ML20135H844

Motion for Stay Pendente Lite of Effectiveness of Decisions LBP-85-35 Re 850903 Concluding Partial Decision on Emergency Planning,Hydrogen Control & Diesel Generators & LBP-84-40 Re 841004 Order Denying Motion for Summary Disposition

ML20135H844
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	09/19/1985
From:	Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
To:	NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
Shared Package
ML20135H845	List: ML20135H844 ML20135H850 ML20135H854
References
CON-#385-570 LBP-84-40, LBP-85-35, OL, NUDOCS 8509240293
Download: ML20135H844 (10)

Text

.- _ - _ - _ - ._ - _ ~. . - . _ . - - - .. - ._- _.. - . _ - - _ - = . _ - - - - . - - - . _ __

i 9-/9-85 l

1. . l

}

UNITED STAVES OF AMERICA i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l* CG'a E T ED <

eerore the Atomic sorety and L i c e n sTrtq C o p p e o l Boar d In the Hotter of )

i ) 65 SEP 23 All:18 I THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-440 OL' ILLUNINATING CO. ET AL. )pg g ,r , 50-441 OL

}'

) 00Chiliw a RWM ,.

' (Perry !1uclear Power Pione, ) BRANCri l I )

Units 1 ond 2) -

7 4

I NOTION FOR A STAY PENDENTE LITE  !

i 1.INTVRCTI(ft 1

j Fursus:t to 16 CR 2.733, IntervenCr Chio Citi: ens for Resporsible Energy ("0CRE") hereey seeks 4 stay of tr4 tifactiVness 05 LBP45-35, 22 ffC , $# test 4r 3,1333 Concluding Parti 41 Int utCecisionon[atr9encyP!rtiirs, l

l R/drogen Control yd Ospel Creretors (sarVed $4ptester 4,1383) and LSF-84-48, 20 PAC 1181 (Octet 4r 4,19H i

i fiancred.m 4N Order (tenyara totico for sw.ery Disusitico on OCRE !ssue flo. 6 and Disaissir.3 the Coraentien))

3 Fr.ars umanastrative Kre41 of trase decisions.

t i

) 11. Rtr#Y 0F DECISWf5 TO EE STi(@

I j A. W43-3 i i

$ This (oncludtr4 Pnttial Initial Lecision addressed tr4 issues liti9itti et evidentiary hearst.js P41d f@ril S-12, i<

! 1%$ Fd I#ril 30-l'N 3,13$$. The hydrQ9th Cor.tfol tssue (crcerned Ccap!!Fct of tra Ferry fl4rt !!! Contentsent 1

degrHed Cort accident bydrojen Cor. trol Masures (4 distritutti igniter systte) with the few provillons of 10 (R j $4,44(C)(!) (iV)*(Vii) . $4jtCts addrejsed anCIUded (3nnter systte design WLi oHretictl, Centatraent C54 City, F.ctdent scen4rtos 4N Inolyses, ccatainment resMnse C41culntional models, and equ Peent survivatlity, f

4 ,

s The dit!41 Stf4f 4tCr issut Cc/Ctrf4f the stility Cf,tFt Ferry ifWRetica (416V41, Inc. ("I(!") ditsti f 4 l Sv.arators to relialy 9 War 66e on-site AC Nur, as fewired by CLC 17. Sutdects 443resseJ ircludes TDI wality [

l

&!!urFCt, tr4 program 4N p!&n Gi tf4 ID! Cwdrs Crcup to i4VallJett it4 6fGir45, Fd (td suatibility of 16 Phase ! {

i

~

i j CompW4nts Mi certain fr.4st !! castments, I i .

j Q1tt017. tra er.dtgancy plaming Mrtion of this decisten Will not te Miressed by OCAI titter in this action or  !

