Text

Forwards Corrected Notes from Portion of 850626 Meeting W/Mechanical Engineering Branch Re Review of ASME Documentation & Compliance for Selected Mechanical Features. W/One Oversize Drawing.Aperture Card Available in PDR
	ML20133N571
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	08/02/1985
From:	Wisenburg M; HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:	Knighton G; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20133N465	List: ML20133N462; ST-HL-AE-1316, Forwards Corrected Notes from Portion of 850626 Meeting W/Mechanical Engineering Branch Re Review of ASME Documentation & Compliance for Selected Mechanical Features. W/One Oversize Drawing.Aperture Card Available in PDR;
References
	CON-#385-155 OL, ST-HL-AE-1316, NUDOCS 8508130532
	Download: ML20133N571 (200)
	v • d • e

-

The Light Company n,-> ugimiig u,- im<, mon n.,->>. mas m mmmen August 2, 1985 ST-HL-AE-1316 File No.: G4.2 Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 South Texas Project Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499 Meeting Notes from NRC MEB Audit ASME Documentation Review Portion

Dear Mr. Knighton:

On June 26, 1985 Branch (MEB) staff met with representatives of HL&P at the Houston office to discuss the mechanical design of the South Texas Project (STP). This meeting was conducted in two portions. Meeting notes covering the FSAR question responses were previously transmitted to you in our letter ST-HL-AE-1296 dated July 1,1985 from M. R. Wisenburg to G. W. Knighton.

Attached are the meeting notes from the portion of the meeting concerning review of STP ASME documentation and compliance for selected mechanical features.

This review covered five Nuclear Steam Supplier System (NSSS) scope items and four balance-of-plant items.

Previous to the meeting the NRC had reviewed several documents that were transmitted to the NRC.

The meeting on June 26, 1985 consisted of follow-up questions and corresponding requests for additional documents which addressed the follow-ua questions.

A sumary of the results of each item is provided in Attac1 ment A.

Documents requested during the meeting (noted in the summary, Attachment A) are provided in Attachment B in the order that they are discussed in the summary.

Attachment C contains a list of attendees.

$$kNOON

$U A

W2/NRC1/v

Houston Lighting & Power Company ST-HL-AE-1316 File No.: G4.2 Page 2 l

If you should have any questions on this matter, please contact Mr.

M. E. Powell at (713) 993-1328.

Very truly.p'urs, f

%w/ Jw-M. R. Wisenburg Manager, Nuclear Licensin CAA:yd Attachments:

A.

Sumary of Results B.

Requested Documents C.

List of Attendees l

l

\\

l s

W2/NRC1/v

ST-HL-AE-1316 File No: G4.2 Houston Lighting & Power Company Page 3 cc:

Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director J. B. Poston/A. vonRosenberg Division of Licensing City Public Service Board Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation P.O. Box 1771 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Antonio, TX 78296 Washington, DC 20555 Brian E. Berwick, Esquire Robert D. Martin Assistant Attorney General for Regional Administrator, Region IV the State of Texas Nuclear Regulatory Comission P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Austin, TX 78711 Arlington, TX 76011 Lanny A. Sinkin

N. Prasad Kadambi, Project Manager 3022 Porter Street, N.W. #304 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20008 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20814 Oreste R. Pirfo, Esquire Hearing Attorney Claude E. Johnson Office of the Executive Legal Director Senior Resident Inspector /STP U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 P. O. Box 910 Bay City, TX 77414 Charles Bechhoefer, Esquire Chairman, Atomic Safety & Licensing Board M. D. Schwarz, Jr., Esquire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Baker & Botts Washington, DC 20555 One Shell Plaza Houston, TX 77002 Dr. James C. Lamb, III 313 Woodhaven Road J. R. Newman, Esquire Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Judge Frederick J. Shon Washington, DC 20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Office of Inspection Washington, D. C.

20555 and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Ray Goldstein, Esquire Washington, DC 20555 1001 Vaughn Building 807 Brazos E. R. Brooks /R. L. Range Austin, TX 78701 Central Power & Light Company P. O. Box 2121 Citizens for Equitable Utilities, Inc.

Corpus Christi, TX 78403 c/o Ms. Peggy Buchorn Route 1, Box 1684 H. L. Peterson/G. Pokorny Brazoria, TX 77422 City of Austin P. O. Box 1088

Docketing & Service Section Austin, TX 78767 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 NOTE:

All copies w/o Attachment B except asnotedabove(*)

W2/NRC1/v Revised 5/22/85

n 3

(

f t

9 Attachment A

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 1 of 10 South Texas Project Units 1 & 2 Summary of Results Main Steam Piping Comment:

1.

Control of Minimum Wall Thickness Spec. 4LO20PS0100 (Shop Fabrication), 4.3.38., defines what is meant by

" minimum wall thickness".

In 4.3.9, wall thickness measurements are required to be made.

Please provide copies of those documents which show compliance with 4.3.9 for:

(a) one elbow and one pipe length used in main steam Dwg. 2C369PMS446.

(b) counterbored end of 32 x 30 reducer, Dwg. 2C369PMS446.

Response

1.

A copy of the NPP-1 Data Report for Mark No. 2C369P-MS-1001-GA2-1-A was provided along with a copy of Ouestion No. 564 from Southwest Fabricating and Welding Co.

Comment:

2.

Steam Hammer Analysis Calc. NO. 2C159RC5038, page 32, indicates that P0 = 5580 psi. This stress can be calculated by P0 = 1183x27.25 f(30 -27.25 ) = 5580 psi.

2 2

2 Page 11 of the calculation lists the maximum operating pressure as 1183 psi.

(a) Does the 1183 psi operating pressure include the pressure wave due to

.the steam hammer?

(b)

Please describe the steam hammer analysis; e.g., source (turbine trip?), maximum moments and their locations, maximum pressures, support loads.

(This may be given in C,alculation No. SN179RC9904; if so, please provide a copy of it.)

Response

2.

In response to Item (a), it was stated that the 1183 psi operating pressure does not include the pressure wave due to steam hammer.

In response to Item (b), a copy of Calculation No. SNN179RC9904 without appendices was provided. A hand calculation showing the maximum pressure caused by steam hammer was also provided.

3742c/0147c

i Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 2 of 10 Main Steam Supports References Calc. No. 2C159RC5038 (Pipe Calc.)

SWG. No. 2C369PMS446 (Dwg.)

Calc. No. JC-MS-9001-HL5016 (Support Calc.)

Comment:

1.

The Pipe Calc., page 43, indicates a support MS-1001-HL50ll at Data Point 128. The drawing identifies the support at Point 128 as HL-5016.

Is the correct identification HL50ll or HL5016?

Response

1.

It was agreed that a data point versus mark numbers inconsistency existed.

This will be corrected by revising the calculation.

Comment:

2.

The Support Calc., page 3, shows forces which agree with those shown on i

pages 52 and 55 of the Pipe Calculation for Point 128.

The Support l

Calculation, page 8, shows forces for Data Point 12B which do not agree with those shown on pages 52 and 55 of the Pipe Calculation for either points 128 or 12A. Fage 7 of the Support Calculation indicates page 8 is for Support HL5015, but the drawing indicates HL5015 is at Point 12A, not 128. The Pipe Calculation, page 43, identifies the support at 12A as HL5010.

Please explain.

Response

1 2.

A copy of the pages from the loop No. 2 piping calculation (RC5039) that I

gives loads corresponding to page 8 of Calculation No. JCMS9001HL5016 was provided.

Comment:

3.

The Support Calculation., page 10, shows an allowable load for SMA-5501 of 50.6k for " upset", which agrees with CDRS No. SMY, page 4 of 9.

However, we do not have that page of CDRS No. SMY which allows a load of 76.9k for faulted conditions.

Please provide that page.

(

Response

I 3.

A copy of the pages from the CDRS number SMY which allows a load of 76.9 kips for the faulted condition was provided.

(

3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 3 of 10 MS Safety Relief Valve Reference Design Specification 4Z4592S1006 and Dresser Stress Report, Dresser 3707R Main Steam Safety Valve, SR-370-15 Comment:

1.

The specification identifies the valve as 3707RA while the Stress Report identifies it as 3707R.

Is there a significant difference?

Response

1.

The extra "A" in the valve identification is only an indication that the valve will be used in saturated steam service.

There is no significant difference.

Comment:

2.

The specification identifies a back pressure of 157 psig; the Stress Report uses (for outlet design conditions) 140 psig at 400*F. Which should be used?

Response

2.

The vendor is in the process of preparing a new stress report. The new stress report will use a back pressure of 157 psig.

Comment:

3.

The Stress Report states that " Allowable bolt stress at 600*F for SA193 Gr.

87 is 50000 psi (=25)...".

We believe the ASME Code allowable bolt stress, as a limit to the calculated (as indicated in App. B of the Stress Report) bolt stress, is S, not 25.

Please cite the Code portion which you think justifies using an allowable bolt stress of 2S.

Response

3.

It was agreed that the allowable bolt stress should be "S".

Due to the conservative nature of the calculations for the MS Safety Relief Valve no problem was caused by the use of "2S" for these STP valves; however, STP must verify no other Dresser valves are used on STP, which use the incorrect ttress allowable for bolts.

Comment:

4 Please provide a copy of those portions of the main steam piping analyses which show that the safety valve thrust of 27,000 lb has been evaluated.

Response

4.

A copy of sheet 20 of calculation RC6548 was provided. A copy of Drawing No. SG369PMS646, sheet 3 was provided. A copy of the preliminary calculation for transient loads (RC9966) was provided.

3742c/0147c t

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 4 of 10 Component Cooling Water Pumps Comment:

1.

Specification 3R209NS0011, 1.5.3, lists documents to be provided by the Seller.

(a)

Please briefly describe (or provide a copy of) the document; "a.

ASME Code Calculations".

(b) Please provide a copy of the document "f.

Hydrostatic test results",

including evidence that the tests were witnessed by an Authorized Nuclear Inspector.

Response

l 1.

In the response to Item (a), it was pointed out that the Vendor Seismic Analysis previously submitted contained the necessary ASME code calculations. Vendor Document 14926-4022-01018-BHT was provided which has the instructions for the pump seismic and ASME code analysis.

In response to Item (b), a copy of the hydrostatic test certificate was provided (14926-4022-01055-AHT).

Comment:

2.

Hayward Tyler Seismic Analysis Report, p. 10, cites loading criteria.

Please indicate precisely where the cited " Maximum Nozzle Loads" are given in Specification 3R209NS0011 (e.g., page of Appendix

) and provide a copy of that page.

Response

2.

A copy of page B-1 from 3R209NS011-0 was provided.

Comment:

3.

Please provide a copy of those portions of the CCW piping system analysis which show that the maximum nozzle loads are not exceeded.

Response

3.

A copy of appropriate portions of calculations RC0034 and 35 were provided.

Reactor Coolant Pumps Comment:

1.

WEMD E. M. 5003, Table I, shows a calculated stress of 33,300 psi for

" FAULTED". Table VII, for " Pipe Rupture (b)" indicates a moment resultant of Mi = (872 + 1032 + 63 ) 1/2 x 106 in-lb = 149 x 106 in-lb.

2 3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 5 of 10 The data on page 15 indicates that the end of the pump suction nozzle has an inside diameter of 31", outside diameter of 38.2".

T1e section modulus of that section is:

4 4

3 j=

(D - D )/ (320 ) = 3099 in Z

g g

and the maximum stress intensity due to Mj - only is:

6 S = Mj/Z = 149x10 /3099 = 48080 psi Further, from the load combination for Faulted shown in Table V, it appears that the stress intensity for the suction nozzle end might be around 55 ksi, rather than 33.3 ksi shown in Table I.

If so, then the stress would exceed your limit of 49.7 ksi and would exceed the stress of 48700 psi (for discharge nozzle) shown in Table 7.3 of WEMD E.M. 5351 - the South Texas Stress Report.

Your response is requested.

Response

1.

Westinghouse will add a footnote to EM5003. A copy of a revised Westinghouse internal memo was provided.

Westinghouse Motor Operated Gate Valves Comment:

1.

Specification G-952850 (a)

Please provide a copy of the documentation that shows compliance with hydrostatic tests, Paragraphs 6.3.1 and 6.3.2, for the valve identified by Drawing 8273081 (8GM84).

(b)

Paragraph 1.2.3 appears to be very restrictive for end moments that can be applied to the valves. For example, for a 304 stainless valve operating at 550F, 0.5Sy = 0.5x18.8 = 9.4 ksi.

In contrast, Eq. (11) in ASME Code Subsection NC permits piping stresses due to moments to be up to 43.4 ksi.

Please supply documentation which shows that the moment limits are being met; e.g., portion of a piping system calculation which shows both the calculated pipe moments at a valve covered by the specification and the allowable limit given in Paragraph 1.2.3D of the specification.

Response

1.

In response to Item (a), a copy of the hydrostatic test report was provided.

In response to Item (b), a copy of Calculation RC00ll, sheets 1 and 63, was provided.

3742c/0147c I

i

)

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 6 of 10 Comment:

2.

WEMD E.M. 5158 (Stress Report)

The Stress Report refers to Specification G-952850 (General) but not to Specification 952874 (South Texas specific).

Is there anything in Specification 952874 (such as Appendix C) that would invalidate the Stress Report?

Response

2.

There is nothing in Specification 952874 that would invalidate the Stress Report.

Westinghouse Class 1 Piping Comment:

1.

The intent of this audit item is to obtain and review the Code-required Stress Report for the primary coolant loop piping of the South Texas plant. WCP-9135 appears to be a part of that Stress Report. Volume 3 (also WCAP-91357) may be another part of the Stress Report.

Please provide for our review a complete copy of what you deem to be the Code-required Stress Report for primary coolant loop piping of the South Texas plant; including certification by the N-Certificate Holder (presumably, Westinghouse) and documentation of review by the Owner (Houston Lighting and Power). Upon receipt of the Stress Report, we will review it and the Design Specification and attempt to close this audit item.

A copy of WCAP-9135, Vol. 1, was provided. Assuming that this is part of the Stress Report, we have the following comments.

(a)

We do not find any indication that the reauirements of NB-3640, Pressure Design, have been considered or met. At the 5/17/85 Houston meeting, to expedite closing of this aspect, we agreed to review RPT-MED-PCE-577, " Reactor Coolant Loop Piping Pressure Design Calculations for Wolf Creek Unit No. 1", as representing what would be done for South Texas.

However, Westinghouse (Rahe to Denton, May 30, 1985) did not provide the Wolf Creek report. When we receive the South Texas Stress Report, we will expect to find evidence that the requirements of NB-3640 have been met.

(b) Design Specification 953385, Rev. 1, indicates that allowable nozzle loads for equipment (e.g., Steam Generator) must be established and the piping' system analyses must show that these nozzle loads are not exceeded. We do not find any indication that allowable nozzle loads have been checked.

Perhaps, this check is in Vol. 3.

In any event, this is a check we will expect to find in the Stress Report.

i 3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 7 of 10 l

(c)

In general, we would like to have a Class 1 piping Stress Report that is at least as complete as calculation packages provided for Class 2 and 3 piping systems; e.g., Bechtel Calculation No. 2C159RC5038. Some of the information found in such calculation packages, but not in Vol. 1, are:

(1)

Material identification (2)

Piping dimensions (e.g., diameters, wall thicknesses, axial lengths via Drawing NO. 2C369PMS446).

(3)

Clear indication of what is included in the analysis (e.g., does Vol.1 cover the pressurizer surge line?

Does it cover the welds between austenitic pipe and ferriticcomponents?)

(4)

Nozzle loads and comparisons with allowable loads.

(5)

Support Load summary.

(6)

List of unusual stress intensification factors. For Vol.

1 and maybe Vol. 3, we would expect a list of stress indices which do not come'directly from Code Table NB-3683.2.1; e.g., C2 and K2 indices for an elbow with instrument taps in the body thereof.

(7)

Appendix C of the Code states:

"the Report shculd include copies of sufficient computer printouts to justify the governing stress values used in the Design Report and enable independent review."

