ML20136A706

Morning Rept Re Beco Reorganization

ML20136A706
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	07/31/1995
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20136A608	List: ML20136A603 ML20136A649 ML20136A706
References
FOIA-96-480 1-95-0096, 1-95-96, NUDOCS 9703100033
Download: ML20136A706 (43)

Text

. - .. -. .. . - - - - - -

PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION I JULY 31, 1995 Licensee / Facility: Notification:

Boston Edison Co. MR Number: 1-95-0096 Pilgrim 1 Date: 07/28/95 Plymouth, Massachusetts SRI PC Dockets: 50-293 BWR/GE-3 Subiect: BOSTON EDISON COMPANY (BECO) REORGANIZATION Reportable Event Number: N/A Discussion:

On July 27, 1995, BEco announced the planned restructuring of the company into four business units, effective November 1, 1995. As part of this reorganization, about one-third of BECo's upper and middle management positions are expected to be eliminated this year. Two of the four new business units ( i.e., the generating business units - Fossil and Nuclear) will be led by Messrs. Ronald A. Ledgett and E. Thomas Boulette, respectively. Mr. Boulette is currently the Senior Vice President -

Nuclear with the responsibility for the operation of Pilgrim Station. Mr.

Ledgett also has nuclear experience in the operation of Pilgrim Station, having worked there as a Director of Special Projects in the late 1980's time frame. BECo also announced that these two generating business units will be further consolidated into a single unit next year. In a related matter, the BECo Chairman and CEO, Mr. Tom May, reconfirmed his intention to seek a president and chief operating officer from outside the company to replace Mr. George Davis, who is retiring on September 15, 1995. Mr.

Davis formerly held the position of Senior VP - Nuclear at Pilgrim Station.

The effect of this reorganization upon Pilgrim Station is expected to result in the elimination of some middle management (i.e., section manager) positions. These changes are anticipated to be coordinated with the existing plans to downsize the Pilgrim Station staff over the next couple of years.

Recional Action:

Information only. The resident inspectors have been briefed regarding projected reorganizational changes affecting Pilgrim Station. Plans for a BECo management briefing of the Region I managers on this topic are being formulated.

Contact:

Antone Corne (508)747-0565 Richard Conte (610)337-5183 9703100033 970303 PDR FOIA SULLIVA96-460 PDR

' .. - . . - _ - . - . . . - . ~ . - . . . - -.. - . _ . - . - . - -

SENT3Y:XeroxTelecopiYII$K;B-11-95;2:5 BPM:- . . _ - - . . . .

COMPLIANCE

• 610 SS7 531.B'# 1 e

• WHATIS DERBOULATION7 , -

I Separation ofgeneration and T & D; market price fbr generation l WHYNOW7 i

Low market price vs. High rates hioccatant with existing regulation

Modds in otherindusnies ISIT APASSINGFAD7 '

1 l i No; econonde presmuss willpersist j

History (California, Michigan, Rhode Island, Mass, JPERC) i l i HOW WOULD A MArXET WORK 7 l

l .

ptstall omstomer acospts bids ihnu remote utility for generation Pays locd utility a distribution charge i Pays remote utility the escaration charge. .,

j pompetition drives down cost of producing power, promotes new products a

4 WHAT: CONCERNS DOES TIES RAISE 7 I

)

L Significant stranded cost (market price less than amhaMari cost)

Utility bankruptcia possihte

Soluotion is move costs to wires by an access clap i

' 2. Envhonmenml degradation -

h x gc7 l Cheapest power will not be tha cleanest

. l - 6

s. panasisey . ~

l Obligation to build goes away E

(

l' Replaced by market laamaman's to build when needed y J [w w

am a WIU" it 13RNATE MARKET STRUCTURES AREDISCUSSED7 k -

4 i

e I -

! D' irect Access I d i I 100LCO

) h g JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES: FERC VS. STATE ROLES Ez m

M l 9 r .