{

j co spul, it cerctrr44 the 4 Jew 4cy et st(sitt tursency plectro unsures as they arteir. to tr4 prticularized 1

contentions (raises by Interverce Smilcuer Alliance Inc.) surviving summary disNsition, y i j 8509240293 950919 '

PDR ADOCK 05000440 m  :

J i G FDR , J(J_ 9; g

_ _ _____m - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . __ . _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ , _ _

l '

.z- I 9 b d o I

After NCrdideranS" the evioenct on thete assues, the LLCinsing Board, findsh] that fM!iCKits had bit thest burden of Froof W that there was reasonable assurance that Ferry can te operated Wittoit endangerirG tt4 Felic ,

! health ard safety, distissed irttervercrs' ccettoti<0s and autteri2ed the Director of isJclear Reactor Re7J]ation to i

issue operating licensu for Ferry i w 2 s* ject to seven license conditions.

II i B.LF-84-40 I This split decision concerred OCRE's issue FN. 6, which, u aJaitted by the Licensing Eoard, stated:

4 Applicant should install an wtomated stway liwid control systen C"$LC5"] to hit 19ete the consetences of an anticipated transient without scras C"RM"J.

Eftst issuan:e of the Consissico's rew AM rule,10 CFR 50.62, OCEE moved for senary dispositten of this issue a

i in its twer as the Ferry SLCS has autcoatic capability, it is OCRC's interpretation os tre At66 rule that 6Ws j With htwtic SLCS capamility be rewired to utill:e it.

4

) as the reiin as rniicrits m sian to Cars ution indicated a daserence os interpretation or te CrR 50.0-

$)(4), Fatticularly the Mraie "alrekf/ dess3r44 Fd tuilt," the Licensing $ card th@ Te%ested briefs free the 1

l partnes on this utter. OCSI s*titted a detailes analysis of the le31slative history of the f,M rule; tt4 1

• le31slative histGry s@pCrts OCFI's ir,terpretatice, b

j the scrmer Cr. airman agreed that the legislattw history supports 0CSE's interpretation. The majority, hcwewr, i

2 13rcres the le31slative history Fd centr:Wd WL illog6 Cal argument to justify its disaissal of OCFI's ccotentica. '

1

!!!. CEt.tCS FM fif 574Y f

4 l A. LIEL!ED Of FFERLI!C Ori FffCf4.

! 1. L9P45-35 The Licensing Scard in this Partial Initial C4 cision ('91D") hu disregarmd the Atonic Energ/ 4:t, i Aministrative Frocewe Act, the Ccamission's re7alaticos W cue lau, and the weight of the evidence to such a deJtee that the PID will ret withstand spellate scrutin/, The errors in tr4 F!D are too numerous W complex to be 1 fully evaluated here. OCFI hu cuttined telcu sne of the stapler ud s. ore e;tesious ettcrs, k By using tr4 90.icle of lice,34 cceditions, the Licensin; $3ard hbj dele;sted contented issues to the EC Staff 9

j for pcst tearito resolutico, a prxtice ptrAsbited by Consclidated Edison (Indian Point (ritt 21, CLt-74-23, 7 f(C f

2 $47,$'i(1374), $4Wral of the corditions truolw analyses, which are ret merely confirmatory batters tot re% ire I an evaluation of sufficient /, $iallarly, the (xt thet procedures are ree*J to operate the Ferry igniter systes (cwsition 4 6) 143 the gastico of their ase446:y, it4 goard refuseJ to consider this utter, however, and stated

3-l i

that 10 CFR 2.206 Frovides a secMnism for consideration of the procedures' adequacy in other proceedires. PID at j 23-23, 14 This renoning contravenei Section 163(a) of the Atcaic Energ/ Act in that it denies a Marirs on an issue that l

even the Ecard found r.,aterial to licensirs. See onim cf cencernu ::. ientists v. t;c, 735 F.2d 1437 (D.C. Cir.

j 1%) (T"). De provisions of 10 CTR 2.206 e not 9;arantee a hearing, as there is no rewirement tut a 1

l proceedits be initiated in ressonse to a 2.206 request. ]TM at 1442-44; Porter Co. Chater of the 1:aat li; alton i

i Leasm of enerica. Inc. v. rec, 606 f.2d 1363,1367 (D.C. Cir.1979). ,

I The $ card's ar7Jbents @l0 at 29) that it reed rct te Corcirr4d With radicactnVe releases frce Ccotatr44nt venting is triply fl wed. First, it nejlects tw kard's om wording of the hydregen control issue, which changed I

but little fica the time wtan tM straard (cr its liti;aticn wu t4trcrolitan Edison (Ti1! 1 Restart), CLI-86-16,11 l ,

