ML20134B842
| ML20134B842 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/12/1985 |
| From: | Tokar M NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Temus C NUCLEAR PACKAGING, INC. |
| References | |
| REF-WM-85 NUDOCS 8508160095 | |
| Download: ML20134B842 (2) | |
Text
_
Distribution:
MadWM F
hi1EG ll!!SS
& 12 25 REBrowning MJBell TE"5 LETTER Gh EM1"iLOY FAM
_i.
JTGreeves TCJohnson itTokar HJitiller Charles J. Temus, Technical Director J0 Bunting Nuclear Packaging. Inc.
Lelligginbotham 1010 South 336th Street PR Federal Way, Washington 98003
Dear Mr. Temus:
As you know, the NRC has completed a review of your tcpical report on the FL-50/EA-50 high integrity container (HIC). A draft copy of the Technical Report Evaluation (TER) has been sent to you under separate cover so that 1
you can confirm that the TER did not contain proprietary information. We should also like you to use the TER to restructure your Enviralloy Family report and your response to NRC comments on that report (which are filed l
under Docket Number WM-
, so that the documentation is up-to-date and consistent with information which has been made available on similar aspects of the FL-50 HIC.
Inasmuch as all the HICs (including the FL-50) in the Enviralloy Family are made of the same alloy (Ferralium 255) and have other features in coninon, the information already submitted and found acceptable on the FL-50 HIC should be submitted on the docket for the Enviralloy Family review.
For example, information on the special vent design that has not been made part of the current body of infonnation on the Enviralloy Family should be provided on the " family" docket. Because we have already reviewed and approved the special vent design for the FL.50 HIC, however, the NRC will not have to address that design feature anew as part s
of the Enviralloy Family review. Nor will we have to re-review other design features that are common to all of the HICs in the " family", but the information on the WM-84 docket should be maintained in an accurate condition so that the review may proceed to a prompt and satisfactory conclusion.
As I have discussed with you by telephone, I believe that the bulk of the review on the family of HICs has already been completed on the FL-50 docket"(WM-45) because of the commonality of features and materials of construction of the FL-50 HIC and other HICs in the Enviralloy Family. Three remaining major areas for review remain, however. They include the burial loads analyses (which to some extent will be different for each of the designs and sizes of HICs), the drop tests, and certain unique aspects of the different closure designs. We will need additional information covering those review areas; the details will be provided in forthcoming correspcndence.
WM Record File WM Prciect_Eb Occket No.
PDLc _
e5081 W 5 850712 PDR WE LPOR PDR
---Distribution.:
_ _ ~_ _ _~_ ~__
pn-s5 g
d-0FC :WMEG WMEG 1
.....:.... 7. 4__..:
... :............ :..........JM g 1g g 0?Afil........... ::.......,....
NAME :MTokar
- TJ o
DATE :07/a/85
- 07/1//85
M /2 585 TEMUS LETTER ON ENVIRALLOY FAM
-2 With your continued cooperation, I expect that we can complete the review of the Enviralloy Family of HICs report in the not too distant future. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely, p
Michael Tokar Engineering Branch Division of Waste Management GFC :WMEG
- WMEG NAME :MTokar
- TJohnson DATE :07/ /85
- 07/ /85