If Vol. 1 is intended to be part of the Stress Report, we view its contents inadequate from the standpoint of an

" independent review". Presumably Westinghouse has on file the detailed calculations which provide the basis for the stress values shown in Table 5-1 of Vol. 1.

We believe that the Stress Report should include a comprehensive and understandable (to an independent reviewer) road map to the files in which the detailed results are filed, and a commitment to maintain those files for as long as the Stress Report is required to be kept.

Response

1.

The items mentioned in this question will be addressed in the Class 1 Stress Report at the time of issuance (including as-built reconciliation).

We agree with the issues raised by this question and will provide clear confirmation, specifically or by reference, in the Volume 1, 2, and 3 Class 1 Stress Reports, which will be provided in the third quarter of 1986.

3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 8 of 10 Westinghouse Primary System Supports Comment:

1.

The intent of this audit item is to obtain and review the Code-required Stress Report for primary system supports of the South Texas plant. Volume 2 (of WCAP-9135?) may be a part of that Stress Report. At the 5/17/85 Houston meeting, to expedite closing of this item, we agreed to review WCAP-10197, which (apparently) covers the structural analysis of primary system supports for the Comanche Peak plant; as representing what would be done for South Texas. However, Westinghouse (Rahe to Denton, May 30,1985) did not provide that report. Accordingly, please provide for our review a complete copy of what you deem to be the Code-required Stress Report for primary system supports of the South Texas plant; including certification by the N-Certificate Holder (presumably, Westinghouse) and documentation of review by the Owner (Houston Lighting and Power). Upon receipt of the Stress Report, we will review it and the Equipment Specification 953533 (which, we assume, is meant to be the Code-reauired Design Specification) and attempt to close this audit item.

Response

1.

The items mentioned in this question will be addressed in the Class 1 Stress Report at the time of issuance (including as-built reconcilation).

We agree with the issues raised by this question and will provide clear confirmation, specifically or by reference, in the Volume 1, 2, and 3 Class 1 Stress Report, which will be provided in the third quarter of 1986.

Roto-Lok Head Closure System Comment:

1.

Design (a)

CENC-1332 appears to evaluate stresses in the studs. Please provide that portion of the South Texas Stress Report (Analytical Report?)

that evaluates the stresses in the stud inserts.

(b) CENC-1332 identifies the stud material as SA-540-824 This is incomplete. What is the Class?

(WCAP-8447 identifies the stud material as Class 2, with Sm = 46.7 ksi at 100*F, 37.5 ksi at 650F.)

(c)

CENC-1332, page 3, indicates Sm = 42 ksi. What is the basis for Sm = 42 ksi?

(d) CENC-1332, pages A138-A145: units shown in " tensile load" and

" moment" columns appear to be incorrect.

3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 9 of 10 (e)

CENC-1332, page A143, shows a tensile stress for Case 1 of 47.6 ksi.

Dividing this by 1.1 gives a tensile stress of 43.3 ksi for design pressure (2500 psi) loading only. ASME Code, NB-3231(a), appears to reauire that the tensile stress due to design pressure be less than S at design temperature; i.e., less than 37.5 ksi.

Please provide m

a response.

(f) CENC-1332, page 3, states that 'All stresses meet the appropriate allowables stated in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III...". However, we do not find any mention of bearing loads (NB-3227.1), pure shear (NB-3227.2) or, more generally, the stress intensity limits due to pressure loading only. Why are these seemingly applicable portions of the Code not considered and discussed in CENC-13327 (g) The analysis described in CENC-1332 appears to involve the assumption of perfect axial matching between studs and stud inserts. Figure 7-10 of the Manual shows axial tolerances for the stud lugs of +0.001".

Presumably, tolerances on the stud insert are similar. What effect does machining tolerances have on the load distribution between the 7 sets of lugs?

(h)

CENC-1332, page 146, states that "Using a fatique strength reduction factor...". The reader can deduce that the " fatigue strength reduction factor" used was 4, but the report should say that a factor of 4 was used. Our cuestion concerning the validity of the fatigue elevation stems from footnote (4) to Code Table I-1.3:

"These stress values may result in relaxation of the bolting materials after prolonged service at these temperatures and the designer is to l

investigate the effect of this relaxation on the application."

During the 107 postulated boltup/unboltup cycles, the footnote suggests the possibility of ratcheting and the effect of this on fatigue is not apparent.

Please provide a response.

(i)

CENC-1332 appears to address normal operating conditions and l

hydrostatic testing. Are any evaluations needed for upset, emergency or faulted conditions and, if so, where in the South Texas Stress Report are they described?

Response

1.

Items (a), (b), (c), (e), (f), and (1) are answered by the base document, CENC-1302, Analytical Report for South Texas Project No.1.

Portions of Book 1 of this document have been provided in a separate transmittal by Westinghouse identified as NS-NRC-85--3044 dated July 3, 1985 from E.P. Rahe, Jr. to H.R. Denton of the NRC..

Item (d) correctly identifies incorrect units in the heading; however, this did not affect the final results.

Item (g) is answered as follows: The worst case tolerances are used to check shear stresses of the lugs. The nominal dimensions are used 3742c/0147c

Attachment A ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 10 of 10 in the structural and fatigue analysis.

The margins between calculated values and the code allowables cover the manufacturing tolerance effects.

Item (h) is answered as follows:

The maximum operating temperature of these studs is below the temperature range of concern in the ASME Code.

The material in the bolts is Class 3.

Comment:

2.

Installation (a) One of our initial concerns was assurance that all studs would be rotated into locked position before bolt-tightening and operation.

The Installation Instructions, Section 3 of the Manual, has eliminated this concern.

(b) The Manual, page 3-9, says:

" Caution, Maximum hydraulic pump pressure shall not exceed 9100 psi".

We question whether this is a prudent limit. We presume that 5500 psi corresponds to the stud load used for evaluating operating loads in CENC-1332; hence, 9100 psi pump pressure would presumably correspond to 9100/5500 =1.65 times the assumed design loads.

If the 9100 psi pressure were reached one or more times during each boltup/unboltup cycle, the usage factor calculated in CENC-1332 might be too low. A maximum pump pressure slightly above the pressures needed for the tightening process, perhaps controlled by relief valve, would appear to be more prudent.

In Section 6 of the Manual, which describes the unboltin we do not find any caution about maximum pump pressure. g procedure, 1

Your comments are requested.

Response

2.

It was agreed that Item (a) is a statement and no response is required.

In

+

response to Item (b), it is noted that the Combustion Engineering instruction manual provides guidelines. Specific instructions addressing these comments on installation will be in the plant operating procedures.

The comment provided by the NRC consultant relative to the " caution" note in the procedure will be reviewed and discussed with HL&P operations personnel.

'I 3742c/0147c

I i

i s

5 h

a

}

1 a

f i

Attachment B 4

s 4

k

FOR\\1 NPP.1 D \\TA R mT FOR FABRICATED NUCLEAR PIPI SUBASSDIDLIES' COPY (As Required by the Provisions of the ASME Code hu es)

SOUTHWEST,,y,gR,I g NG & WELDING CO. INC. 7525 SHERMAN. HOU. TX Q0/d..S.O.#02657-MS' D.

in.

m.....s v.w.. wa

s. r.n.mwr HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.. HOUSTON. TX._o,..,n..P.O.#35-1197-6014 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER"C'0*. ;"* ^**'"

3. go,SJ'M TEXAS NUCLEAR UNIT I

,, g,,,a

.,,,,,,, WADSWORTH, TX.

Main Steam. Serial 539270

s. ries Sr.se. ide. site..si i s n. :.. un,u...

(.i o,..... n.,02 6 5 7-MS #1 re.,.,.4., SOUTHWEST FAB. & WELDING CO.. INC.

N/A (sinmi

.as.

n 2

s. vn.

.. m.w....

u,nti 4.

.ni,.

,u...un ASME C.de Squ in. Cru.

1974

.Ame

.o. WINTER 1975

. co. u..

saus n...mu w.-s om. m.,.n.,-,-i, is ui.e e.i..

m, c a..

e i.. m 6.

tw.s.n.a r e PIPE - (P1) Ladish Co. S/N 40U:

en. e.u u..< mi.

n ca.., r.n - si u.a

.i4.

ELL - Item (A) Southwest Fabricating & d,elding Co. Inc. S/N LR-9087:

RED. - Item (B) Southwest Fabricating & Welding Co. Inc. S/N CC-4008 N/A

v. sn., w, mai. T.,

s

s. o.=,mi

.<,i,4 a=,.c.MK:

2C369P-MS-1001-CA2-1-A:

SA-155 RCF-70 Wid'd CL. I, cin.a-.

-...na.,

m....--

w.i.-a

...-i..

30" 0.D. (1.375" W) 22 7/1.6" lone: SA-420 WPL6 Wid'd. 30" 0.D. (1.375" MW) a u.

. - u.........

900 LR Ell: SA-420 WPL6 Uld'd, 32" 0.D. X 30" 0.D.

(1.375" MW) Cone. Cone Red.

Material machined to a minimum wall of 1.250".

ANY a

g l

i W...nify in an..t.e..

s...d. s. tni.

pe,t.,..

.t d tn.a (n. f.b,4..si...f kn. de..,th.d pip..p. (

witti en.

s.

8 SECTION !!!.f in. 4SME 50tLEn Ano rRESSUnE VESSEL LODE.

n,(ih) N 4ZA cN W I

om._8-31-84 St..a SF&WC0 y

i.

(

N-1459 l

c.nia....e 4.in.uuu E...,.. JULY 23. 1985

e.,an....,4 n....u n

i CERTIFICATE OF 5110P INSPECTION r.im.

4.

i w.n.ienne...i44.

a..

4 m,in. n.is.

s...e. s.ii.,

a r..

v....:r..

TEXAS

.a...,.,H.S.B.I.&I.CanHARTFORD. CT-l u

a. sie.., rr. c =..,

m.n.....aain. mm 4...nn..a.ini.on.m...n

_8-3Ia,81.

....in.,,.

..,.,m

.u.a.m. u. sui-u n...

u,=i.4 me. eies. i..u o. in in.

.si.mi. s.

..is

. AsuE c.s..

s..u su.

s,..... in....nio n.. uun in. :=,.c -.- ni....an........,. =,... u w = i uw. e.a. w l

........ m.. o.. n...n. rwa.ai ~. =im.e in. i.. uw mi..., sun e n.

6. u.as. 6.

,...a.,

i r

n,

..-.i....e-,=m..n.

.e.

nw.....i-,

u STl bY

. Iv..7 W

.i om.A_#

-:~;, < < w,~.%

c...,

nu..u sin.. e.

.. e...

um..u

. s.wi.

e n... in t =.s uu...mue n..

4,..ia..

, m. = w

... < u.au

.w.. i. in ins-c.

u.

a. 2..e s h tfi t.........f4

. i i-8 4

..... n.. g,..d ( 3 ). 4 n. n..t i..

b...d..d ws.

.i....t. 8.....rd.. i. it.

7, ** R.

>-n.

k'.2672AI b

s.O. w.;

~

Southwest Fabricating & Welding Co., Inc.

-[ ')[-"8 o...

sh.. N..

(

LlOUID PENETRANT INSPECTION REPORT P.ge

.8 Procedure No. bb te CL...

......L oE C..P

.ogoasEu / opes?1 4' /o >cc 3o fip& gaa L. S.S. x,

c. s, M..g6 s. s. g

......~...... - ....... re., <....w d

s....

c. ...u. EI ...u.u. O ,.. < ~... .... e ,PoFu91 sx t.s c sxC s er ,.. m.. 4, 4o. s. c'.a o 9 h.<m.,d...;. o 5 <.,soco s=o s sr suor/ s.t.. , c.us m .. e c o o.. .-oo go 1_ [ Sgc-S,go[m.PM.~, r u.. ~ /c u..- ~ s.n-.. ~.e.a T w.... s.., O o .<.a........ ..u.

oEW.L

..M E Po.,CLE.NE. a w.L u. E D p. .%N,LE. 3-g y...., gg p@ g j a u..... soi.... !? ~ ~ u a u DE SCRIP TION OF INDIC A TIONs 0 0 1 8 a = 5 4 E .J M lJ-l V Y U, Tt+1H SP h s'11 v-b y s . ts tv-f\\ rT~ PN w-b, co c'R1 x r s' i

i k N k -k .5 %7 hs b Q \\ m* .s e y q< s A R W m 4 m h .\\ E 5 e

. 4 I

E 7 M o .g

+

w \\ 3 3V T' Y %R k E % !h '

A

"!, g l 'v 'Y E !A C s g Uo M Y 2 N E o2 N ~ u h 3 g 2 g F9 = W H O 1U C EE w e ep T y F-e q-w "U E a w !. m o 8 4 Il y t 8u .I C 4 45 7 is .5 ! C', b

2 9:

%,4! 4 3 3 9' 9 D O C ,g g T t t T w D N, ), 4 D %M* m u i N o W .h m 4 %) 4 caannon et N,,e. ik 1 avaun i 5 3 Q a taaraat, i t 12 :; V *r:h -oucu. .J =g x 2easov 2 a 3 3 i i I u I " iyZ + ~ d g O G Wx BECSIEr wi 3 ;Ti (4 mo AdOO I g 333:4 s t i i 3 I4

*x

) Q.).) e

P,

, 3 eaoV 0 [ b 4 %e V,y ' lIP W o h WELD OA 5 0 mm5 E N SEAM 2 M, E 5 g g o O g gj$ M i\\ k ,M h D N YT1 7* O m )p FILM h 'NNg %4 M f N h h N b; y LOCAisON ( k 5 \\ 3.\\ \\ kk h $ k( ACCEPT i Em REJECT 1 l T u n l tse POROSITY -4 sn kmj o 58* SLAG 2 1 l <"n 2 iNC PENET Q s a3 O tNC FUSION ? E h 5 M CRACK

5 h

o o D., O l SURFACE z m I N i EXCESSIVE N omn ( zIO PENETRATION b $o saa m5z p i M*j Lb [(L E n!m f A .s 1,1 W E i mM2 n-f. f 8 9 I $U8 EE 9 ~ 2 Q 2 E E "#~ 5,, i dea n 5 @U* E E E s s" i m5 5* E P r1m>z> l $55' h h z2 5 a co>. 7 i+ ~ z fm9 \\. o C$I h I >b WELD OR =s$ SEAM a g $ -* w FILM k S z LOCATION M l W R k M ACCEPT. I r 8 ,,s $g"pa 4 REJECT D f zmg = POROSITY ) ! f g* f O o l 5Ea SLAG b ear g 4m5 U si INC. PENET I$% I! ?>m E INC FUSION m S l oog m I E CRACK 8 Q SURFACE 88 i EXCESSIVE C o PENURATION N l t

SOUTHWEST FABRICAftNG & WELDING CO.. INC. b PAGE OF RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE DATA PROCEDURE NO. # 7" / 6 k7 S.O NO-/ .2 b5 7 A9 s -l DATE: /9-2 3 - 2 y' MATERIAL TYPE: O//f8ce/ PIPE SIZE 36 THtCKNESS:/* 8 78 " WELD THICK. / fv 0 TYPE SEAM-T / '?b// COVERAGE PER FILM- /f. 5"' WELDING PROCEDURE USED: S.M.A.W. O S. A.W G.T.A W. O G.M.A.W I K.V. USED-M M.A. USED: M ISOTOPE TYPE: >N- -/ 9 L-CURIES: /6C EFFECTIVE FOCAL SIZE:,/## S F. DISTANCE: /5 O F. DISTANCE: 80* 7"//C 7" SCREENS USED: e d /0 O/ o '# FILM TYPE: //ecdgsf-M PEN. MAT *L. & NO. O PEN. FILM SIDE: O PEN SOURCE SIDEM FILM SIZE: I b7 No. EXPOSURES 2 EXPOSURE TIME: 7 * */ f~ ASNT Lev. FILM PROCESSING: MAN.O AUTO. WELD No2 8 RADIOGRAPHER: 7- [7'&. c.;ss /?.22-4 O ,N O Source g SouncE D STATION 37,7,ou saiu f MARKER MARKER PEN. / SOURCE STATION O g e-- STATION MARKER l i " ^ " " " a- - ) (( '~ . 2. U SOURCE s Suu PEN. s g M '3 E ETRAMETER PENE TRAMETER LM FILu RLM RLM S.S F S. C [ E ETRAMETER 4 STATION MARKER STATION O MARKER [- g. [ COURCE p/, O s SOURCE SMIM

PENETRAMETER h

,,L. REMARKS. Mcyrg N AdOO > q

o. y ASME SECTION III,1974 EDITION AND S b OADDENDA Ti!RU WINTER 1975. CLASS 2., gmg 30 \\.37 5'l m. d Q.,om...{as, k b it wo o f r,wnosecco nec - July 29.1980' O ... e,,o Hw0 46i83_i / \\uaro] tow WL.G w D'ETAILED ANAI,YSIS REPORT ~ cn'?,"J"5 S.O. 06183 am:=q = l -- OF MATERIAL ROM WH CH MADE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ESCRIPTION .e==* -"*>=s ],",' = e.. .u.. Hear e.' '

- UU. "."

