ML20134A620

Further Response to FOIA Request for Four Categories of Documents Re Plant Qc.Forwards Documents Listed on Apps B & C.Portions of App C Documents Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 6 & 7)

ML20134A620
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	10/22/1985
From:	Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Bell N NUCLEAR INFORMATION & RESOURCE SERVICE
Shared Package
ML20134A622	List: IR 05000483/1985002 ML20134A620 ML20134A628 ML20134A632 ML20134A636
References
FOIA-85-655 NUDOCS 8511070431
Download: ML20134A620 (3)

Text

k

[ ** *%q[o UNITED STATES I

8" g

I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 OCT g 21985 Ms. Nina Bell Nuclear Information and Resource Service 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 160 IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20036 TO F0!A-85-655

Dear Ms. Bell:

This is in further response to your letter dated September 23, 1985, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Infonnation Act (F01A), four categories of documents related to quality control at the Callaway nuclear power plant.

Document 1 on the enclosed Appendix B is already available in the NPC Public Document Room (PDR). The remaining documents on Appendix B are being placed in the PDR in folder FOIA-85-655 under your name.

Portions of the documents listed on the enclosed Appendix C are being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Exemptions (6), 7(C), and 7(D) of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6), 7(C), and (7)(D)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(6), (7)(iii), and (7)(iv) of the Commission's regulations. Disclosure of the information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and disclose the identity i

of a confidential source.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been detennined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. James G.

Keppler, Pegional Administrator, NRC Region !!!.

This denial may be appealed to the Comission's Executive Director for l

Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC i

20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."

The NRC has not completed its search for and review of documents subject to your request. We will respond as soon as those actions are conpleted.

Sincerely, I

'/

' d M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Decords Of fice of Administration

Enclosures:

As stated g5 lo g i 951022 BELLSS-655 PDR

=

i Re: F0!A-85-655 APPENDIX B l

1.

03/04/85 PNO-III-85-20, available in the POR,ANO 8503110231 i

2.

03/10/84 Union Electric internal memcrandum on effective communication (6 pages) 3.

02/07/85 Handwritten notes ffrom B. Little (1 page) l 4.

02/22/85 Union Electric Request for Corrective Action number P8502-035 i

(5pages) 5.

02/22/85 Union Electric Request for Corrective Action number P8502-039 (4 pages) j 6.

02/22/85 Union Electric Request for Corrective Action number P8502-034

]

(3 pages) j 7.

02/22/85 Union Electric Surveillance Report (10 pages) 8.

03/25/85 Union Electric Surveillance Report (24 pages) l 9.

04/23/85 Union Electric Surveillance Report (16 pages)

10. 09/03/85 Allegation Management System Printout (2 pages)

11. Various Newspaper Articles (4 pages)

12. Undated Allegation Data Form (1 page) i i

j 4

4 1

i l

t 4

O Re: F01A-85-655 APPENDIX C WITIlHELD IN PART 02/05/85 Memorandum for Weill from Pelke on Callaway Allegation. Withheld name and address under Exemption 6 and 70, release would be an invasion of personal privacy and his name is confidential as an alleger. (1 page) 02/13/85 Letter to an alleger from Well, withheld name and address under Exemptions 6 and 70, release would be an invasion of personal privacy and his name is confidential as an alleger. The attached inspection report is in the PDR, ANO 8504080524 and AN0 8504080520 (5 pages) 07/15/85 Letter to an alleger from Weil, withheld name and address under Exemption 6 and 70, release would be an invasion of personal privacy and his name is confidential as an alleger. The attached inspection report is in the PDR, ANO 8504080524 and ANO 8504080520 (16 pages) 1 l

i-

~

v, Q M o: -

r v 5 E r j

=

Nudear Information and Resource Service 1616 P Street, N.W., Suite 160, Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 32& 0002 Septebmer 23, 1985 James M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records FRE OF WHINNWATON Office of Adminstration REQUEST U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.((~[b -db8 Washington, D.C. 20555 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REOUEST 4.C fN "M

Dear Mr. Felton:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.

522, as amended, and 10 CFR 9.8 of the Commission's regulations, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service requests the following documents regarding the Callaway nuclear power plant.

Please consider " documents" to include reports, studies, test results, correspondence, memoranda, meeting notes, meeting minutes, working papers, graphs, charts, diagrams, notes and summaries of conversations and interviews, computer records, and any other forms of written communication, including internal NRC Staff memoranda.

