ML20134G037

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-254/96-19 & 50-265/96-19 on 960930-1126.Violations Noted:Two Apparent Violations Were Identified & Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action
ML20134G037
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/1997
From: Caldwell J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Kraft E
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20134G040 List:
References
EA-96-530, NUDOCS 9702100253
Download: ML20134G037 (3)


See also: IR 05000254/1996019

Text

.

. . -

. . . -

_

_ - . .- -

. . -

.

-

-.--

.- -

--

. . . - .

.

b

D$ 0

,.

i

e -

$

a

i

February 4, 1997

.

EA 96-530

,

4

i

Mr. E. Kraft, Site Vice President

'

Ouad Cities Station

Commonwealth Edison Company

j

22710 206th Averue North

j

Cordova, IL 61242

l

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORTS 50-254/96019(DRP) AND 50-265/96019(DRP)

i

l

Dear Mr. Kraft:

}

j

On November 26,1996, the NRC completed a special inspection at your

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station facilities. The enclosed report presents the results of

that inspection.

,

Based on the results of this inspection, two apparent violations were identified and are

,

being considered for escalated enforcement action in accordance with the " General

,

i

Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy),

j

NUREG-1600. The first apparent violation involves the failure to maintain the reactor

building blow-out panels in accordance with the design basis. This failure resulted in:

(1) a number of damaged blow-out panel bolts existing for an extended period of time, and

'

'

(2) installation of pipe supports without adequate evaluations. Both the damaged bolts

and.the pipe supports would have impeded the blow-out panels from performing the

'

design function during certain accidents.

2

The second apparent violation involves making changes to the facility without an adequate

evaluation to determine if an unreviewed safety question existed. In one example, the

existence of damaged bolts and attached pipe supports allowed the blow-out panels to

degrade into non-compliance with the design requirements described in the Updated Final

Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). In the other example, a 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation

performed by your staff improperly concluded that the reactor building siding inner panel

4

was the only siding component required for secondary containment, and that panel's

f

exterior siding was not an integral part of secondary containment.

In accordance with the Enforcement Policy, no Notice of Violation is presently being issued

for these inspection findings. In addition, please be advised that the number and

characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection report may

change as a result of further NRC review.

An open pre-decisional enforcement conference to discuss these apparent violations has

been scheduled for February 19,1997, at 9:30 a.m. (CDT) in the Region ill Office in Lisle,

k

lllinois. The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does

'

S

D

k

)(12

%g'O

9702100253 970204

DR

ADOCK 0500

4

- -

.

- .

-

_. .

.

.

4

Mr. E. Kraft

-2-

not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement

4

action will be taken. This conference is being held to obtain information to enable the NRC

to make an enforcement decision. This information includes a common understanding of

the facts, root causes, missed opportunities to identify the apparent violation sooner,

corrective actions, significance of the issues and the need for lasting and effective

corrective action.

in particular, during the enforcement conference we expect you to address:

(1) how changes were made to the facility without determining if an unreviewed safety

'

question existed, (2) what your plans are to increase the technical quality of safety

evaluations, (3) the reasons for the missed opportunities to determine if the non-safety

classification of the reactor building blow-out panels was consistent with the design basis,

and (4) your future plans and the corrective actions for maintaining the reactor building

blow-panels in accordance with design requirements. In addition, this is an opportunity for

you to point out any errors in our inspection report and for you to provide any additional

information concerning your perspectives on: (1) the severity of the violations, (2) the

application of the factors that the NRC considers when it determines the amount of a civil

penalty that may be assessed in accordance with Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement

Policy, and (3) any other application of the Enforcement Policy to this case, including the

exercise of discretion in accordance with Section Vil,

i

You will be advised by separate correspondence of the results of our deliberations on this

'

matter No response regarding the apparent violations is required at this time.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Sincerely,

/s/ J. A. Grote for

James L. Caldwell, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 50-254, 50-265

License Nos.: DPR-29, DPR-30

Enclosures:

Inspection Reports 50-254/96019(DRP), 50-265/96019(DRP)

See Attached Distribution

~.

. - .

-

-

..

-

.

_

.

-

.

.

'

.

i

l

Mr. E. Kraft

-3-

Distribution

cc w/ encl:

T. J. Maiman, Senior Vice President

Nuclear Operations Division

D. A. Sager, Vice President,

Generation Support

H. W. Keiser, Chief Nuclear

Operating Officer

L. W. Pearce, Station Manager

N. Chrissotimos, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

C. C. Peterson, Regulatory Affairs

Manager

1. Johnson, Acting Nuclear

Regulatory Services Manager

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

Commission

J. R. Bull, Vice President, General &

Transmission, MidAmerican Energy Company

Document Control Desk-Licensing

Distribution:

Docket File w/enct

Project Manager, NRR w/enct

PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl

DRP w/enci

OC/LFDCB w/enct

SRI Quad Cities, Dresden,

RAC1 (E-Mail)

LaSalle w/enci

A. B. Beach, w/enci

Rlli Enf Coordinator, w/ encl

CAA1 (E-Mail)

W. L. Axelson, w/enci

Rlli PRR w/ encl

TSS, w/ enc!

DRS (3) w/ encl

Document: R:\\lnsprpts\\ Powers \\ Quad \\Oua96019 DRP

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enci

"E" = Copy with attach / encl

"N" = No copy

0FFICE

RIII

P

NRR

M

RIII

T

1,IJJ

,

NAME

Hiland fl13

Capra @ ( Clayton b Cd4h

DATE

1/f 7/97

1/ /7/97/I' L(

1/l7/97

1/f/97

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY