J.,
on page 7 in line 4 ef the second full paragraph the third word should be "additiors".
J' KK.
In the testimony of Edward Michael Shevlin concerning contention item 12.J. the following corrections are needed:
1.
On page 4, the "A.8." which appears beside the first full paragraph should be deleted; 2.
On page 6, the "Q.9."
whic. cppears on line 4 should be "A.9.";
3.
On page 11, the "Q.14" which appears beside line 2 of the first full paragraph should be "A.14";
4.
In answer 14, in line 3 of the second full paragraph the fourth word, " accompanied", is misspelled, f
LL.
In the testimony of Neil P. Smith concerning contention item 12.J. in answer 15 in line 5 the last word should be "if" not "of".
MM.
In the statement of material facts concerning contention item 13.B. and the accompanying discussion the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 1, in the last line the second word, " Affidavit", should be deleted; 2.
In material fact 8, in the last line the third word "Kostal" should be capitalized; 3.
In material fact 12, in line 2 the third word,
" November", is misspelled and the sixth word,
" document", is misspelled and in line 3 the third word, " reports", is misspelled.
, V
o 4.
On page 6, in the second full paragraph in line 8, the seventh word, "the",
is misspelled.
In the introduction concerning contention item 14.B.
NN.
on page 1 in the first line the seventh word should be "its" and not " tis".
In the statement of material facts concerning contention 00.
item 14.B. in material fact 5 in line 8 the fourth word
" independently" is misspelled.
PP.
In the statement of material facts for contention items 14.B.2. and 14.B.3. and the accompanying discussion, 14.B.l.,
the following corrections are needed:
1.
In material fact 2, in line 1, the number at the end of the line, "10", should be deleted.
2.
In material fact 8, in the next to last line the words "on 14.B." should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
3.
In material fact 10, in the next to last line the words "on 14.B" should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
4.
In material fact 11, in the next to last line the words "on 14.B." should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
5.
In material fact 12, in the next to last line the words "on 14.B" should be inserted after the words "Quaka affidavit";
6.
In material fact 12, on page 6 the following sentence should be inserted just prior to the citation:
"The closure is documented in Inspection Report Nos.
50-456/85-52; 50-457/85-50, dated December 5, 1985.";
7.
In material fact 34 in the next to last line the words "on 14.B" should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
8.
In material fact 35 in the last line the words "on 14.B" should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
9.
In material fact 36, in line 1, the fifth word,-
" corrective", is micspelled; 10.
In material fact 37, in line 1 the two words "non" and " compliance" should be one word; 11.
In material fact 37, in the next to last line the date should be " December 5, 1985" and the words "on 14.B" should be inserted after the words "Quaka Affidavit";
12.
On page 14, in the first paragraph in line 8, the second word should be "XVIII" and not " XVII" and in the second paragraph, in line 6 the year for the Regulatory Guide should be 1980 and not 1978;
-13.
On page 16, the first seven words on the page should be deleted.
14.
On page 19, the last word in the last line, "In",
should be deleted; 15.
On page 20, the first word on the page, "recurr",
should be deleted; 16.
On page 20, in the first full paragraph in line 9, the third word should be schedules" and not " schedule" and the eighth word should be " require" and not
" requires";
17.
On page 21, in the first full paragraph in line 2 the word " Site" should be inserted between the words " Edison" and " Quality";
18.
On page 21, in the first full paragraph in the last line, the Inspection Report should be "50-456/
85-51 and 50-457/85-49";
19.
On page 22, in the second paragraph, in line 4 the fifth word should be " audits";
20.
On page 22, the last three words on the page, "Accordingly, Edison now," should be deleted; 21.
On page 23, the first word on the page, " basis",
should be deleted; On page 24, in the first full paragraph in line 7, 22.
the sixth word, " Pullman", is misspelled; 23.
On page 24, in the first full paragraph in line 16 the numbers "-1980" should be inserted after the numbers "1.144";
24.
