ML20135E466

Forwards Summary of Braidwood Const Assessment Program (Bcap) 850625 Meeting W/Nrc at Region III & Bcap Director Progress Rept for Jul 1985.Attendance List & Meeting Viewgraphs Also Encl

ML20135E466
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	09/05/1985
From:	Miosi A COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
NUDOCS 8509160406
Download: ML20135E466 (36)

Text

_

3 .g..., j

~'

Commonwealth Edison ony First National Plaza, Chicigo. Ilknois

' k

~

) Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767

,/ Chicago, lilinois 60690 Sept. 5, 1985 f 4

7 7G gre -

B4hp Z-Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator - Region III sk z@t "d L L

v cM g

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

SUBJECT:

Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Monthly Meeting Minutes / Monthly Report Docket No. 50-456 and 50-457

Dear Mr. Keppler:

The ninth open briefing on the status of the BCAP ef fort was provided to the NRC on June 25, 1985 at the NRC Region III offices in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. Forwarded herewith is a meeting summary including a copy of the visual-aid material used in the presentations.

Also forwarded herewith for your information is the BCAP Director's Progress Report for the month of July, 1985.

Please direct any questions relating to BCAP to Mike wallace, Assistant Manager of Projects and the Braidwood Project Manager.

Very truly yours,

!f Anthony D. Miosi Nuclear Licensing Administrator Attachments cc: NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood NRC BCAP Inspector - Braidwood John Hansel - Evaluation Research Corporation Ninu Kaushal -

Commonwealth Edison Company 0605K 8509160406 050905 PDR A ADOCK 05000456 pyg cEP V 91985 i

8 t--- - O

F' s . .

Meeting Summary BCAP NRC/ CECO /ERC Monthly Meeting June 25, 1985 9:00 a.m.

Region III NRC Office Glen Ellyn, Illinois The meeting was opened with a brief statement by W. S. Little of the NRC Region III giving the purpose for the meeting, that is, to discuss BCAP, it's progress, and the Independent Expert Overview Group's (IEOG) review of the BCAP. Mr. Little also stated that upon completion of the presentation by CECO and the IEOG, the NRC would respond to questions from the public in attendance.

The following is the agenda utilized for the remainder of the meeting.

I. Introduction Presented by the Braidwood Project Manager to provide the major topics of the presentation (see Enclosuro 1).

II. BCAP Task Force Presented by the BCAP Director to provide the BCAP achievements and results completed as of June 25, 1985 (see Enclosure 2).

III. Qaality Assurance '

Presented by the General Supervisor of Quality Assurance to describe the overview activities of the CECO BCAP QA group (see Enclosure 3).

IV. IEOG Progress Report Presented by the Project Manager of the IEOO to describe the overview activities of the 1E00 (see Enclosure 4).

Additional items discussed during the meeting are included in Enclosure 5. The attendance for the meeting is provided in Enclosure 6. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 a.m.

'.095J w

Enclocura 1

'+ie Page 1 of 1 1

j BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAE)

MONTHLY NRC STAFF BRIEFING i

i

t JUNE 25, 1985 4  :

I j I. INTRODUCTION MIKE WALLACE i

j i II. BCAP TASK FORCE NINU KAUSHAL i

i III. QUALITY ASSURANCE NEIL SMITH I

IV. INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP JOHN HANSEL I

i I

.i r

?

1 i

l

e- r

/g ?

,' , .. Enclosure 2

- i

. Page 1 of 15 BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)

STATUS BRIEFING PRESENTED TO REGIONAL 0FFICE -- REGION III i

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

a  !

, N. N. KAUSHAL BCAP DIRECTOR l I JUNE 25, 1985 (1029J) l

. Enclosure 2 Page 2 of 15 DVERALL BCAP STATUS CSR

• REINSPECTION / REVIEWS COMPLETED AS OF 6/24/85

• PROCESSING 0F OBSERVATIONS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED

+ ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS IN PROGRESS, COMPLETED FOR SEVERAL POPULATIONS RESE

• REVIEW 0F ALL CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES COMPLETED AS OF 6/13/85

• PROCESSING 0F OBSERVATIONS IN PROGRESS

• ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS IN PROGRESS RSCAE

• REVIEW COMPLETED FOR EIGHT OF THE NINE PROGRAMS

• REVIEW ON ONE REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED MID JULY DVERALL

