|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20212L1141999-10-0101 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Request for Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2.c ML20212F5261999-09-22022 September 1999 SER Approving Request Reliefs 1-98-001 & 1-98-200,parts 1,2 & 3 for Second 10-year ISI Interval at Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 ML20211F4281999-08-25025 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Provided Acceptable Alternative to Requirements of ASME Code Section XI & That Authorization of Proposed Alternative Would Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety ML20207E7231999-06-0202 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Proposed Alternative Exam Methods Proposed in Alternative Exam 99-0-002 to Perform General Visual Exam of Accessible Areas & Detailed Visual Exam of Areas Determined to Be Suspect ML20206M7711999-05-11011 May 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request from ASME Code Section XI Requirements for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20206F0691999-04-29029 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Re ISI Plan for Third 10-year Interval & Associated Requests for Alternatives for Plant,Unit 1 ML20205M6941999-04-12012 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief for Second 10-yr Inservice Inspection Interval for Plant,Unit 1 ML20205D6061999-03-31031 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Proposed Approach Acceptable to Perform Future Structural Integrity & Operability Assessments of Carbon Steel ML20205D4711999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Proposed Alternative to Employ Alternative Welding Matls of Code Cases 2142-1 & 2143-1 for Reactor Coolant System to Facilitate Replacement of Steam Generators at Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 ML20204B1861999-03-15015 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Licensee Request for Alternative to Augmented Exam of Certain Reactor Vessel Shell Welds,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) ML20198M7841998-12-29029 December 1998 SER Accepting Util Proposal to Use ASME Code Case N-578 as Alternative to ASME Code Section Xi,Table IWX-2500 for Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 ML20196F4911998-12-0101 December 1998 SER Accepting Request for Relief ISI2-09 for Waterford Steam Electric Station,Unit 3 & Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 ML20195C4841998-11-0606 November 1998 SER Accepting QA Program Change to Consolidate Four Existing QA Programs for Arkansas Nuclear One,Grand Gulf Nuclear Station,River Bend Station & Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Into Single QA Program ML20154J2471998-10-0909 October 1998 SER Accepting Inservice Testing Program,Third ten-year Interval for License DPR-51,Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 1 ML20248D7491998-05-28028 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for Relief from ASME Code Repair Requirements for ASME Code Class 3 Piping ML20217A7211998-04-17017 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Alternative for ANO-1 to Implement Code Case N-533 (w/4 H Hold Time at Test Conditions Prior to VT-2 Visual Exam) ML20217P8281998-04-0707 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Authorization for Alternative to Requirements of ASME Section Xi,Subarticle IWA-5250 Bolting Exam for Plants,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) ML20216D6111998-03-12012 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License NPF-6 ML20199H3711997-11-19019 November 1997 SER Accepting Approving Request Relief from Requirements of Section XI, Rule for Inservice Insp of NPP Components, of ASME for Current or New 10-year Inservice Insp Interval IAW 50.55(a)(3)(i) of 10CFR50 ML20216E9921997-09-0404 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting 970623 Request for Relief Re Authorization for Use of ASME Code Case N-416-1 & N-532,ISI Program for Listed Plants ML20141H8411997-07-30030 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Use of Code Case N-508-1 for All Four Plants for Rotation of Serviced Snubbers & Pressure Relief Valves for Purpose of Testing in Lieu of ASME Code ML20138K0561997-05-0505 May 1997 SER Approving Licensees IPE Process Capable of Identifying Severe Accidents & Severe Accident Vulnerabilities,For Plant,Unit 2 ML20149M4221996-12-12012 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Update Insvc Insp Programs to 1992 & Portions of 1993 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Sect XI for Licenses DPR-51,NPF-6,NPF-38,NPF-29 & NPF-47. Technical Ltr Rept Encl ML20134P8411996-11-25025 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Denying Request for Relief 96-001 Re Second 10-yr Interval ISI Program Plan,Due to Failure to Provide Basis for Impracticality ML20107F5611996-04-17017 