ML20134B472
| ML20134B472 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/30/1993 |
| From: | Thadani A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Yung Y WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134B474 | List: |
| References | |
| PROJECT-697 TAC-M79498, NUDOCS 9312010011 | |
| Download: ML20134B472 (1) | |
Text
^ - -
i
. , n .
3;
., 4p u:u,,'o,, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
' j; i v.q g g ;
- wasuswcton. o. c. 205ss
,/ october 30, 199~-
- ?,y ,
y
< Mr. Y. Y. Yung, Chairman VIPRE-01 Maintenance Group Washington Public Power Supply System
. P.O. Box 968 h
[ Richland, WA 99352
Dear Mr. Yung:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF THE MODIFIED LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT, EPRI NP-2511-CCM, REVISION 3. "VIPRE-01: A THERMAL-HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS CODE FOR REACTOR CORES", (TAC NO. M79498)
We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the VIPRE-01 Maintenance Group (VMG) by letter dated February 28, 1990. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the raport and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as e reference in the license applicaticns, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific piant irvolved. Our acurance applies only to the matters described in the repc t.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-390, it is requested that VMG publish accepted versions of this report, pro;,rietary :.d non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accep.ed versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (cesignating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, VMG and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for continued effective applicability of the topical repw . without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely,,
! -Q ' ,9 l & A, .h g r/a
- . ~
Ashok C. Thadani, Assistant Director Olvision of Syster Safety and Analysis Office of Nuclear uctor Regulation
Enclosure:
NRC Evaluatien V(r (52OE
'LF - SUBf ytR]CF If931.i30 OEM-7CRGR