ML20134M662
| ML20134M662 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 02/14/1997 |
| From: | Jain S DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9702200344 | |
| Download: ML20134M662 (3) | |
Text
-.
/
g 8..
v.uy e., si.imn SNppingport.PA 150U-0004 oEn' vin..w.ni February 14, 1997 p.xl4i$ $$
=::=Ln l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j
Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Schedule for Completion -
Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Issues i
Our previous submittal of December 27, 1996, identified that a schedule for completion of the Thermo-Lag fire barrier issues at Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) j Unit 2 would be provided by February 14,1997. Based on a telecon with NRC staff on January 14, 1997, a progress summary of our efforts to-date was also requested by the NRC. Enclosed as Attachment 1 is a status summary of our efforts to date and a schedule for completion of the Thermo-Lag fire barrier activities at BVPS Unit 2.
In summary, we project that the hardware modifications, utilizing additional Thermo-Lag material for upgrading the electrical conduit raceways required for post-fire safe shutdown capability, will be completed by August 29, 1997. The engineering I
analysis efforts and the ampacity evaluations associated with the Thermo-Lag installations vdll be completed by September 29,1997. If any unforeseen circumstances arise that recessitate a change in this schedule, we will notify you at that time.
j
/.s requested in Generic Letter 92-08, confirmation in writing will be provided upeu completion of the actions noted above. In the interim, fire watch patrols will be
)
mauntained for the affected areas until the Thermo-Lag fire barrier issues have been i
resolved. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Roy
[ 9 K. Brosi, Manager, Nuclear Safety at (412) 393-5210.
Sincerely, Y
j Sushil C. Jain c:
Mr. H. J. Miller, NRC Region I Administrator DEllVERING Mr. D. M. Kern, Sr. Resident inspector 0UALITY Mr. D. S. Brinkman, Sr. Project Manager ENERGV a
9702200344 970214 PDR ADOCK 05000412 P
l
)
/.
ATTACHMENT 1 I
Progress Summary of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Issues at BVPS Unit 2 i
Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems are utilized at BVPS Unit 2 for fire j
protection of safe shutdown circuits on electrical conduit raceways, boxed enclosures j
)
(electricaljunction boxes and pull boxes) and their associated supports. Thermo-Lag is
{
not used to protect cable trays at BVPS Unit 2. A different product, 3M Interam fire l
protection system, is used for protection of the cable trays.
Based on the results ofindustry testing, the boxed enclosures utilizing Thermo-Lag l
330-1 fire barrier systems were upgraded or justified to meet the required 1-hour fire resistance capability. These upgrades, utilizing additional Thermo-Lag trowel grade j
material and stress skin along the butted seams, were completed during the third quarter of1996.
Currently, the smaller size conduit raceways (< 3" in diameter) are being upgraded I
due to a change in methodology for compliance with the Thermo-Lag fire barriers issue.
i The upgrades, which utilize an additional layer of Thermo-Lag pre-formed half shells, 4
are being perfonned due to recent information from the industry and NRC that the use of fire modeling would not be an acceptable alternative for resolving the Thermo-Lag fire j
barrier issues. Approximately 400 feet of 1 1/2" and 2" diameter conduit raceways are being upgraded to meet the required 1-hour fire resistance capability. This effort is
}
}
approximately 65% complete at this time, and is expected to be completed by March 31, l
j 1997.
4 l
j Duquesne Light Company has been actively pursuing a resolution to the Thermo-i j
Lag fire barrier issues for BVPS Unit 2. As such, the larger size conduit raceways (3" to j
6" in diameter) encapsulated with Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems were in the process of being evaluated by Duquesne Light Company in comparison to industry j
testing which had successfully qualified as c.1-hour fire rated assembly. One of the parameters previously assumed in the engineering evaluations was the installation i
i method of pre-buttering of the joints with trowel grade material vs. post-buttering after the assembly is configured. In December of 1996, during the upgrade project for small size conduits, a 2" diameter conduit was discovered to be void of the trowel grade material along the seam of the pre-formed half shell installation. Acceptable industry 2
testing on 3" diameter and larger sized conduits has been based on utilizing pre-buttered
~j joints. Industry testing of post-butteredjoints on smaller sized conduits (two tests of 2" diameter conduits) had mixed results. The discovery that post-buttering was used on certain installations at BVPS Unit 2 had a direct impact on the acceptability of the engineering analysis efforts that were being developed forjustification of the as-installed 3" to 6" diameter conduit Thenno-Lag configurations.
i A conservative management decision was made to assume worst case post-buttered j
assemblies and proceed to upgrade the remaining (3" to 6" in diameter) conduits j
encapsulated with Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems which are credited for post-fire Page 1 of 2 4
/'
Progrets Summary of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire BarrierIssues at BVPS Unit 2 safe shutdown capability. This decision necessitated the need for a scope increase and an extension of the schedule for performing the necessary upgrades for the larger size conduits encapsulated with Thermo-Lag (approximately 900 feet). These upgrades are expected to be completed by August 29,1997. If unforeseen circumstances arise during the course of upgrading the Thermo-Lag installations which necessitate a change in our schedule, we will notify you at that time.
Our objective is to ensure a 1-hour fire rated barrier utilizing Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems by bounding our installations at BVPS Unit 2 to a qualified, tested configuration.
Minor anomalies or differences with tested configurations will be evaluated and justification provided in supporting engineering analysis. Engineering analysis providing justification of the Thermo-Lag installations at BVPS Unit 2 including ampacity derating evaluations will be completed by September 29,1997.
l Page 2 of 2