In your response, please identify which documents correspond to which requests below.

Pursuarit to this request, please provide all documents prepared or utilized by, in the possession of, or routed through the NRC related to:

1.

A February 22, 1985 audit report of Union Electric's quality assurance office which led to the suspension of inspectors; 2.

All related requests for corrective action or plans for corrective action related to this innue, and Union Electric reviews of the quality control inspection system; 3.

Union Electric Company documents that indicate that on March 10, 1984, Terry Shaw, a OA supervisor, directed his inspectors to take their technical problems initially to Mr.

Shaw or to an assistant supervisor; and 4.

NRC Staff responses to Union Electric plans to review and correct problems in the quality control inspection system at Callaway.

Newspaper articles regarding the problems with quelity control inspection at Callaway are attached.

9.ny-w

,p.

7 i

l i

s 4

l Please provide a list of offices to which this request was forwarded.

l In our opinion, it is appropriate in this case for you to waive I

search charges, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552 (a) (4) (A) "because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the general public."

The Nuclear Information and i

Resource Service is a non-profit organization serving local organizations concerned about nuclear power and providing infor-i mation to the general public.

Information required by 10 CFR 9.14a was provided by letter dated August 3, 1984, i

i Sincere 2

s.

Nina Bell

,e Assistant Director i

}

cc: File I

e i

e i

i t

i

.t i

1 i

.I 1

n I

}

2 i

m R nbune 1

O 1985, COLUMBIA, MISSOURI 20 PAGES - PRICE 25'

~ UE adds 15 inspectors to roles of unqualified GIRISTOPil SZEQfENYI operating in December, generates plants, Garde said, including the of the Tribune's staff 1,150 megawatts of electricity for William II. Zimmer plant in Ohio, a Union Electric Co. has identified customers in St. Iouis and dozens of Midland, Mich., plant and the Mar-22 inspectors - 15 more than initial-Mid-Missouri towns such as Ashland ble 11111 plant in Indiana. All three ly reported - who lacked qualifica-and Moberly. The plant is 35 miles have been shut down for severe defi-tions to ensure the safe operadon east of Columbia.

ciencies. Quality control questions have also been raised at the Co.

and maintenance of its Callaway Mike Geary, a Union Electric County nuclear power plant, a Nu-spokesman, said utility offictals de.

manche Peak plant near Glen flose, clear Regulatory Commission offi-clined to comment on their investi. Texas.

cial said this week.

gation of the inspectors' work. "We Geary said Union Electric engi-he official, Bruce utile, said util-don't see a need for a blow-by-blow neers are carefully evaluating the ity engmeers and auditors who account of what's being done," he jobs performed by the inspectors began investigating inspectors' said. But he confirmed that 22 in, with questionable credentials.

backgrounds last month have identi-spectors lacked certain credentials.

"We're looking at the nature of the work involved," he said. "If it didn't fled about 250 inspections performed Uttle said he expects the utility to by the 22 inspectors during the past wrap up its study by the end of I'9,uin a high level of expertise, we !! probably assume it was done three years.

March. At that time, Geary said' all right. We'll also check to see if A special utility task force has Union Electric will provide the com-the work had been subjected to addi-found that the 22 irupectors were mission with a report of its findmgs U nalInspeedons."

qualified to do all 230 of the jobs re-Uttle plans to file a report of his own ne utility's engineers have not viewed as of Friday, Uttle said. The f ndmgs and recommendatMns by reinspected any areas yet, Ocary task force has found no evidence of the end of April.

Said S me reinsPections may be dtf-deficiencies in the plant's hard-In early March, the utility con.

ficult, if not impossible, to perform ware.

cluded that seven of its present in-because plvit materials have be-ne St. louis utility is reviewing spectors lacked sufficient training C*** I'"#CU

about 12,000 work orders, said Uttle*

or experience in some areas of work a commission inspector at Cal-they had been doing at the plant. As A longtime nuclear power oppo-

laway, a result, Union Electric suspended neA Kay Drey of University Oty, lie said his agency will wait for the men from doing certain jobs.

said yesterday she and the Coalition for the Environment will file a peti-Umon Electric to complete its study Union Electrie employed 13 of the tion asking the commission to shut before considering action Ile said 22 inspectors, Uttle said. Seven of down the Callaway plant.

the utility is conducting a thorough the 13 still work as quality contrut investigation and has found no evi-g EI P

she said, "makes it all the more ot[

dence that the inspectors

• work com-i

,,d for ind pe vi us that we have to call on the reg-prombed the plant s safety.

dent construction. contractors, in, Billie Garde, a staff member with ulatory commbslon to shut down the cluding Danfel International Co' the Government Accountability plant until Union Electric can dem-which helped build the plant-Project, a public interest group in onstrate that the systems are Washington, D.C., voiced doubts.