"U.' C MN P S St CR NI MO CB wo! ' "0" "C " =* * " 0" e ~. 22* ~'~ asase mas ,="a ~B"=m Mad d rom: Phoenix Steel 50700 79000 25.0 .25 1.02.015.009.24 / / y v Charpy V-Not :h at +4 fF. 8889626 Corp.. SA-516 Cr.70, l 1mpact Testei.= 108 -8.2-

73. -

Slab: % Shear = 7 60-30-50 58051 (Normalized). _Latergl Exp. e .08 5.- .073 .0(5' = / __ (1) SA-420 WPL-6 (W), ,.e Physi :als an ! Chemic ils s. ime a show n above. / 30" (1.375"MW) LR 90 Ell. 100% (-Ray Emg Seam Weld per W-51 and :'F&WC0 Pro :edu' e RT-4,R/2 Resul ts: Sat :sfactor r. _ Mark No. LR-9087 Norma Lized a : 1600 F.,I:.0 F. v FM A FL (Weld) Charp r V-Notei at -40F (Base) Cl arpy V-No :ch ;it +40"F. / / Wu Impac t_Teste.1 = 92-75-81 Impj ct Ta sted = 61-60.65 % She-ir = 70-50-70 % SIear =4)-40-40 -iY. _ Lateral Exp. = 78-12-76.' Latcral Lxp. =57 58 v' h. yr-f.3 i ACCORDING TO RECORDS IN THE P8 HEREBY CERTIFY THIS REP ly SSESSION OF THIS CORPORATIOl g NtYs1 Y. f&11(W, u f e l

i SOUTHWEST no s O. NDA Til E 7 1.A S O O onorn,.o HWO-Q6I83-1 DETAILED ANAI,YSIS REPORT g',:5;?,",.' a=- S.O. 96183 OF M ATERIAL5 floM WH CH MADE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION 7 S",C [*

Hear

. n as. n =... = =... iU "i En", *[.'h 0" .C MN P S St CR Ni MO CD 880" ma'C# esavaniat u .u. ,.o 3/32" si 1/8" Page AS-25 Chen ical An alysis Feport ed =aos .Sper,JFA-5.18 C1. E70S ~n _fpr Information Onl y. Cu 3/32" & 1/8" Page AS-25 .079 1.22 0 15 0 2.32.46 .02 .OR_.01 .10 909105 __ Spec. SFA-5.18 C1. E70S-3 Cu 1/8" Chemetron Atosi Arc .07] L.21 OIL.,035 d2 .06 .07 .02 JD 90963 Spic. SFA-5.1 C1. E-7018 Va 3/32" Linclon L-61 W. Wire .04 1.02.012.017.44 .03 .02 .01 .02 432C3491 Spac. SFA-5.17 C1. F72-EH12K Linci on 860 Plux Htd. 85R .10 1.10.012.020.31 .10 .09 .02 .19 77F Cu ~ 4 P e=='$ 7 I _ q e M..c,,,) .a ,n V' .v.. I,f" s .a. h___ ERD I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS REPORT TO DE TRUE AND CORREC1 D ACCORDING TO RECORDS IN THE POSStiSSION OF THIS CORPORATIOP f /16&2 Y /sA/$M.s - (/ J' ~ ~

FORM NM-1 DATA REPORT FOR TUBULAR PRODUCTS AND FITTINGS WELDE As required by the Provisions of the ASME Code Rules. Section 111, Division 1

1. Manufactured by SOUTHWEST FABRICATING & WELDING CO.. INC.

HOUSTON. TEXAS (Name end address of NPT Certificate Hoeder of tubuier products)

2. Manufactured for SOUTHWEST FABRICATING & WFTnTNC CO..

TMC. ROMETON_'fFYAt (Neme end edureas of ourcnesert

3. Identification-NPT Certificate Holder's Serial No.

LR-9087 / (Lot, etc.) (CRN at orewing No.) N/A 1980 (Nori soere N46

4. (a) Manufactured according to Mat'l Spee SA-420 WPL-6 (W) tyr, mfg.)

Purchase Order No. MWO-06183-1 csA or sai.- (b) Desenption of Product inspected (1) 30" (1 375"MW) LR 90 Ell.' (c) Applicable ASME Code: Section Ill. Edition 1974 Addenda datF/1975 - Case No. Class 7

5. Remarks:

None. (sner osecnet on of Feenw c.) CERTIFICATE OF COMPUANCE We certify the statements made in this report are correct and the products defined in this report conform to the req of the ASME Material Specification listed above on line 4 (a). The radiographic film and a radiographic repo locations are attached to the Certified Material Test Reports provided for the material vered by this report) /' .fuly 29. . tg 80. S;gned SF&WC0 Date gy / w y[ E Aerdu e. (NPT ComHcete Hoeder) ASME Certificate of Authorization No. N-1459 to use the NPT Symbol expires July 23,1982 (NpT) (ostes CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION I, the undersigned. hotding a valid commission issued by the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors State or Province of Texas of Hartford, Conn. and employed by BSBI&ICo. have inspected the products described in tii.s Partial Data Report 7/29/ 80, and state that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the NPT Certificate Holc 3, on product in accordance with the ASME Code Section lit. By signing this certificate. neither the inspector nor his employer makes any warranty, expressad or implied, conce ing the product described in this Partial Data Report. Furthermore, neither the inspector nor his employer shall b any manner for any personal injury or property damage or a loss of any kind arising from or connectecf with this insp Date N 19 / A Commissions Texas 9 8 s ector a s gnaturel Nanoned toerd. State. f'nnnnce and No. ' Supplemental sheets in form oflists. sketches or drawings may be used this form. C3,

Qf, a

BECHTEL (ton 71 This form (Ecoosol mey tie obtained from the oreer Dept ASME,345 E. 47th St.. New york. N.Y.10017 AdOO /6

Eupplier a.Jeviation Disposition Request NOTE:

1. COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF THIS SHEET C4 2.

nems 318 De'o* to os como'eteo OY suppher

5. secntes must be notoried witnen 5 days af ter detect,ori of deviation

3. = atems. Secntes entries onsv

6. A copy of tne compteted SODR form shall De incluced DV tne suppher i Attaca adosrIOn38 informaison whenever n.Ces&ary ene ouality verification cata package for each nem to wnicn tnis Soci sophes FOR SUPPLIER USE swooner 500R No.

Date suomateo PROJECT S*"" G%A5 FOR BECHTEL USE 1 -"I 1/9/84 aos no, ) 4.**yz.%.c >c q OS9/ / - 9 Py 8echtet SOOR No. Date Received

1. Suponer, 'h re4 s.e sa s r As t a t e.4 t',

Name C M 'h a-6 f~ t h t (- Address 7 N 7 ** 5NMMM City & State 5353 W O O Zio I~I O I #2-

2. Suponse s oroer No.

J. Sucos.er's Part No.

4. Succiser's Par Name

5. Deviation Detecteo

6. All Previous SODR iNo.

h ~2,.(a $ ~) (a '5 9 ,.j 0-hg h ( y ('? m m f.1,s'.I2,-t L El'45 IPooL osee uerno,s /, 6 4

7. secntes P.O. & Rev. No.

8. Secntel Part No.

9. Esentet Part Name 10 B w

3s -s m ua 0 A-5n W a *^

W echtes SQR Notsfied

11. 8ecntes Engrg Not*hed

W.

+3 %2n-vw-e./o L4

l ~2.

D pG. Trsoo L_ f oste uerneo care ~ usenoo

12. Deviat.on Descriotion iA traca entra smeets. onotogreens. stietenes. etc. es necessary and identify c ant RE i (-* MC- ~7/t t C. f "L C'A C. % 9 -fvt % - t o c 1 r"Wvt i> tc2C 4+-

Q 75 f iev and terras Nofs as apohcaDiel u [ A (2 CEE; v W G A "T~o -rA L tm G:' (FI 3 2.

O b x M 'oo 1.'3"7T #U U n.4 s t' 87 s-M4 'i O

? w.is.s. M. %.- 1 0 ** L.O s.) Ca. A ~Y Tot C ' s'v.w-, c, G.~ c,u ra_ .s.-e u r.t s. V t-h 'a e 1 <s a F c t~v

i r/L A t G H ~7" T40 G'v2.

Coae R LM v t.3.N. L S U ttW

u. Suposeers erooassa caposason use.A is O nso ir O uod ey s. cat.: neau..w.vnt g,

14. Cost imoact

.4,2.'/t s cmu': m. em.,.,e,,d is. Seneouis imonet

4..,:P vt.

16 Proooted Disoosition and Tecnnical (otus CostfSeneouse if acchcaosel Justification: Ot s-4 y i AC L.CN7 Attaen extra sneets. stetenes. etc. as necenserv 'E <> ~/*t..A 1 s H T

%L* C--rt.

<e c J / uz v sM 6 s. LJSE f3 suo o 7=' k +1r ni -ft'E. r 4Y %sG SMtic/feut Ye o ) - cas r-St1 ve s; s ns _A J e.J b 4:Pt .16L.e 6 05t_ V 'I2//t d u ttE '-* b t A 1"- % L 7.

17. Associateo Suponer Document Caangelst

\\ ~9/,. a 5F ot: 74 a. e//t:P 7J D1D 4 ANk7 A%sa 6 .a. .m &

18. Suconers Authorueo Heoresentative us.,

. A'_ C (, 4' 6W lc rice 'A w=rr///<A 46L%t ALr. /,%d su.rua. l--4 -?_F is. 8eenie. enn. **"aa es,e M ^**** "* g0,,,. D., caanse gs.catei %5uooheri O Licens.n ooc.cnange pon O so.cinea. chan, iO secnies O swooi.e i O Pr'ee Adiustmeat C neiectes O otner suooie.rs Artee ed O oins-r

20. 8,cntet Onooset.on Statement tactuding Justification 4 Attach entre sneers. sketents. etc as necessarv

~?712 fee ?7e'2 Speesr>20 <:: o~ MesoJT,etc Edovese /s Accepr ons : S e.,i &c nr2.4/ mar ~);~?.c'en &ac A% cuerc /s SsinitAn /M deafiGes/2A?>osu' A~'s 75 Bse;Jret. W DJS/GM tt//rn 7DE Mxtrre ~S'r.csss /NrnastricA7~/oM FAerox. ADDiriew PS c=r2Ai&Mr 2/G2 y &/Af0// N/s d.Vh'.f. 82 // 4~QA*'s0y /s ACME 77mf 2">f w CoMs A5' 0ucee G/sl& M&- As= feet XC F1oeu. 72/s 0 C%%'P-MS -/00/ Tis //2t/ rs 6M A7E' ///7b 816M*7*.^**L. *n92AlusA/6r.5 /004. ~SMeer / W W M ~6.1cm--s: ~ So,2 M. bdL TMn A/oristern Peer "Jhread /--30-84. nk<'_. h f[

21. Secnte g

Construenon Acteon Required O v== # %"a cceof ance ss.gnature Date as J V=UNT% Date &La u 74._ hf b _b :. OfA_.1AA

n. s.co,.e, g $*. ' ', '_.,,,',~~'\\

e-r-s M M./ M' "-

23. Bechtet Supoher

[, / .,) { "' G A Quantv Heoresentahve N /1-W-= # &g

tot ee, "t[p 4. so AdOO ed~'

Lo 21 HL v. 2 857L g

HO S . h Seiction III, 1974 edition lpg l . W.1ddenda thru Winter 1975. FA M M ao sto".. a. ine 6. i99.4 iOm 2: gu,,,,,,_,45 V DETAILED ANAI,YSIS REPORT g','Ris J "$' 2657n-245 5{scerca. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS waar OF MATERIAL $ ROM WH CH MADE ".*iSU a=**' a='** marsmint DESCRIPTION ,,of [.'e '.'s eU.E.U"u.., g,

* ~ '

". ~ ' .C MN P S St CR Ni MO CB '80" *neces usou e ..n .e _ D-6817 SA-516 see,1 rrn. v.,L.,o cr.i co. L 200 80.200 28 .22 1.20.018.006.23 SL #3H CR-70 Conforms to SA-516 CR-70 (8) 32" x 30" (1.375" HW) Ph rsicals and che micals sam as shown above. Conerntric Cone Reducers He it tres per or icedui e 10 120 11/19 1620 F. 1 or I hr 30 min. Lot # SA-420 WPL-6 (W) Ch arpY V-Ilotch te sted ( +40' F. Ft. L1 s. Lat. Exo. % Sher r 3179 4 (S Ize: 10iun x 10m m) Weld 48.0 4: 40 m 7 44.0 41 40 1 44.0 4: 40 Mfg. S/N CC-4003 thru 4'If. HAZ 50.', 4; 40 63.0. S' 50 CC-4010 66.0 50 50 _Vn Base 99.0 7' 85 (,, yr,s}. U 97.0 70 80 96.0 70 80 i n m 2 s X-1:ay lon> seam p. r procedur e RT-l1 R/4 P Resulti - Sati: facto ry This material was manufactured and supplied e HEReny CERrlFv THIS REPORT TO DE TRUE AND CORRECT in sccordance with the SF6W Co. Quality ACCORDING'TO RECORDS IN H

OSSI gSION OF THIS CORPORATION Assurance Manual Rev. f4, meeting the

[- requirements of NCA-3800. Page' I of'2 s

1 " ~

SOUTHWEST O,

FAEHCATNG. -oo.ro....... aune 6, i 984 O sowa Dwsco mc onoen o HWO 2657N-245 DETAILED ANAI,YSIS REPORT 5" :;,",:.;'5' 2657N-245 CONTINUED P H T S I C A 1. $ S'8 C "'C * - OF M ATE RIALS FROM WHICH M ADE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS tag jaa g a, a..,e 0 ", .'.$.( DESCRIPTION ]*, an e.' e C MN P S St CR NI MO CU esow maeces i.. es e so..e e ,,o I/5" Page AS-25 Carbon Steel ~ Repo rted foi Umid Wire Spec: SFA-5.18 Clas,s ~ ~ l'R10S-3/ E 70S-3 informa tion on1 y VA .Cm .035" Airco Carbon Steel Weld Repo eted foi Wire SFA-5,18 TvEg_E-70 S-6 in foEm_p tion on1 y .095 1.43.015.011.96 .031 .061 .010 .20 45458 VA .007 3/32" Page AS-25 Carbon Steel Weld Wire Spec: SFA-5.17 EHl3K Repo rted foi .070 1.20.022.015.72 .06 .08 .04 .18 30945 with Lincoln 860 Flux Lot VA n rat tion on1 y