• REPORT WRITING IN PROGRESS 1750J

.' '. ,, . Enclosure 2 Page 3 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION STATUS ESTIMATED NUMBER EST. NUMBER NUMBER OF PROCESSED CONSTRUCTION OF ITEMS IN SAMPLE DISCREFANCY FOR DESIGN CATEGORY POPULATION SIZE REPORTS SIGNIFICANCE STATUS CIVIL STRUCTURAL Concrete Placements 1,300 80 80 54 Structural Steel 10,800 123 153 150 Masonry Walls 610 70 177 132 containment Liner 920 75 62 61 ELECTRICAL Conduit 2,800 123 112 112 C Cat. I Conduit Hangers 10, ~100 138 147 139 Cables 2,700 122 107 89 Cable Pans 900 90 99 90 Cat. I Cable Pan Hangers 3,800 130 165 122 Elec. Equip. Installation 1,800 138 200 31 HVAC/ MECHANICAL HVAC Duct 730 80 122 121 HVAC Equip. Installation 110 60 45 44 HVAC Duct Hangers 600 115 119 110 HVAC Housing & Plenums Fab. 190 61 17 17 C Mech. Equip. Field Fab. 10 10 36 27 Mech. Equip. Installation 260 70 47 8 Touch Up Galvanizing 730 80 15 15 C NSSS Equip. Installations 540 70 14 0 NSSS Supt. Verification 270 70 42 0 PIPING S.B. Pipe Configuration 1,100 84 20 20 C L.B. Pipe Supports (Rigid) 3,600 139 114 101 L.B. Pipe Suppts (Non-Rigid) 340 73 55 53 L.B. Pipe Configuration 350 70 63 58 Piping System Bends 2,900 100 5 5 C S.B. Pipe Supports 1,450 117 57 43 S.B. Piping / Instr-Welds / Mat 17,900 128 6 6 C L.B. Pipe - Welds / Mat'l 8,200 134 5 4 Instr. Pipe / Tube - Suppts. 870 120 139 64 TOTAL 2,223 1,676 (1777J) i

. . Enclosure 2 Page 4 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: HVAC EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION GENERAL DATA:

TOTAL POPULATION 110 SAMPLE 60 INSPECTION POINTS ~24400 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 45 N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 202 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 0.8 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCIES EVIDENT NO SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 1750J

Enclosure 2

. ,' '. ,. . Page 5 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: HVAC DUCT GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 730 SAMPLE 80 INSPECTION POINTS ~101,000 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 122 NO. OF DISCREPANCIES 749 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 0.74 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCY EVIDENT NO SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 1750J l

• Enclosure 2 Page 6 of 15 CSR RFINSPFCTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: HVAC TOUCH-UP GALVANIZING GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 730 SAMPLE 80 INSPECTION POINTS ~3t400 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS IS N0. OF DISCREPANCIES I12 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 1.2 RESULTS N0 DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCY EVIDENT NO SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED

, 1750J

I I

o - o Enclosure 2 Page 7 of 15 l l

CSR REINSEPCTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: HVAC HOUSING & PLENUMS FAB.

GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 190 SAMPLE 61 INSPECTION POINTS ~13,400 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 17 N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 72 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) .S RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES N0 PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCIES EVIDENT N0 SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 17S0J

~

.' ' o -

0 Enclosure 2 Page 8 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: ELECTRICAL CONDUIT GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 2800 SAMPLE 123 INSPECTION POINTS ~5800 N0. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 112 NO. OF DISCREPANCIES 146 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 2.6 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES RECURRING DISCREPANCIES REQUIRING F0LLOW UP SEG. CODE LABELS MISSING OR DAMAGED LOOSE FLEX CONNECTIONS DISCREPANT ATTACHMENT TO SUPPORTS INCORRECT SEPARATION l

1750J

. Enclosure 2 Page 9 of 15' CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: SMALL BORE PIPING CONFIGURATION GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 1100 SAMPLE 8 11 INSPECTION POINTS ~2800 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 20 N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 29 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 1.0 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCY EVIDEN1 NO SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED

/

t 1750J

.,- -- , ~ .