Nuclear plant inspectors check

,,f,'n "De system had to have broken electrical, mechanical and civil en-down in a fairly significant fashion,"

gineering work throughout the plant, she said. "The NRC's approach to includmg systems such as pipes and this is dangerously inadequate "

valves in the reactor buildmg.

TH L. WEATH ER Utile said he cannot assess Garde said Daniel International whether the unqualified personnel helpn1 build Kansas' Wolf Creek nu-Cloudy 1oday, with a 70 percont I

influenced the safety of the plant clear power plant, which has been chance of showers. High around near Fulton until he looks at the plagued with structural flaws. De 50, with southwest winds at to to work orders and, if netessary, ex-regulatory commission recently 15 miles per hour. Tonight,60 per amines the inspectors

• field work.

gave the plant near Burlington, cent chance of showers, with the lie plans to start that part of his in-Kan., an operating license.

Iow in the mid-30s. Tomorrow, vestigation on Monday.

Inspection problems have turned cloudy with a 30 porr.ent chance The $3 billion plant, which started up at several U.S. nuclear power of showers. High in the mid-40s.

- ~.,

l

! 4 Yearlongworkers' rift revealed in UE safety assurance problems By QIRISMPil SZEQIENYI Shaw's inspectors. "I would expect a supervisor to G of the Tribune's staff competent in inspection philosophy."

Friction between inspectors and their supervisors at Several inspectors said such a management attitud the Callaway County nuclear power plant had surfaced and supen-isors' shortage of expertise spurred inspe nearly a year before Union FJectric Co. started inves-tors' complaints to Powers' office which did the audit.

Ligating its deteriorating quality control system, an in-outlined inadequate training, education and experienc

_ternal memo reveals.

among seven of 13 inspectors - including Portell r.nd a Company documents show that,gn '"" in_1980 sistant supervisor LM. Zahara - and sparked suspe quality control supervisor Terry Shaw ordered inspec-sion of some of their duties.

tors under him to take technical problems to him or to an Following the audit's suggestion, the company su assistant supervisor before approaching other depart-pended inspectors from some tasks until their qualific tions are established. Union Electric is also reviewir ment managers.

h "In past weeks, there have been numerous instances some 12,000 work orders to determine whether disqua' k demonstrating a lack of effective communication within fled men did inspections that could jeopardize tl 90 the quality control department," Shaw wrote in the plant's safety.

memo to 30 people, many of whom were inspectors.

'Ibe St. Louis utility is also reviewing the credentia "Our aim is to solve problems through communication, and work of 50 to 60 more inspectors employed by a fir not create them."

that helped build the plant, which sttarted generati But some inspectors said this week that they repeated-electricity in December.

{

ly got no action from Shaw when voicing concerns about 1he Nuclear Regulatory Commission's inspector supervisors who were unqualified to make technical de-callaway is also planning to review some work order y

cisions for ensuring safety. In addition, the utility con-Yesterday, the Fulton Sun quoted plant spokesm:

firmed today that inspectors took their concems to Mike Geary as saying that "we have a good system be Shaw's boss in early December, nearly two months be-for recourse..I'm not sure why the inspectors didn't a fore the utility started an audit of problems.

up the quality control chain of cammand "

Several inspectors said they did not trust some super-But today, Ceary admitted that statement was e 5 visors because they lacked expertise in certain quality true. lie said he had been unaware of the inspectors' e control areas. "On a day to day basis, you're going to forts when he talked to the Fulton newspaper.

have technical questions," said one informed source He conceded that seven or eight inspectors had tak who requested anonymity. " Management wants us to go their concerns in early December to Paul Appleby,.

to them for answers, yet how can they discuss these assistant plant manager who oversees quality conb problems when they're not technically qualified?"

operations.

