ML20135D059
| ML20135D059 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/06/1996 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| PR-II-96-101, NUDOCS 9612090222 | |
| Download: ML20135D059 (1) | |
Text
_ . _ . . _ _ _ ._ _ ___ . _ . _. _ __ . _ . _ _ . __._ .
1
- j. -
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I REGION II 101 Marietta St., Suite 2900
. Atlanta, GA 30323 i
No. II-96-101 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Friday, December 6, 1996)
Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878 l SUMMER NUCLEAR PLANT RATED " SUPERIOR" IN THREE AREAS, j " GOOD" IN FOURTH AREA OF NRC ASSESSMENT REPORT The Summer nuclear power plant received performance ratings of
" superior" in three areas and " good" in the fourth area of the j Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest systematic assessment of
- licensee performance (SALP) of the facility.
I The SALP report was sent today to South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, which operates the facility near Columbia, South Carolina.
- It evaluates the plant's October 26 of this year. performance from January 29, 1995, th
- rough j
1 4 NRC and SCE&G officials will discuss the report during a meeting set i for 1:00 p.m. Monday, December 16, at the Summer site. The meeting
- will be open for public observation. NRC officials will be 4
available after the meeting to speak with reporters, state and local j officials, and members of the public.
NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four functional i areas - plant operations, maintenance, and plant
- support - and assign ratings of Categoryengineering, 1, 2 or 3 depending on ,
{ whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or J j -adequate.
(
2 ThereportonSummergivestheplantaCatebcating" operations, engineering and maintenance, in ry 1 rating in plant superior" )'
j performance, and a Category 2 rating in plant support, indicating
- " good" performance.
i In.the previous SALP report in March 1995, the plant received the j same Category 1 or " superior" ratings in operations and maintenance.
- Performance in engineering improved from Category 2 (good) to
- Category 1 (superior). Performance in plant support declined from j Category 1 (superior) to Category 2 (good).
) ###
i EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP reports are also available on the NRC's Internet web site (http://www.nrc. gov /OPA) and by e-mail
- subscription. To receive SALP reports by e-mail as they are issued, send an e-mail to listproc@nrc. gov with the
- following message
- subscribe salp yourfirstname
< yourlastname.
1 i
4 9612090222 961206
_ - . .- .