EFFECT ON NUCLEAR, POWER d N I

Disanowed stranded costs wm c p usii.s I [,Si e

IhLL ,

/

. 1

• .-e*.. . . ,

.. y .. ,,,.--

c, ,,, :,4,,, t i

Going forward, utilties wi8 focus on low prices / low cosa .

Decomnissioning will probably get special treatement t

ROLE ,OF BECO IN THE DEBATE / PROSPECTS FOR MASS

)

i i

l -

l a

i 1

1 4

9 I

i 1

l

)  !

r i I

i I

l

, i l

t l

a i

l

! I t

i f

f 1

n z; w w.i a; w .n y r.-n-w m 9 ; -mewsr w w rai:o

~

I I I

- l 1 s } } I s}

j, I i " 8 i

l - -

)l i o li iiI111l i>

't i

, it l i jt

' i g i

ct:

uJ ll ,

- - il i il x1

}gI I t

.d - -

\ \

s l /I Z

l li1 4,~~ ii j IIi ]i }>i }] l j; 1 1

-r tililI3 k

1 n

i i Ii 1 i

wc.t, .

_Furictional Or anization Charts 1

BOSTON EDISON  !

COMPANY it .

I

=_. .- - , _ ~ . .

i -

a l!

l I$

E i Nuclear -

Fossil Customer l Comte I Division Division 5

Services Head 9uarters '

l Division Groups i

i i Division t ,

'l r t! r l

. . m m.._ma; m - - -=_- - .-=.;; J3 -_ j

. +

_ _ m_ d m_ .

SENT BY: Xerox Telecopier tuel ; o-11-vo ; 4:oirm . wme.2mv.:- 3., aa, .a .. .

MEETING WITH NRC '- ALLIANCES

1. What are alliances? ,

2. Him can alliances help keep nuclear power safe and competitive?

i 3. What Idnds of alliances are we looking at?

i 4. What are the advantages / benefits?

a i

5. What makes alliances of Interest to NRC7 i

a

6. What comments, suggestions or recommendations does NRC have?

i i

i i

4 i

a j

i 1

I .

l i

1 1

DEREGULATION, COMPETITION AND 1 sIE BOSTON EDISON RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL Presented to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I August 14,1995 i

l i

a Deregulation, Retail Competition; Restructuring:

What is it?

Separation of generation from transmission and distribution.

2 l

) l Generation priced at market, open to competition.

l T & D remains a regulated monopoly, based on cost of service.

Separation may be just functional / pricing at first; corporate later.

i l

-l-'

. _ _ - . _ ._ . _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ .- ~ _ . _ . _ _ . . _.- __ _ ._ _ _

i i -

1 1

4

Why now?

)

Low wholesale market prices vs. High retail rates. l i

i  ;

i.

Discontent with existing regulation.

4 Success of non-utility generation.

N Deregulation of other industries in the U. S.

l l Deregulation of electric industry in other countries.

Benefits of competitive markets.  :

I i

1 s

i i

(

I i i

_3-

Is it a passing fad?

' Unlikely.

Economic pressures will persist.

Most states have begun the change.

California Michigan Rhode Island New Hampshire Massachusetts I

l

)

.y-

i How Would A Competitive Industry Work? i i

Generation monopoly ehmmated; customer free to chose from multiple  ;

generation providers. l I

Customer pays- 1 l

Delivery charge (T & D) to local utility (monopoly) l l

Generation charge to selected supplier (competitive) l l

Piice of generation drops to market price All generation suppliers subject to competition Competition promotes new products / pricing mechanisms I

l f-I

i

) What concerns does a competitive structure raise?

1

1. Stranded costs

2. Reliability

3. Market power

4. Cost transfers between customers l 5. Environmental / safety performance

6. Transmission pricing l

l l

l l

1 i

_ (, .