One assistant supervisor, Vernor, Portell, recently lost Geary said the inspectors' concerns "were bei certification for two types of inspections at the 33 billion taken seriously." After the interviews, Geary said, O plant near Fulton. Reacting to the finished audit, dated pleby put together a plan for corrective action. Ces Feb. 22, plant manager Steve Miltenberger suspended said he didn't know what changes Appleby had p:

Portell's certification. Porte11, however, retains his su-posed.

pervisory role.

Irupectors said this week that they grew impati)

" A supervisor does not have to be certified at any level with Appleby's efforts, and so they asked Powers' qui in any discipline," said Robert Powers, assistant man-ty assurance office to investigate. Powers noted that ager of the division that oversees the effectiveness of spectors have the right under company policy to co plain to his division.

Auditors concluded managers had broken wnt THE WEATHER c'mP'"r r"'** ia **'er*

'a't' ace' by certifri"8 * :

inspectors. The inspectors check electrical, mechanic civil and material work throughout the plant, includ Fair tonight with a low in the upper 30s. Mostly systems in the reactor building and other key com sunny tomorrow. High around 60.

nents.

e

50483852034 PKillH:nnEV NOTIFIEAlleN Cf EVENT OR UHUSUAL OCCURRLHCE--PHO.it t-8 a

Da te fy,n h 4; M65 oublit intGrest significance.This preliminary notification constitutes EARLY notice

)

I The information is as initially received witt.out veri-ation or evaluation, and is basically all that is known by the staf f on this date,

/)r /2 Facility: Union Electric Company Callaway Nuclear Plant Licensee Emerge'ncy Classificaticn:

Steedman, MD 65077 Notification of an Unusual Event Alert Docket No: 50-483 Site Area Emergency General Emergency

_y,t__Not Applicable

Subject:

DECERTIFICATION Of QC INSPECTORS The licensee informed the Resident Inspector on February Union Electric Quality Control Inspectors were decertified af ter a review 4

26, 1985, that seven procedural and education / experience deficiencies in UE's inspector certification identified program.

impact on Construction.The decertification only affects the Operational QC pregram a The licensee began the review after employees alleged that a key procedure certification process was not being followed, i.e., that a level III. inspector had i

not signed the certification documents of recently certified Level 111 inspect The allegation was substantiated and further review by the lictnsee uncove additional deficiencies:

insuf ficient records to support QC inspector certification; i

QC inspectors did not have the required work exp d

deficiencies in the UE Certification / Qualification program itself 1

1 r

As part of its correction action program, the licensee is plannin; an eval ati i

the impact on the plant by these now non-certified inspectors u

on of include a reinspection of at least a sample of their work on safety related s This evaluation will i

ystems.

The resident inspectors are.following the licensee's course of action

)

l The State of Missouri will be notified.

)

1 The news media is aware of the inspector decertification.

This information is current as of 11:30 a.m., March 4, 1985.

U2 CONTACT:

P. Pelke E. Greenman FTS 388-5560 FT5 388-5518

.. DISTRIBUTION:

4

~

H. St. M.W MNBB/3

• c>-

Ph i l l ips_/ 3.et.

E/': / ' W Willste /3 #7 Chairman Palladino ELO Comm. Roberts NRR PA IE NMSS Comm. Asselstine OIA RES MPA Cnmm. Bernthal ELD AE00

i. Zech Air Rights /?. < d I

SP Mall:

INPO15.21 ADM:DM8 ACRS NSAC f3 26 DOT: Trans Only CA Applicable Resident Site /3 t 3 POR Regions 1/Ja7_, 11 n. >7, IV e 3 </, V,3]e Licensee (Corporate Office)" ' ' e

-7 j[jC1j((Li 850304 PttD-Ill-85-020 PDR

_pey, 97f;;ft Ph

+

t N

g r

,,-.,---.-.-,,,,r

.,,_g,

-,m-m,,-,,m,-.

--e...

+ -,,..,, - - -

.,,,-w-

a,s mm y

-.-,,w-VOL, LXXXVI, NO.137 THURSDAY, MARCH 7,1985, COLUMBIA, M 4

UEtargets unqualifiedp:

Concern surfaces about quality, safety assurances at Callaway.

i

.,. w

~

(C) 1985 ColumMa DaQy Tribune its original price estimate - sup-l

~

?