110F Class F7P25-EH13K 01 Mr, c:/N CC-4003 thru

( 4.t wC) CC-4010 h o. j 3 g y Wa CD I HERERY CERTIFY THIS RF ORT TO DE TRUE AND CORRECT rn ACCORDING TO RECORDS IN 1E PC SESSION OF THIS CORPORATION NO by l., 44u p p x r i kV f D.aa 9 ar 9

FORM NM.1 DATA REPORT FOR TUBULAR PRODUCTS AND FITTINGS WELDED WITH FILLER METAL' As required by the Provisions of the ASME Code Rules. Section Ill. Division 1

1. Manufactured by Southwest Fa'bricating & Weldine Co.Inc. _7525 Sheman _ unumenn_ Ty tName and escrees of NPT Cettficase Hofoer of tuevaer eroeucts)

2. Manufactured for Southwest Fabricatinn & Weldine Co.Inc. 7525 Sheman _ nnusten. Tr (Neme ena eodrene ce purenseer

3. Identification.NPT Certificate Holder's Serial No.

CC-4003 thru CC-4010 (Lot, etc) (CAN ai Drevnng No.) N/A 1984 D A-w U ghet's Board No.) . lyr. mfg) Purchase Order No. 2657N-245

4. (e) Manufactured according to Mat'l SpectTPT -

g (bl Description of Product inspected 32" x 30 (1.375" MW) Cone Cone Red. (24" ig) (cj Applicable ASME code: Seccon lli. Edition 1970 Addenda date W/75

c. No.

ci. 2

5. Remarks:

N/A (Enef Descnotion of F enceuon) CERTIFICATE OF COMPUANCE We certify the statements made in this report are correct and the products defined in this report conform to the requirements of the ASME Material Specification listed above on ling 4 (a). The radiographic film and a radiographic rep showing film locations are attached to the Certified Meterial Test Reports provided for the material covered is r rt. Date June 6 _ ig_8_4 Signed S F & W Co. gy (/Lu N-1459 (NPT CertrRcate Hooderl ASME Certificate of Authorization No. to use the NPT Symbol empires 7-23-85 (N,TI io..., sen

n. _1 P G & '* o

e CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION 1.the undersigned. holding a valid commission issued by the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessellnspectors and the State or Province of Texas and employed by H S B I & I Co.

of Hartford, Conn. have inspected the products described in this Partial Data Report on 6.- / L 19 84 . and state that to the boet of my knowledge t.id belief, the NPT Certificate Holder has produced this product in accordance with the ASME Code Section til. Sy. signing'thas certificate. neither the Inspector nor his employer makes any warranty, expressed or implied, concem-ing the product described in this Partial Data Report. Furthermore, neither the inspector nor his employer shall be liable in any manner for any personalinjury or property damage or a loss of any kind ansing frpm or connected with this inspection. Date - ~ /1 - 19.E.S. J '-f. M 4_,;c.ey A-Commissions Tna s 874 tanseector s S.gnaturet Nenones Soera. State. Province and No.

Supplemental sheets in form of lists. sketches or drawings may be used provided (1) size is 8% in. x 11 in.. (2)information on items 14 on this Data Report is included on each sheet, and (3) each sheet is numbered and number of sheets is recorded at the top of thes form.

ST.S W.Co. Q A ,,cy = (to m This,o, crooosol may no set.ined from the o,oe, oset.. AsuE.3as E.47tn st.. No. vort. N.Y.1oo17 AdOO fy

M,41 r al Ana,ysis l'eport E..I. ' l' ' V /)

[Y O METALLURGII;AL DEPARTM.ETT Southuest Fab & Weld Co. M,_ gc; 3, c y, m,, October 24, 19 ~70 PUCCHA5ER'S ORDER No. 6181 N-6 kk l!-7 O ( L-f B2l172 O HO. .O. Box 9449 Ifouston, Texas 77011 A n at55 { g. ,gyg,c, go, DESCRIP TsON HE AT NO. CHEvsCAt. COMPO58TeoN PHv5tCAt. PROPERTIES AND AND 'C va tt. o ULTms.*E r s.u s e. "8 7* SPECIFIC ATION CODE C Mw P S Ss No C at MO ST R ENGTH ST;sENGTH g O' < ss Mss

- ES l

Item #1 HEAT ANAINSIS MILL TENSILE C9726 .98 .011.003 .26 53.2 77.6 26 JY4Uli v 30" C.D. :C 1.375 N/W Pipe Sq. Cut Ends PROD JCT A; IALYS [S (L) CENTER WEL 3 TEN 3ILE. .23 .95 .008.010.25 62.8 81.6 22 70 60.4

80. ~5 23 70 ASME SA 155 KCF 70 Class 1 per ASHE Section III Class 2 1974 64.8 80.5 23 69 Edition, through Winter 1975 VEE notch Charov impacts at +40 F.

Full Size o Addenda Notes 1, 3 & 4 only of Purchasing Notes QA-20 dtd. Ft. Lbs. % Shear Lateral Expansion 10-11-74 upply. C.W. 90.0 - 83.0 - 83.5 90 65 .077 .073 .074 P.M. 33.5 - 35.0 - 36.5 29 35 .030 .028 .030 li.A.Z. 60.0 - 47.0 - 43.0 55 47 .052 .048 .036 ASME NPT Certificate No. Manufactured frosa ASME SA 516 Grade 70 plate. N1600 expires 1-10-80. Guided weld bend test - satis factory. fo ( SUB5CCISED AND sworn TO BEFORE ME THIS ~ I HERE8y CERTI THAT TO THE BEST OF My KNOWLEDGE AND belle TifE OV RE b"T 15 T UE AND CORRECT. 24th,4ya,_ October ,, 78 4p 4.uL%b EQ Y 'O % s b nep pu.uc g P QY couMISSION EXPtRES August 17, 1980 A

~ - p crassian e:depts cyms 1 MET 4LLURGICAL DEPARTMENT O. Southwest rah a weld ca.

b*"
Qu; CHASER cuoAuv. wis..

~ PURCHASER'S ORDER NO. L$o Ho, _ P.O. Box 9449 - flouston, Texas 77011 g on,33 ,nyg,c,,,, Center weld impacts were taken with their longitudine1 axis transverse to the longitudinal axis of the pipe,1/2" from the outer surface. The axis of the notch is centered on the welded joint and perpendicular to the surface. Parent metal impacts were taken with their lon91tudinal axis transverse to the longitudinal axis of the pipe,1/2" from outer surface. The axis of the VES is perpendicular to the surface. lieat Affected Zone impacts were taken with their longitudinal axis transverse to the longitudinal i axis of the pipe, 1/2" from the outer surface. The axis of the notch is centered on the fusion l line and perpendicular to the surface. Pipe was welded per 16-F-115 Rev. 9 dtd.12-8-77 using Page AS-15, Heat No. 60403 weld wire and Lincoln 860 Lot 478 flux. s'rocedure qualification record no. YR 489 dtd.11-16-77. Pipe was heat treated per (L) Procedure 13-N-628 dtd. 5-3-77. Stress relieved at 1125 P. Air cooled. Welds were radiographically inspected and accepted per (L) Procedure 9-Q-216 Rev. 5 dtd. 12-8-77. Pipe was hydrostatically tested and approved per (L) Procedure 19-0-010 dtd. 1-17-77 at 2612 psi. PIPE IS IDENTIFIED AS FOLLOWS Ladish ASIE SA 155 Kc? 70 e class 1 SA 516 Gr. 70 - L - Jy4UH Weld No. 40U 2612 psi l R, Identification includes NPT Stamp C1. 2 1978. g.MY g DD h Partial Data Reports attached. b p SusscRisED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THl$ h I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE ABOVE REPORT 15 TRUE AND CORRECT. 24th October 78 DAY OF 19 %2 < des gr9y ruauc { ~, ( _g I s .a eneustufhJ FYPHIFC Atigust 17, 1980 m

L A DISH CO. g, '"'"'ia Ar.airst's' Report O. METALLURGICAL DEPARTMENT g e b ary U, y, _ M Southwest Fab & Weld Co. CUDAHY, WI5., PURCHA SER L50 HO. ~ ru CHASER *5 ORDER NO. 't P.O. Box 9449 - Houston, Texas 77011 INVOICE Ho. SUPPLEMENT TO ORIGINAL REPORT DTD. 10-24-78 deld was repaired per Procedure 16-F-020 Rev. 7 dtd. 6-22-78 using Chemetron E7018 heat no. 42149081 electrodes. Procedure qualification record no. YR 490 dtd. 12-29-77. Pipe was heat treated per (L) Procedure 13 N-628 dtd. 5-3-77. Stress relieved at 1125 F. Air cooled. Weld was radiographically inspected and accephed per (L) Procedure 9-O-216 Rev. 5 dtd. j 12-8-77. l Pipe was hydrostatically tested and approved per (L) Procedure 19-0-010 ded. 1-17-77 l l at 2612 psi. 1 j q

V

-%t )D< e m \\ E.9 M v m I HERE8Y CERTIFY TH4T TO THE SEST OF MY KNOW1. EDGE Sus 5CRisED AND SWORH TO SEFORE ME THIS AND BELIEF THE ABOVE RE*0M 15 TRuE AND CORRECT. 79 27th February 1, orY Or $1.Zttuk j 5 n9 9u ru.uc

I FORM NM 1 DATA REPORT FOR TUSULAR PRODUCTS AND FITTINGS WELDED WITH FILLER HETAL As requered by the Provisions of th ASME Code Rules Ladish Co., 548_1 S._,Packard Ave., C,udahy, Wis. 53110 ~ i, geoogeeto,ed by tu.m..no.m, v u.nov iu,.,sesueusero.sema

2. Manufassured fo, Southwest Fab & Weld Co., _PO__ Box _9449, Houston, Texas 77031 tu e

er swe re

3. Identaficanon.Manufacauter's Serial No.

40U 2 g g 0,9 sm _.__. 1978 i

4. (a) Manufactured according to Mac's SMA155 KC O C1. 3pu,en a e n.a wr. mee,a cnne o,de, No.

6181 N 6 tad Desanotion of Productinspeised' 30" O.D. x 1.375 N/W Pine 1974 _ Aasenaamste W75 CaesNo. Cims 2 (cl arew.we A,sg Code: secuen ut, Eoison

s. Aemarks:

i ,.,y,;,,,,,,,,,,y,,g,,,,,, ~ Welded with filler metal and produced in accordance with ASME san _ TTT cla== 9 t-n cut i M M ev '70 mpani4r4em+4nna-1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE We certafy the statements made in this report are correct and the products denned in this report conform to the requirements of the ASME Material Specification listed above on line 4 (ab The radiographic film and a radiographic report show *ag film locations are attacned to the Certified Material Test Reports provided for the matenal cow (ed hyp Date M Nw I/ 18E Signed Tmgs{y _ Sy, l ASME Car:ificate tr Authonastion No. N1600 to use the NPT Symbol emperm _1.10-8Q__ 48'. Ab?/D tur*nai --m t: A W8 CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION 1, the undersigned. holding a valid s f-t-inaued by the Nataonal Sorrd of Soiler and Pressere Vesselinspectors and the State or Province of Wiscont1" and employed by of _ tam 14 h = Mm== have inspected the products dessnbed in this Manufacturer's Partial Data Report

- w 7 - 192E and state that to the best of my knowled0e and belief, the Manufacturer has produced this en r

product en accordance with the ASME Code Section lat. Sy signing this certincate. neither the inspector not his employer makes any warranty, empressed or implied. concom-ing the product described in this Manufacturer's Partial Data Report. Furthermore, neither the inspector not his employer shall be liable in any menner for arty personal injury or property damage or a loss of any kind ansang from or connected wiin this inspection. Date h1 197 4 LO 4 &O~< - Commiusons.2ha.96.L......... -_. i t) $**WW.*lln/n "*'** ~ '"'

* * ~

7/76 form (E000801 may be entained from the Orcer Ooot., ASME.345 E. 4hn St New York, N.Y.10017

- Arkwright Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.

Mutual Boiler Division, Factory Mutual System Weld was repaired per Procedure 16-F-020 Rev. 7 dtd. 6-22-78 using chametron E7018 Heat No. 421W9081 electrodes. Procedure Qualifica-tion record no. YR 490 dtd. 12-29-77. Pipe was heat tregted per (L ' Procedure 13-N-62'.1 dtd. 5-3-77. Stress relieved at 1125 F. Air i cooled. Wald was radiographically inspected and accepted per -(L) Procedure 9-Q-216 Rev. 5 dtd. 12-8-77. Pipe was hydrostatically k,% tested and approved on 2-27-79 per (L) Procedure 19-Q-010 dtd. i p ,1-17-77 at 2612 pai. gggg7gL in -l AdOO /

Rin was normalized at 1650*: / . Tensil Test (QW.150) wel e '; St.rcs3 relieved @ll2' ?_1 7"q. O tnm n _ ultimate utswn.ste Charactor of Spocamen Total Load Unit Stress Failure & no. p o. Th.dness Area

tb.

Kob1 E v Location ..Q.yt _62.LU).0L. 1T .. 5045. 15.,975_ . 7 9. 9.. #1 Part, cup & con :f e gy!44_2. if d ) C/ 1a.___i505"_ .15,450 . 77,1 ;#.2 ? art.Cupacon n 'o M 2_1(a) C'c/ 27 50L5".5 15.,700 .. 7_8 5 43 Eart... Cyp.1.c.on af O_'f!A6?. 7 ( a 1 c'f! 7A 4 W 4"G 15.500 77.5 ELPart. Cuo& Con af o ffisod.1 ( e u PM( i_nn e t ). 60L"rA 75.260

76. t1

SCun!:Cona/ Car tt O't.'L62.1( d )I PM( Cirettm ). SOL"G i

15.250 76.4

6? art.Cuc& Con'f

.e Tau,,h==ss Tec- (CW.T:-) I l

.3_:-:-

,,e 7e j { 3_..., Ts >. Ta -- 8 .vn: es 4Sw. w.s e s~n Pv- + n

SA370 l

i Ft-Lbs.t t Fig.11a I t l IC'il i Vee

+30*F

86.0 72 69 i

i i C'il i Vee 8+30*F - 86.O-62 73 I 4 . _ dC'c! i Vaa

+10*F 81.0 55 8

76 i i ~I 'HAZ Vee t +30 F 4 39.0 55 6 38 4 .j -

HAZ i Vee

+ +30*F : 52.0 69 L6 a i a ..liAZ Vee .'+30*F 3 A6.0 62 3 66 8 1 c t. i i e p?.4 T n - cr..) vaa e + :t O

F 57.0 57 2

62 e -..-J 1 1 1 1PM( "._i), Ve e.,; +3Q.*E :_._49. O i 4 5_. ___..44 _.,_L.,_____ PMC ' " l) V e e__,1_ +.3.0

F i 57.O I

SO _ 5.4..T-.._____.t __ J '~ i i .._i . J. __ l-l i i - -. 4-i j RIP q 4457 caiRos no. 31-.12089 u 0 2 T=ai MO 64-02365 y.,,g7, Radiocrachic Satisfactory to ASME Sec. VIII Para.- UW51 gn ~ . mp ss m O Mn P S Si Ni Cu + c..x,, ( L ) '/la i d .10 1.86 .0 24. .016 .27 .02 .13 + Deposit chemistry as-welded p.er 16 F 115 R9 (2-3/lo" thick A51o plate) ../.. frn.SIA. 5,.12..Eti.L4..LP3.Ke.. 6#.1L..B. 6.0.402),,,g,r,e t.,J,/12,','g,,,,,&,,Li,n.c,9,1,n-860 . flux, Lot 47.E. + ~ . wouse.edia. - R..Kateley 12'888 18P/ Tam --- - =y. R. We.11s m ea 7,,,,, ypngo v. . we a:rer e.m ci. c==or=2 a.,a,scxrd a = amm ass.ast am erst m.ka. ,,,:,.r.inrs med - a cv es./.s.rg cc==. = a:m:rcan.= wrn

e. - w =ee U

$13 D /l // ' ' ~ u,,,. .0::=' J ')- sy /H W& W44 % m^ n '. f.. ' * '. '... YLD. STR. K S T.. ... :y;.{..;:.m.. :.2% 077557 -. f. Et, R ';^.=;*.f, R A '?. - . ~.. ~. . #1-C'il, ,..a..