- _= -

Enclosure 2

• Page 10 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: PIPE BENDS GENFRAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 2900 SAMPLE 100 INSPECTION POINTS 500 NO. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS S N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 5 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 1 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCIES EVIDENT NO SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 1750J g

.m

,' . Enclosure 2

. Page 11 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY: LARGE BORE PIPE-WELDS / MATERIAL GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 8200 SAMPLE 134 INSPECTION POINTS ~2100 N0. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS S N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 5 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 0.2 RESulTS N0 DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCIES EVIDENT N0 SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 1750J

. Enclosure 2

. Page 12 of 15 CSR REINSPECTION RESULTS (CONT'D)

CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY- SMALL BORE PIPE WELDS / MATERIAL GENERAL DATA TOTAL POPULATION 17900 SAMPLE 128 INSPECTION POINTS ~1800 N0. OF DISCREPANCY REPORTS 6 N0. OF DISCREPANCIES 6 DISCREPANCY RATE (PERCENT) 0.3 RESULTS NO DESIGN SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES 1

NO PROGRAMMATIC DISCREPANCIES EVIDENT N0 SYSTEMIC FOLLOW UP ACTION INDICATED 1750J

~~ *

• Enclosure 2 Page 13 of 15 RPSR STATUS VALIDITY IfFACT NUPEER OF NUPEER OF DETERMINATION EVALUATION S&L PROCEDURES ESSENTIAL NUPEER OF (PERCENT (PERCENT CONCERNS CONTRACTOR SPEC. REVIEhED REQUIREMENTS OBSERVATIONS COPFLETE) C0FFLETE) ISSUED L.K. Comstock Co. , L-2790 109 642 22 70 15 0 Inc.

Nuclear Installation L-2834 37 467 12 0 0 0 Services Company G.K. Newberg L-2722 43 564 di 0 0 0 Construction Company Pittsburgh Testing L-2850 44 722 33 40 0 0 Laboratory PHillips, Getschow L-2739 130 759 73 0 0 0 Company Pullman Sheet Metal L-2782 58 344 13 30 0 0 Works, Inc.

Midway Industrial L-2831 39 275 10 50 0 0 Contractors, Inc.

Chicago Bridge and L-2725 131 418 19 40 0 0 Iron Works M & 0 Insulation L-2828 1 3 1 100 100 1 Company (1776J) i

Enclosure 2 Page 14 of 15 l

RSCAP STATUS REVIEW COMPLETED ON 8 0F THE 9 PROGRAMS No SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS IDENTIFIED THROUGH BCAP FOR 5 PROGRAMS ADDITIONAL ACTIONS ARE BEING UNDERTAKEN BY COMMONWEALTH EDISON ON 3 PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS.

ONE PROGRAM CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW: EXPECTED COMPLETION MID-JULY.

(1778J)

e .

Enclosure 2 Page 15 of 15

SUMMARY

• CSR INSPECTIONS AND REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE.

• RPSR REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE.

• RSCAP REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE ON 8 0F THE 9 PROGRAMS: ONE REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED BY MID JULY.

• SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS MADE ON EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS.

• NO DESIGN-SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES TO DATE.

• COMPLETION OF THE WORK EXPECTED BY MID AUGUST.

I I

(1779J)

. g.

"' ~

• . Enclosure 3 Pace 1 of 6 BCAP 0.A.

MONTHLY BRIEFING

~

N. P. SMITH JUNE 25. 1985 (0515B)

BCAP OUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCES 250-to 200 e w -

~

/

_s -

_3 w 150 -

H

[

100 ,

x

~

d w -

/

N 2

~

/

/

' 50-

- 2'!?

/ WS "l

R,2 0  ;;,' ....,... , ...,,.. i. ..,. .

i....i....i 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5

09/07/84 01/01/85 03/01/85 05/01/85 06/21/85

- Actual SURVEILLANCES Scheduled SURVEILLANCES ,

BCAP QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS 20-

= Actual AUDITS Scheduled AUDITS S _

/

r

=?

/

x M

f -

w/

$ 10- /

/ iii a

q _

u_ f o -

m. _

uJ ca 5-r a _

mm Z _ .

EE m-

_ m' we

, , P, !

0 /; ; , ,., , , , , , , , , , , , ," , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,",, , , , , , , ",

d 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 '

09/07/84 01/01/85 03/01/85 05/01/85 06/21/85

.i.

. i CORRECTIVE ACTION

• REQUESTS t 4 0_.

n

- ,n

/

d .

/

30-_ /r

^

?

m1 E i

w

. / .

E  : ,, , / ' Total CARS 20- '

/ .