UmonDectricCo.hasaUowedun. pbes 1.150 megawatts for about I quahtied inspectors for more than nGon Union Electric customers in j " J ser -

"$$ri i

s..

of its Callaway County aMaar communities, such as Ashland and

,.;--W

..J.'g three years to help ensure the safety St. IAnis and dosens of Mid-Missourt g 9,

s e*

1. . ;.. ?*1; i. 4.f.y

' 4 power plant. The utility recently sus-Moberty. After eight years of con-

. Q Q."J#q ! i m.m.@ ;

q'..E e :

g pended seven inspectors from nu-struction, the plant, wtdch is N n.? a,E.. ??.V P J'

merous daties after an internal in-muss from Columbia, started

v..~

ta their training, eduestion or expe-Any citisen may petition the NRC - %.e,['.+g ' ;;6.1 e n W

- %yRJ E.N C : 1. T D. g +

d, vestigatice revealed aboncomings operating in Decemhae.

f.3

i.. -f.,,i / }.., Q ; > [,,,. hh. ? -

., ?

• r-V I

rsence.

to halt the plant's operation untQ the

, gg.,

r. lJ3..:?.-,. A.(46g ;'a 1he discovery has raised company safety review is naiahad Unscho-

'p.

,s e-M":.

2....

.a. n -

officials' doubts about the pant's deled shutdowns, the camnan, has e

k. kff i

eA(. 79

@,d-Q '.'; 1W.f. '

r,'.q'. d. '.g..

1. 1 \\ 1. T 's.<

'. y p~

j safe operation, leading them to estimated, would cost the stility g.

s p

J..

3 iL 9

begin revamping the quauty control about 3"30,000 a day.

g. y= m b a,-

i inspection system.

Doubts about inspections strike at 4

f'.

, P t

A ~# : j'f-i N 'k Y.$ 2 w

- -: ^

l Conceras won't be resolved unta the heart of the plant's quauty assur.

6,h %,W f'( ',ll:'"A.,.W qa"['y

+

j the utinty completes a massive re-ance program. Pouard said. "The 4 ' O, ?

'r../O *;-

vsew Winspectors' work dating back paper process is the rty way they

% 4.. % ' (' @*p' '.f.' g.".,.%, ',,g *

. E.-*,,

4.' g.

to 1961, cunpany ofSctals said yes-have to assure pubue aafsty."

'-N i *. h I

tarday. The review is expected to Robert Powers, the plant's assie-

'J i'.

l

. ' ? p '. ' )

f,S^y/ M;" e.O take at least three more weeks.

tant quauty assurance manager.

' ? "'" ' A "We're interested in seeing if said interviews with disquaufled in-

% s.

- * & 7.J - ".

there are any safety protaems,"said spectors revealed that when they en-

.:?

'7

..,..f.

7.p *3.. :.J.

l company spokesman Mike Qeary, countered wortt outside their areas

' 'l ' ' ' i.,%' t i

m? -

.s "and in correcting them if they of apenise, they panned the }on yy ;. e

([,,%.P '.' * ' '

t h e...

l

?

uisk" along to quatMad men.

The St. Louis utiltty is reviewing "We don't have any concern about

.:-, 3

~

work try 50 to GC more inspectors em-the plant's construction," he added,

% f +iwM4. ; f.,.

1

• 4'

./ 7..E E 5* 9 J s

[

played by a contractor who helped noting that the inspectors d&d aR buud the plant near Fulton. Umon their work during whatis ccasidered W. u-ch l

_T'. ' 3. 7..c..s?^

s i

f Doctric wanta to eneurs that inspec-the plant's operational phase, since % U-

1. -t.

tors had adequate ski lIs and certifl-midyear 1981.

4((.g.-<

9

.,,k.

,].

n M r, g y cation.

One worker, wbo requested ano-s i

A recent ceparv aud!!, prompt-nymity for fear of superiors' repri-T. i, K.,1 f.

fn

'%,,.+ m p '. f.$.,y%"l/ i.

s -

ed by laternal cenhirn unco-sais, said be found certification a-S.; - 247;',

1 f,2,*[ / ' '- @?"

(

M_

wered deuctencies with seven of 13 papers on his desk a few months age

~'

4 -

utility inspectors. A.s a result, the sDowing him to do inspections for 3

- f

--t 9 ' ';, ".

