ML20133Q302
| ML20133Q302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1985 |
| From: | Grossman H Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| References | |
| CON-#485-926 79-410-03-OL, 79-410-3-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8511010481 | |
| Download: ML20133Q302 (3) | |
Text
y h(o '
y, ~ ug/s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3;y b
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s
OCT *z 5 TDW h ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD tia
,4 nocKc y h G Before Administrative Judges:
S%C[<E.c Q
/
-\\h
- h ]TlJ\\
e7 Herbert Grossman, Chairman Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Dr. Richard F. Cole SERVED OCT 261985 In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-456-OL 50-457-OL COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N COMPANY
)
ASLBP No. 79-410-03-OL (Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2)
October 25, 1985
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on Applicant's Motion to Strike Testimony)
MEM0RANDUM In conjunction with its motion to particularize Rorem Contention 1(a), as supplemented by its letter of October 2, 1985, Applicant has moved to strike a portion of Staff's testimony which it contends goes beyond the scope of the particularized contention it desires.
In our Memorandum and Order of October 18, 1985, we particular-ized Rorem Contention 1(a) to encompass all pre-accident public infor-mation programs, and excluded from its ambit a consideration of public 8511010481 851025 PDR ADOCK 05000456 C
PDR p So t
. notification measures to be taken at the time of an accident.We based our determination on Intervenor's failure to raise any issues curing discovery or in prefiled direct testimony other than relating to pre-accident information dissemination to the public.
As Applicant requests in its motion to exclude testitrony (at 3) we would not allow testimony pertaining to " advance arrangenents for dissemination of information through the news media during an emer-gency."
However, we did not further restrict the testimony to only the emergency information brochure. Consequently, tc the extent that planned annual press briefings are to be utilized to further educate the public about emergency planning in the ever-of a radiological emergency, testimony about that forction is admis_ ible; to the extent they are utilized to establish in advance the principal points of con-tact with the news media for information dissemination during an emer-gency, the testimony is excludable.
ORDER I
For all the foregoing reasons and based upon a consideration of the entire record in this matter, it is, this 25th day of October, 1985 ORDERED l
l l
l m--
r
. That the following phrase appearing at page nine (9) in Staff's proposed testimony of Gordon Wenger be excluded:
, and a continual flow of vital information to the public in the event of an emergency".
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
=-
Herbert Grossman, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE October 25, 1985 Bethesda, Maryland