ML20134D213
| ML20134D213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/13/1985 |
| From: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Charnley J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134D217 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508190145 | |
| Download: ML20134D213 (4) | |
Text
-
en
(
o UNITED STATES
[
k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
4j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g ***#,/
AUG 131995 I_
Ms. J. S. Charnley, Manager Fuel Licensing Nuclear Technologies and Fuel Division General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Ms. Charnley:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT NEDE-22148-P, " EXTENDED BURNUP EVALUATION METHODOLOGY" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the C;..;.:.' Chetric Company (GE) by letter dated June 25, 1982. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accdtdance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that GE publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
f 8508190145 850813
/
PDR TOPRP ENVGENE C
PDR v
G
Ms. J. S. Charnley.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, Gas o.1;== =-
Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch 1
Division of Licensing inclosure:
As stated l
4
- e f
I e
m w --
--wr--
7g+
w,
i AUG 131985 Ms. J. S. Charnley.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
4 i
Sincerely, Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief t
i Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated i
DISTRIBUTION Central File SSPB Reading PDR DCS PNoonan HBernard HBerkow RDiggs CThomas MWohl MDunenfeld RLobel i
n :dm ard e
8//3/85
/85 8/lp/85 8/j85
,-7
.. +
- ~ -. - -..
W a
2 AUG 131985 Ms. J. S. Charnley -
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusion's-as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION
. Central File -
SSPB Reading PDR DCS PNoonan HBernard HBerkow RDiggs CThomas MWohl MDunenfeld RLobel 8//b/85 jp /85 8/lp/85 8//J85