On page 25, in the first paragraph in line 6 the last number should be "4433" and not "433" and in line 7, the date should be "May 14, 1985" and not "May 13, 1985";
25.
On page 26, in line 7 of the carryover paragraph the last word " succinctly" is misspelled; QQ.
In the testimony of Scot T. Forbes for contention item 14.B.1, the following corrections are needed:
1.
In answer 12 in line 13 the inspection report number should be "50-457/85-31" and not "50/457/85-32".
2.
In answer 13 in the last line the date should be
~
December 5, 1985.
RR.
In the testimony of Thomas E. Quaka concerning contention item 14.B.2, in answer 12 in line 2 the inspection report numbers should be "50-456/85-51; 50-457/85-49".
SS.
In the testimony of Conrad L. Holt concerning contention item 14.B.2 the following corrections are needed:
1.
In answer 13 in line 2, the fourth word, " independent",
is misspelled;. _.
2.
In answer 15 in line 4, the date should be " December 5, 1985" and not " December 6, 1985";
TT.
In the statement of material facts for contention item 14.B.4 and the accompanying discussion the following corrections are needed:
+1.
In material fact 6, in the last line the fifth word'" Inspectors" should be singular; 2.
In material fact 9, in line 2 the comma after
~
" performed" should be deleted and a comma should be inserted af ter the word "Novenber";
3.
In material fact 13, in line 8, the inspection report numbor should be 50-456/85-44; 4.
On page 9 in the first full paragraph in line 4 the word " Department" should be deleted.
5.
On page 10, in the second paragraph in line 8, the inspection report number should be "50-456/85-46".
UU.
In the testimony of Steven C.
Hunsader concerning contention item 14.B.4 the following corrections are needed:
1.
In answer 9 in line 2, a semicolon should be inserted after the second word, " deficiency;"
2.
In answer 16 in line 7, the word "the" should be inserted after the word " rescind" and the final word in the line, "the", should be deleted.
.D UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter Of:
)
)
COMMONWEALTF EDISON COMPANY
)
)
Docket Nos. 50-456 (Braidwood Station,
)
50-457 Units 1 and 2)
)
l l
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Gary A.
Kruse, one of the attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company, certify that copies of the errata sheet for Applicant's motion for summary disposition have been served in the above-captioned matter on those persons listed in the attached Service List by United States mail, postage prepaid, this 3rd day of January 1986.
1./2 l AllAD
' 'Ga A.'Krbse ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 558-7500 DATED:
January 3, 1986
o O
SERVICE LIST Herbert Grossman, Esq.
Mr. William L. Clements Chairman Chief, Docketing and Services Administrative Law Judge United States Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Commission Board Office of the Secretary United States Nuclear Regulatory Washington, DC 20555 Commission Washington, DC 20555 Ms. Bridget Little-Rorem 117 North Linden Street Dr. Richard F. ' Cole P.O. Box 208 Administrative Law Judge Essex, IL 60935 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board United States Nuclear Regulatory Robert Guild Commission Douglass W. Cassel, Jr.
Washington, DC 20555 Timothy W. Wright, III BPI 109 North Dearborn Street Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Suite 1300 Administrative Law Judge Chicago, IL 60602 102 Oak Lane TN 37830 Oak Ridger Charles Jones, Director Illinois Emergency Services Stuart Treby, Esq.
and Disaster Agency Elaine I. Chan, Esq.
110 East Adams Office of the Executive Legal Springfield, IL 62705 Director United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission William Little, Director Washington, DC 20555 Braidwood Project Region III United States Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Commission Board Panel 799 Roosevelt Road United States Nuclear Regulatory Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Commission Washington, DC 20555 Jan Stevens United States Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Commission Appeal Board Panel 7920 Norfolk Avenue United States Nuclear Regulatory Phillips Building Commission Bethesda, MD 20014 Washington, DC 20555 George L. Edgar, Esq.
Thomas A. Schmutz, Esq.
Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 "L"
Street, N.W.
Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 1
_