Concern 1: Stranded Costs Rates Before Rates After T&D 4 cents 4 cents Generation 7 cents 3 cents Total 11 cents 7 cents Mascive revenue loss to utilities No economic gain; simple reallocation from customers to shareholders Violation of" regulatory contract" l

l i

.]%

Concern 1: Stranded costs (cont.) a uf[$c

} mil , s"' g[C p -

Exposure frequently de6ned as follows

I l

Revenue requirement to cover

~

existing generat3on costs It ' l

_ gg l( /b Annual fMS*W a. '"^l~ea~~"

g .s,y n;;u&..., w4 . . .; "xa6,.. r, r~,e,%.~.

. ;.g I, RSvenuel WW n ' 'w,ex..a. %u., ,

S.L *'--'

l djp$tranA,ss/

7.m v. uter m , w w M W r # c $ 5 0 7 f f f # ',

w ., n se /\

" * , y,

%;y.,a,s r

t a.m.ntV -M W %. %. . n=n;r;t.w. e -

. o P'~ Revenues received by chargire -

g, market price for generation n4

" " ' ~ ' " " " * " ~ "

1995 Ux 0 "dM 7 Figun1

. l l

Industry totals: 100 to 200 billion )

Frequently exceeds net worth of utilities 4

\

Tdb (c.r s e, ur : 7t U AEtwC - hq IQ ca cq ( , ,$

l I

i l

l l

l

. y-

l 4

i

, i-o Concern 1: Stranded costs (cont.)

i x j.

~

i' Solution: Allow generation price to drop to market, but adopt a " wires . , . l charge", which collects the differential as part of the T & D charde.

s#y s '~

p' et '[ , ,,:'

j' Permits utility to remain whole. d

, , t . 5 j 'I',p i,3. '

Y' e t /' ,

! Permits true economic competition between generators. , v. '

! Does not create significant, immediate price decreases.

l l

FERC has proposed recovery of" legitimate, verifiable" stranded costs.

Customers, others oppose such recovery.

9-

l

Concern 2

Reliability j

If customer can choose suppliers, utility has no obligation to build.

No one has responsibility to insure long term power supply.

l In a market, price balances supply and demand:

i As load increases, less efficient units run and price goes up.

l The result is:

cont uraption drops

new entrants are encouraged i

the lights stay on.

Argument for:

i Price mechanism is exactly what is needed to bring efficiency to the electricity production market.

Will avoid current distortions, such as underpriced peak.

I i Argument against:

i ,

Markets generally permit shortages, and allow stockpiling; that l cannot be done with electricity. Zero tolerance for shortages; j there is no " busy signal" in electricity.

i I

s I

-/0-

Concern 3: Market Power Compeitive markets require many suppliers.

At present, most generation markets have one or two players holding 50% or more of the generation supply.

. United Kingdom example: only two significant generators, price I distortions result. I Divestiture proposed by some as necessary part of deregulation.

-tI'

p

.- y-eg 4

.. c

+

e . ,'. -

~

~.

Concern 4

Cost transfers between customers. j .;. -

t ~ p ,,g. ..,-

Competitive markets allow price discrimmation. p ,#' '

1 Large customers will get lower rates.

E j Prctections for small, residential, low income will need to be enhanced.

i l

1 l5'

E l Concern 5: Environmental /SafetyIssues

Competition forces use of cheapest power source; cheapest may not be , ,.1

p. ',j;';yl[ cll:id 3 i the cleanest.

i DSM/ Conservation may be undercut.

Economic pressure to compete will put stress on nuclear performance.

! Stranded cost disallowances may leave nuclear utilities in stressed i economic condition.

L pd

(. liv i

t

! ,)L g' v **

4

- ~, , -

4 e

1 i

j i

- IS-

1 1

Concern 6: Transmission Pricing i

Stmeture will require establishment of transmission rates to move 4

power.

Some transmis,ior/ grid costs difficult to separate from generation:

{ spinning reserve j runnmg power plants out of rate to support area voltage.

Inaccurate pricing will lead to inefficient consumption.

.Iy-

The Alternative Market Structures

Direct Access v. POOLCO.

