ML20135D438
| ML20135D438 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1997 |
| From: | Gaudet T ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| W3F1-97-0043, W3F1-97-43, NUDOCS 9703050240 | |
| Download: ML20135D438 (5) | |
Text
-_
Entergy g u g y - =.i c.
=
Operations emu =6 Td 504-739-6650 i
W3F1-97-0043 A4.05 4
PR March 3,1997 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
)
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Fitness for Duty Performance Data, Six Month Report i
Gentlemen:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), Entergy Operations, Inc. hereby submits by attachment, the Fitness for Duty Performance Data for the six month period from July 1,1996 through December 31,1996.
If you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Tim Gaudet at j
(504) 739-6666 or Homer Skip Cooper at (601) 368-5820.
j i
Very truly yours, U cL W m
T.J. Gaudet Acting Director Nuclear Safety & Regulatory Affairs fC I
TJG/GCS/tjs Attachment (w/ Attachment) cc:
L.J. Callan (NRC Region IV), C.P. Patel (NRC-NRR),
R.B. McGehee, N.S. Reynolds, NRC Resident Inspectors Office 9703050240 970303 PDR ADOCK 05000382; R
%I%hEhh,0hh
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM j
PERFORMANCE DATA i
l PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 j
Entergy Operations, Inc.
December 31,1996 Company 6 Months Ending 4
l Waterford 3 SES, PO Box B, Killona, LA 70066 Location 4
4 Karen L. Shelton, Security Coordinator lll (504) 739-6308 Contact Name Phone (include Area Code)
)
l Cutoffs:
Screen / Confirmation Appendix A to 10CFR26 i
Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 N/A
/
l Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 N/A
/
l Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04 %
N/3
/
i Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractor Contractor j
Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 801 N/A 282 l
Categories j
Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 69 1/0 N/A N/A 256 5/1 i
{
For-Cause (Post accident) 0 0
N/A N/A 1
0 For-Cause (Behavior) 0 0
N/A N/A 1
0/0 i
Random 182 0
N/A N/A 91 3/1 Follow-Up 2
0 N/A N/A 0
0 Other 0
0 N/A N/A 0
0 Total 253 1/0 N/A N/A 349 8/2 Page 3
BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencydidine Alcohol Refusal 1
2 3
4 5
to Test Licensee Employees 1/0 0
0 0
0 0
0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractor -
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term C:ntractor 3/3 4
0 0
0 2
1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A A
i Tctal 4/3 4
0 0
0 2
1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14*
- Two samples tested positive for both marijuana and cocaine.
One sample was a refusal to test.
Page 4
i Fitn=c fer Duty Progrcm Six Month Performance Report FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The Waterford 3 annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 25.2 percent of the population have been randomly tested.
There were four positive tests resulting from random selections. The rate of positives from random testing is 1.47 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
Of the substances tested for, marijuana is the drug of preference accounting for 53.8 percent of the positive results and cocaine is second yielding 30.8 percent of positives. This is consistent with what has been detected at Waterford 3 in previous submittals. Entergy uses a more stringent cut-off for marijuana. The lower cut-off accounted for 42.9 percent of the marijuana positives.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
l Access was denied for the employees that tested positive during pre-access and random testing. Management was notified and the individuals' files were annotated of the positive results and management's actions.
There was one employee participating in a follow-up program. Two follow-up tests were administered to this employee. Both tests yielded negative results.
One individual who reported to Fitness-For-Duty for pre-access testing refused to provide a complete sample. This individual was denied access. Management was notified and the individuals' file was annotated of the refusal and management's actions.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC):
During this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for duty program that were reportable.
l l
Page1
Fitn:20 for Duty Prcgrcm Six Month Performance Report PROGRAM EVALUATION / AUDIT:
During this reporting period, an audit of the Waterford 3 Fitness-For-Duty Program was conducted by the site Quality Assurance organization. The audit concluded that the overall program is sound and reflected two program strengths: 1) fifteen minute random reporting time, and 2) process forms and MRO forms. An isolated event was noted during the audit in which a presumptive sample was confirmed after ten days.
The event was recorded on a condition report and will be resolved through the established corrective action process.
i i
Page 2