text
.
NRC f Orti 366 U.S. NtXLEAR REe,)LATORY COMMISSION APPROVED B7 OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXPlRES 5/31/95 EST{ MATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO CO WITH LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
$AR Bug (N kS TEk RE E$T E
I THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714). U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
(See reverse for requtred number of digits / characters for each block) gfT.
5-0 g g o TO TH APERW0g MAN MEMENT AND BUDGFT WASHIN DC 20 3 FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUPBER (2)
PAGE (3)
Limerick Cenerating Station, Unit 2 05000353 1OF6 TliLE (4) Unit 2 SCIWl, a Reactor Protection System Actuation,Due to a Failure of a Ball Joint that Connects the Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to the Tube Positiorier.
EVENT DATE (b)
LER N'JMBER (6)
REPORT DA1E (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR f
E h
MONTH DAY YEAR FACILilY NAME DOCKET N'IMBER
~
12 24 96 96 009 0
01 23 97 05000 1
~
OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 6: (Lnect one or more) (11)
)
MODE (9) 1 20.402(D) 20.405(c)
X 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 73.71(D)
POER 20.405(a)(1)(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.71(c) i LEVEL (10) 377.
20.405(a)(1)(ii) 50.3elc)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(v11J OTHER 20.405(ajll)(tii) 50.73(a)(2)(1)
- 50. 7Jl a)l2)(v111)( A)
(5pecify in 20.405(a)(1)(iv) 50.7Jta)(2)(11)
- 50. 73 t a)(2 )(v111 )( b) n e
40.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)U11) 50./Jia)(2)(x)LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Code)
J. L. Kantner - Manager, Experience Assessment, LCS (610) 718-3400 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
R OR1 E R
E
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MUNIH DAY YEAR YES SUBMISSION No (If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X DATE (15) feb'Ti1 t
1 e ap (16) 60Eimit to 14uu spaces./20 9$roximately le single spaced typewritten lines)an overspeed condition occurred on
'B' hours on 12 A
reactor recirculation pump (RRP) and the RRP was manually tripped. At 0613 hours0.00709 days <br />0.17 hours <br />0.00101 weeks <br />2.332465e-4 months <br /> operations identified that the reactor was operating in the exclusion region of the power / flow map and a manual scram was performed, a Reactor Protection System actuation. All control rods inserted as designed. The cause of the overspeed condition was a failed ball joint which connects the
'B' Motor Generator (MG) set scoop tube to the scoop tube positioner. The ball joint failed from high stress reverse bending fatigue from low amplitude low frequency vibration induced by the fluid coupler. Additional causes were an inadequate diagnosis of a 10/23/94 event, and an inadequate follow-up to GE SIL 355. Corrective actions include installation of vibration monitoring equipment, Unit 1/2 MG set inspections, revisions to appropriate preventive maintenance tasks, the assessment of a design change, and Engineering re-reviews of previous responses to industry experience. A parallel evaluation identified that the manual scram may have been unnecessary since the procedure for determining actual core flow after a RRP trip was conservative, and jet pump instrumentation logic assumes reverse flow in an inactive loop with 1 RRP in service. As a result, the affected procedure will be assessed for revision.
NRC FORM 366 (5 92) 9701290078 970123 PDR ADOCK 05000353 S
PDR
NRC f OgM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORf COMMISSION APPROVED BV OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXP1RES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION RgST:
50.0 HRS.
NNF0hMA Ek BM
(
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
C PS MAN l
TEXT CONTINUATION ggM15EN1. fND T TH R
Ma 48%(M& oC%l8!
FACILITY NME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUpeER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION 05000 2 OF 6
Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2 353 96
-- 009 --
0 TEKT t H more space Is requtrea. use acattronal coptes at NRc form J00A) (11)
Unit Conditions Prior to the Event Unit 2 was in Operational Condition 1 (Power Operation) operating at approximately 37% power level.
Power ascension was in progress following a maintenance outage.
There were no systems, structures or components out of service which contributed to this event.
Description of the Event At 0605 hours0.007 days <br />0.168 hours <br />0.001 weeks <br />2.302025e-4 months <br /> on December 24, 1996, when Operations personnel raised core flow to 60 Mlb/hr, the Unit 2 " Alert High Vibration" and " Danger High Vibration" alarms annunciated in the Main Control Room (MCR).