Direct Access:

Customer contracts directly with power plant to buy output.

Power plant runs to meet customer load.

Regional power pool dispatches on customer orders, not on economics.

POOLCO All generators sell to pool. i Pool dispatches all units on economic basis.

All customers buy from pool.

Customers pay to the pool and generators receive from the pool i the marginal price in each hour.

Customers and generators free to execute " contracts for differences" to achieve any desired pricing.

- lT-

l l

. \

l JurisdictionalIssues FERC regulates sales for resale (utility sales to other utilities or municipal light districts, for example; about 10% of the total.)

l States regulate all consumer sales (about 90% of the total). j FERC regulates all transmission rates. l Moving to competition may convert state jurisdiction to federal .

jursidiction, because of the introduction of a transmission transaction.  !

l 1

l

)

l l

l l

1 l

l l

1 l

- /l-i l

i l The Picture in Massachusetts Massachusetts opened restructuring docket earlier this year.

Multiple parties commented.

, p v .v c,c.

c.t 5 I dWV"D'C 18 parties filed a joint set of restructuring principles, ac.

Boston Edison filed a specific outline for moving to a competitive market.

1. 7 ...

a sf', c c:

e d. ,J I

,,,+*'

/

t

-l7'

i

. l DESCRIPTION OF BOSTON EDISON PROPOSAL l

l . Split generation rates from T & D rates

. Set generation rates equal to short term market j price

. Move stranded costs to the " wires"

. Customer choice through contracts for differences i

. T & D rates set on PBR basis

! i i

-/&-

i

! SPLIT GENERATION RATES FROM T & D RATES i

• Replaces current" base rate and fuel clause" l

l structure 1

I i

l SET GENERATION RATES EQUAL TO SPOT MARKET i PRICE l

. Hourly market price charged to all customers, each hour

! = NEPOOL lambda is proxy for market price 4

i i

e Adjustment needed - NEPOOL is " control lambda"

• NEPOOL itself may do the calculation

! . Visible and impartial i

-/i-

h TRANSFER STRANDED COSTS TO THE WIRES i l

l

^

l l

i 4 . Difference between market revenues and l embedded costs is collected through non- l l bypassable T & D charge  !

l l

) . Non-volumetric rate mechanism (e.g., customer  !

j charge)is preferable i

l T & D RATES

. Remain regulated

. Likely PBR format j

. Performance criteria: price, reliability, customer satisfaction

-go-

MARKET FORECAST TRUE UP MECHANISM

. Unadjusted market price mechanism leads to unacceptable risk of large windfall gains and

! losses

. Differences between forecast of market and actual market are tracked l

l

• Periodic (every 2 years?) true up adjustments

made 4

EFFECT OF TRUE UP i . Acts to allow collection of agree-upon stranded l costs l . Does not apply to unexpecti d cost changes; utility bears risk

. In effect, utility sees " price cap" regime

. Customer sees market pricing 1

'hl' i

CUSTOMER CHOICE e Customer pays competitive, spot market price to local utility

. If content with spot market, no need for further action

. Customer seeking a fixed price can enter" contract

for differences' with any supplier or financial player

e Financially indistinguishable from " retail wheeling"

or " direct access" t,cenarios

-n-

EASE OF IMPLEMENTATION

. Completely within power of DPU to enact

. No transmission, so no FERC approval

. No need to quantify costs of" ancillary" transmission services

. No need for all utilities to adopt

. No statutory amendments needed (utilities simply elect not to use fuel clause)

-%3-

EFFECTS ON CUSTOMER l l

. Customer sees market price l

. Customer has effective choice - the ability to l contract with any party on any available price terms I