April 1996 Safety Evaluation Providing Guidance on Submitting plant- Specific Info W/Respect to IST Program Alternatives Request ML20149K9451996-02-16016 February 1996 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request for Second 10-yr Interval IST Program Plan for Pumps & Valves at Facility ML20058L6111993-12-13013 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Approving Second ten-year Interval Inservice Insp Request for Relief Re Use of IWA-5250 Requirements Listed in 1992 Edition of ASME Code ML20058F6661993-11-24024 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Use of New DG as Alternate AC Power Source for Coping W/Sbo Subject ML20056H1331993-08-23023 August 1993 Supplemental Safety Evaluation Re Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97.Plant Design in Conformance W/Guidance of Subj Reg Guide ML20056H0001993-08-19019 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 920918 Response to GL 87-02,suppl 1 ML20128C9181993-01-22022 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Inservice Testing Program Relief Requests for Pumps & Valves ML20126H8661992-12-30030 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from Certain Inservice Insp Requirements of Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Determined to Be Impractical to Perform ML20126F7571992-12-18018 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Conceptual Design for Proposed Alternate Ac Power Source ML20062A5751990-10-10010 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Station Blackout Rule.Util Response Does Not Conform W/Station Blackout Rule ML20062A5881990-10-10010 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Station Blackout Rule.Util Response Does Not Conform W/Station Blackout Rule ML20059A7081990-08-17017 August 1990 Sser Concluding That Rochester Instrument Sys Model SC-1302 Isolation Device Acceptable for Use at Plant for Interfacing SPDS W/Class IE Circuits ML20056A7511990-08-0707 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Fire Barrier Penetration Seal Program & Commitment to Complete 100% Review of All Tech Spec Fire Penetration Seals by 911231 ML20062C8341990-05-24024 May 1990 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from Certain Inservice Insp Requirements of ASME Code,Section Xi,Per 881103 & 890823 Requests ML20245K3671989-08-11011 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Actions in Response to 890120 High Pressure Injection Backflow Event ML20247N7451989-07-31031 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Isolation Devices Acceptable for Use in Spds,Contingent on Licensee Submittal of Followup Evaluation Verifying That Failure of RIC SC-1302 Was Randomly Deficient Device Prior to Testing ML20247A8371989-07-11011 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.3 Concerning Reactor Trip Sys Reliability for All Domestic Operating Reactors ML20246J5421989-07-0707 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Re NRC Audit of Util Resolution of IE Bulletin 79-27.IE Bulletin Concerns Adequately Resolved for Facility.Periodic Test Program for Devices Recommended to Be Developed by Licensee ML20245K5971989-06-21021 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Diverse Scram Sys & Diverse Initiation of Turbine Trip Meet Requirements of ATWS Rule (10CFR50.62) ML20245F3921989-04-25025 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Granting Util Relief from ASME Section XI Insp Requirements for Reactor Coolant Pump Casing Weld Indications Due to Impractical Requirements,Per Util 881027 Request & 10CFR50.55a ML20247E0191989-03-23023 March 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling for Plants ML20206F5021988-11-15015 November 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Transfer of Operating Responsibility to Sys Energy Resources,Inc ML20205H8751988-10-25025 October 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 861124 & 880603 Responses to Generic Ltr 86-06,TMI Action Item II.K.3.5 Re Automatic Trip of Reactor Coolant Pumps ML20151D4131988-07-12012 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831105 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Online Testing ML20236A7581987-10-15015 October 1987 Evaluation Supporting Justification for Continued Operation Re High Reactor Bldg Temps ML20235W7011987-07-15015 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Re HPI Makeup Nozzle Cracking.Util Agreement to Record HPI Flowrate & Duration of Flow During HPI Actuation When SPDS Available Acceptable 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217L8931999-10-31031 October 1999 Rev 1 to BAW-10235, Mgt Program for Volumetric Outer Diameter Intergranular Attack in Tubesheets of Once-Through Sgs ML20212L1141999-10-0101 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Request for Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2.c 0CAN109902, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Arkansas