ML20135A606

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 70-1151/96-03.Corrective Actions:Prepared Commitment Tracking System to Guide Emergency Preparedness Coordinator in Defining Audit Scope & follow-up Review of Future Audits
ML20135A606
Person / Time
Site: Westinghouse
Issue date: 11/27/1996
From: Fici J
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
CON-NRC-96-056, CON-NRC-96-56 NUDOCS 9612030316
Download: ML20135A606 (2)


Text

-

r% '

i

(

-g f-

~;

l i

Westinghouse Commercial Nuclear orawer a Electric Corporation Fuel Division fl$$'eAg2sa 8

NRC-96-056 j

l November 27,19%

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk j

Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION

REFERENCE:

REPORT NO: 70-1151/96-03 Pursuant to the provisions delineated in Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Westinghouse herein provides formal response to your letter of November 1,1996, regarding your inspection of the Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility conducted during the period of September 9-26 and October 4,19%.

Appendix A provides our response to the specific violt. tion of NRC requirements identified in the Notice of Violation.' 'All additional issues presented in the inspection report have been highlighted for tracking to resolution, and appropriate documentation is being completed for follow-up inspector review.

I hereby affirm that the statemer:s made in this response are true and correct to the best of'my knowledge and belief. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please telephone me at (803) 776-2610.

Sincerely, i

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION e0.

ames A. Fici, Plant Manager Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility Q

f j

Attachments:~ APPENDIX A' I-cc:

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Administrator, Region 11 101 Marietta Street, NW '

l Atlanta, GA 30323 D-The l%dhrahnuse Commerch/Nucharfue/Diwsion - Whnerofttie 1988Malcolm Baldripe NathnalQua/H}' Award

.9612030316 961127 PDR-ADOCK 07001151 C

PDR

~'

70-1151/96-03

, November 27,1996 APPENDIX A WESTINGHOUSE RESPONSE TO THE ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED IN THE NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION The information in this Appendix is provided in response to the Inspectors' observations as described in the

" VIOLATION" section below:

VIOLATION 1.

The following information is provided in response to the inspector's observations that the 1995 independent audit of the emergency preparedness program was not performed as required by the Site Emergency Plan. "The licensee's audit consisted exclusive of the CY 95 exercise. No evaluations were performed within the areas of training, emergency facilities, equipment, supplies,-

records, or the Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures."

WESTINGHOUSE RESPONSE

[

I.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE VIOLATION The violation is correct as stated in the Notice of Violation.

l

. II.

REASON FOR THE VIOLATION The violation resulted from a misunderstanding between the emergency preparedness coordinator and the independent auditor as to the required audit scope, and a failure to recognize the limited scope of the audit during review of the audit fmdings by the emergency preparedness coordinator.

III.

IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN AND RESULTS ACHIEVED The emergency preparedness coordinator immediately committed to preparing an audit checklist for the 1996 audit to assure that all applicable criteria from the Site Emergency Plan are included.

The independent auditor for the 1996 audit has been selected, and the audit checklist has been prepared and sent to the auditor. The 1996 audit is scheduled for completion by December 15, 1996.

IV.

ACTIONS TAKEN, OR PLANNED, TO PREVENT RECURRENCE A Conunitment Tracking System (CTS) item has been prepared to guide the emergency preparedness coordinator in defming audit scope, and assuring completeness of follow-up resiew, of all future audits.

V.

DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WAS ACHIEVED i

Since it is not possible to re-do the 1995 audit, and the 1996 audit has been structured to meet all l

Site Emergency Plan requirements, full compliance has been achieved.

.. _..., _ _.