. All customers benefit, regardless of size

. All customers benefit immediately - no phase in period

. Customers protected from generation cost overruns

. Potential for limited immediate rate reductions l

EFFECT ON UTILITY

. Link between costs and revenues severed

. Utility motivated to reduce cost, regardless of ownership

. Utility bears risk of cost effectiveness of new investments l

. New capaci,ty added when supported by market '

price l

. Next increment of new capacity likely to be interruptible contracts

. Uti!ity recovers previously approecd, prudent costs i

-AT-

COMPARISON TO RETAllWHEELING Has the Essential Benefits of Retail Wheelina l l

l

. Generation priced competitively at marginal cost

. Appropriate competitive incentives to utility

. Correct economic signal to customer

. Explicittreatmentof stranded costs

. Potential for transition charge adje:,tment (social programs) l i

COI!iPARISON TO RETAllWHEELING 4

Eliminates Many of the Drawbacks of Retail Wheelina a

l . No customer movement

. No issue of customer base to plan for

. No wheeling, so no state /federaljurisdiction problems

) . No " jumping off the cliff"- easily reversible if

desired

. No requirement that other utilitles or states

participate j

d i

4 g p g- . -mp u.a - . - . - . - - - - ~

iv4 HLt.aR1f1 1 509 747 2246 P.02  !

r _ WILLIAM R. ELINF. -

.a ,

I i .-

i  !

' l t---~ ~ '(617) 424-2564 I

l PROFTLE i

, i Resuhs-driven professional with rnnte than severdeen years' management environments Pmven abilitn' s include: and caperience in l

\

Managing engineenig, proyect management, and ardmical services per!

support of nuclear asal fossil generanag facilitics,

=

• = organizug workload and lulger coorrot assocsated with capital and enase pri

• Troubleshooting of diverse tschacal design and fleid construenoc probicms. j Demumtrated knowledge of scismic engineesing principles e

Effective unnmunicator with desagn, construction, and ergulmory staff.

4 l

q h

l PROITSSIONAL EXPERIENCE i BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, Bcmo, MA (1990-Present) j Madaga, Production Etnisg Department (1995-Present) ((c ,- )

techn' cal arrvices in support of company's fossil fuel pow i

• Facilitated dica >iuns, as chairman of Major Egenditure Review ('omminee (M resulted in reductiors to 1995 Power Supply capital (13%) and expense ($2 mi meet more aggressive goals set by ctwnpany.

%

• Coordinated close-out of tssues from 1994 PED rinrganization which improved

, interdepartmenral comnszucation and problem solving during aujur outages in !a0$.

= Optimized departrnent performance by initiating productivity u' nprovemer.t ,

of PEFSY work and budget coadrol inftware available on the network.

j

• Participated m tesmess feasibility review of pusereial company products and services t

meanber of the Product and Prsing Ceremittee. ,

Manager, Civil /StructuralDmaian (1993-1994)

)

Directed the activities of 14 civil / structural, mechamcal, and firc protection engineers to n;ur unplernentation of the design. p!ty>ical, and operating cruena for Pilgrim Nuclear Power maisun i

. Coordsnased deputment review of complement useda exa monitored the development of three ye4r cruplement reduction plan to ranke engineering more competitive.

y . Succcssfully addrenarl ptublem of assigning resources to match talents anal dills witt whde concurrently mecting the priorir'ws of division external custorners *

• Mediated personnel issues related to perforrr.ance aims managemtnt-to-bargsmmg unit tra iewhing in personnel performance and attimule irnprovennants.

• Fostered strung high-quality work team spirit among divuion personnel reflected in division seinsation cui time.

i

/

4

EP-07--1995 EY3:04 tRC P1LGR1M i 508 747 2246 P.03 e l i

WIT.LIABf R. KLINE

. Page 2 I

b Sensor Fapneer, Nuclear Fagtmeering 1Aepartment (1990-1993)

(bI Mo Analyzed technical issues related to seismological design treds. Ikveloped of }tgran Nucjcar Station design chantes to erhin Pilgrirn operating heense sad regulatory com=iaa-*1 i

• Participated in Outage Perforrn4um Eah--'=a'* Task Force. Pruvided recommend piuduedvity improvements to optialue <=page durations.

