ML20134Q190

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Retyped Hearing Schedule & Lists Revs,Per
ML20134Q190
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  
Issue date: 09/04/1985
From: Gallo J
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
To: Brenner L, Callihan A, Grossman H
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#385-438 OL, NUDOCS 8509090207
Download: ML20134Q190 (5)


Text

-

ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE CWNSELORS AT LAW gg(;gg779 USNRC THREE FIRST NATON/.L PLAZA 85 SEP -6 U?

CHICAGO,4UNOIS 6m02 TELEPHONE 312 S$8J500 SMIETON OFFICE TELEX. 2-5288 08 RT T NC LN.

1120 CONNE TAVENUE,N.W wituAu s sEALE. isams 0FricE cr Serf ^f*"j7MC.2 mas 00CMET PgEPvir September 4, 1985 a

Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Lawrence Brenner, Esquire Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge i

102 Oak Lane Atomic Safety and Licensing Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 i

Re:

In the Matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Braidwood Station, Units and 2, Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457) O Gentlemen:

As promised in yesterday's letter to the Board, I am enclosing a completely retyped hearing schedule.

The schedule l

attached to the Board's August 1 Prehearing Conference Order was used as a starting point.

The following revisions were made:

l.

All schedule milestones for September and October and associated with Neiner Farms' Contentions 1 and 4 were deleted since these issues have been dismissed.

2.

The schedule revisions identified in September 3 J' int Motion To Applicants' o

Revise Hearing Schedule have been l

integrated into the enclosure.

l l

3.

The schedule milestone of December 23 for the filing of testimony on Rorem Contention 1(b) was clarified to make clear that said contention is not 8509090207 850904 "

.g$03 PDR ADOCK OS000456 G

PDR

._[__.._

f" s

t (

1 i Braidwood Licsnaing Botrd i

f Scptemb2r 4, 1985 Page 2 p

t

..i l

l i

subject to any future motion for' summary i

disposition since the time for filing i

such a motion on that contention has passed.

rl No other changes'have tAsen made to the hearing schedule as ' approved by the Licensing Board on Au' gust 1.

Sincerely, r

Joseph Gallo One of the Attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company j

cc:

Service List

\\

I

/

I*

\\

i i

t

?

j 1

/

.t j

6 l

t

(

q I

f'

SCHEDULE July 30, 1985 Applicant and NRC Staff objections to selected Rorem QA interrogatories and document requests.

August 1 Rorem mails answers to Applicant's " SET II" interrogatories, numbers 19, 20, 22 and 23.

August 2 Any motions by Rorem for confidential treatment of names of Comstock employees identified in attachments to July 12 supplement to harassment contention.

August 6 Proposed license conditions related to Neiner Contention 1, and possible agreement on summary disposition of the contention.

August 9 Report on possible stipulations related to Neiner Contention 4.

August 9 Applicant and NRC Staff (to the extent not previously furnished) complete answers to Rorem's QA interrogatories and related~N s s document requests; answers (motions to l'

compel discovery) in response to July 30 objections to Rorem QA discovery requests.

September 4 Identification of witnesses on Rorem Contention 1(a).

September 4 Any motions by Rorem for confidential treatment of witnesses on QA harassment issue.

September 13 NRC Staff-FEMA evaluation report on emergency planning matters arising under Rorem Contention 1(a).

September 20 Written direct testimony on Rorem Contention 1(a).

September 27 Motions to strike September 20 prefiled testimony.

i l

October 1 Results of 82-05 Corrective Action Program l

assembled by site project management and l

Region III and Rorem briefed on results of i

82-05 issue.

i l

l

I i

l l

i SCHEDULE (con't.)

October 4 Answers to motions to strike and cross-examination plans on September 20 prefiled testimony.

October 8 Begin hearings on Rorem Contention 1(a).

(approximately)

October 15 Report on 82-05 Corrective Action Program received by parties.

October 28 Deadline for identifying QA witnesses, except for the safety-related equipment issue (hereinafter "82-05 issue").

QA discovery ends except for deposition of witnesses and discovery generally on 82-05 issue.

October 28 Motions for summary disposition on QA contention (no summary disposition on 82-05 issue).

November 18 Depositions of all witnesses completed except for 82-05 issue.

November 19 Written Staff position on 82-05 issue receive.d by parties.and witnesses on said program identified.

November 25 Answers to motions for summary disposition.

December 2 Last date for receipt of FEMA findings on emergency planning.

December 3 Discovery ends on 82-05 issue.

December 17 Target date for Board ruling on motions for-summary disposition of QA issues.

December 23 Written direct testimony on Rorem Contention 1(b).

January 6, 1986

-Motions tocstrike December 23 prefiled testimony.

January 13 Answers to motions to strike December 23 gprefiled testimony'and cross-examination plans.

2

. _ _.. -. = -

i SCHEDULE (con't.)

t January 15 Written direct testimony filed on QA issues remaining after summary disposition.

January 20 Hearing commences on Rorem Contention 1(b)

(approximately)

(evacuation of special facilities) issues.

January 22 Motions to strike prefiled QA testimony.

January 29 Answers to motions to strike QA testimony and cross-examination plans.

February 4 Hearing Commences on QA Contention.

(approximately)

't i

b f

3 e.

,.y

,7-. - - - - -

m

.