'O 6

utgity began studytr.g about 12,000 which he lacked complete training

, ;;j S %8..c;;

work orders this week to determine He and other workers nald manas.

t. y-

.g

~

whether unquahfied men conducted e wanted to improve emelency by

.O, e

fau:ty L7dm hundreds of using multicertified inspectorst

. ;.c

',. /

-'cJ j/. [., i r

V.l', t.j,. /.,p F which were done in key safety relat.

"I was afraid I might get asked

'"**y ed systems. "We need to rettew to do something I had no experience 3..-]' w.

V,,.4

.' ' '.' 4 ' 4 e., 4 ~ >

w

, 4,i. 7..

6 y, -l :g *

1. i.. b es those records to find out what they la," the worker said this week,"and g..

4..

3 3-g 4,.

3

'. P. U l.b,. % '%.N actua27 dui," said James Gearhart, at that point, I would have had to

.'s 9

.c.

'~

' ". %gc,T.

6 j

the Union Cectrie employee who su-asy, Set somebody else in here who

%.F.*.'W

• .*)i.'s*+y y 'l.^ h. ;

^

'I" pervised the audit.

knows what they're doing.'"

e The Nuclear Regulatory Cemia-Other workers said they never re-fW^

'. ^. -

4r-i stan has not moved to alter plant can seeing or hearing of aninspector

?,

. s operations la the wake of the find-who proceeded with an inspection

,e. lg'4.'.t-? ('

?

.N ',/ w/ gr[. g. ','

n

^

s.'. S<

. f.; y,.

?-

e

.f '. 4 ings. Bruce IJttle,

• In-for which he wam't quaufled. In M,.,

4 ;.

h l. / ;-

d spector at Cacausy, said be wCl re-such instances, the workers said, the Y e.

?*

... y. ;.- J.

,. Q,g l

s view some utG!ty work orders. So inspector always turned to someone far, the stDaty has reported no evi-q=aMad But the employees noted

(. b,.,..V', =. '. 'l,-..'.,,." y'.sl N M,4 %( %

.l y

', ' &..f.. - ' ' ;. X..'. e T.

i

'.t dance that the unquaufted inspec-that theinspectorsla geestion-and A :

• f W

W

.y

', N l

their work - have causetalarps., $ f.'

tors compromlaed safety, uttle 4.

T >'

3 ' y" v about the quality controlprogram. A

". 4 $. ; + -

said.

m hj pj._.Mg.. ;, i..

The agency's regional office in. final rullag about safety can ettne

,.. y e'V<,'. J g, 4g..

c Chicago, respacaible for overseeing only when reviews are f'a%=d the

.7 c M e7,.

I top division cluets and the Dve com-Two stDaty divisions are the key 3d D t, q. 1

'.x 3 4-#

Causway's operation, has alarted its werkers agreed.

x mianianers in Washington, D.C. IJt.

pisyers: the quality control branch,

. W ? s- } <fM%.~'*'"..s%6 '... %

' 3 1

XM ' ' ' ' T 5 tie said the ut!bty might have violet-which inspects malatanaaee work ed NaC rules.

and repairs to make sure they meet Ch!!away plant manager Bob Pouard, a staff memhee of the strict safety regulations; and four regensta for corrective action:

l Union of Concerned Scientists in Powers' quality assurance wing, e One of three quality control as-tanberger suspended Por I

Washington and a former cammin-which reports only to corportte sistant supervisers, Vernon Porten, certification. He retains b l

sion worker, said regulators should headquarte-o and functions to an-lected necessary expertence la civu sory position,Cleary said, l

shut down the plant untu the utsuty sure that n_=nhers of the quauty and electrical inspectlana, fields he been barred from fursta completas its rutews.

eentrol staff perform correctly.

evernsw.

siectricalinspections.

f amhamg the federal agency's la late January, the quality assur-e ne man rempan.ihte for appen-e Most of the 13 men har inaction, Pouard said: "Dat's es-ance of5ce received cametalata tag certification of inspectors, queil-for inspections la more e actly what the dif5eulty is over at from inspectors who gaa=*=ad the ty centrolsupervisor Terry 5 haw, on the four technical catege the NRC, Instead of proof that a cradaaMala and ab0lties of other three accaslons since Oct. 21 vlolat-taung 38 certifications ar plant Le safe, they operate on the ab-quality control inspectors and two ed company rules for certifying in- - but half of those ec sence of proof that it is danger-evtales supervisors. Powers said spectors.