I EC 674 (1%8), 6r.ich specified 10 CTR 100 as tha regul& tion urder which hydrogen control could be tun liti;1ted, a

! !ecenJ, it contains the circular reasonira that Ferry wi!! not te alload to cFerate if the hydrogen ccotrol systen 1

< proves irasemate, forsatting tut it is the Entd's respor.sibility to determine this for this contested issue.

Third, the Scard res!nts its Prinary 1

l oaty to usure tMt the Felic will not t4 Mrned by radiontive releuu free Perry, l

The Scard refused to accept its respctd bility w4 nJ!e on the FrcFer sccFe of the preliainary analysis ci tr4 ,

hydro?2n Contrcl systes, re%irtd befCre cFeration accue $*: Fower tt 10 CTR 50.44(c)(3)(vii)(P), so that a firding j cf ccapliarce or non-cowlirce with tr4 regulation could te deterair41, as rewired ty 10 CTR 50.57(a)(2).  ;

4 i Inittad, the BGard used F. illegal and sucjective " reasonable assuryce cf safety in tre it.terta" staNard, P!Dat 1

33.

1 ite bird illeintly toon credit for fdplicr.ts' R5t1E CS$e service IM10 analyses of the canttirsent vessel

• JID at 34, 33, fiNin9 32) den 10 CTR $0,44(c)(3)(iv)(5)(1) specifies the scre cor.servative A31E level C as an 1 Ffroprinte styvjard, D4 Bctr$, witrat e/p!Enti7i, rejected "an unsut,st arrtsated" CCFE's arguments that some of the witnesses were ,

evasi'.e, tttruthful, or irecwetint (PID at 31, desfite evioerce des.oristratanj this wd despite the fut that the l

i

! $%rd fMd it necessary to unctish the witresses for tMir evaliver45s on several occusicns at the hearinJ, See, e.9., fr.1329-30, 3473, 3$03, X(0, Also see OCFrs Prcused firdin]s of rett ud Ccu.lusicr4 of tw, filed Jur4 13,1%$ at 24, 25-26, 30 (in 1), 32 (in. 2), ad 34, na LicensinJ Bo6rd ter,itits a blatant distejard for (spendix B to 10 CrR 50 by refusiro to consider the r

i

at-character of the TDI Cuners Crow w its cemous lack of independence from commercial interests, #4n that i

organization's activities are relied (son to revalidate diesel engines unufactured,wer a deficient gality l . assurYce program. PIDat63.

The Baard relied upon jy4, dinit Sversents of the Witnesses and otMr Saterial that was rot in the record and was ircwable of being enained by 03.E. Of course, a Licensin3 Board decision resting significant findings on i

egresstors of e> pert cptnien not suscutttle of Lein3 testet on exiaination of the witness is a fit cWidate for f rtversal. Virginia Electric and Powr Co, Dicrth Arta tiuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAG-533,18 IRC 23 (19750 .

i 1

1 i

For exacle, the Board relied on a vitr4ss' description of analyses of stresses at defective wlds in tM i

i contairment vessel at 50 psig when the analyses wre not even wailate for OCPE's scrutiny. PID at E Finding 163iTr,3315.

Sisillrly, the Boara relied @cn the statt) tents of Witness L4Wis that flame speeds lower than that assumed in t i the CLR5!X-3 contairment resPerse todt! Used by l&plicants have been measured, despite the feet that he could not i

)

(or untd rat) identif the/ the egerinental buis for his statements with sufficient particularity to detereine the

$ Eplicallity to ccntairaer.t scale ccnditicra. PID at 102, finding 132; it. 3321-22, 3

j TM [ pare also relied won tM ijse doit asserticers of Applicants' witnesses that drywell leakage of hydropen ,

Cof the magnitude assumed by an Ltwailatte Car 4ral Electric calculation) Would rot affect the results of their '

FLilysts of hydroAn trysport and ccaeustion,'de!Pite the fact that the witnesses admitted that the effects had not l been evaluated. PID at 43; Tr 330s.