I U'S -

Opon CARS i

ct ,/

w _-1

[D -

/

5

~

V z _

~

.10 _

'/p,\/'\./\,

/s

/

[

wj

= : /, , \ ,/ \

y /

,m wo a/% Y \ 3 / N jOg o

g_ ,,, *g i , i , , , , i i i , , , , , , , ,n i i , , , , , , ", , , , , , , , a , , , , , , , ',g on 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 **

09/07/84 01/01/85 03/01/85 05/01/85 06/21/85

r .,m+ , we = w <e,. w-,,.n. , , , - - , , , - - . , ,,,,

+ -

BCAP QUALITY ASSURANCE HOLD POINT FOR REVIEW 0F INVALID OBSERVATIONS 247,n2

> [xN\ \

\ '

i

\ f INVALID OBSERVATIONS

\ Y 767. 21 i

i 1126 REVIEWED WITHOUT COMMENT gg

1. 1-WITHOUT C0FliEbfT g.

.?47 REVIEWED WITH COMMENT

---

wg 1473 TOTAL REVIEWED THRU JUNE 21 22-WITH COMMENT' {

.'. ' .' .' ' # Enclosure 3

.' Page 6 of 6 OVERINSPECTION

SUMMARY

PACKAGES COMPLETION OVERINSPECTED OBJECTIVE SUBJECTIVE STATUS DESCRIPTION OF POPULATION (%) (%) (%) (%)

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ---

95 90 ---

Civil / Structural S-001 Concrete Placements............. 13 99 NA 90+

S-002 Structural Stee1................ 11 99 99 90+

S-004 Masonry Wa11s................... NA NA NA NA S-005 Containment Liner............... 16 98 NA 90+

S-006 Cadwe1ds........................ NA NA NA NA S-007 Post Tensioning................. NA NA NA NA Electrical E-CND' Conduit......................... 12 95 NA 100 E-COH Cat. I Conduit Hangers.......... 12 97 99 100 E-CBL Cables.......................... 15

• NA 90+

E-CBP Cable Pans...................... 10 100 100 100 E-CPH Cat. I Cable Pan Hangers........ 11 99 94 90+

E-EIN Elec. Equip. Installation....... 12 96 98 90+

HVAC/ Mechanical H-001 HVAC Duct....................... 18 95 100 100 H-002 HVAC Equip. Installation........ 23 97 99 100 H-003 HVAC Duct Hangers............... 10 97 99 100 H-004 HVAC Housing & Plenums Fab...... 15 *

• 90+

H-005 Mech. Equip. Field Fab.......... 30 96 NA 90+

H-006 Mech. Equip. Installation....... 14

• 94 90+

H-007 Touch Up Galvanizing............ 11 97 NA 100 H-008 NSSS Equip. Inst................ 10 100 100 100 H-010 NSSS Support Verification....... 12 98 100 90+

Piping M-001 S.B. Pipe Configuration......... 17 97 NA 100 M-002 L.B. Pipe Supports (Rigid)...... 18 98 98 100 M-003 L.B. Pipe Supports (Non-Rigid).. 23 98 98 100 M-004 L.B. Pipe Configuration......... 23

• NA 90+

M-005 Piping System Bends............. 16 100 NA 100 M-006 S.B. Pipe Supports.............. 16 98 99 100 M-009 S.B. Piping / Instr-Welds Mat..... 11 100 100 100 M-012 L.B. Pipe - Welds / Mat'l......... 11 100 100 100 M-015 Instr. Pipe / Tube - Suppts....... 11 *

• 90+

• under evaluation (0503B)

,9

! BCAP STATUS MEETING FOR l APRIL THRU JUNE, 1985 i

INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP  :

JUNE 25, 1985 mm .

En E

~g R2 u, n l

Enclosure 4

, s ,

Page 2 of 5 TOPICS o Executive Summary o Overview Activities o Closed Issues o Open Issues

.l 1

4 l

.- ' '[ . EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

R; "";; j

! o BCAP OVERVIEW

! Program has been well executed and is being closed out in an orderly fashion.

o CSR ELEMENT ,

Reinspections essentially com-plete and results are being compiled. Last two populations are nearing closure, o RPSR ELEMENT Draft reports in progress.

Element did produce some ob-

servations requiring followup.

o RSCAP ELEMENT

Reports nearly finalized.

Several of the SCAP's will be ,

completed subsequent to the l closure of BCAP. l l

o BCAP QA Continuing to demonstrate. good l performance.

e m ----,,.-m-,w.- , - wm-,,,- -- . ,,- ,.,-,.,---w, -

Enclosure 4

.' d . Page 4 of 5 OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES REINSPECTIONS l o One observation issued and subsequently closed. l o Observation BCAP-OBS-018 issued and open.

