ML20134L732

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Affidavit of Hc Garg,Supporting NRC Response to Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 10.7 Re Environ Qualification of Westinghouse electric-type Hydrogen Recombiners.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20134L732
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/29/1985
From: Garg H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20134L697 List:
References
OL, NUDOCS 8509030398
Download: ML20134L732 (5)


Text

'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of

)

)

GEORGIA POWER C0.

)

Docket Nos. 50-424

--et al.

)

50-425

)

(0L)

(Vogtle Electric Generating Plant,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

AFFIDAVIT OF HUKAM C. GARG IN SUPPORT OF NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR

SUMMARY

DISPOSITION OF CONTENTION 10.7 I, Hukam C. Garg, being duly sworn, state the following:

1.

I am employed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission as an Electrical Engineer in the Equipment Qualification Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regula' tion.

I am responsible for the technical reviews, analyses and evaluations of the adequacy of the environmental qualification of electric equipment important to safety and safety-related mechanical equipment whose failure under postulated environmental conditions could adversely affect the performance of safety systems in nuclear power plants.

Prior to my present position, I was employed by Gilbert / Commonwealth Associates from 1973-1980. My most recent position was Supervising Engineer for the Instrumentation and Control Section.

In this position I was responsible for the instrumentation and control aspects, including the equipment qualification for nuclear power plants.

I had previously worked for Fluor Power Inc., formerly Pioneer Service and Engineering Company (1969 - 1973), in the design of electrical systems for nuclear power plants.

8509030390 B50030 4y4 DR ADOCK O

I am the Staff's technical reviewer responsible for the review of environmental qualifications of electrical and mechanical equipment for the Vogtle Plant.

I have knowledge of the matters set forth herein and believe them to be true and correct.

2.

I submit this affidavit in response to Applicants' Motion for Summary Disposition of Joint Intervenors' Contention 10.7.

That con-tention challenges the adequacy of environmental qualification of West-inghouse electric-type hydrogen recombiners.

3.

To ensure hydrogen concentrations inside containment remains at low levels following a design basis accident, each Vogtle unit will utilize two Westinghouse Model B electrical hydrogen recombiner systems. These systems consist of a recombination unit located inside of containment, and a power-supply panel and 'a control panel outside of containment.

4.

Westinghouse hydrogen recombiners do not contain any transducers or sensors, and no such devices are necessary to operate the recombiners during a design basis accident. See FSAR Section 6.2.5.5.

5.

The Westinghouse Model B hydrogen recombiner is a modified version of the older Model A~recombiner. Staff had previously reviewed the environmental qualification of the Model A recombiners set forth in Westinghouse topical report WCAP-77096, supplements 1-7, and found it acceptable. See Exhibit B attached to Applicants' Motion. These same reports for Model A were also reviewed by Staff and found acceptable during the recent near-term operating license audit for the Susquehanna nuclear plant.'

i e

6.

Westinghouse has recently submitted to the NRC a test program (Westinghouse topical report WCAP-9346) for Model B which lists the differences between Model A and Model B and environmentally qualifies those features of Model B which differ from Model A.

I have reviewed WCAP-9346 and conclude that the differences between Model A and Model B are minor.

I have also concluded that those features of Model B which differ from Model A have been adequately environmentally qualified by this Westinghouse test program.

7.

10 CFR 50.49(f) identifies acceptable environmental qualification methods that include:

"(2) testing a similar item of equipment with a supporting analysis to show that the equipment to be qualified is acceptable and "(4) analysis in combination with partial test data that supports the analytical assumptions and conclusions." The' testing for the Westinghouse Model B hydrogen recombiner, as set out in WCAP-7709L, Supplements 1-7 and WCAP-9346, satisfy these standards. Based on these test results for Models A & B, I conclude that the Model B recombiner has been adequately environ-mentally qualified.

8.

I have reviewed the Statement of Material Facts appended to Applicants' Motion and fully agree with the facts stated therein.

l H6ax Hukam j

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 f*4 day of M, 1985 c

8 fAYYd'&

l Notary Public My commission expires:

7A/86 l

l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY,

)

Docket Nos. 50-424 et al.

)

50-425

)

(OL)

(Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, )

Units 1 and 2)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " STAFF'S RESPONSE TO APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR

SUMMARY

DISPOSITION OF JOINT INTERVENORS' CONTENTION 10.7 (HYDROGEN RECOMBINERS)" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class or, as indicated by an asterisk, through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Comission's internal mail system, this 30th, day of August,1985.

Morton B. Margulies, Esq., Chairman

  • Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.*

Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. Oscar H. Paris

Administrative Judge Region 1 Counsel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Panel Suite 3100 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street Washington, D.C.

20555 Atlanta, GA 30303 Bruce W. Churchill, Esq.

Douglas C. Teper David R. Lewis, Esq.

1253 Lenox Circle Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Atlanta, GA 30306 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 i

j i

r Atomic Safety and Licensing Laurie Fowler, Esq.

Board Panel

  • 218 Flora Ave. NE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta, GA 30307 Washington, D.C.

20555 Docketing and Service Section*

Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Secretary Appeal Board Panel

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulartory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 James E. Joiner, Esq.

Ruble A. Thomas Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman, Southern Company Services, Inc.

& Ashmore P.O. Box 2625 127 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Birmingham, AL 35202 Candler Building, Suite 1400 Atlanta, GA 30043 Tim Johnson Executive Director Campaign for a Prosperous Georgia 175 Trinity Avenue, S.W.

Atlanta, GA 30303 444 A0 Lee Scott Dewey Counsel for NRC Staff

.