2-cu..;;.:,c,r,,..'.'.

..00,5.. '.s,'14,' ,.5T. Fraet. ~out' side,ga, ge_, mark..,._:_'

HL-cn..' :.. l ' -ln:u, '.D;g. g:. :.. ;. :..

':',0 Y : ...e 49;9.c.. jf.'.3 V..' 16.h..s.. 5s:. .,,.:.. ::.. j... -

. p :..

3'. 7..f.* 2w C'!.d:. * ; .r. -:. "::: y.i 52 ' . / 5-P'W to'nW.-)..* ': :%49.'6 ' ';.' C :.: '33". , ;.-n 57, Era *ct.' i,1QRe.. mark. *.."d.:. y*..rF 33' ^ . = ': "66 .:: :? "> - /6-PM ciret::...')

49 9 31 59

p Q

ffL ~ AdOO Y34538 PaSe 2 code m z

(Se9 QW.(, 51. an IX.1974 ASME Beiler and Ppssuro Vcsk, ode) 3 Cun pany Name 12 dish 'O' / Pror.edure Qual.fication Recced No. YRL90 V p re 127f877'? ' ~ ~ v.1s ns. _J.6.F O20 LR and 16F008 Rev. 8 {' w.:n,rg Processias)- bNElI typo. (w.. u.s. Aucu...nt... s.n,s.Aoru.) Man 33.1 (L) Unit AC39h582 JC;NTS (OVt432) gn a.. ]e s ,s -. ( E Stq Q s h. Qn g .,i t s,, O 1 k } T,,le. 2 w RIP # 445 7 4 o,_. oe. BASE METALS (QW.t.33) Matsrial 5:ee. ...A516 PCSTWELD HEAT TREATMENT fow.ac7) ype or Grade 7em,e,,,u,, see Individual Test Resul P No. 1.. _,.. 7.Q Time . _.to P Ho. 1._ O: hor Thic*sness 2.=1M " ( Ciameter ( Par.ge_3/2.6 f o_.5." 6, _ O.h, Ht. No._.X.5_L5.38, code JJLZ (Z50) GAS (OW.Cd) i 7ype,, c,,,, cases Composition of Gas Mixture Other FILLER METALS (OW40s) Weld Metal Analysis A No.. Si.w of Electrede 3 80 Filter f.letal F No. b- / ELECTRICAL CHARA."."TERISTICS (QW.:09) t Current II0 su soeof. cation % 1..... ./ Petarity Rey.erse AWS Clau..% tion. ..E70.lb... - i ~' " e:he,.9he=e tren..E7.038.,.Xt.. !A2]J90H ... ~ Amps. W Volts .l 0:n,r ?Jee lt.t. aeh.ed Weldinz Reco.-d TV:s TIO.'s (Cvt 105) Position of Croeve _. d.' @ D TECHMOUE (QW.aso) ~ + Weld Pr:gression (Up%It. Do nhill).3Ori 0.Ut31 Trasel Speed 45 0:nvr... _ _. S: ring or weave ee o Jt,d,n; Oso!Intion Multipass or Sing!, Pass (ser side) NM)3310ESS Pfi! HEAT (OW4368 Single or Mui:ipie Electrodes 83.EE19 rehrst Temp. 60 -2 'iO

F,,,,,.,,,,_.,.,

P Other . 60.c00 % in'tep ass Temp es { Othte. r "tr7tEL { ~ . (11708 j Th s form (ECCCCH may b+ c::t,eaned frorn The Order ov: ASME 3.:5 E.17 .. New Yorw. N.Y. th 1 AdOO Page 1

{ ( og,,,,3 g Test seetior. or=ali::ed prior weld:,r. wel(ced, stress relie, Temae Test tow.ises Cd 112, ' +O -25, 2-1/2 hrs. d Ur:.ma te U68 mate Characes et Spe. meg Totes Li,sc u n.: Sr.ess rs.e,e J. C dLf.,.2 3.Gi) i C't!..._E__ __. 50 5"G N3

f.%a=ar*

7.. h r.e.s Area 13 )* Q M LD:st ce ,Q 1 15,000 7L.9 a, ICuc& Cone / tiel! gdLMd) l C'il

_1_E,

.50L"3 1 11.550 72.9 52 tcuc& Cone / !e f-g.!L6?.,(d) ' C'ci 23 . SOL 5"O I 15.050 75.3

3.Q1:Econe/tieli Tlh62.1 ( d 1 i C t!

23 .50L"2 i . t IL.650

73. L SLCucaConeMTe3

~

0.. '. 6 ?.1 e i ' ", r -- -,

. n sur < i , r,, n l go.g n i r n. s.r'e -. /r =, t O'dL62.1 ( d ) i PW Cire i:). 505"'3 i i 152800 1 78.9 F6ICubaCone/Ced Tougtness Tests (QW.170) Specimen NCt n Not n , Test Impact t g?ece Exo. Oree w' c*e' 0 No locs* ton Tvn Tea.3 Values % S*ese l Ws Bresa i Ne 5 =34 e SA370 t i iEt-Los. c I Fir.11a IC't! Vee i v30*f i15L.5 100 92 i C'cl Vee + 30

F i 190. 0 100 89 Chr Vee

+30*F !19L.0 100 77 I I i i l H rZ Vee i t30*F t 56.0 95 E9 H3Z Vee +30*F i52.0 89 12 7 ~ Haz i Vee +30*F i L8.0 60 L3 0 I Faif Lc'.r. Vee v30*- t 10 1.0 7> b> IPiIi l Vee 0 +30

F i 129. 0 100 82 iPM(

i Vee i v30*? : 106.0 82 T76 1 ~ ~ ~ RIP.$: 4457' ~ l 2 0: hor Tests Cu227 NO.'51-12090 .EQ 64-02371 ~ T m etTm F" din--"'-#"i-Ra*4' Sc'n-.- +n a 9'r:' Fe c. trTTT o -n_ TTi751b_Jrr '_7' _ V T n o po.;t A,uw, .C Mn P S Si Mi Cr._ Mo Cu ..L1_ % ( L ) '.fe l d 05 1.20 .016 .016 . ~4 8 .02 .Q5 .01 .06 01 Q 07 .01 Mill - PM .26 1.05 .011 .017 .2E .2............................................................................................................................... w *w. ti,,,,, S. The t_cser. ciac no. 12660 Tem emnes,cted ey: R. We11s . sismo No. LG _ uso,,toryr. u.__ YRL,90 / We certify mat tas state *==.e3 in tais record are corrvet and tear tne test welds wers propearsd. welded and tested in ac the requirements of Secte,n tx ci tas ASME Code. fl Lk-' SF 'CO,_ /Z /Je /,) Manor,ctor,r i s, __ H. M. f_ff2.;is_ ___ c,., YLD. ST?.. KSI .2% o?Fs T % EL. % RA . C.1

52. L 26 73

~CW 52.L 2L 75 BECHTE - C'.1 51.0 27 74 7' 55.6 25 7L 74a -er ( Long. ) 53.7 32 66 -FM (circu=) 52.7 30 58 AdOO M

O. M po.s FABRICATING S' oosro.1. as January 18. 1977 I h ' " C" '"C TEST &' p

)M-TECH CORP. REPORT NO 3965 - ~

wona no. 0131s DETAILED ANAIJSIS REPORT 8;;&'?"Jo"5' CORRECTED 5-6-82 oF MATERIALS ROM WH CH MADE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS $,C ',",C Hear DESCRIPTION = = = = * "a=8 CO "'M a'at [.*lU.,I" to, a a **== C MN P S SI CR Ni MO EB ao. '"0""'"" m " a nt l .035",3/32" 1/8" Combustion REPORT. :D }.02 1.51.018.005.25 24.05 12.80 .10 74649. / Engr. T-309/309L Stainless CU.05 N.05 1 Steel Wire. Specification / SFA-5.9: Class ER-309/ER-309L Check nnalysis For CHl:CK A1ALY! IS Inform, l tion Pu poses .023 1.58.015.007.38 24.48 12.34.21 .09

only, V.03fi, CU.19 Ti. 11, ob + T;

.017 N. 011 FERRITE 1: %-13:' CAL :ULN 'ED FROM CHEF ICAL ANAL" SIS 1F CllECK AllALYSIl, USIbG SCI AEFFl.ER D IACit 6M. .~ p .D b r g i .b, l HERERY CERTIFY THIS REPORT TO DE TRUE AND CORRECT ACCORDING TO RE IDS THE PO ESSION OF THIS COR RATION tu e y5 M

M ANiss ACTUTIEr.S OF HIGH QUALITY NICKEL ALLOY .TAINLESS STEEL AND LOW ALLOY WIRE POP SYSTEMS WELDING, FORMING AND OTHER APPLICATI NS \\Combuttson Engineering, Inc. CE RTIFIED TO ASTM, ASME, AWS. SECTI e C E Wire ANo SECTION lli NUCLE AR SPECIFICATI NS 4224 Shackieford Road Norcross, Georgia 30093 Southwest Fa'.icating & Weldin6 SHIP TO: DATE SHIPPED: 12-23-76 7525 sherman corrective Cow 5-4-82 Houston, Texas 77011 MARKED: CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY CONFORMANCE TESTS 2076 CUSTOMER PURCHASE ORDER NO. SHOP ORDER NO.: SPECIFICATIONS.SFA 5 9 This r.iaterial was manufactured and supplied in accordance with quality A surance annual revision Dated: 11/1/76 accepted br Southwest Fabricating. POUNDS ITEM HEAT NUMBER SIZE TYPE SHIPPED l 1 746k9 .035"Dia, n3og/m309L A d, 2 .094"Dia u N 3 .125"Dia 4 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ITEM C Mn S P Cr N. Cu Al Mo N, ~ 1 .02 1 51 25 o05 .o18 24.05 12.8o .o5 .10 .05 2 h 3 4 i ITEM TENSILE STRENGTH YlELD STRENGTH ELONGATION ADDITIONAL TESTS 1 1 Welding Temper 2 B W EL 3 70 4 WE HERE8Y CERTIFY THAT MATERIAL REFERRED TO A80VE CONFORMS TO THE PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTS AND t$IN ACCORDAN WITH SPECIFICATIONS N"*:rv F hr. e " ; (.. ~ * ' ? T ****? ntt,aren 5 14 ' " % del kg l$, j;,g Combustion Engineering, Inc. .L c6L dfm %. u s.~. Q V %/ ~ Notamv h AUTMdRa2EO UP P eCI AL

{, Ol . Qpg (<,' = a - = O 'FAKATM _ ' 5/3/84 oo.ro .r. l r.WELDINGCO INC 4.,,,M

4-TEOf LAB REPORT NO. 84-1618-1 & 2 odd no.

02183 DETAII.ED ANAI,YSIS REPOltT 8;;;;;,";;,; PHY$8 CAL 5 OF MATERIALS FROM WillCH M ADE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS wear 5 C 'C * - DE S CRIPTION

l, es ys, y

CU

== =. tor C MN P S SI CR Ni MO lill 'aou u ....s,. es. say..e no, =.- 3/32" & 1/8" PAGE: AS-25 REPO1TED .095 1.29.012.007.52 .10 .10 .023 .18 40911 CARBON STEEL WELD WIRE Va = 102 SPECIFICATION SFA-5.18 AS WELDE[ CIASS ER70S-3/E70S-3 72,5'00 90,500 28.0 73.0.078 1.20.012.010.46 .07 .30' .01 .27 Va =.01 'Y'iOTCH CHAR'Y IFPACT AT -20*P FT.LilS. 64.0 - 71.0- 97.0 LAT. EXP. 46 69 % SHI AR 50 70 STRESS RE.IEVE 3 AT 1150 'P FOR 8 IKXIRS 63',700 106,100 27.0 75.0 CHEMISTRf SAFI AS ABONI. 'Y'iOTCH CHARPY IFPACT AT -20*P WELDED PER 01.01.037 R/5 FT.LBS. 150. ti - 15 1.0 - 155. 5 3 (u.A n o. HEAT TREATED PER HT-PI-2 R, 4 LAT. EXP. 80 83 ,g ) I k<e X-RAY SATISFACTORY h % SHI AR 100 - 10f - 1 00 . 'j I' W I.HEREDY CERTIFY THIS RE PORT TO DE TRUE AND CORREC1 y@ ACCORDING TO RE O DS IN THE POSSESSION OF THIS CORPORATIOh ~h A t.,

,., g /l & r. 'l%Gli--W il.M )N G)lti'Olt.\\ TION C!iET1;CE AMRYSts.MRagyf g M j_,__7 V,tWgg gs g-r.u.i w u inu. im isim, .\\q. centdgty,1GQ.

.... m.. m...s

..s.,,.....s..........,.:...,....:. -. ~. n o s...... i M.... p[tP37.b, Da7.G'h u Date: 4/11/84 Customer's Order: 2442 ClimTiON INDUSTRIAL SALES., Shipped To: IIOUST0N, TX S.W. Fab P.O. #84-0194 SOFTilWl:ST FAliRICATING & WELDDT; F0ll: It00STON,'TX Our Register: 1300-122-133 Via: UNIBR.V.E-PAGE 1300-138-095 Net: 3000 Gross: 3114 Pallets: 2 Material: 3/32 AS-25 #2 CnIL

1/8 AS-25 #2 COIL **

AS!IE Ilo11er & Pressure Vessel Code 4 Section II, Part C Specification SFA 5.17, Classification D1-13K and Specificatica SFA 5.18, Classification ER70S-3/E7053 i a M:IUAL_.GIEt:1SIRY Nest No. C Mn P S Si Mo Cu Al Ni Cr V t

0911

'.095 1.29 .012 .007 .52 .023 .184*, .10 .10 <.002 1[

TOTAL *

.g .176 **** TOTAL ,s l l i I We certify that these chemical test results are correct as contained in the records of the co A. Stamps, Q.C. Dept. This material was manf actured in accordance with the Quality Assurance !!anua Co., accepted by Southwest Fabricating and Weldin;: revisiren dateJ lt.trch 31. 1933, as meeting the rcrinirements of NCA-3S00. . _,. r,s - L%vt4'. fQh \\ 8 3 A. STNTS

.t

~ ,, -f sp. gg .. ' ' y, t': ~* R.:1., in 'D AUOO W /

i yl', k f N CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL SALES CO. 6420 Navigation. P. O. Box 9130. Houston, Texas 77011. Phone 713 9217183 JUNE 1, 1984 ' SOUTHWEST FABRICATING & WELDING CO., INC. 9.0. BOX 9449 ';,. HOUSTON, TEXAS 77011 AE: P.O.#84-0194 (Ht. f40911) 1/8 AND 3/32 PAGE AS-25 MATERIAL WAS MANUFACTURED AND SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL, REVISION III, DATED '.,1/02/83, ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY SOUTHWEST FABRICATING & WELDING CO., i INC., MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF NCA 3800. e CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL SALES CO. d //?lM . /k ' A AMOS STIBORIK $? 8 k k AS/jt ,y 4. C' & &. Q ir ^ y* ' BECHTEL 74 n 99l1 wsa%g AdOO