Nuclear One,Units 1 & 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Arkansas Nuclear One,Units 1 & 2.With ML20216J6271999-09-27027 September 1999 Rev 0 to CALC-98-R-1020-04, ANO-1 Cycle 16 Colr ML20212F5261999-09-22022 September 1999 SER Approving Request Reliefs 1-98-001 & 1-98-200,parts 1,2 & 3 for Second 10-year ISI Interval at Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 0CAN099907, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20211F4281999-08-25025 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Provided Acceptable Alternative to Requirements of ASME Code Section XI & That Authorization of Proposed Alternative Would Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety 0CAN089904, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20210K8831999-07-29029 July 1999 Non-proprietary Addendum B to BAW-2346P,Rev 0 Re ANO-1 Specific MSLB Leak Rates 0CAN079903, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20207E7231999-06-0202 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Proposed Alternative Exam Methods Proposed in Alternative Exam 99-0-002 to Perform General Visual Exam of Accessible Areas & Detailed Visual Exam of Areas Determined to Be Suspect ML20196A0191999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Arkansas Nuclear One,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196A6251999-05-31031 May 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 0 to TR BAW-10235, Mgt Program for Volumetric Outer Diameter Intergranular Attack in Tubesheets of Once-Through Sgs ML20195D1991999-05-28028 May 1999 Probabilistic Operational Assessment of ANO-2 SG Tubing for Cycle 14 ML20206M7711999-05-11011 May 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request from ASME Code Section XI Requirements for Plant,Units 1 & 2 0CAN059903, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20206F0691999-04-29029 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Re ISI Plan for Third 10-year Interval & Associated Requests for Alternatives for Plant,Unit 1 ML20205M6941999-04-12012 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief for Second 10-yr Inservice Inspection Interval for Plant,Unit 1 ML20205D6061999-03-31031 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Proposed Approach Acceptable to Perform Future Structural Integrity & Operability Assessments of Carbon Steel ML20205R6351999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20205D4711999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Proposed Alternative to Employ Alternative Welding Matls of Code Cases 2142-1 & 2143-1 for Reactor Coolant System to Facilitate Replacement of Steam Generators at Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 ML20204B1861999-03-15015 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Licensee Request for Alternative to Augmented Exam of Certain Reactor Vessel Shell Welds,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) 0CAN039904, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20212G6381999-02-25025 February 1999 Ano,Unit 2 10CFR50.59 Rept for 980411-990225 ML20203E4891999-02-11011 February 1999 Rev 1 to 97-R-2018-03, ANO-2,COLR for Cycle 14 ML20199F0351998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2 ML20198M7841998-12-29029 December 1998 SER Accepting Util Proposal to Use ASME Code Case N-578 as Alternative to ASME Code Section Xi,Table IWX-2500 for Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 0CAN129805, LER 98-S02-00:on 981124,security Officer Found Not to Have Had Control of Weapon for Period of Approx 3 Minutes Due to Inadequate self-checking to Ensure That Weapon Remained Secure.All Security Officers Briefed.With1998-12-11011 December 1998 LER 98-S02-00:on 981124,security Officer Found Not to Have Had Control of Weapon for Period of Approx 3 Minutes Due to Inadequate self-checking to Ensure That Weapon Remained Secure.All Security Officers Briefed.With ML20196F4911998-12-0101 December 1998 SER Accepting Request for Relief ISI2-09 for Waterford Steam Electric Station,Unit 3 & Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 2 ML20198D2441998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20199F7401998-11-16016 November 1998 Rev 9 to ANO-1 Simulator Operability Test,Year 9 (First Cycle) ML20195B4801998-11-0707 November 1998 Rev 20 to ANO QA Manual Operations ML20195C4841998-11-0606 November 1998 SER Accepting QA Program Change to Consolidate Four Existing QA Programs for Arkansas Nuclear One,Grand Gulf Nuclear Station,River Bend Station & Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Into Single QA Program 0CAN119808, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2. with ML20197H0741998-10-29029 October 1998 Rev 1 to Third Interval ISI Program for ANO-1 ML20155C1351998-10-26026 October 1998 Rev B to Entergy QA Program Manual ML17335A7641998-10-22022 October 1998 LER 98-004-00:on 980923,inadvertent Actuation of Efs Occurred During Surveillance Testing.