• Dirccal psutram durmg seismic reanalysis ref Pilgran reactor building to conant mo

• Results will benefil future design work by reducing level of conservatism.

Provwied innovative liceming katerpretations of Regulatory Gin' ele 1.97 to snable compleuon of sesmic qualification d#winerus for affected compouets.

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & IJOHT COMPANY, Allcatown. PA (1978-1990)

Project Englaser, Nuclear Design (1982-1990)

• Assumed gespurmihitfry as 14ad Site Engancer on $14 million !!re protocuen upg hxpedited status wishin six delays morghs. in engiwring support of schedule and icstured project to ahead cf sch Directed multi-ducipime design project teasu to conuruct $1.3 million control italerive re'

• facility. Prrsonnel safety features installed exceedal industry standards.

Functioned as Sul>. Group leader supervising scismic desieu and qualificanon work.

Engineer Level 1/II (1975-1582) t Entry level design rosilians in transnussion eneneenng group. Prepared layout of distributi and resolyc4 ficld constnictkui problems for transmission structure fronhtions.

EDUCATION Master at Bunness ."'

• 4stion, Lehigh University.1964 M.R.,Civit F.,  ; '4, University of Pitaburgh 1978 B.S., Civil Emeuseenlug/EagineeriaC and Pubtic Aftaars. Canwgie Mellon University,1976 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Bwineer in Pennsylvania i

TOTAL P.03 }

1 l

- - . . - - . - . . . - .- . . - ~ . - --- - . . . - - - . . - - . _ ~ ~ . - . . , _ - ~ ~ - - _ .

SEP-06-1995 08:26 tRC P1LGR1M 1 508 747 2246 P.02

. . .8 a

[45] Froms PGtricio Williams at ~ Corp-Relations 8/31/95 2:13PM (4208 bytes: 1 12 jubject: % DAY XTRA, THURSDAY, 8/31/95

---

Message Contents ------------------------------

4xt item 1: Text _1 MDAY EXTRA Date: August 31, 1995 The following are new Group Manager appointments under the new corporate restructuring. A selection panel made of up of Business Unit and Headquarters 14.aders reviewed the resumes of interested-candidates and made their decisions by group consensus. Tom May and

, George Davis then signed off on the selection panel's decisions.

{ Technical Section Vern O'Heim Engineering Services Bill Kline Regulatory Affairs Nancy Desmond Nuclear Services Clair Goddard Training & Management Services Jack Alexander 1 Plant Ted Sullivan L J' FOSSIL Fuel & Business Management Joel Kamya Generation Services Jim Dillon Mystic Station Fred Greenberg New Boston Station Ed O'Brien CORPORATE SERVICES Engineering Services Bill Meehan Finance & Accounting Bob Weafer Supply Management Tcm Murray Information Services External search to be conducted *

, CUSTOMER BUSINESS UNIT Customer Servicee Frank McCall Marketing & Sales Dave Rosi Electric Delivery Business Peter Clarke Transmission Greg Sullivan j Field Service Area 1 Bill Clanc  !

Field Service Area 2 Steve Murp y Field Service Area 3 Maggie Coo l Energy Support & Comnunications Position on hold **

Continued HEADQUARTERS Auditing Barbara Reade Energy Planning & Supply mul Vaitkus TOTAL P.02

1 253 747 2246 8

W 1995 08*26 NRC PILGRIf1 1 508 747 2246 P.01

, a aroug -

e.

