ML20136E703
| ML20136E703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1985 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Opeka J CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8601070102 | |
| Download: ML20136E703 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000213/1984026
Text
,
s..
., ..
. ,. 8
.
DEC.3 01985
Docket'No. 50-213-
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
ATTN: Mr. J. .F.
Opeka
Senior Vice President - Nuclear
. Engineering and Operations Group
P. O.-Box 270
' Hartford, Connecticut _ 06101
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Inspection 50-213/84-26
This refers to your letter dated November 21, 1985, sent to clarify your
initial response dated February 25, 1985 to the results of NRC inspection
report number 84-26. We agree to the clarification that the automated Produc-
tion Maintenance Management System (PMMS) will reflect the Master Equipment '
Parts List as it relates to each identified component's QA indicator.
Thank you for informing us of these actions documented in your letter.
These
actions will be. cxamined during a future inspection of your licensed program.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
'
origimi Sir. " ! W
LeeB. Ecttoonausen
Stewart D. Ebneter, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
cc:
'R. Graves, Plant Superintendent
- D. O. Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance
_' R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensing
- E. J. Mroczka, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
- Gerald Garfield, Esquire
Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
- 'NRC Resident Inspector
State of Connecticut
.
"
8601070102 851230
DR
ADOCK 05
3
JE0b
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
RL HN 84-26 - 0001.0.0
12/26/85
.,
'
,.
b'
Connecticut' Yankee Atomic
2
Power Company
bec w/ encl:
-Region I Docket Room (with' concurrences)
, Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)
.Section Chief, DRP
M.-McBride, RI, Pilgrim
i J. Shedlosky, SRI, Millstone 1&2
,T. Rebelowski, SRI,-Millstone 3
,J. Akstulewicz, LPM, NRR
.
/
.
RI:DRSS
j. s RI:DRSS
RI:DRSS
./
Prell/gcb cW Eapen
Bettenhausen
12////05
- 12// /85 -
12Er/85
7
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
RL HN 84-26 - 0002.0.0
12/17/85
-
_
Y
.
_
,
. *
'
.
~
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
B E R LI N. CONNECTICUT
P.o. box 270
HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06141-0270
TELEPMoNE
203-665-5000
Noveuber 21, 1985
Docket No. 50-213
A04582
Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Engineering and Technical Programs
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region 1
+31 Park Avenue
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
References:
(1)
T. T. Martin letter to W. G. Counsil dated
December 28, 1984
(2)
W. G. Counsil letter to T. T. Martin dated
February 25, 1985
(3)
S.D. Ebneter letter to J. F. Opeka dated
August 26, 1985
"entlemen:
.
Haddam Neck Plant
Follow-up to Inspection Report No. 50-213 /84-26
MEPL
.
..
~1
_
[A.-~~
-'
Reference (1) transmitted the results of Inspection Report
50-213/84-26.
Reference (2), which responded to that inspection
report, delineated several commitments. Reference-(3), which
transmitted the results of Inspection Report 50-213/85-17
f avorably addressed the status of most of the Reference -(2)
commitments. The Coanecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
(CYAPCO) is in agreement with the conclusions of Reference (3) .
The purpose cf this letter is to clarify the one Reference (2)
comnitment not addressed in Reference (3).
.
Reference (2) stated, in part:
"By January 1, 1986, the majority
of the information currently in the MEPL (excluding certain items
such as consumables , pipe supports , etc.) will be incorporated
m n w .t -) .?Q
3nV'
v v.wr T
r
-
.
..
-
.
_2
into the automated Production Maintenance Management System
(P99tS) ." Since the MEPL is a somewhat complex document and the
1991S system's ability to replace it is limited, some clarifi-
cation is in order.
The PMMS System is a component-based automated maintenance
'
et
management system. To access information from PMMS for a given
component, the component identification number must be used.
This allows several "pages" of data on that component to be
displayed.
Part of that data is information on the QA Category
of that component. This system lends itself well to aid in the
storage and retrieval of QA Category (and, therefore, supports
the MEPL) for certain components such as pumps, valves, motors ,
etc.
The MEPL has several parts.
It includes guidance on determining
the QA status of components, blanket statements to cover broad
areas of QA applicability, (e.g., " All equipment within the fire
protection progras shall meet fire protection quaxity assurance
requirements"), descriptions of structures which are QA and
component by component listings of Category 1 equipment. This
last area is compatible with the PMMS data base and it is this
portion of the MEPL which we were addressing in the commitment
quot'ed above. To rephrase that commitment: "All components
(excluding certain items such as consumables, pipe supports, etc.
and some minor subcomponents of electrical equipment) which are
individually listed in the MEPL will have their PMMS QA
indicators verified as properly reflecting their QA status by
January 1,1986."
It should be noted that, currently, this
commitment has been virtually completed.
+
Other components in the PMMS system which are indicated as not
QA have an evaluation referenced which is the basis for that
status._ Many components have their PMMS QA indicators
" undefined," which according to our procedure (NE0 6.01,
Material, Equipment and PartJ- Lists for In-Service Nuclear
Generation Facilities) will require a QA evaluation prior to
commencement of any work on the component. Any components waich
are not in the MMS data base are entered as the need arisas with
their QA indicators " undefined" and are evaluated as above.
In summary, the probram we have established is one that will
simplify quality assurance determinations while making them more
rigorous and conservative. This will ensure that the proper
controls will be utilitt.ed for each activity.
I
$
i
-
-
-
- - . - .
- - - -
-
. . - - -
e
.
- ,--
,
e s
,
.
. '.
_3
We do not believe that this letter changes the intent' of my
previous commitment and is provided for information only. My
staff is available to answer my questions you may have on this.
.
Very truly yours,
,
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
i
.
J. F. Opeka
Senior Vice President
By:
C. F. Sears
Vice President
4
e
m
- ,
,.-,---,------,-,.--.w-
,.,7_,_y
-
m.,__-..
-,
,
..,,s,--_.-
.,-._,.-,m,.e.
9, - , , -_ -
-m
- ,