ALLOY RODS, inc. CARTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 517 HANOVER, PA 17331 717/637 8911 CERTIFIED MATERIALS TEST REPORT 'IWECO INC. Customer Order No. N84363 P.O. EOX 12668 8350 MOSLEY Order No. 228759-1 HOUSIDN TX 77017 AITN: DA MANAGER This Material Conforms to Specificatio ASME SFA 5.1 Sec. II Part C & ASME Sec Trade Name III or Trademark: Atom Arc 7018 Add., NB-2400 1983 Ed. thru Summer 1983' 10 CFR Part 21 applies. Diameter Size: 3/32" Weight: 2,500 lbs. Test No. 2-2945-00 Lot Number: 2J311AA02 Control No. JJ043 X-Rays Satisfactory - Heat Number: 411XO991' Moisture 18000 F. 0.08% Concentri ity 3% Type Steel A-285 Carbon .05 . Manganese 1.07-Test No. Full Split Volts Amps Chromium . 03 - Tensiles & Nickel .03-Silicon .4 0 ' Impacts 1 3 22 100 E Columbium + Tes.t As Stress' Tantalum Results: Welded-Relieved Molybdenum .01' 8 hrs. @ 11500 F. Tungsten Yield '70 500 ' 62 600' Copper .02 Tensile 84 000' 77 000-Titantum Elon 34 0% ' 34 0% ' Red.gation Phosphorus .016 of Area 75.6% 76.0% Sulphur .013 Vansaium . 01 ' Charpy V-Notch Imnacts Tested @ -200 F.- Cobalt Ft. Lbs. 9 96 140.120-134 Lat. Exp. 6 71 82-82-83 Ferrite: % Shear 30-30-30 60-40-40 Fillets: OK Vertical / Overhead Tensile Specimen.252" Impact Specimen .394" x.394" ASME NX-2322 and/pecimensLocation&OrientationofCharfA/W RIP # 4457 L v-V-Notch / Tensile S is I or AWS/SFA Quality Systems Certificate No. QSC-22 arpeci f i ca t i ons as applicable. Expiration Date: September 8, 1984 State of Pennsylvania ? The' undersigned certifies that the County of York J SS contents of this report are correct and accurate and that all operations Subscribed and sworn to before me performed by the undersigned or sub this 5th day of December, 1983 contractors are in comptsance with requirements of the material speci-fication and ASME Boiler and Pressure f Vessel Code Section JII Division I S' . 1 y..t d0.& D.......... '"*0** " " ^^ ** Notary Public ALLOY RODS, INC. My Consni s s i on exp i res : 11/22/86 BY...... .a X)........... g I D. E. Lebo Quality Assurance Specialist BECHTEL 743 l AdOO ^

...i 713 - 943 2000 is Dietributors For m Union Certide. Linds, Chemetron. Ateen Are, .O. ses 12m M% g,,,,y, g,,,,,,, ,,,,, g,,, y,,,,, gg,,,, Heussen, Temos 77017 Housten. Temos 77075 Weetanghouse. Areos, All. State, Areeir, Tweee IWECD,1NC. yyyyyyy CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $o a rA w es,r- [A6bcA rwd ub. p. O. No. 05 - l2 8 2-Material Specification ['70/O S FA S. / 5 t.c._Zr b j Heat No. $ II X O 9 A l tot No. 2 J 3 / / AA o 2-q,, Control ddO43 This material was manufactured and supplied in accordance with the Quality Assurance Manual Revision /Yd. 2. / l b o Accepted by bz orn wtt r M8 ic 4 re,v4 , meeting the requirements of NCA-3800. / g g 2. /] W - - Joe Morgar([_ Q.A. Mgr. BECHTEL 742 AdOO J.

siUTHVGST- "~ 0-

' ' ' FABRICATING 3/22/84

.--vo.- Ol 84 G WELOW8G CO INC j Test 02161 O An-Tedt Iab. Report Ib. 84-1080-1 & 2 neto. DETAILED ANAL,YSIS ItEPOllT FA;;;?,';;; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS HEAT OF MATERIALS ROM WH CH MADE CU [o", ma n n.at DESCRIPTION m e ** ""5=*

*aa'

==.- ,U. 'j. d'.*l%.'" ' '. * "'O'. ' 'a" *'"C " a* =aa C MN P S SI CR NI MO g ,,o.

- u m

.r .035 Alloy Ibd Reporti d .09' l.46'.006.013.85'.04 .04 .01.05 12132 l l Spoolarc 88 Carbon Steel Va =.01 Weld Wire 33 y,yg ~ j Specification: SFA-5.18 66,400 86,100 23 61.3 .11 1.47.005.012.80 .05 .05 .01.25 Class E70S-6/ER70S-6 Va = (.01 "V"Ibtch Oary In aact at 0 F. Ft.Us. 33.0 35.0 - 53.0 Iat..Exp. 25 28 - 42 l % Shear 30 40 M Strens He I.leve I at 1150 b for 8 firs i l t s M 58,600 74,800 28.0 70.9 man stry same as a:xwe 0 "V"I btd) Gar y Innect at 0 1 '. , m ,J1 (saa w.co). Welded per 01.01.038 R/7 Pt.U s. 71.5 74.0 - 76.5 i r a A j m p i n) Ileat Teated per ifr-P1-2 R/4 Iat. Exp. 56 - 57 - 63 \\ y2 X-Ray Satisfactory % Sh< ar 70 - 70 - 70 1.HEREDY RTIFY THIS REPORT TO DE TRUE AND CORREC g ACCORDING TO RE 4DS I THE P SESSION OF TitiS CORPORATIO n A { e-b l l

ALLUY HUUS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS P.O. BCX $17 HANOVER, PA 17331 71 ,7 8911 CERTIFIED MATERIALS TEST REFORT SOUTHERN ALLOY 8e EQUIP. 6620 FULTON Customer Order No. 1461 REF. P.O. 0739 HOUSTON, TX 77022 Order No. 232119-1 Shipped: This Material Conforms to Soecification ASME SFA S.18 Sec. II Part C & ASME B&P' Sec. III NB-2400 1983 Ed. t h ru S untne r Trade Name 1983 Add. 10 CFR Part 21 applies. or Trademark: Spoolarc 88 Type: ER 70S-6 Diameter Size: .035" Test No. 2-3380-00 Weight: 1,020 lbs. Lo t Numb e r : Heat Number: 12132 Carbon .09 Manganese 1.46 C1.romium .04 Nickel .04 Silicon .85 Colu nb l um+ Tantalum Mol ybd enwn .01 Tungsten ( T'1eansum Copper .05 Phosphorus .006 Sulphur .013 = Vanadium 01 Cobalt ~ FERRITE Quality Systems Certificate No. QSC-221 Expiration Date: S.t' ate of Pennsylvania September 8, 1984 1 County of York [ SS The undersigned certifies that the contents of this re ort are correct Subscribed and sworn to before me and accurate and th t all operations this 22nd day of March, 1984 performed by the undersigned or sub contractors are in compliance with requirements of the material speci-A = fication and ASME Boiler and Pressure e j# ey / Vessel Code Section SEAL. Subsection NCA-3800 III Division I .5 ot ub 'c My Conmission expires: 03/16/87 J/ BY........ m....... / . L. Starner Q.A. Supervisor Wm p= cvaa m BY Q. A -- DATM' ~ SCUTHERN ALLOY & EQUIPMENT, INC. KdOO 2 A

SOUTHERN ALLOY & EQUIPMENT,INC. 382 GARDEN OAKS BLVD. P. O. BOX 10208 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77206 (713) 69l-5513 March 20, 1984 Re SF&UCO P.O. Number 84-0163 dated 2-8-84 1020# Chemtron.035" Dia. "Spoolare 88" Mild Steel Mig Wire AWS-SFA 5.18 Class ER-703-6 Heat #12132 ~ THIS NATERIAL WAS MANUFACTURED AND SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL REV.3 DATED 3-24-80 ACCEPTED BY SF & WCO, MEETING THE REQUIRDIENTS OF NCA-3800. Southern Alloy & Equipment, Inc. f.*c"- s. C.A. Hardin Mgr. Q.A. J4 rA61 ~ 4Ch g ,~,3 74 AdOO

2 I

[ r... sotnMGvsr FAM.o.CABE I 8-10-84 Oi %k -oo....e...... i oco -c S 0 212 AN-TEClf LAR. REPORT No. 84-3057-1 f 2 DETAILED ANAI.YSIS REl' ORT Etan",ff*' PMY5ICAL5 5",C

y,8 -

OF M ATERIALS FROM WHICH MADE CHE MIC AL. ANAL.YSIS weav ,j 0 DESCRIPTION ,'gy, a=y 1

=.

u., s.... e.. ene se .e C MN F S St CR Ni MO CU secu..ca ,,o __.e .=c a unos

<

3/32" PACE AS-25 CARBON REP )RTED .13 1.18.013.009.58.046 .041 .007.16 40925 STEEL WELD WIRE V= .002 SPECIFICATION: SFA 5.17 72.900 85.800 26.0 64.9 AS W ELDED CLASS EM13K WITH .13 1.15.024.010.60.06 .07 .02 .22 LINCOLN 860 FLUX LOTi w V= C.01 137S CLASS F70- "V" ) 0TCH CHART INPACT 90 ?. EMl3K F7AO-EM13K PT. LBS. 39.0 36.0 38.0 OR F7PO-EM13K h LAT. EXP 38 31 35 % S1 FR 40 40 40 CP STRI SS Rl:LIEV :D F. L 150' ' F. Fi )R 8 Hi)URS j W P /' 64.400 81.400 27.0 66.I CHD ISTR' ' SAM : AS LBOV3 "V" NOTCII CHA tPY I iPAC-00 F. I [ WELDED PER 01.01.040 R/7 FT. LBS. 45.0 44.0 45.it 7 IF 3 h]W[ HEAT TREATED PER HT-PI-2 R/4 LAT. EXP 43 42 43 Y-RAY SATISFACTORY _Z_S1 EAR 40_ _40__40 tts I.HEREBY CERTIFY THIS REPORT TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT g ACCORDING TO RECO S IN HE POSSESSION OF THIS CORPORATION h .N F i

f UNIDR AZE.l' AGE COIIPOlt ATT i 205 CLAY sTHEET. H0X IW sowt.t.sc cREEN. KENTtTKY 421021519 CiO3 7At T/WI T{ LEX M 4.15.1 I Date: 8-9-14 Shipped To: CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL SALES Customer's Order: 2637 HOUSTON, TX FOR: SOUTHWEST FABRICATION & WELDING HOUSTON, TX. S.W. Fab. P.O. 84-0597 Via: CUSTOMER PICK UP Our Register: 1300-208-128 Pallets: 2 - Gross: 2928# Net:2816 # Material: 3/32" AS-25 52 Coils ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code l Section II, Part C Specification SFA 5.17, Classification EM-13K and Specification SFA 5.18, Classification ER705-3/E705-3 e Heat No. C Mn P S Si Mo Cu Al Ni cp y 40925 .13 1.18 .013.009 .58 .007 .16 .041.046 .002 TOTAL RIP W4.45 7 II We certify that these chemical test results are correct as contained in the records of the company. A. Stamps, GC. Dept. This material was manuf actured in accordance with the Quality Assurance Manual, r3 vision dated march 31, 1983, accepted by Southwest Fabrication and Welding Co. CO meeting the requirements of NCA-3800. AA 8 . [b A. S tamps, O.C. department neura 743 AdOO n

N eA w i s t i ; '> i ,r 7 CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL SALES CO. 6420 Navigation. P. O. Box 9130. Houston.. Texas 77011. Phone 713 9217183 August 10, 1984 Southwest Fabricating & Welding Co. P. O. box 9449 Houston, Texas 77011 Re: pe#84-0697 car.t (40925) 3/32 Page AS-25 material was manufactured and supplied in accordance with the Quality Assurance Manual, revision III/ dated 01/02/83, accepted and approved by Southwest Fabricating and Welding Co., Ind, meeting the requirements of NCA 3800. A assbf$b'S" Amos Stiborik gT* 445T' p

BECHygg, 7e n 9FJ wsahd AdOO

./ CUSTOM BLAST SERVICES,INC. P.O. Box 1566 LaPorte. Texas 77571 713/487 8066

s, This is to certify that the following items have been '

processed with Accordance With Approved Procedure

1002-NUC-83 Rev.l.

Lot k Dated S-t\\.M Snlos Order Sheet No. Piece Mark b2.uS1 CC ilO ' 136S9-CC-ECM-OD-OT-N - O2d1 MS - \\ ' 7 t w%'9-W- \\tht-c, Al \\- A - 107vsm M%% ' ? C L %~9-(r\\%. h v-G N>- yA - btus 1 trss vs ' it. kp 7.n% c12-t- A ' f

G2ms, ms.23 -

icsw.m- % c-a, \\A - 02vs% c_c \\w scs c4 cc-u s o n-m- M - i RIP # 4457 I i l BECHTEL 743 s AdOO 4

PR00l' IDENTITY RECORD FOR COATING Mt-' RIALS (By seller / 5uDcontractor) PROJECT NAME : SOUTH TEXAS NUCLEAR PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: P.O./SU8 CONTRACT NO: 3-5749 SELLER CUSTOM BLAST, 2550 Senoa Red Bluff, Houston, Texas 77571 FOR ITEM / AREA : (By Coating Material Supplier) MANUFACTURER : AMERON PROTECTIVE COATINGS O! VISION LOCATION 201 NORTH 8ERRY STREET BREA, CALIFORNIA 92621 - PRODUCT NAME : DIMETCOTE 6 PRIMER ~ GENERIC TYPE : SOLVENT BASED INORGANIC ZINC PRIMER ORDER NO. 7004483 CUST. PO # : 3-5749 GALS SHIPPED: SEE CONPONENTS COMPONENTS 8ATCH NO. DATE OF MFG. SHELF LIFE EXPIRES A. Powder (27 x 5 gals) 108126 3/29/84 3/29/86 8. Liquid (80 x 5 gals) 108382 4/16/84 4/16/86 Provide batch and standard test data for all components. TEST METHOD A - COMPONENT B - COMPONENT COMPONENTS ASTM or OTHER BATCH STANDARD 8ATCH STANDARD ~ WEIGHT-Ibs./ gal.: 0 T475' 58.6 58.6 8.35 8.24-8.64 VISCOSITY-CPS

Fed #4287 1000 200-2000 600 200-600 WT. SOLIDS-5

Formula (info only) 100 (info only) 29.2-35.2 GRINO

N/A FLASH POINT

0 1310 (info only) 77 Deg. F (mixed, as applicable)

MIXING RATIO

14.9 Lbs. Powder : 6.3 Lbs. Liquid MIXE0 MATERIAL ASTM or OTHER 8ATCH STANDARD RIP # 4457 VIstOSITY

N/A REC 0AT TIME

24 HRS. at 77 Deg. F FULL CURE TIME 2 HRS. at 77 Deg. F / 50% Relative Humidity ZINC PIGMENT ASTM or OTHER BATCH STANDARD METALLIC ZINC-5 : Formula (info only) 69.4 51 EVE ANALYSIS :

N/A We nereoy certify that the coating materials described above were manufactureo with the same formulation, raw materials, production methods, and quality control standards as the coating materials on which the original acceptance was granted by Bechtel. BEcliTa QUALITY CONT L CHEMIST: AICE M 743 SI 0: d 51GN DATE : May 15, 1984 DATE ay 15, 1 4 WP: 11381 AdOO

WoYereU$.' M1?s73*W.a m Amecon Dwwon May 17. 1984 Purchasing Department T Custom Blast 2550 Genoa Red Bluff Houston. Texas 77571 Re ference: Purchase Order 3-5750 Aneron Order 7004482 ' CERTIFICATE OF COMPL1ANCE I This is to certify that the following Aneron product f Apercoat 101 Thinner 2 x 50 gallons Batch Number 8510844H Was manufactured in accordance with the standard Aneron Protective Coatings Division quality control procedures ap;,1(cable to this j heercoat product. RIP # 4457 J per+44pt / /3 / p Deviq L. Berry Quality Assurance DLB:s cc: Aneron Houston i h e BECHig in O AdOO

1 ,,, FORM 2 CLEANING AND COATING VERIFICATION RECORD NO.l A k %.u.h 1-muk PROJECT NAME a O Mk PO/5USCCNTRACT NO. ib7/h*9ITEM / AREA I I 1 1 INSTRUCTIONS j

1. Use a separate C!eening Ind coating Verification Record Form for each item. lot or area.

i

2. Record all readings.. tests, and other. date in appropriate bones on this form for the item. lot or area Identified above, if an appropriate bom eennot be found. record data under " Comments".

l I

3. Provide all inspection and test data required by the specifiestion. Mark other bones "N/A"if the i

data is not required by the specification.