A flow increase was observed on the
'B' reactor recirculation pump and the
'B' Motor Generator (MG, EIIS:MG) set scoop tube was locked.
Subsequently, the
'B' reactor recirculation pump ' Danger High Vibration' alarm annunciated in the MCR.
At 0606 hours0.00701 days <br />0.168 hours <br />0.001 weeks <br />2.30583e-4 months <br /> Operations personnel entered Operational Transient (OT) procedure OT-104,
" Unexpected / Unexplained Reactivity Insertion."
At 0608 hours0.00704 days <br />0.169 hours <br />0.00101 weeks <br />2.31344e-4 months <br />, an overspeed condition was identified on the
'B' reactor recirculation pump and the pump was manually tripped per procedure OT-104.
Procedure OT-112, " Recirculation Pump Trip," was entered to determine the reactor operating point on the power / flow map.
At 0613 hours0.00709 days <br />0.17 hours <br />0.00101 weeks <br />2.332465e-4 months <br /> Operations personnel identified that the reactor was operating in the exclusion region and the reactor was immediately manually scrammed, a Reactor Protection System (RPS, EIIS:JC) actuation.
Following the scram all control rods were verified to be full in, the Main Turbine was tripped, and the reactor feedwater pumps remained in service for reactor level control.
At 0629 hours0.00728 days <br />0.175 hours <br />0.00104 weeks <br />2.393345e-4 months <br /> the manual scram signal was reset.
An investigation revealed that the transients occurred as a result of failed ball joint on the
'B' reactor recirculation pump
'B' MG set scoop tube control linkage.
A four hour notification was made to the NRC at 0845 hours0.00978 days <br />0.235 hours <br />0.0014 weeks <br />3.215225e-4 months <br /> on December 24, 1996, in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.72 (b) (2) (ii) since this event resulted in the manual actuation of the RPS.
This report is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (iv).
l9
m.__ -
NRC fb,kN 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICJ APPROVED BV OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXP!RES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION 50.0 HRS.
DNFOR LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (I2R)
A E DS EM N C
TEXT CONTINUATION g g O g g g reg lA OR REDUCTION PR(k)ECT MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (WASHINGTON 3150 0104),
DC70jCE OFF OF s03 FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUp6ER (2)
LER NUDBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION 05000 30F 6 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2 353 96 009 --
0 TEXT Ut more space is requirea, use naastsonal copies of NRC form J66A) (11) i Repairs to the
'B' reactor recirculation pump MG set scoop tube control linkage were performed, startup activities commenced, and the Unit was synchronized to the grid at 1256 hours0.0145 days <br />0.349 hours <br />0.00208 weeks <br />4.77908e-4 months <br /> on December 25, 1996.
Analysis of the Event
i The RPS functioned as designed in response to the manual actuation of 1
the system.
All control rods fully inserted as a result of the manual scram initiation.
The MCR Shift Supervisor made a conservative decision to take control of the plant and initiate a rapid plant scram after identifying that the reactor was operating in the exclusion region of the power / flow map.
Operations personnel controlled the plant shutdown using the appropriate station procedures.
There was no release of radioactive material to the environment as a result of this event.
When the
'B' reactor recirculation pump MG set scoop tube control linkage failed, an increase in core flow from 60 Mlb/hr to a peak of 85 Mlb/hr in 10 seconds occurred.
Reactor power increased from 38% of rated to a peak of 61% of rated in 8 seconds.
Core flow stabilized at j
81 Mlb/hr and reactor power at 49% within 20 seconds of the start of the event.
This event is bounded by the Recirculation Flow Control Failure - Increasing Flow Event, an analyzed transient classified as an incident of moderate frequency.
Initial reactor power and flow conditions for the analyzed transient are chosen to produce the most severe results.
The most severe transient occurs when high reactor power and low core flow initial conditions are established (i.e.,
57%/40 Mlb/hr) with a fluid coupler speed increase rate of 25% of full speed per second.
This event occurred at lower power and higher flow than the analyzed transient (i.e.,
38%/60 Mlb/hr) and the fluid coupler speed increase rate was less than 10% of full speed per second.
All of these conditions resulted in a milder transient than the analyzed transient.
Cause of the Event
The cause of this event is separated into two parts.
First, the causes l
for the
'B' reactor recirculation pump overspeed condition are addressed.