! J i

i The Board relied won analyses of drywell capacity, ewipeerrt survivattity, and secondary fires performed for the Grand Gulf plant wich were not a part of the record and were not made available by Applicants during discwery. 4 j PID at E Findin; 114,103, Findin3 136, and 1 E Finfin; 143,  !

4 j Tr4 Ecord relie w/i a vitress' conclusicr.s as to tra mility of the RCIC systes to sair.tain costant nueur in 1 station blKkcut accident oespite the fait thit the Witness was not fa6iliar With the deta:Is of the unWailable F41Ysis. P!D at 196' , findin9146; Tr. :((0.

l Fra 54ard relied won the jgg dgij userticr4 of an obvtcasly trmalified witrass.as to ewtpr4nt hatch 0-rin;

} tcepressico s4t resulting frca hydrogen turn temratures. P!D at 97, FiNins 108. The witness' stateher.ts wre clearly not based @0n his oWi if,owled9e and therefore Were not $4,jtet to examination. If, 36l@ (see ((p.C's Frcesed Fwings of fact aM Ccrclusicr4 of Law, Jure 13, ngs, at pp. 25-26).

g*

741.icensing Scard cle4*1y (tiled to constont tM fxts in this casa, as rn; ired by P'Alic Sarvtce Co of Mw daarshire (!&atttet Station, trits f and 2), R2-422, 6 !9C 33 41 dim, Insttu the End (Jored SLAstantial evinnee in tre record :entrary to its conclusi:ns I r exaeple, tM S03rd itates that Sandia Matt 0nal Laboratories accepted tw CLA5IX Code results with reservaticos, citins OCE D. 21 at it. PID at 39. However, all that is stated on that page of the ethabit in that tM distrituted iFiter system (not tM CLASIX code) is consiJered marginally ade% rte. D4 Board lyurts tM severe Criticisas of tF4 QASIX cede and its irput assumpticos thrtu9ost that exhibit, P4 3Clard igncred tre evi3ence (Mt hydrogen iFiter location and tM scray shield of tM i7 ster asseebly Would afcect ccetcstion characteristics G)CRE D. 21 at 195-%) and accepted, withcut exp:ar.ation, Applicants' witresses' i seitements to tM corarary @ID at 41-42, 'e 7 indies 31), 91 Timing 84), 92 FiNiN 13!)), dewate t*4 Scard's i

e rec.~ritico ed !Wia's enettise in tM sield cf hydrogen ccets.stion. fr. 387. Pe Board similarly ircred 1

eserteertat sata afi5 tests, fr. 327) siAstantiatirg 5Wis's concems.

P4 Scard Rund tha* ese WTECH ir.alysis ci defectia centairment wlds did rot twe credit for tr4 stolus concre+e, ignoring t'* '<t that C(PE Ex. t9, a St ati rescrt of a wetirg cn t*is 51.bjec*. c:rtairts certrW inscreation. PID at ? .

P4 Ews cmtriwd an arg. ment ser wiJirs tM issue of cztii ment stray wailability as an irost to

)

certaiteent rescense arityses, despite its cwi admissico that stran are an important wat trrseer mechanisa arms Jes;ite the statF's telies that spray availaility is 3;estienable in a degrs3ed core v.cident W should rot te toen c* edit ser in such r.alyses. PID at 43-44, OCPE E4.13 at 4.

74 Scars stated thae later wrstens of Sindia's KCTR cet air =!nt resacase *)oet m 1:wer tearera+ures int pressures than tu verst0n used in OCE Cr, 21, sespite tre sxt that tu ccly reliab:e evioence :n ths scint med hi]her pressures from a later version. P:D at 33, fr. 3723, 3741-42.

)n tM TDI dieset issue, tM Board relied won a witressa sta*aeant (corcerning tM tersen os time energency Awr ts r4+ sed for core cooling) mich tM witress la+er retrxted *rder 2.tstioning by tM Board. PID at 72; Tr, 2274.