1

• • • • • l l

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I RESIDENT INSPECTOR OFFICE l PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION l Phone: (508) 747-0565 Fax: (508) 747 2246 Date: 9h hs Tkne:

1 Message To:

[Mch Conte, Section Chief, RPS 3A, PB3, DRP

_ Jkn UnvHk, Reactor Projects Branch 3, DRP

_ Secretary, Reactor Projects Branch 3, DRP

_ Ron Eaton, Project Directorate 1-3, MS 14D1 Tekcopy nurnber:

Message Frotn: '

_ Rich Laura, Senior Resident inspector

_ Tony Corne, Resident inspector

_Ath Korona, Resident inspector

_ Jane Fitzgibbon, Of6ce Resident Assistant Please Note:

Pages to ibHow:

Date received: 71rne:

VerfWendon inidels: /_

, SEP-08-1995 14:16 tRC PILGRIM i 508 747 22e6 P.02 m 7 m :m.co . e o i o- - - - - - - -

E ce f .vh C i \A/c% L, 2

m d ' ~0L- September 8,1995

~

95-100 l

WORK CONTROL DEPARTMENT l NUORG oyeeNews .

The Plant Group announces the creatior of the Work Control Department. The l prunary role of this department will be to unburden Operations and Malawamace i from current duties other than operatmg and maintaining the facility. This I

department will focus upon all aspoets of station work activities indnAing planning.

scheduling, intergroup coordination and statistical analysis for each woiweek. l The department's focus will shift from schdnting to pn:paration which will reduce the station maintenance request backlog and increase work control pro 9ess efHelency. I After an extensive selection process, the following individuals have be(n selected to l

!aunch this new department. , l Work Control Department Manager (acting) - Stewart Mishan  ;

Work Week Managers -

Paul Gallant',

EricOlson , 1 1

Thomas Trainor Steven Verschi Work Control Supervisor / Scheduling - StevenHansi Work Control Supervisor / Planning - ' ArnoldOwens Work Controllers - MichaelEndland LeeKitcheni DonnaMcKinley

. John Ohrentierger

. . . . , , . .u.., . . , , , a TOTAL P.02

^d1

~SEP-08-1995 i tRC PILGRIf1 1 508 747 2246 P.01 i

1 i

/* "'*%

y n '

v, [ 1

%, ... .. /

l UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

RESIDENT INSPECTOR OFFICE l PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Phone: (506) 747-0565 Fax: (508) 747-2246

, Date:

Tkne:

Message To: \ Y

_ Rich Cdnte, Section Chief,'RPS 3A, PB3, DRP

_ Jkn Linvme, Reactor Projects Branch 3, DRP

_ Secretary, Reactor Projects Branch 3, DRP

_ Ron Eston, Project Directorate 1-3, MS 14D1 1

Terecopy number; s Message From: -

(Rich Laura, Senior Resident inspector

_ Tony Corne, Resident inspector j i _ Beth Korona, Resident inspector l

_ Jane Fitzglbbon, OfHce Resident Assistant ,

1 Please Notei l

Psges to follow:

Date received: 71rne:

Ver/Rcation in!dels: /

?

NUCLEAR DIVISION 3 s ti 7d

'd fo E. T. Boulette 1g Ntedest DMsenMureger I

I I I

L.J.Ohkr SL V oheht GerieralMariagerTecfWest F. H. Ferederl Quey Assu' ara

{r' k

VP. Msdtvr Operstiers 4 Staticrt 04.

I

!E I I I I  :!

T. A. Supram C. S. Codderd J. F. Alesarider W. R. hprio M Deirnand y ~. ' p l

Nuclear Engirwertig Serwoes RepAfery RetrUcro Ptars Menegar Nucteer Services Hudsar Trrg. & Myrt Sen4ces t W3 '

L. Wether:4 J.Gesify R.Merleeste W.Rigge s.CrNea Mansgu inTrairtig DagoyMensger Oeste EP Deputy Mwisger Statioriservices R. Lewy J. BeGefeuite J. Sperger ,

W.Dicroce $.Larutart Meterts's & Comp. Ergg. Caste EP - f Raffm6cri Pte ection Records Mrnirt & Proced>re

.Wirterovice T.WNie J.Maene J. Tearyntia J. Neel A. Shiewt

@ j Y ,g ,-tV

Techr6celTrahing CkE St ucttral& MeefL Engs. LksW 8 Certipience fr.stnprwntrilon 8 Ct itres Prtsedhe Services ht)