were found questionable ses."

his auditors began investigating the One perses that Shaw recon > cases, the snen did not me l The $1 biDion CaDaway plaat - next day. Among the findings sul-sneeded be certified for two locbal-accepted within the trw 4

campisted at snore than ave thnee lined in a reb. st eedst report and cal dunes was Perten tast week, others, Union Electrie tv i

i

1 l

52 PACES - PlbCE 25' W

MARCH 7,1985, COLUMBIA, MISSOURI talifiedplantinspectors no canew, county nuci.ar power pient. etth me mesoun wer in ine dmanc.

ce..c a e. co,e e

... +..;v'.f.. x ; ey&. e..

. L.'

J.h

- ' :,, s -

. 4, A

' '.[ ' f'

'm-y

• ' i: g.- c h h f - &_m-.

w jf L

/.N.

m

., i.

Y' k

N

'_. - l-Qy ' '

l Q;y. J O_ 'Md; l;..Y., ' ! e;&,...

1+-

, '.l, p %

y f,:4.

~ '

3. A T Ws. g l*? ' j '.

r J'

Regiatory commassion inspector

'.1 ;

.L n.

O ' +

F Uttle said adestepping compara

-A Q,

7 'v, 3.,'_.~ Q ~f,,? j Q N q..,

a 7.J e,

. f f.e. ?

polncy v olatae fe6eral rules %en

.~p'y 'f

,?

k:

granted beenses to build and operste We. [.x -

7

~

y..M g gge

.y.

Q 'y'Q.J{7 i

'.'. / " ;g~ N.%A.+}/,5 Fj

,.M.,,

4 Canaway. Union Doctric n! edged to

..P

... s.... -

g

1. y* i D,*'k,h: [. i V 'f,*.

^'-

/; V 1

.d '

,N#. 's upbold NRC regulauons as we3 as 2

.. - ' W. y W,,%y s..- j. 4[ f'.T. [;=, jM, ).f.tk

... - 1 e-my poucies utue noted

,e s

On Tuesday. Geary said "We oc

-J g l.,

N F

V.,.

"rw + :J..t.

- 3*-fC.

V ' t V.y

" + * { not bebeve we have committed an

,. ll

<E

' (* ~ -

violabons_" But Uni _on Dectr

, $j;p -

.4..g. M c,,,,,

7 p' I.,.jkI..

g,.e 4' '

' y c [q. s

.s m-Until the utlhty and uttle eorm Y

'./.[.b. t d

plete thett reviews of the ceruhca-th{.,-7

^

T;

~.-f u-

' f; ' '

2' p;M can problem. Ltue said, the protr 4.<-

5 *. ' -

4 -

lems are considered " potential vi+

%y.*

3.; ' T. A

' /N

.l;, g lauons" that could lead to dis %n-

[ 4,.

p==-

.]

ary accon or fines by the coa.nu

.3-

' f' non i

im edd2uon to suggesuns that me

.* - 1 3.;,

cert.Scaucca be pcIIed from the

- - Q';[ 9

'h.,

-v seven inspectors until their qd cauons are estabhabed, the sad:t

_ (~

~-

-;'t-

_[.

proposed several otber steps for Lm-

//,,

,n y

proving the certincation procesa T t/>, -~"c M; of tospectors, managers and quabt)

In response, Powers said, a group

> >;. w

. <f, 7.

7//. [,.,, ;gf,.Q.

g~,T 4f,. g5

• 5f'. f

-~*;p

.A e:,

d'

, / -t J.

g, ;

,7

,- pgM, assurance workers will recommend

" _ <.t.4'.y. >

l, p,. i >

,.n.,. y g-

,;.4.e specinc chansa to match or exeeed p e,-- g,#

7,,. -

a..

1 t;3 A W - *

• the prevamns industry standanis t.

--p*!Py%

3s,.

g.

y., w for certincauon.

M....,,,

. o y(

g,g.

-Jr-. ~%. p, '...fg -

• 7

., %) W-f.. s

%#p-(.

Dance work orders would shes i

7.,

e

'.3.'.