94 inard also spores stats witness Kirnood's disappro.at of rs+1icants' evaluation Mich tra Board accepted) of tM Perry eMine 30Nati:n. PID at 75,120-12f, finding 200,fr.2417-13.

P4 kard sioitarty 17eres evisence that tw saintenance and sur,t:11ance progrie may r4wr t4 instamented or

=ay ret exist sor t>4 lise os tM slant. P!D at 64. OCPE Ca. 2, fr. 2 05, i

.g -

It DJst h4 rE411ed that scr a Board to batt evtsarce ni then f ail to e41ath ty it has rejected is F9I.5 kr rt trsal. Putlic fen.tice Electrtc 3rd C4s, (1<ft Cem Cererating $tattm. (Otts 1 W 2), 06-*3. 6 f9C 229, 2R (TC.

i 2. UP-h -4 TF4 uforsty in this tiesornfA Ind Order W40") ccensts reaerous etters to sustasy its cerclusivi. First, the s

egislatist histcry es the AT'd5 rule pertaining to *re interpretaticti es "alreuf *siy4d ard busit'* is c:epletely l

irotto. IM H.'crity instead relied won 4 legal interpretaticti os 10 CTP !O.62(c)(4) b/ cr4 5t44 est itt Y l

interstetatim cwtously certrivea to sit the circumstances of Perry Wit 1. N0 et 9,11-12. Pe uscrity concluaes. without t,4 sis, that tM *ctaission considered in its ruleuktng tre situatice at SF4 4 (F relar havars a M CWatile cf WtceatiCn at evtre9ely 10W Ccst but dich rtiuses to btilice that itature, Secord, tre majority only splies its interpretatica to Ferry @it 1, lering it t3 suture CMes t3 Jeterair4 wether reKters Aich art TCt in an RFCed st49e of construction" should 4L.tce4*e t>4 $lC5. .",s0 at f2. Pchett, j this cate%ry incluses Perry Ttt 2, and this is an (1 ProceWing sor both Perry trits. The naicrity cwletely WCided its resporrsibility to # Cide this issue for Tit 2, and such Woidante is tintanamt to the !!!egal Etion l of cele 94 ting tre issue to tM Staff sor post 4eartP9 resolutice, finally, tre majority rejects ibelicarits' owi fiWrt of $100,Q% (with tM a4Jority etscharKterices as CCRE's Mtiset) for SLts a,tomation by concluotng that a "sult rigorous ute s ific value imaxt analysis" eld has to 1

te retc*ed to ceritire the estinate 740 at tL despite tFe ctmous *Kt thee generne r;:e=4tir9 is voertaten to j Mit so:b site specific ar.alyses. Pe 34jority tren u,rces *re incetfible t*4 cry t*P. i'1 t$ts Perry-!;Elfic ral/ sis, smk cests relating to rot:aatico ci tr4 SLC5 sta,13 Le casicered Mrvard ccsts, l'40 at ti ita examples ato.t semanstrate t>4 bicarte ard illogical renoning of tich tM ujority csinico is cceprised.

4 Surely this coinion will tall wri wSellate review,

9. Int?',MdLE 9 R E Dff A ST2f A

1. Capesure ,a paAine [siss..es os Fadittica i

If t54 FID t4ccees e66e"tt'.9,

. t*e Ptery Plant Will be 1110Wed tS cFera*e. I'4 c0eratton Cf Pert / has 4

rcceitant er;ect as enesure c8 t*4 pamlation to routtre, eco-r.atural raftexttw eenssicos. This einsee hks teen terned "4 sirect ard present inNry"/ b' the g " rete Court, tee Power Co. v. (volian twirnaer+al It'e/

70s, 438 U.S. E 74 (trS). As is $sacostrMed bY [*ibit b tr4 8881*$t o' It. C8'l J. F*A 'h'5 N'Y 3

i

.. - q 15 trrWF3ble 14 t0 t*4 c3ttinCNnic Eti'n c4 IN 10'el ritiltim.