4. Use a separate Costing Record - Part 11 sheet for each seat applied to the same item. lot or area.

J, RIP # 4457 CLEANING RECORD - PART I i ee. r ..-i... l i ,/ i i

AMStENT cONOlTION:

8 l see. d. Alessvevm Te.e..*P: M. (me M M.

M. As*

o.= eei.e.*P: '5 ney/W.t o sud. C..e Aie Anemi cowede. pois Poe.t T o. Tt Tt Pw.mse i 4u be l% k'h w h L' A I m.. A A.' s.u twontch %Ih w

n et A

uk k JL L t u _ 2u -. 6 l l ~ l l i i. i i l i I SURFACE PREPARATION l .e.....: % t Q._. s 4.s e....... si.:M p c. 3 m o e,........i m. i n r o....... % t b '. A & w.<c W ').3 i...#nE % $. t M. h M L N 8 n s... vi. lI v.. i I e,.v.i. I R.... j

o. '.

vi.. C c o... v;. i I e,,v.s. l l %.n N.w le ArU 1 5 l i I l ) %.tt Iv.m ba261 s..s l l l t h% celIi.s! I l l 1 Es. " %.tt I i % lte lem'lJ a s I 'l 'l I l %a la. leerAJ u i

t. w itmiyu.sIa.i....e i.a i om l

I I I A. ~.e. I l a.5 lo.. lek.t A.u i A s ~v w i ~ .-~

roun... NT'D. ATING,VERIFICATIO'N RECOR g A. CL.EAN!MG AND CC COATING RECORD PART ll j I'.- ~ -s' og Meandeeev, ort

AA

\\nton ,3,W Cest. ch.uM_ tovsn.we ist. Ok - c.' m ~ co l muaean (Cs,cf. Cael EM57 ~ iom.t. n 9 co n.i. !. *d"".I.* *.....). .%.ea ju Ti, w

o..

c..m ~ sue : w.,, e. ) AMSIENT CONOT TIONS Dew Point.*P 3 0* .yo AH,% Q.\\c. me, Ai, Coe,eWen. .,mm.4 so e's. A.</5wrf ees T.me,'P: surf. p Dew Test ..Dtv/ Wet c.g Seim Teme. . IhAe b ek. l... n Sein L M I oL M 'S ' bu.Too 30 % lb N % sin-N yL f } I } i l l i. l Ng ~l - I i i I uuxsNa nEcono ,,r. ut.:Q4y I I I in' ui.im Tim. &.,,_ m.,,. ",",,7 B4te No. i s.e.u.....i7.r..*P g% Time g p h l I Om Ianists I I Bat $No. y I

',d * "

I I b Tim. 9 l j o e. I stRA' u [ A 'd 5 .. l i i bui9 h'3elh i lA s l idIA I N hS. i i i I 1 i b'M!LNOA T I 1 bh 1 I .u I I l I i l mee.gc I 3% I i { INSPECTICN RECCROnu~ s...s: go \\. d. (,, o j e im. m. :: % mka.. on wh g4_.a cem-r T h, se. 4. wet 7.im ae( a r.m. w.i 1 o,y s a n,.. sasi,vm.... o.a I in.o.m cem.. I4.6 ... B 4W.I Wcel l3nl Ti,. w., I ory .__Ttt_html o... i 1 I 3.3 I _,_1;Tt.___ I 3.W,hgenI \\'Z. Ih 00 I i IM mo %.n twoci e32-J a - L'a An_Litml l'2 nI l

a>

I f6 %u.Iwm l*4.s I 13 3 i l l hthr.m is.c)1 4.m. A11Jira4

12. ni b h W. col l

AdOO

.'"O a e 2 '7 o coer m.0 ..L. L / s... 4 /. 4 Y N k 'T~- s = .m b.. y ( -00 AL* ,, g .g. ny ' h

1. 4t.1 i 4 9. ~

OETAIL.A.L .} TM L pg,2 T,1 Y8 b

f

~ # f3 /47 1 "**'O ~f-7_ 27 %" , f4 E Y / 4/9 g /cy norE *st, THK l.499 4 /.5 kP/ (SEE pcTe*l2 i i 4 g ~ MAC ACAdffq0 1

g. g,

,,j B 3M db /

y

/.395 g / 3 7G 1.382. (SM Nmd NOTES: (DF-329) (1) SEE SPECIAL BEND NOTES e (2) MIC. WELDING ALLOWED ON.375"W THK. OR LESS. (3A) MIC. WELDING LIMITED TO ROOT FASS ON ALL WALL THK. OVER.375"W THRU 1.500"W. (35) NO MIC WELDING ALLOWED OVER 1-1/2" WALL THK. (4) NO E-6010 ALLOWED. ($) FCAW LIMITED TO 1-1/2" WALL THK. AND LESS. ,(6) ALL SMOP WELDS REQUIRE "C" BORES. (7) DISTANCE BEIVEEN WELDS SMALL BE 2T + 4" OR 6", WHICHEVER IS CREATER. (0) FOR VEIS MAFFING, SEE PROCEDURE 2657 R/0 (9) CRIND ALL BW'S PER EF-8210 R/0 (10) TOTAL WEIGHT OF SF00L TO BE INCLUDED WITH OTHER MARKINGS ON SF00L.. IF TOTAL THEORETICAL VrtoMT EXCEEDS 10,000f, FIECE MUST BE WIICHED AND RECORDED.l (11) SILICA-CEL DESSICANT REQUIRED [ Mb b. (12) RECORD MEASURED MIN. WALL ON SPECIFIED MIN. WALL TTCS. AND FIFE-4 FIACES AT END-90*AFART AT ALL BW'S AND OPEN ENDS. (13) NOTIFY BECHTEL INSFECTOR FOR INSFECTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ATTER RDt0 VAL OF ALL TEMPORARY ATTACHMD('t$. .(j4),ATTMH GUPl*t.IER.s DEMTtod psPostTich) /CEGutS7" W/ 7-05N l,' d#J bT# # SOUTH TEXAS UNIT l' BECHTEL JOBd14926-001 SYSTEM 0 '26 5"l-l%

s0 MK:2C%99-ML-lool G A2. l-A

.or, $^,"[o*Pnar: PROC. EP-8212 R/0

NONE i

hat YES OR PT O.D. & ACCESSilLE I.D. OF ALL WELDS NOT R.T. EXAMINED & TEMPORARY ATTACH. AREAS Pt YES SEE MT Rf YES ALL GIRTH & LONG. 8W'88 ALL BRANCH TO HDR WELDS GREATER THAN 4" NPS. UT NO SURF PREP 50LVDfI CLp ($6PC-SP-1) My OIL OR GALA)E FR10R TO NEAR WH PmEMEAT NO, M/O BLAST ($$PC tF-10) PER AFFROVED FR0CEDURE 1002.NUC-83 R/1. ,,*j- ' 'EINORbANIC) Dl'tCTCOTE P6N TER APbdVED PROCEDURE 1002'.NUC-83 R/1.

w

va ots:mistioN

,, umt wT ova usit tot *L nisc {@T 8 'rt. A ALL BEVELS 371/2 / SAdto - wh c, exNs v. N ao mi res,e,- a,'ce L. e s s s k A' w 'c 2 3 6 0 z A r-EXAL sxe es xid 4/4 A /. So'b.o g oo 0.1 7s %u.w)tg E*LL ' W xdr C 7'?' 2So " / ?*fff *a ~71vt- /.2S'O "D= %.% A \\ f/M N /EL'df$00 Cr 2 7. i'se " Tu - i. 2 s o " A D //4. '.' Mis /. \\ h7"*B88 94'14 % L&W7 A' & 32'b.o. X300.D 6. 27&O ) I [*C,v'c 'fouk fE'D x 2eZG. %7'EdD M6C Abf.:.d'r A ' v w /s ' n s/ d. C = 2 9. 3 4 S '?.f's '- '. 7M, /. 3/ES'D = 2. VSo" d l ~ ' 70 'EMD MBE Cu-77.250 * .#/fo* ' 7~n'. t. 2 5~o " D = //z A N7"*c ' D 4817 SA ? c - 4 coc O.h73 % ) SE/S5 kcl ~-70 L-i Cl. ! utub (cas&y' y ' sforcM TESTCi 40*r 'G2 ' a\\ Lc'ss pgs n'c 23do LA7~- Q ERAL ' Evr# 'fS' M/l 5 M/^J ) LW ' PI f. 3 0.~0. n. 22 %". 2Md6 k C - 27. FC0".7"'86"s.'7a"~ s A250 "A R' r D-2,7 5 0 ". p'- M7 W 4up & ACu /. 32 offu' bdo P207Ec7Dd / 30" CftC\\/ Edl> EforE'~r0A 6 ~ C'C. ((. 7ti DE-323 .a M, A % nm ss a, r on .N # $ $' - p4"QC- \\ b $'y AErl5ED t'-de46 Cm WT PLO WTFTGW WT PMPE7 4\\8D @t' /M P e t. O.# 5% 4-(s. c. c.) /d TOTAL d ISSUED FOR FAB A. fgp M A S M E lil '2 (ISO EDIUC arv oAra cascaiPriom y my en 1874 WINYbY1975 G A

@. L s.io'o,'., %

^W*"" HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER FOUMNEST

/4 35-1187-8014

~ S W Oe W-'- ,Y,, _,, 7__; O 2 651. es l s nass ee..

MANIBCTURINGh._ CORD SHEET N CL 2 CARBON MRCOPY ig DATA, OPERATIONS,OR DOCUMENTATION N h S$F. & W. WELONG PROCEDURE (SHOW LINE NO. OF APP'

D. PROCEDURE

) l / / // 6 f).E Cpi 3 GTAW' 2 ,,s i t. 05 03 {d SMAW 3 sv gI GMAW 4 / ' 3 3 B$ SAW 5 " # N N / 7/g # do, / / 4o9// GTAW WIRE. 6 a 7 8 SMAW ELECTRODES 9 s / 10 11 M WRE' 12 y s / /2 /32. 12/32. 13 E SAW WIREe 5 s - / 40923' do 9 2.5-18 SAN MLUX f TYPE) 840 IT H ./ /3 *?S /37.5 wu e f, seu be a u u o>re m 2 IS / l NELD DOCUMENTATioPJ BYa' 19 / V Yu/s4% b/s4 Te 8/e?/54 7 l g Ei',5fEb% t 4-106 R/5 S/1 20 3 4!, Mouw e 4-108 R/4 El FIT UP 22 V V %5/4*** f es'f* b Grue La / ROOT PASS

R3 A

FINAL @D B4 / V / %/ss"U Te//48U 8h/gM / u g%jM PT-5 R/4 IB Y Y Y 808M*1 ,",,,,,eME : MT-3 R/5 37 / / V

W!,*.7.5 M'Jg8 UT-1 R/6_8/1 33 k g5 W ssvar : RT-10 R/7 ES / Y 1/ /

D'6# N %1** N NU MM illlALL CDECK OF 'C' OORE r a0 PREMEAT* 200 *F MIN 3l V v %4/8e %

/11/S4 %

Vo'th4 'fo ,'*anQ'sInuw

HT-P1-2 R/4 32 33 34 L*IL'*n% s 1 9 / V

%.Ws4 tr x* m,sdigu. : /o-/o/ @ as a aan gy E M i i CORRECTED nnn asefTATKIN ENTRY 8 N i 40 i g REPORTW NONDOWORMANCE 8 41 k %YWl"" 1 45 V W lhol84 4 OI *Ermis'sItam. min'apEinm7~' 8 41 Y / Mt///V g d' pro'*NRE NO. REY. BUPR E7 W PR0r*nt"E NO. REV. SUPR EP 8'i 1 i I, 01.01.030 1 ! 1 540 J S-103 3 S I l 01.01. 331 f I 54Q K T 0 '.0 '.037 l i 540 1. u I I'l O'.04 03i L 1 640 d U 0'.01.04U P 1 540 le i f - f l O'I.01.046 ,,3 1 540 jl: il in A J.lS.g.OO 6 4 1 1

rop _isj,.) COP b@ O-O O o o C E.8 E E c. 12. C =, L l I I 409 # 4 09// m._ 4//20941 t 4 l* ,/' A i W O 4692f de92.f 4092S' l) JI /37S /395 -/31G (W %4/h4 it i V

/ivos % %D4 % %M44 % 9/is/gs %

, tL . r r T,' ' te! A_ lyn V ac % 1 sv % ry *C % n* O %hsM 9s16s c. %%o % %/es'L %4/as% %1/os % %Me 4s tiivge 1. %Ms % t/isie s % t i 8" M SOUTHWEST FABRICATNG& WELDING CO. NC. R O. BOX 9449 HOUSTON. TEXAS 770ll 7t5 / 928 3451 AUTH.MSP. DATE 1E & QA. DATE $ < a *, v-F 1/1 e 7//w e, x ll4 PC. MK. 10. SHT. NO. REY. n.!, w. A. e*,,.. J u. J. i W. W.'7 s 2.- i ->v--w-- w- - -

anen (I QUESTIONS ON MATERIAL OR DIMENSIONS 9!E 4-d APPROVID BY QUt3T. NO. ASKED BY nAT* f/ 3O M 4 to S rEh P 1 Pi A> G U v D e2, SPecin c47,.o dkt RECD v1 CL@$ 30 /, 3 *? '5" Ae o a, 14/ 4 t t PIPE l Aus) /* 3 *) 5 " * +, t^' t~ n< s Pi r -r e-. c.!. WB hE AoLo14 A us u,r ~ o, wnut of

t. 3 s s " o us ALc fn a ai<< ricn>

a 7(ltM. 7WA A s h1/J

u. A L s-A.GY)ut 4 E ns L'% s-OP

/ o3 7s " o as Fr rri-G taA t.t. s. le] l n / n/e C-noite fea urge +evis fG7 BY BEOfTEL Ar/O /S!