'.. : ~_:

.y

1.,. y Pkwws saW the rettew of mah y.

g g-l

.1.q' t ".

.u I

whether some plant systems need

,.i.

f-reinspecuan Untiltbe review ts f:n-

'. g f-I ~, p ^ ' [/ *4 A

,j. ;.e f.

[.7, g r,.p7 J;;

'.,.q,

" Q lj 7

@ S y.,. -

1sbed. Qeary added, Unfon Dectric 3

.N...Je

. g&.

• ,'~

,.[

3

.x fjd has contracted to hire two more in-

, y - sg.?

.. < %@. k f.

.., '/ ' k i.

s,;,h.. i --

spectors to Eneet the wortjoad

(*?

j e.'/

4. g,..,.,, ' p. g f%e specums a day J

3 [, 2

-1 7

g g.,... I Ceary amid the men average two in-3.--

4

'g g.

-.g In explaming the origin of the cer-p.-

G, p.'

s 4 a c.,.'y'

,J

.t.3

.'.; 3 Doctric from contractor Danae! In-4 canon problem. Powers said acc.e

%. J '.

i

. '. ; edgy <-t 'j y) inspeetors had been hired by Uruar i.

s

+ (f..

..c f Q..

,.. it g x.

.-f;

<~.,; 1,rv -

p.

o l

.... d,(1,

- p-. q t: [.Md d1 ternanonalCo Then, company man-iyN. b

.... ~. [. /.)A..e' -

i agers gave them new certincabons q,

a;

,-p'$@l

. s+

h J'_"

based on overly broad interpreta-q,. ' 7 9

f - 3%v< -W, 7. a,1 #

4 mans of industry standards. Powers

'f

~.1 s

^. c,p ; -

A,y.f..

. ;c., % o,.

said. The standards say offictau g ;

.?

y-g i. O.,j' ' -i

- gg.

g ;.

,...p, 7 may take related experience into s -

-s q-y:{:

J 7.

a.

-f x 3.:

ennahauon m certifytng inspec-

., 9 g ;.,, -.

L-(-

4+ - -

$ i.t.f n, T. m 1.[,

• M/9 Ah 7.4, W; J,_

c t 's-s 9

aera..

g.,.d.

. ;" ' :. 9.H.

~.'

3a2 one inspector *They abused

.f.M A.H ~y., j

'y

~ 3y.-.m the term 'reinted expertence ' ne S.r. y... ; ', - (. -f V

.. +

1-

,1:'

c-t bottam kne as we have a lousy man-

..gb ".d

- [.

agement attuanon."

h, e.g... c.v72...

o,;-.: f..

, 1 9. / o,.e.;9. $ g c 4.-.f. i.e. p'.

y Two plant wWrs close to me a.

s,

,1 i

problem said managers had hoped i

sts for corrective action: Canaway plant manager Steve MD-its own rules by exempting some to save money by ustr4 nspecto-s

! three quality control as-tenherger suspended Portelrs di.sj men troen the ertterta without docu-for multiple duties instead of harms wrvisora, Vernon Porten, cert 1Scacon. He retains his superrt-toenting why.

more employees tsaary expertence in etv0 sory pan' ham Qeary said, but he has After antahing their report, audi-Powers derued cost savings a.: a scal' P W fle w he been barred from further civU or tore whitdad the hat of unqualihed modvs. "We felt there were some electrical inspections inspectors to seven by verifying program weaknesses and perhaps an responsible for approv-

• Most of the 13 men had authority techrocal prowess with documents some judgments that shouldn't have 1

stion of inspectors, quah-for inspections to more than one of or in interviews with the other in-been made I consider any violauor of the program as a significant con-l supervisor Terry Shaw, on the four technical categottes - to-spectors isions since Oct. 22 violat-tahng 2e certincations among them

• On five procedural potnts, quab-cern "

of rules for castifying in-

- but half d thcee certincations ty control managers dodged Urdon were found questionable. In some Doctric's own written poucles for 7ks story was compUed and wrn-rson that Shaw recom-cassa, the men dad not meet criteria proper certification of the tnspectors tan by Thbune reporters e certined for two techro-accepted wtthiri the industry. In charged wtth ensuring Callaway's Saechenyt and Dolores Muskey and editor Paul floberts was Porten. tast week, athers. I. inion Doctric had ignored safe opersuon.

.