s The e4cstre of perses eue esrectally su cestible t0 criter by gerette fxters (as retealed ey aserse isesly I

hiktory) to tM iM10KtiM feleties 505tulated in tM fttry f[$ Cm5titute5 54vece irrgartble hys, Qifi3 Nit Cf (f. Caf! j, jort5m at p. 4. [4054Te t0 the esi$tims occurs by virtus 04 Fhy5ical Ft0xteity to the Fefry Site, by external esosore and internal esoscTe free irbaleian and irsestian of radionuclides free conswing containeted 4cd Of w4ttf, Id, at 2-3, [ahlbst 2, tM affidavit of St.: sin L Histt, shces that an M nester h4 var,g geretic 125ceptthility tQ cirEtt Will be 49C$ed t0 tM FMi>Ktise effluerts iroa Perry, ZFE will theredore 54544f hats dros tM c(4 ration G8 fttfy FaNen*e Q Atch cartCt t4 rectified by a vtCtGry

n wCe41, a$ the Seeds of cancer will htW 41 rett / t4=!n pinnted, This (Et n!One demands t $tt/,

2, Silk Of IeVtte ACctJenti l

l 14 Perry 15 permitted to coerate. XRC members (r.d tM 3erstal petulation) will te enesed to a rtst that as i

"tw n0rrexistent: the risk 05 a fe' efe ruclear reKtcr acct:ent, i IMrt if M dotAt that the con 5MJances of a sure reKtor Kei.1ent can te devtAtating. As estteated in tre

T[5, NE;-0684, a sewfe accioent ctuld cause 379 early f atalities,13,0eg latent cancers, and ae<ut Lees genette i

essects, erpose 9tM people to 1)Ses evceeding 3 reas ane 650,(98 people to 125es o"er 25 rees, ira cost sie billam SCf tidsite ettt;4tteg Etion$, (($, f ale $,9, p, !-$3, Heebers of M .ould in2Mtedly be among tre i

Victies $>t t$ t*4ir pfcytetty of resi:lence to tM Pt'ry sitt.

Alt *407 tM $ tali COnstar$ tM pir.tability CF an KctWit ci Such $4'.4f tty t3 to 10u (t[-3/rext0f9 ear), such t3tts4*e5115J: ject to lutit antial Pttttighties, f[3, Section $,1,4,1,4,7, F9, $-63 and H3, Gaven tM seri 4:e Kcidents and accisant prachtscrs occurring at Tft!, Brows forty (stre), Garna, 341ea, Stoirs feffy 3 (fift:41 actle f ailure), and tM jme ) (v.idont at @pittants' DW15-9elle (Kality, it il M'l Opinton (Mt a tevere ruclear Kcident il not a feecte 3Dd li4ctJlatiW peilibility but il a Vefy real and Pfot@le darger, It also is not wearent Wat sx5 an accise is ry less litaly nig wete ,1ite,creratim than at :AMr rerads u a l reKt0t'$ ($ef atim.

$tthld 3 seWre Kctment XWr W&fte g, a 4tetcry m WFeel cirT4t c04N#$4te (Gr tt4 Osage st4 t3 M i by the Kctsent, De coeratica of Ferry tMrescre creates the rist of severe irreparate hars.

3, t.oss of it ttus -- Or; frte y.tssary 50f a Correct ;4 cision on [isA fio, 6 l

As roted awse, the correct resolutten of Issue :to, 6, m autcastion of tre Ferry 5L:s, biroes en tre

_ . .- .4_. -.-.--,---w-. - - - - -_~-r,- ,-._r,~. -.m- . . - - - . - - - _ _ - .,,---y, ,_.---,--~y---,,.7

. ~ _ . .