Second, since an evaluation identified that the manual RPS actuation may have been unnecessary, the causes for the RPS actuation are discussed.
1 NRC fUrM 366A U,5. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH lHIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
NNF0NhN$ WEC A
DS GE B
TEXT CONTINUATION g, g g j05 N I S Di O TH A
d b
T D ET f
DC FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUM ER (6)
PAGE (3) l ygg SEQUENTIAL REVISION l
05000 4
OF 6
Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2 353 96 009 --
0 TEKT Ut snore space us requirea, use cacttrorust coptes of NRC forTn J60A) (11)
Ccuses of the
'B' Reactor Recirculation Pump Transient:
1.
'B' MG set scoop tube control linkage fatigue failure.
The cause of the overspeed condition on the
'B' reactor recirculation pump was a failure of the
'B' MG set scoop tube control linkage.
Specifically, the ball joint which connects the MG set scoop tube to the scoop tube positioner failed.
Following the failure, the tube retracted from the fluid coupler oil circuit causing the speed on the MG set to increase.
The metallurgy analysis of the ball joint concluded that the failure was the result of high stress reverse bending fatigue.
Review of Plant Monitoring System computer data recorded during this event indicated low amplitude low frequency vibration of the scoop tube control linkage induced by the fluid coupler prior to the failure.
- 2. Inadequate diagnosis of the cause for an October 1994 similar event.
On October 23, 1994, a failure of the Unit 2
'B' reactor recirculation pump MG set scoop tube linkage ball joint occurred during a unit startup.
During analysis of the 1996 event, a review of data from the 1994 event was performed.
The review revealed that this low amplitude low frequency vibration was also present prior to the 1994 ball joint failure.
The original cause of the 1994 event was concluded to be a failure of the positioner brake, and the presence of this vibration was attributed to play in the ball joint prior to failure.
- 3. Inadequate follow-up to the recommendations of General Electric (GE)
Service Information Letter (SIL) No. 355 issued in April of 1981.
GE identified low amplitude low frequency vibration of the scoop tube control linkage as a potential problem in 1981 and provided recommended actions in GE SIL No. 355.
The SIL recommends contacting the MG set manufacturer if a vibration problem develops in the scoop tube control linkage.
The review of this SIL was performe'd prior to commercial operation of Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Unit 1, which commenced in February of 1986.
The review dated August 14, 1984, indicated that LGS personnel were aware of the potential vibration problem addressed in the SIL, however, no follow-up action was initiated to monitor for the vibration problem during start-up and operation.
As a result, the review of the SIL was closed and the recommended actions were not l
implemented at LGS.
Also, there was no documented review performed for LGS Unit 2, which commenced commercial operation in February 1990.
jl
=. ~ -.
~ _ _ -.
- - NRC FOhM 366A U.S. NUCLfAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY ONL Y 150 0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES b/~a/95 EST!MTED BURDEN PER RECPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION RE0 JEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
D FO N 0 M T C NDS E
B C TEXT CONTINUATION g g. g s E N.REgULAT g
S
'S M
TA ET.
i
' DC FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUpsER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENIAL REVISION 05000 5 OF 6 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2 353 96 009 --
0 TEXT Ut more space is requtred. use acastronal coptes at NRC fann J66A) (11) l Cruses of the Manual RPS Actuation:
l
- 1. The procedure OT-112 guidance for determining actual core flow af ter a pump trip was conservatively inaccurate.
Procedure OT-112 guidance assumes reverse flow conditions in the inactive loop with one pump in service at speeds above 42%.
An analysis of the core flow data prior to the
'B' reactor recirculation pump trip indicated that core flow in the inactive loop ~was actually in the forward direction.
Operations personnel, as directed by procedure, used the indicated core flow value to determine the reactor operating point on the power / flow map.
This resulted in an indicated entry into the exclusion region of the power / flow map and required an immediate unit scram.
- 2. The jet pump instrumentation logic assumes reverse flow in an inactive loop with one reactor recirculation pump in service.
The jet pump instrumentation cannot determine flow direction in the inactive loop with one reactor recirculation pump in service.
This results in an incorrect indication of core flow when one pump is in service at low speed and core flow is driven by natural circulation.