AUDITS o Audited BCAP QA for their procedures QUASI's 15, 16 and 18. One concern issued and closed during the audit.

DOCUMENTATION REVIEW o Maintained reviews of BCAP observations, S & L design significant reviews and PCD NCR's.

o Maintained reviews of checklists, procedures and plans.

o Essentially completed re-views for CSR documentation package. No problems i

observed that had not been defined by BCAP personnel.

I l -

l

Enclosure 4

'.'e. Page 5 of 5 t

Closed Issues o All IEOG observations and Notices of Concern have been resolved except BCAP-OBS-018.

i l

\

l 1

=. -- -- _ . -

~

, so '

.' n .

I ENCLOSURE 5 ITEMS DISCUSSED AT THE NRC/ CECO /ERC MEETING I

JUNE 25, 1985 NRC REGION III OFFICE i Mr. Wallace presented the outline for the presentation. Mr. Wallace informed the NRC Staff that BCAP reinspections and document reviews were completed on June 24, 1985 and that the observation processing was i approximately 75 percent complete. Mr. Wallace stated that final results

! are expected to be available for discussion in August.

i Mr. Kaushal presented the status of the three BCAP elements. This presentation focused on the results of work essentially complete as of June 25, 1985. In response to a question on inspection points, Mr. Kaushal stated that it is the number of decisions the inspector had to make, any one of which could have resulted in a discrepancy.

During the presentation of the RPSR status Mr. Kaushal stated that although the impact evaluation of the observations was not complete, the

initial review of these observations does not indicate any major impact

, on construction. Mr Hansel of the ISOG stated that they also had i reviewed the observations and did not see a problem.

During the presentation of the RSCAP status, Mr. Gardner of the NRC asked when some of the RSCAP reports would be available. Mr. Kaushal stated he felt they would be available in about three or four weeks. ,

Mr. Smith presented the BCAP QA status. He stated that the QA hold point on invalid observations is going well, and that after resolution of comments, QA agrees with the task force invalidation on greater than 99 percent of the observations. Mr. Smith also stated that the QA overinspection of the BCAP inspectors was showing very good recults.

Mr. Hansel of the IBOG stated that the IBOG has also completed approximately a 13 percent overinspection the BCAP with good results, i

Mr. Hansel presented the IBOG activities. This presentation included an executive summary, overview activities, closed issues, and open issues.

Mr Hansel stated that BCAP was proceeding towards the finish very well and the BCAP was properly executed.

i 1878J

c-

.i '

• 4 '

, ' Enclosure 5 Juns 25, 1985 Page 2 I

I Mr. Maiman stated that this concluded the presentation from Ceco to the NRC. He also stated that CECO was nearing completion of the massive BCAP I effort which is producing very good results and that the BCAP r densonstrates construction quality of the Braidwood Station.

, Mr. Keppler stated that he was glad to see the results of the BCAP coming out good and that the effort was a very important one. Mr. Keppler commended Ceco on their efforts. '

l At this time the meeting was opened for questions to the NRC from the public in attendance. There were no questions, and the meeting was adjourned.

P

r i

I i

w l

T I

P 1

I l t l

1878J

. . - r

. A Enclosure 6 List of Attendees 1

NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION J. G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III NRC W. S. Little Chief Operations branch Region III, NRC R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspector Region III, NRC J

R. D. Schulz Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III, NRC L. G. McGregor Resident-Braidwood Region III, NRC W. Muffett DRS Region III, NRC M. J. Faber Inspector NRC A. Dunlop Inspector NRC D. E. Hills Inspector NRC J. S. Mueller DRSS Co-Op NRC L. O. DelGeorge Asst. Vice-President CECO W. E. Vahle Proj. Field Eng. Mgr. CECO G. C. Jones Project S&L W. J. Shewski Ceco Manager of Q. A. CECO G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP CECO R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP CECO K. T. Kostal Project Director Braidwood S&L R. E. Ham IEOG, Asst. Project Manager ERC J. L. Hansel IEOG, Project Manager ERC W. L. Chase Consultant IEOG N. P. Smith General Supervisor - QA CECO D. L. Shamblin Proj. Const. Superintendent CECO E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA CECO T. J. Maiman Manager of Projects CECO N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director CECO L. S. Weiss BCAP - SWEC Deputy Mg. SWEC M. Franco Consultant MRF&A M. J. Wallace Project Mgr. CECO 1095J

.~ . , , ,

t t ,

e T.