.c .

irtertretatian of Q CFli 50.62Cc)(4) consister.t with its legislatioe history, ists r+3ulation states-i The SLCS initiatian nest te autcaatic r4 aust be designed to Hriort its 4#cttcn in a reliaele arrer kr pists Frted 5 constru; tion Nrent after july N,1984, &nd for plants Frted a cystructton permit prict to jaly 3, 1E, that ha,e already teen astred 3rd teilt to include this feature, 2 literal interpretnion, as advocated by 491icants and Sta'3, would exempt Bats that did not ut an autcoatic

RLS already dess3 red and built as of the effectaw date of the rule, s

i d be.ve, inersation in the rooetal Pegister noti:e trWicates that the decision to eyespt certaan plarts sece 1 .

j autteetion (despite tM sirificart rist reenctice acbeised tMrefree) stees free a per+ric value-iapact ar41) Sis I

tssed on insorsation tactied by t>4 Utility Cros on AT'd. 43 FR 3833 Uune 3,1994).

34 !egislative histcry cen* aired in SECY43-;93, specifically, Enclosure 0, the AT6 Tast Force Report, provioes ra tsiyht into this decision. TM costs ior 1C5 wtcaxion Opm Auch tM r;te is buof) taclude 83,35 ei!! en Rr Mst3n, ergineering, W installaticn, 313.9 entlion icr metite ser it!ta!!aticn; 15 0 m:11 cn '(f suix.s trip; and $4,2 al11 ion ice , TAC, CMration, and utrtenance. (See Ie;tember *,1984 CGlC Bened on t>4 Wstory ir,f [r*er.t 06 t64 AT6 P;1e it 1.) Thus, tre scurte C* the Ftraje "ctstred W built" is tre IJe $Ji RT t*4se Etivities consi$tred in the Val'Je/isfact ar41'isis.

74 Task FCret assdeed that e.risting plants would be s%lect to t4 i'JII $23 million for aut;mattrg (*41C$,

i j f9w plarts Mich are assmed to already te desiF+d with this deature, Sae 49 FR NBA), citarly, .aN!d be sut;ect l

to f ar less, Most strificantly, tMre w:uls be no optime scr install > tion, N situatiJn r w etsst N Sor Ferry with resMct to tre costs of SLCS autcoatty, is c!cser to a row plare tem

• o an operntrg plant, The autceatic SLCS is already

• sired, parts ;# it are installed, to dinish t**

Installation would cost, by @elicants' estseates, $fW,8%, Dissent 8% (Ftnicrt of CNirsan Stoch, f40 at 19 li installed belcre Deration, tMre are no costs 05 donettee, I

m interpre*Mion of tre GT4 rule cortsistent with this history wtuld thus tardate tutcoation 0$ t>e Ferry SLC3.

4 Mwer, if Ferry is pereitted to cferste, it will be seject to the Costs 08 ystsee ed will f all 60to the class if reKtors Clearly neart t0 t4 47eepted (Me tutceation: cserattr:g plants, The immed Me eidectiveress 08 the P!0 will theresore result in the loss os t** stMus y g raessary to a corrut mis 6cn on this issue. TM opportmity to gain a sunisicant testow.eer4 in sasety will, asent a stw. e4 screser lost,

(AlttoJgh tw2 members of tM Licensing Sc.ard wearently (41t that a cNnge in cirewstances et tM time of h

__ ___ _ _ . .-_m _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

s9 ell would ret liiect tre outccee of tM issue 02) at 23, n,11), at axid te dar too dngercus ter CCE to tilae tMt Est11F.e trat*n11 bill 3 Met thil View; it is 4150 Obvious tht, ifter OCeration. $vtise 65 3 real cest, rd woli:3 tim of tM ATW5 rule then, an Ecordance with its legislatist history, xvid ret reaaire

}

DAceMian of tM RC$,)

C. 2 TO OT @ F W ffE5 i

(lently, tM Cly Farty Aich cotid t4 Mreed by a 5tay 65 tM @Plicrts, rtM4r, tM Coli Pym t*J weich tref 44,14 14 RAjected is t6.at with dich tNy bag lief frce tFe nr.ceStt n ci t4 Feity plFt tnt tre tillius of dollne$ 5;*nt on Perry will go04 7 n#Jght, With 4tts cren, Splicrits hvg tecepted this rise, NMPtr ;*ett, a

i Citdire F%er 243cter (eitt:teert Co V frterrai: cal tysm cd [!ectrical, tWio. 2M MXFtre 'Krief3, %7 tj,5,

il 415 (t%t).