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Involved with Event Were Counseled & Procedure Changes Were Implemented.With 981022 Ltr ML20154J2471998-10-0909 October 1998 SER Accepting Inservice Testing Program,Third ten-year Interval for License DPR-51,Arkansas Nuclear One,Unit 1 0CAN109806, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for ANO Units 1 & 2. with1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for ANO Units 1 & 2. with ML20154E2171998-09-28028 September 1998 Follow-up Part 21 Rept Re Defect with 1200AC & 1200BC Recorders Built Under Westronics 10CFR50 App B Program. Westronics Has Notified Bvps,Ano & RBS & Is Currently Making Arrangements to Implement Design Mods 0CAN099803, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for ANO Units 1 & 2. with1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for ANO Units 1 & 2. with ML20237B7671998-08-19019 August 1998 ANO REX-98 Exercise for 980819 ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency ML20236X2351998-08-0505 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Defect Associated W/Westronics 1200AC & 1200BC Recorders Built Under Westronics 10CFR50,App B Program.Beaver Valley,Arkansas Nuclear One & River Bend Station Notified.Design Mod Is Being Developed 0CAN089804, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2 ML20196C7831998-07-30030 July 1998 Summary Rept of Results for ASME Class 1 & 2 Pressure Retaining Components & Support for ANO-1 ML20155H7161998-07-15015 July 1998 Rev 1 to 96-R-2030-02, Revised Reactor Vessel Fluence Determination ML20236R0531998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Ano,Units 1 & 2 ML20249B7791998-06-22022 June 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Findings,Resolutions & Conclusions Re Failure of Safety Related Siemens 4KV,350 MVA,1200 a Circuit Breakers to Latch Closed ML20249B5091998-06-15015 June 1998 SG ISI Results for Fourteenth Refueling Outage 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
m - - . - _- _ - . _ _ .. .- . ~ -
gn [tr
[ -
UNITED STATES 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l 7; :C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k.....
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION CONCERNING ONCE THROUGH STEAM GENERATOR SLEEVED TUBE INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT 1 ARKANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-313 1.0 INTRCDUCTION Because of the number of defective steam generator tubes being identi-fied in Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 (ANO-1), Arkansas Power and Light Company (AP&L) is initiating a steam generator sleeving qualification program which will provide the basis for a large scale sleeving of defective tubes.
The staff approved the sleeving demonstration program in the Safety Evaluation dated November 8, 1984. However, infomation on the subsequent inspection of sleeved tubes was incomplete at that time, but the staff noted that the licensee had committed to a program to demonstrate the adequacy of eddy current inspection techniques for inspecting sleeved tubes, and the staff would evaluate the efficacy of the licensee's eddy current inspection technioues when such a program was submitted for review.
By letters dated December 14, 1984 and May 10, 1985, AP&L provided infomation on the inspection of sleeved tubes that it committed to provide in a letter dated October 10, 1984
2.0 BACKGROUND
l As a result of degradation in the ANO-1 once through steam generators )
(OTSGs), a substantial number of tubes with eddy current indications in excess of the 40% through-wall plugging limit were removed from service.
AP&L is perfoming a steam generator sleeving qualification program on ten sleeves which will provide the basis for a large scale sleeving program. The suspected corrosion mechanism affecting the tubes in the upper tube-sheet (UTS) region is corrosion attack by concentrated chemical contam-inants carried by moisture in the steam flowing up through the tube lane region. The lane region is cooler; therefore, more moisture would be in the steam in the lane region at the UTS region. The contaminants carried by this moisture would be deposited on the tubes in 8508190598 850814 PDR 0 ADOCK 05000313 PDR
i i
I
- the UTS region. Plugging the lane region tubes increases the area of j cooler water flowing up through the lane region which increases the
- amount of moisture in the steam, and thus increases the amount of 3 contaminants carried by the steam to be deposited on the tubes in the UTS j
region. This aggravates the degradation of the tubes in the UTS region.
! Sleeving should improve these conditions by preventing additional loss of l' heat transfer area which will limit the spread of degradation. In addition, the sleeve has better corrosion resistance than the original tubes.
