ML20134G296

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 970124 Telcon RAI Re TS Change Request Re Rev to Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits Due to Use of GE13 Fuel Product Line & Cycle Specific Analysis
ML20134G296
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/1997
From: Hunger G
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9702100356
Download: ML20134G296 (4)


Text

.,.. _

Ctation Support Department s

A 10CFR50.90 f

PECO NUCLEAR nco%c_

A Unit of PECO Energy

'*$*;Ijj^*

p 1

i January 28,1997 j

Docket No. 50-353 Ucense No. NPF-85 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Umerick Generating Station, Unit 2 Technical Specifications Change Request No. 96-11-2 Response to Request for Additional Information Gentlemen:

Attached is our response to the NRC Request for Additional Information (RAl) discussed in our telephone conversation on January 24,1997 regarding the Technical Specifications (TS) Change Request No. 96-11-2 which was forwarded to the NRC via PECO Energy letter dated December 6,1996. This proposed change will revise TS Section 2.1, " Safety Umits," to change the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Safety Limit due to the use of GE13 fuel product line and the cycle-specific arslysis performed by General Electdc Co. (GE), for Umerick Generating Station Unit 2 Cycle 5. This RAI is being submitted under affirmation, and the required affidavit is enclosed., Letter R. M. Butrovich (GE) to H. J. Diamond (PECO Energy), " Limerick 2 Cycle 5 RWE Analysis", dated January 28,1997 contains this additional information.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, A.a.

G. A. Hunger, J ~.

Director - Ucensing Enclosure, Attachment cc:

H.J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC (w/ enclosure, attachment)

{

N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS (w/ enclosure, attachment)

\\

R. R. Janati, PA Bureau of Radiological Protection (w/ enclosure, attachment)

/

A4

{

9702100356 970128 PDR ADOCK 05000353

\\

P PDR I

1

(

J l

l l

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss.

COUNTY OF CHESTER D. B. Fetters, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Vice President of PECO Energy Company, the Applicant herein; that he has read the enclosed response to the NRC Request for Additional Information related to the Application for Amendment of Facility Operating Ucense No. NPF-85 (Technical Specifications Change Request No. 96-11-2), to change the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Safety Umit due to the use of GE13 fuel product line and the cycle-specific analysis performed by General Electric Co. for Umerick Generating Station, i

Unit 2 Cycle 5, and knows the contents thereof; and that the statements and matters set forth are true and correct toJwhest_o is k wiedge, information and belief.

L

)

Vice President l

Subscribed and sworn to before me thiabay of 1997.

Notary ublic J

.,m l

Che C

% Commesion Emres MayNego,

l Meneer.Perrsg.dhof taaewr 1

I 2

4 i

4 ATTACHMENT 1 4

4 LIMERICK GENERATING STATION i

UNIT 2 i

DOCKET NO. 50-353 LICENSE NO. NPF-85 i

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE REQUEST l

NO. 96-11-2 (RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION)

Letter, R. M. Butrovich (GE) to H. J. Diamond (PECO Energy),

" Limerick 2 Cycle 5 RWE Analysis,"

dated January 28,1997 l

  • ~

s 3E Nuclear Encray

)

kharo M Eutrovien 6

January 28,1997 RhiB:97-022 l

l l

hir.11. J. Diamond, Director

. Fuel & Services Division PECO NUCLEAR 965 Chesterbrook Boulevard Wayne, PA 19087-5691

SUBJECT:

Limerick 2 Cycle 5 RWE Analysis

Dear Hugh:

This letter provides the information requested by the NRC on January 24,1997, regarding the Limerick 2 Cycle 5 Rod Withdrawal Error (RWE) analysis. A cycle specific RWE analysis i

wu performed for Limerick 2 Cycle 5 as part of the reload licensing. The results demonstrate that the 1% cladding plastic strain criterion was met. Limerick 2 Cycle 5 passed the check for the 1% cladding plastic strain criterion for full withdrawal of any control rod.

Additionally, the current Rod Block hionitor (RBht) operability requirements (Technical Specifications Section 3 / 4.1.4.3) are adequate to protect against Safety Limit violations and 1% cladding plastic strain for Limerick 2 Cycle 5. In the Limerick 2 Cycle 5 RWE analysis, the control tod was fully withdrawn without violation of the 1% plastic strain criterion, therefore, htCPR is the limiting parameter for setting the RBhi operability conditions.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,

^

s c. e/,pg.,y,- w',

)

+

R. hi. Butrovich

,