}

lt 11 e4ectes tMt @Clicy.tl will complith of increlled ccits 16 c$4rittet) is Mll'jts FeNiBJ lifell, e

HM'er, tM Cftly sitWton in dich thi5 beC0ees relevant is if c&eratam il irevat3ble, t.e., is notervencf 5 bM no Sance 05 Dat/4tling m Nfe41, QS larg as tM fisk 04 Jental of tM Q, exist 9, at tar out'4tpa any posnable c0st trCittses etSulting free 4 Stby, A5 Jeschittated 3eoW, tM probeility oo (ever541 of tM FlD 15 ht),

It must also be reali:od that @plicants hM bNught euch of this risk m treei4Ms Litig4 tion on letral e43cr assues crAld km eeen cceptetely Mided by w.eeting tM SLCS, ocesing a segraded ccre hydregen centrel stitle tMt tid nct ircolve tuming (al notice was giteri by tM Ccamissten tMt this is 3 less oesittele oction, 4

) Fi 6:292 (1301)), ed rescIvity tre TDI prcelas een it inest tecame scarent, in 1973 (see OCE Ct, i, (8, Tr, 213 0 , 5tte plierts eccepted tre rist created by their actims, tref stould not t4 tened to ar7;e t*4t a sta/

)

eNing the correct resolutice of these issues will cause thee hart, 4 0, MPC M A.R!C INTEK5T LIES Since tM Pali

, as 41145 OCE, will suider injuttes resulting sme ropant radicactr,e entslions and will be

! t<Kl+f t3 tSe risk ci segre accijents, it is c4viousl/ ret in the pt&lic interest to persit tM c4eretscri ci Party J

, rareed am, ar4 6, cca remire os rxt u calean es Lo, usu e, J.r413, ms. tsu 16,

.=ay 22, tm), Splitres are im raoleim e4 te rJR H 42(e)(4),19 lfR 9,4(c)c)(w) (fil), W E 1 yd 17, I

j r,d tre Ltcensing Beard has violated Sectset) ?9(n) ci tM Atceic Crergy Act, These procestors wre, es corse, 1

l

. - . - . . - . .~. ~ _ .- . - . - - ~._.. - _ - _ .__- - .. - - -

~ _ - . . - ..-

t

-/O -  !

t

• i l enacted to protect tM Phlic interest. 50 Strong is tM Pklic interest in the enforcement of trase measures that I

j tM Coast 38tm's reWittion3 edll itly htMrite (NuncttW relies M they paw teen Va31stw

}

31 initFCtiCA Cr CtMr Court Order ear te C6ttired prohibiting any vio!stico of t>4,1*ctic [retsy k.t Of 1356, as l leerded. Or Title !! Ci the [Nrgy Reorgani 4 tion Act 0$ 13N, Cr any reN14tton Cr Or.it? illi.ed t'4f 9J"4er. 10 (TR ,

! 15.30.

TNJs, a stay is ear 44t3ry to virdicate the PAlic interest nePlicit an C0epitarce with te4 Qt". sac Ente 7/ f(.t and f

I the C0ess35im'1 regulatiers,

\

l W. M MI}

As morstrated isove. OCE kas eue an affirmatwo sNwing on all tour tactors c810 CTR 2.738(et tM i

.I

, Fr batility 04 rt.er$41 Di the illegal 3rd errorgCLS 4Ct4Cf.5 Cd the Littnaing 204rd il Pi), %K

}

! will su84er irreparate here asent a ster; fePlacants will not 14 harmed by a str/; ns t*4 mAlte settrest seseos j 4 Itay.

IP4 evtsence and tM law tt45 re9Jtre that the rtheited relief te gearted. (Q[ freys th44 the f48941 Scard LS 1

j IO M ,

3 Pelpe:t A411y $24itted.

W Susan (..Histt 1, CatRepresentaeaw j 9275 mason fd.

'entor, m uH i UtO 25 H 154 I  :#ed SeeM /9, /WC l

1 1

I i

I i

)

1 J

4 j .

i.