. m -

P193 2 Enclosure List of Attendees NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION R. F. Williams BCAP-QA CECO R. C. Cannon BCAP-QA CECO P. R. Pelke Project Inspector NRC P. Dunlop Engineering Mgr. SWEC I. M. Johnson Nuclear Communications CECO R. R. Minue Nuclear Engineer State Of Ill.

Dept. of Nuc. Safety M. R. Dougherty BCAP Supervisor CECO B. R. Shelton Projects Engr. Mgr. CECO s

B. R. Pardunn BCAP Eval. Coordinator S&L D. M. Fischer Proj. Manager BCAP S&L V. Copeland Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal J. A. Stevens Licensing Project Manager CECO E. L. Chan Counsel for NRC NRC, OELD t

I i

j l

1 1095J

7

.' * ' '

• Page 1 of 3  ;

PROGRESS REPORT l

BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

\

REPORT PERIOD JULY l - JULY 31, 1985 I. SUfMARY/ STATUS This is the thirteenth monthly progress report for the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from July 1 through July 31, 1985.

l i

CSR Checklist and Instruction preparation and Reinspection and Documentation reviews have been completed for all populations.

Observation processing is proceeding on an expedited basis.

4 During this period RPSR efforts concentrated on proc e*ssing observations taking into account information received from PCD, QA, and S&L.

i Draft RSCAP reports have been prepared for eight out of a total of nine programs. The draft of one remains to be completed.

As of July 31, the number of personnel assigned to BCAP is 57.

II. SCHEDULE ANALYSIS i CSR Element - All reinspection and documentation review packages have been issued and the corresponding visual reinspections and reviews have been completed. It is anticipated that observation processing will be completed so as to support the overall draft report completion in September.

RPSR Element - Observation processing and evaluation of the impact of

^ RPSR concerns remain to be completed. RPSR work completion is expected to support the overall draft report completion in September.

RSCAP Element - Draft reports for RSCAP programs are undergoing internal

, review.

3 General - Based on projections as of the end of this period, the BCAP

effort is expected to be substantially completed by the end of September.

III. PERSONNEL STATUS The total number of personnel assigned to the BCAP project at the end of July was 57 compared to 85 at the end of June. The 57 were distributed as follows: Management and Administrative - 12; CSR Engineering - 29;-

RPSR Engineering - 4; RSCAP Engineering - 3; Inspectors - 9.

4 l

l (1183J)

d* '

• Prga 2 of 3 IV. BCAP ELEMENT STATUS A. CSR Status Reinspections and documentation reviews have been completed for all populations.

Observations are being processed on a high priority basis.

Reinspection observation processing has been completed for ten of the thirty populations.

Evaluation of observations is in progress and results are being incorporated into text for the BCAP report.

B. RPSR Status During this period RPSR effort was mostly devoted to the processing of observations, taking into account information furnished by PCD, QA, And S&L.

It is expected that RPSR observation review and evaluation will continue during August.

C. RSCAP Status Draft reports have been prepared and are being internally reviewed for the following eight programs: QCSSR, Safety Related Pipe Supports, Piping Heat Number Traceability, Electrical Installation Documentation Review, Mechanical Equipment Installation, Instrument Installation Verification, HVAC Retrofit, and NSSS Component Supports. The Quality Control Inspector Reinspection Program is currently under review.

D. General Drafting of the overall BCAP report continued. Draft sections mostly provide program descriptions, however the incorporation of results and conclusions has been initiated.

V. PROBLEMS / DISCREPANCY FINDINGS A. Implementation Problems No significant implementation problems were experienced during this period.

B. Discrepancy Findings A total of 7518 CSR observation reports have been written as of July 31, 1985. Review of these observations for validity is largely complete, activity being mostly devoted to reassessing additional l input from various contractors. out of those that are considered I valid discrepancies, approximately 3950 have been sent to S&L for design significance determination.

l (1183J)

'c=w Paga 3 of 3 As of the end of this report period, S&t,has not identified any discrepancy as design significant.

No discrepancy findings or concerns were reported by RPSR or RSCAP.

VI. RECOf9ENDATIONS No recommendations are offered at this time.

N .N .tudA N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director i

1 I

(1183J) l

_ _ _ _ . ~ . _ .

.__ _ . _