T. Swart J. Rogers p OA kl

8. Mihshun Cherntstry OpensonsMW SSSA p , }

West Cemet T.9enedst3 E.Mrneede - $ h[

o

\jyst 1 T. Trope Ier cornpunensemens iac tnes. ,

Om f3 Dbd s.chen.o yfu _

~~ E. ,

Qf ( \'% '% fY\VYD'k( i f , ,. m u p 8:

1. n,. ,

O r' 9 ,ad .v t i i) 1

., j

)

i  :

.i l l

[

From:

To Nancy Desmond (" NANCY _DESMOND9 MAIL 1.BEDISON.COM")

rbelenrc.com,  ;

[ Date: Tuesday, September 19, 1995 5:02 pm ,

, subjects' FYI - Nuclear Announces Dept. Selections (SMTP Id#: 37971) 1 I

j. Hot off the presses.  !

I Forward Header i

Subject:

FYI - Nuclear Announces Dept. Selections Author: Donna Furtado at ~ Pilgrim Date: 9/19/95 1:58 PM i

I NUORG EMPI4YEE NEWS l September-19, 1995 e

1. 95-102

] Nuclear Announces Department Selections

- The Nuclear Division is pleased to announce the following department

manager selectior.s. As you know, the Nuclear Division restructuring was expedited in order to prepara for the upcoming INPO evaluation.

Plant:.

Deputy Manager Bill Riggs Maintenance Bill Dicroce Instrumentation & Control Jim Taormina Work Control Stu Minahan Operations Tom Trepanier

~

Nuclear Services:  !

Station Services Bob O'Neill Radiation Protection Susan Landahl Protective Services . Johnny Neal Nuclear Training & Management Services Records Admin & Procedures Roberta Levey Technical Training Alan Shiever Operations Training Tom Swan Computer Applications Tom Beneduci Nuclear Engineering Services:

Deputy Manager John Garety Materials & Component Eng. Jean Bellefeuille

-Civil Structural & Mech. Eng. Tom White S&SA. Jeff Rogers I&C Eng. Ed Almeida ,

Electrical Eng. Bruce Chenard {

l Regulatory Relations:

Offsite EP Ron Markovich Onsite EP Jack Spangler  !

I j

i 1

1 1

I I

Licensing & Compliance Jeff Keene Nuclear Business Unit:

Quality Assurance ,

Frank Famulari l Other assignments being made at this time are as follows: l Project Manager - Alliances Bob Fairbank Team Leader - Operations QC Rick Schifone i Team Leader - Qual. Assessment Ritchie Ventkataraman ,

Team Leader - Radiological Support Patty Drooff j Team Leader - ALARA Programs Bill Mauro Team Leader - Operations Support Stan Wollman l Asst. Maintenance Dept. Manager Jim Saccoach Manager-in-Training (Nuc. Training & Mgut. Serv.) Laurie Wetherell l Acting Chemistry Dept. Manager Dave Fountain j 4

l

+

l

l l Tr1L ~~

1h&ON 1'vdolmdf?'

4 AGENDA MMdMOb #

Boston Edison Company .f)2, 5.h g6 e .

November 15,1996 gj, (

l. Status ofIndustry Restructuringin Massachusetts

2. Overview of Proposed Hoston Edison Settlement 1996rM-Customer choice permitted y 96 - h@  ;

l 10 % rate reduction i

Fossil generation divestiturem= j 100% recovery of stranded investment

3. Itesolution of nuclearissues No divestiture obligation l

Full recovery of sunk investment, with carrying costs Full recovery of decommissioning costs

- true up to actual costs

- additional pre-funding under discussion ,

1998 - 2000: 75% of going forward costs recovered via market prices Md" 2000 and after: 100% market pricing for going forward costs ort 1

]

4. Outlook l Agreement and filing by year end )

l l

Favorable resolution of fm' ancial uncertainties Decommissioning ftmding assurance provided 9'( l I

l I