ML20134F974
| ML20134F974 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/18/1996 |
| From: | Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| SECY-96-215-C, NUDOCS 9611080219 | |
| Download: ML20134F974 (2) | |
Text
1 4
~'
......................o.I RELEASED TO THE PDR.\\
NOTATION yOTE.
RESPONSE SHEET bat 5
,,,, in} a{s,,
TO, J hn C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM:
CHAIRMAN JACKSON
SUBJECT:
SECY-96-215 - REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPPING PACKAGES USED TO TRANSPORT VITRIFIED WASTES CONTAINING PLUTONIUM Approved Disapproved XX Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion COMMENTS:
See attached comments.
lA4 4-b V
SIdNATURE Release Vote
/ XX /
October 18, 1996 DATE Withhold Vote
/
/
{%
()
Entered on "AS" Yes XX No 9611080219 961018 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR C O t l t@
i g
CHAIRMAN JACKSON'S COMMENTS ON SECY-96-215 I disapprove the staff's recommendation to make and issue a determination under 10 CFR 71.63 (b) (3) regarding canisters 4
containing plutonium-bearing vitrified wastes.
Such a determination could result in an exemption from the requirements of 71.63 (b) for double containment of plutonium shipments and set policy for a large number of plutonium shipments from U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) facilities.
This policy issue should be addressed through rulemaking.
The staff should deny DOE's request for a determination under 10 CFR 71. 63 (b) (3).
The staff should immediately begin rulemaking on the issue of j
plutonium shipments.
The staff should initially focus on rulemaking that addresses DOE's issue of shipping plutonium-bearing vitrified wastes in single containment packages.
In the longer term, the staff should also address through rulemaking i
whether the technical bases for 10 CFR 71.63 remain valid, or whether a major revision or elimination of portions of 10 CFR 3
71.63 is needed to provide flexibility for current and possible i
future technologies.
In SECY-96-215, the staff does not discuss the reasons for pursuing a determination process over rulemaking.
If the staff has a compelling reason for an urgent Commission decision on DOE's determination request, or a strong basis for not pursuing rulemaking, then the staff should inform the Commission immediately, before starting rulemaking.
~i
-,