Corrective Actions
Immediate Corrective Accions:
The failed ball joint was replaced on the
'B' MG set control linkage and the positioner was successfully tested per Instrumentation and Controls (IC) procedure IC-11-00710, " Checkout of Recirc Scoop Tube Positioner."
The control linkage for the Unit 2
'A' MG set positioner was inspected and no similar problems were identified.
Long Term Corrective Actions:
l
- 1. General Plant (GP) procedure GP-5, " Normal Plant Operations," will i
revised to exclude operation of the Units 1 and 2 MG set scoop tubes in vibration regions as each region is determined.
Procedure GP-5 will be revised for Unit 2 prior to startup from the fourth Unit 2 refueling outage (2R04) scheduled to commence on January 31, 1997.
The procedure GP-5 revision for Unit 1 is expected to be completed by July 1, 1997.
Until these revisions are implemented, Operations personnel will continue to follow procedure OT-112 as written.
4 NRC f uhM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM1551C2 APPR0 nD BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXP!RES 5/31/95 l
ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQ [lNFO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
ECO 05 EM B
TEXT CONTINUATION g g4 @ N L$ k RE glATOR 05 REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104). OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDFfT WASHINGTON DC 20503 FACILITY NAME (1) 00CKET NUPBER (2)
LER NUpeER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REvl510N 05000 6 OF 6 l
Limerick Generating Station, Unit 2 353 96 009 --
0 TEX 1 tit tinre space is requirea, use acostronal coptes at NRC torm nOA) (11)
- 2. Vibration monitoring instrumentation has been installed on the Unit 2
'A' and
'B' MG set scoop tube linkage to determine vibration regions and magnitudes.
Instrumentation is expected to be installed on the Unit 1 MG sets by April 1, 1997.
- 3. The Unit 2 MG set scoop tube control linkages and positioners will be inspected for wear or degradation during the fourth Unit 2 refueling outage (2R04) scheduled to commence on January 31, 1997.
The Unit 1 MG set scoop tube control linkages and positioners will be inspected during the next outage of sufficient duration.
The equipment will be refurbished as necessary to meet required alignment and clearance specifications, and these inspections will be incorporated into the appropriate Preventive Maintenance Program procedure.
- 4. An internal inspection of the Unit 2
'B' MG set fluid coupler will be performed during the fifth Unit 2 refueling outage with corrective measures implemented as necessary.
- 5. A design change will be assessed to resolve the MG set scoop tube control linkage failure problem.
This assessment will include an evaluation of the GE SIL 355 recommendations.
- 6. The LGS Engineering Operating Experience Assessment Program (OEAP)
Review Panel, currently in progress, is reviewing previous OEAP responses for applicability.
- 7. More accurate guidance will be identified for determining actual core flow when operating with one reactor recirculation pump at low speeds.
Upon completion of this action, procedure OT-112 will be revised as necessary.
- 8. A Shif t Update Notice, which provides a summary of this event and details concerning the vibration monitoring instrumentation in action no. 2 stated above, has been issued to Operations personeel.
Also, this event will be reviewed for inclusion into the appropriate i
training lesson plans.
I l
Previous Similar Occurrences i
A previous similar event occurred at LGS on October 23, 1994, and is l
described in the Cause Section of this report.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000352/LER-1996-001, :on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-001-02, :on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-002, :on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised |
- on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2 |
- on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-003-02, :on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations |
- on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-003, :on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay |
- on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected |
- on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-004, :on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers |
- on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned |
- on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-005, :on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised |
- on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006-01, Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006, :on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed |
- on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-006-02, :on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated |
- on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-007, :on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed |
- on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-007-02, :on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys |
- on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008-01, :on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps |
- on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008, Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | | | 05000352/LER-1996-008, :on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415 |
- on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs |
- on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009-03, :on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced |
- on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009, Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-009, :on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs |
- on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-010, :on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731 |
- on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-011, :on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed |
- on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-012, :on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings |
- on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-013, :on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram |
- on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-014, :on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930 |
- on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-015, :on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented |
- on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-016, :on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed |
- on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-017, :on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed |
- on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-018, :on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised |
- on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-019, :on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued |
- on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000352/LER-1996-020, :on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques |
- on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-021-01, Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | | | 05000352/LER-1996-021, :on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures |
- on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022-01, Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Re | Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Reading | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022, :on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized |
- on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-023, :on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group |
- on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) |
|