1 As part of a long range, large scale sleeving program, AP&L has proposed a demonstration sleeving program to verify the field installation capability of the process. The demonstration program will verify and i benchmark the actual field leakage rates against design criteria and i
laboratory leakage rates and confirm the reliability of tube sleeves
- under actual operating conditions. l 3.0 INSPECTION PROGRAM I
Before sleeve installation, parent tubes were inspected in October 1984 during the inservice inspection of the OTSGs. Inspections included a i
full length 0.500 inch diamete.. differential bobbin coil inspection and a profilometry inspection of the tubes from the primary face of the UTS down to the 14th tube support plate.
a the sleeves were inspected with a After standardfabrication type differentialand prior eddytocurrent bending, bobbin coil. This inspection was to assure the integrity of the sleeve prior to its use.
j After the sleeves were installed, each sleeved tube was inspected along its full length utilizing a MIZ-18 multifrequency eddy current testing i
system. A 0.410 inch diameter standard differential bobbin coil probe j
was used. This examination provided baseline information or the parent tube and the sleeve for comparison with future examination results. The j MIZ-18 system is capable of detecting flat bottom holes specified in the t
ASME Code in the expanded areas of the sleeve / tube assembly and will i detect 40 percent (and greater) ASFE through-wall defects in the rolled
- transition area of the sleeve and tube. At this time, these methods do l not permit detection of an ASME 40 percent through-wall defect in the j parent tube at the sleeve's lower end. However, the parent tube in the vicinity of the sleeve's end was examined prior to the sleeve's installation and found defect free. Also, the area at the sleeve end is not considered to be a critical inspection area for the baseline
) examination because there are no stresses induced in the tube at this j location during sleeving.
t At our request, the Licensee provided Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) Report No.
1154532, " Baseline Inspection of OTSG Sleeved Tubes" which showed the MIZ-18 system to have the following capabilities:
1
. ASME type flaws of 20% TW or greater in the sleeve free span can be detected and quantified.
. ASME type flaws of 20% TW or greater in the parent tube free span can be detected and semi-quantified.
. ASME type flaws of 40% TW or greater in the parent tube can be detected in the center of expansions and at expansion transitions.
. ASME type flaws of 40% TW or greater in the sleeve can be detected at expansion transitions.
. ASME type flaws of 20% TW or greater located at TSP edges in the parent tube can be detected.
5.0 FUTURE PROGRAMS There are two problem areas in the inspection of sleeved tubes whether installed in OTSG or U-tube steam generators. The first is the rolled transition zones where the joints are made and the second is the parent tube at the sleeve's end. Both problems are related to the change in the i
tube / sleeve diameters. The main problem area is the inspection of the parent tube at the sleeve's end, due to the abruptness of this transition. However, this is an area that is not mechanically affected by
! the installation of sleeves and which has historically, in the case of AMO-1, not experienced defects.
AP&L has committed to inspect the 10 sleeved tubes during each inservice inspection until they are certain that they are as resistant to defects as the originally installed tubes. Future inspections of the sleeved tubes will incorporate state-of-the-art technology to more thoroughly assess those areas of the sleeve and tube most susceptible to 1
stress-related cracking as well as other areas where it is more difficult to characterize the extent of the defect.
i Future inspections will also utilize the baseline data obtained frem the post-installation inspection for comparison. This will enable detection of deviations from the as-installed condition.
The Licensee has connitted to participate in research and development programs that will ensure that state-of-the-art technology will be utilized in the inspection program for the sleeved tubes. According to the Licensee, since it is highly desirable from an enhanced detection standpoint to maintain continuity of eddy current test (ECT) analysis, AP&L intends to coordinate the evaluation of ECT techniques for the inspection of sleeved tubes with B&W, its primary vendor for these services. AP&L plans to stay abreast of other ECT vendors' capabilities, as well as the industry's efforts in this area, in order to provide input into the B&W evaluation and to identify alternate inspection vendors, particularly if proprietary methods / equipment are invovled.
i
.. 1 I
_4 l
Babcock & Wilcox has begun a research and development pro,iect entitled l
" Development of ECT Techniques for OTSG Sleeved Tubes." For this program in which AP&L will be a participant, calibration standards and inspection samples will be used for technique evaluation and development.
The most promising new devices and technioues, such as cross wound probes and large ferrite core probes coupled with two and three frequency mixes, will be selected for further development.
5.0 CONCLUSION
S 4
Based on our review of the information provided by the Licensee, we find the Licensee's program for eddy current inspection of the steam generator tubes, along with his commitment to utilize state-of-the-art technology in future inspection, to be acceptable.
flRC contributers to this Safety Evaluation: H. Conrad, G. Vissing Dated August 14, 1985 4
e i
l l
l
,