2. +

ctov~ see 6o A.es. A A/ 6 L W iL/T 4 #61 O W'"T" oF L4,tL'>-af m MA L. 4isf Ld (J,0 ff RA.ts LA 4 e r'o /Amo MA+ + c7v' CSS

s <4.<r ~, < --,

'-d tL. o F' I8 3bSe L%$6 E fi,-f 6 YOust' 8di SU t, 44 t. 4.N L4,f't% S7.*J A~ts Ao vuSc if A u/s e c -rs/ lee ess e.e:s.t 74u .]n.3CS % vue dG pts % 17rs&,. l ftanme ILAnL f f=T G A 4 t w t ? $ (1 7 $ s )$ll'C/ ft LA*f IO **$ 0 (- A.ve EC- $ff es) k1LL ktM % 1llt5 \\[ Au {s 4 4 L/t g /F K W sj e M /^e 6 w a L S-W M e**En tJ ** o W e N #6/49Eg, ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS/ /NO3 DATf 7"U/*84 W ROVID BY ANSWER NO. ANSWERED BY SCJ/7"Wl NAS fMV/St.t'/8sC NC AWJM NAl A%memesrs fox 7De Mxw swnm & swr 7 Z4 men MMse,dl ZkA'+3 3#'. && Qu famir- _k Y//d. NAl f.,, $ 5 Q ll / A S / 7/ S h l Y $ $ $ $ k Nf / M,ris/ Wesm Pip /im //J Ysve WA ~/gmzist s,.1;ss ( 157 COPY RETAINED IN SOUTHWt$T (NGINttRING QUt1 TION FILE JOB 1lTLl4/2@f WN M 2ND COPY: RETAINt0 BY COMPANY AN$wtRING QUt$TIONS YOUR P.O. NO. M"II D 7

UI O 3RD CO*Yt stTVAN 70 50VTHwt1T OR33 ADDat15 SIDt OUn gyq. y LI

_,m

f . g CALCULATION COVER SHEET

== ~ 'co,gCT STJ'u TE '! 44 M *WW \\ l som no_ IM 2 4 -0 2,' suggT or SueJECT l' ' " I C'E # 'd

W "Y ~ E T'# t' I' /' i# F#

l~f I4 LDS TOTAL NO. Or SNEETS I FILE NO. N/A calGIN ATOR 500. OlSCIPLINE P59'r DATg gage. no,f t J f 741 ff ff /).I CHECMER SLG. 4 DATE OU ALITY CL ASSIF. I RECORD OF ORIGIN AL ISSUE AND REVISIONS "," V - l REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE ORIG CNR OL OS CHIEF o o f C75 '/.?) A#1b A'.O-9TEb FCP. UiE 2 ltCl1P b.'/ A II/rA (M SMr/ N/A V = RESULTS OF CHECKER REVIEW O,9IO' ITEM DESCRIPTION yg j FIN AL RESULT NUMERIC AL OtFFERENCES INITI A L h ARE E SIGNIFIC ANT; NO CORRECTIONS b NECESS A R Y DATE .*yg FIN AL R ESU.T NUptRIC A L OlFFER *NCES INITI A L SiONIFIC ANT. NECESS ARY COR!tEC= = i NS H AVE BEEN M ADE. DATE g INITI AL CHECM M ADE BY ATTACHED ALTERNATE CALCULATIC48. DATE C O M M i T,T E D This calculation is for Unit 1;OUnit2: QUnits1&2 U.));Fmtl t J t), [t1\\10 ( CM.1 I:. /L:: As)EL M l.'ltJ 1~El la

T.* - OT E /. IA -/ t/ I/,5 f, Af !/s '#1'h WH1$

'. ','/ *. PldI AQ) C'/ ;.G /.1!.4.E f, '.' ?.T. r. L '. h 'i

t )

f 1 t, t! T C,F.'V.t) "" I ' '~-5 ST5/ P L)/4f H rs' LMts F4CM 7$'s ef# LW,is eM'. G E 'l.') L 11 W l. JRTH %E L et4, Fr >ts TFC U l (, q- :: n' : I.2 ~) D',

1C C f.: 5M2 y:.4I'*CV.Me:s), ;;TUCr).S.1, % \\M s : n. :.

Y l ' u;; t.. '.'.. w.....,,..

F d CALCULATION TITLE SHEET M::;tlM. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 Plant Desien 9 MAIN STEA't LINFS INSIDE A'm OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT ,,g,,,, ,y;je cy STP-MS STEA'1 HAT. !ER ANALYSIS C A Lt. mo. ",IO, cua'LIYv CLassw' 0 ~ 6:icinatos sie. ' sAva \\ // //// c 3 13 P

d. sh?.

eAva me. Last eats CMscusa sis. Sheet i of it o s svawaii nto o ORIGIN AL. lSSUE ACTeoM Maws eso o eats sismAtuns /f[Mf9 bNUff/ R. Gashu Approval emoveLaassa /-I-) I/C 4. [.[1.#' ?...e S. Mohamed Approval es ///3 h //[. ). '(/ Af J. Lee Review ysceAList / 1{!f3 b% L. R. Brown Aporoval_

CMig, etmse RECORD OF REVISIONS en osvision eats swa.

can et es se s c. cwie r A ( >\\ 7\\ ^ A O Issue to project for itsplementation in the design. O h t. A

uo. inn CALCULATION SHEET CALC. NO.STP-M S IO D SIGNATURE DATE CHECKED DATE s \\ PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 JOB NO. SUBJECT MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS II SHEET OF 11 SHEETS 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Description Page s 8

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1 7 2.0 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 3 8 3.0 METHOD OF ANALYSIS 5 4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYSIS 8 'O 5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 9 6.0 COMPUTER RUNS LOG 12 82

7.0 REFERENCES

13 13 Appendix A - Stress Isometrics and Input Data Al Appendix B - Results of Main Steam Lines MS-01 and MS-02 Inside Containment Analysis B1 Appendix C - Results of Hain Steam Line MS-03 Inside Containment Analysis C1 to Appendix D - Results of Hain Steam Line MS-04 Inside Containment is Analysis D1 to Appendix E - Results of Main Steam Lines outside Containment 21 Analysis El 22 Appendix F - Reference Material F1 24 2$ 26 21 2s e 30 i 31 ' 32 33 34 3S 34

u,, t CALCULATION SHEET CALC. NO STP-MS D SIGNATUR E DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT SOUT TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 JOB NO. l I 13 MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET OF SHEETS SUBJECT 1 2 1.0 INTRODUCTIO:I 3 This report prepared by the Plant Design Staff of Bechtel Power Corporation, 4 s Los Angeles Power Division, for South Texas Project describes the analysis performed to determine the dynamic structural response of the main steam a 7 piping systems. The analysis evaluates effects of the steam hammer loadings e resulting from closure of the turbine stop valves. s The analysis described in this report covers each main steam line piping 10 system from the steam generator to the turbine stop valves. Dynamic load-11 12 ing on the piping systems can be induced during a turbine trip event by 13 a sudden closure of the turbine stop valves which are located in the tur-14 bine valve chest. Closure of these valves creates pressure and momentum )is transients throughout the piping systems, resulting in a significant time-varying force at points of the piping system direction change (elbows) is 17 until steady-state flow is achieved. is e The purpose of the analysis reported herein is to evaluate the maximum is dynamic response, i.e., stresses, displacements, support reactions and so 21 nozzle loads in the subject piping systems due to the steam hammer loadings. Transient dynamic force histories were generated (Reference 1) and applied j 22 6 23 to the piping systems. The response of the piping systems was then evaluated by developing a three-dimensional structural model and perform-24 as ing a dynamic time-history analysis. The worst case loading was assumed to occur for the condition of simultaneous closure of all four stop valves as as in the main steam supply system. as as Section 2.0 of this report dcscribes the configuration and important 3e parameters of the main steam supply system. Section 3.0 provides a 31 general description of the analytical approach used. Details of the }u analysis assumptions and procedures are discussed in Section 4.0, and 32 the results are discussed in Section 5.0. 34 35 36 c , cc >

r ~ " " " CALCULATION SHEET CALC.NO STP-MS I\\\\OlY3 CHECKED DATE SIGNATURE DATE 6 g 001 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. PROJECT MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET OF SHEETS SUBJECT In summary, the displace:nents and stresses of the main steam supply 1 system under the steam hammer loadings are found to be well within the 2 3 acceptable design limits. 4 is noted that the results presented herein should be combined with It those obtained for other applicable simultaneous loading cases and 6 evaluated for compliance with relevant criteria in the ASME Section III __ ? -Code (Ref erence 2), and the PSAR/FSAR of the South Texas Project. e e 10 11 12 13 14

IS i.

17 10 19 20 31 32 23 3e 2S to 37 ft 30 at ,32 33 34 3% t D L

r- ~""" CALCULATION SHEET cat.C NO. STP-MS O O SIGNATURE DATE-CH5CKED DATE ' PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 JOB NO. SUBJECT MSL STEAM RAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET 3 I3 OF SHEETS 1 2 2.0 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 3 8 The main steam piping system for the South Texas Project consists of four s (4) main steam lines designed for the primary function of delivering a steam from the steam generators to the turbine. The piping systems 7 under consideration, support locations and orientations are shown on the a following drawings supplied by the South Texas Projects s 80 (A) Hain Steam System MS-01 Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0505-2 si is (B) Main Steam System MS-02 Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0506-5 '3 (C) Main Steam System MS-03 Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0507-4 14 (D) Hain Steam System MS-04 Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0503-2 )1s n (!) Composite Piping - Isolation valves Cubicle, Plan at E1. 50'-0", Area 11, Drawing No. SG-15-9-P-0054, Rev. 0, (Appendix F) i, is (l') Hain Steam Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0004-F, Sheet 2 (C) Hain Steam Bypass (MS-2) Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0005-L, Sheet 1 M (11) Hain Steam Bypass (MS-3) Stress Isometric No. 1-R-0006-1, Sheet 2 3, 82 (I) Piping Fabrication Drawing Nos. 20369P-MS-1001, Sheet 3, Rev. 11 83 20369P-MS-1002, Sheet 2 Rev. Il 20369P-MS-1003, Sheet 3 Rev. 1: 84 and 20369P-MS-1004, Sheet 3 Rev. 1 n M Pipe properties and support stiffnesses used in the computer model were at also supplied by the South Texas troject (References 6 and 7). M Analysis of each main steam l'ine was divided into two independent problems, M 30 separated by an anchor-containment wall penetration. The two different 31 problems are 38 33 34 M D

CALCULATION SHEET CALC. NO. STP-MS \\O D 'Y SIGNATUR E DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. 14926-001 SU8 JECT MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSYS SHEET 4 OF 13 SHEETS 1 3 (A) Main steam line inside the containment building, from the steam 3 generator to the containment wall penetration. 4 s (B) Main steam line outside the containment building, from the con-a tainment wall penetration to the turbine stop valves including 7 bypass lines to the condenser. e e Since the layout of the main steam line MS-02 inside the containment is 18 a mirror image of the main steam line MS-01 layout with identical pipe H support types and locations, only one dynamic analysis using higher el steam. hammer forces was performed for those two piping systems. 13 14 } L to 17 le 10 30 39 33 23 34 31 M 37 29 M 30 at 33 33 i M 6 i M

CALCULATION SHEET l$ / CALC. NO. STP-MS )} U M u iO f M I SIGN ATUR E N DATE CHECKED DATE SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 PROJECT JOB NO. MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SUBJECT. SHEET 5 op_ 13, SHEETS 1 3.0 METHOD OF ANALYSIS 3 The analysis to obtain the structural response of the main steam piping 4 system following the sudden closure of the four turbine stop valves a consists of the thermal hydraulic analysis (Reference 1) to obtain force histories acting on the piping system, and dynamic structural analysis to determine response to these transient forces. Since the distortion s of the piping is relatively small, the interaction between the struc-tural response and the fluid forces is not significant, and the overall analysis can be performed in two distinct phases - thermal hydraulic and structural analysis. i3 The method of analysis consists of the following stepst ,4 )is (A) Development of thermal-hydraulic model of the system. 17 (4) Performance of the thermal-hydraulic analysis using program CAFT to determine transient state histories at discrete locations throughout the piping system. It (C) Integration of the transient state histories to develop force 3, histories applicable to different sections of the piping systems. 33 24 (D) Development of a lumped mass structural model of the piping system. 27 (E) Utilizing program HE-101 to perform the structural dynamic analysis of the system with forces developed in Step (C). 30 Steps (A), (D) and (C) above comprise the thernal-hydraulic analysis 3, phase discussed in Reference 1. Steps (D) and (E) comprise the struc-3, tural analysis phase which is discussed in the following subsection. 33 34 Ss 34 ) C Y.--

r + LA0 0,18 &f 3 CALCULATION SHEET STP-MS CALC,NO SIGNATURE d DATC W D O CHECKED DATE \\ \\ s PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS 6 13 SUBJECT SHEET op SHEETS 1 2 3.1 Method of Structural Response Analysis 3 In order to evaluate the dynamic structural response of the main 5 steam lines due to t'ne transient steam hamer forces, a time-a history analysis was performed. The time-history analysis is based 2 upon the normal mode superposition method using a closed form inte-c gration technique for the evaluation of the responses associated 8 with each mode. A finite element model consisting of lumped masses 80 connected by three-dimensional elastic piping elements was developed H to represent the struct2ral piping system. The lumped masses cor-12 respond to the data points which were located at carefully selected 83 locations in order to adequately represent the dynamic behavior of '8 the system, and the beam elements were provided with elastic pro- ') perties equivalent to the actual elastic properties of the pipe. Is The time var / ng forcing functions, representing the transient i thermal-hydraulic forces developed as described in Reference 1, were is it applied at the locations of direction changes in the piping model 20 (elbows and tees). Location and direction of these forces is sche-21 matica11y illustrated by arrows in Figures A2, A4, A6, A9 and A16 22 representing forces on MS-01, MS-02, MS-03, MS-04 and MS-Comen, 23 respectively. Each of these forces represents the net unbalanced I 24 force per pipe segment between two elbows. A positive value indi-i 25 cates a force acting on the pipe in the direction opposite of the 26 steady-state flow (Reference 8). 21 2s Bechtel's proprietary program HE-101, References 3 and 4, was used se to perform the dynamic time-history analysis. A description of the 30 program features is covered in the User's Manual listed in Appendix 21 F. Finite element modeling proceduro allows to write the equations 32 of motions of the system as a finite set of the following sinul-33 taneous ordinary differential equations se 39 36 =

uo.u s ons CALCULATION SHEET CALC, NO. STP-MS DATE - M Tb U CHECKED DATE-SIGNATURE 14926-001 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. PROJECT 7 I3 HSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET OF SHEETS SUBJECT 1 2 HU(t) + C6(t) + Ku(t) = F(c) 3 where M, C and K are the system mass, damping and stiffness 4 matrices, respectively, and F(t) is the time dependent vector 5 s of the externally applied loads. U(t), 6 (t) and u(t) are the structural system time dependent vectors of acceleration, velocity 7 e and displacement, respectively. The solution to the above equa-tions is based upon the normal mode superposition method. A e description of the procedure of the integration method is pre-to 11 sented in Reference 4. 12 13 14 }15 i 17 10 19 to 21 22 23 24 21 26 27 2s 30 31 31 33 34 35 34

CALCULATION SHEET CALC. NO STP-MS DATE \\ O O 1 W CHECKED DATE SIGNATURE 14926-001 PROJECT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. 0 13 MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET OF SHEETS SUBJECT 2 4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYSIS 3 i The lumped mass structural model of each main steam line is shown on the s following figures: 7 MS-01 Figure A1 - Inside Containment a MS-02 Figure A3 - Inside Containment s MS-03 Figure A5 - Inside Containment l MS-04 Figure A7 - Inside Containment 80 H MS - Common Figures A9 through A15-Outside Containment 13 These figures show the piping layout of each system, location of the i4 structural nodes (lumped masses) and location of supports for the piping gis's systems. The integration time step for the time-history analysis was i 37 selected to be fine enough to include accurately the structural response i to t;he highest f requency components noted in the load history. For all is piping systems inside the containment building, a time step of.001 seconds was used, which is considered to be accurate for evaluation of ao structural modes with maximum f requency of 125 cps. Similarly, for the 3, main steam lines outside the containment building, a time step of.00164 22 second was used which is considered to be accurate for structural modes 33 with maximum frequency of 76 eps. The structural response was analyzed 24 for a minimum duration of 1.7 seconds and 7.5 seconds for piping located inside and outside the containment, respectively. 3 27 Since in all cases the transient shock loads reached a steady-state condi-tion at much earlier time, it was reasonable to expect that no significant excitation of the system could occur after the time period analyzed; and 3a that the structural response has been accurately obtained. 3, 32 For all analyses, a critical damping value of two percent was used for all 33 modes of piping system vibration. This is based on the recommendations 34 35 of Regulatory Guide 1.61 (Reference 6). 36 _w__ n_____.___._

m... n...

CALCULATION CHEET CALC, NO STP-MS SIGNATURE Id d DATE- \\0 U CHECKED DATE

PROJECT _.

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 14926-001 JOB NO. SUBJECT MSL STEAM H/MIER ANALYSIS 9 13 SHEET OF SHEETS 1 2 S.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 3 4 The results of the dynamic structural analysis of the main steam lines 5 are presented in the following appendices: 6 7 MS-01 and MS-02 Appendix B s MS-03 Appendix C e MS-04 Appendix D so MS - Common Appendix E II 12 From the time-history analysis of each main steam line, the maximum pipe 13 displacements, stresses at all nodal points, support and anchor reactions 14 were obtained and are summarized in Tables B.1, C.1, D.1 and E.1 for gis MS-01 and MS-02, MS-03, MS-04 and MS - Common, respectively. ) 16 17 To facilitate a realistic ccmbination of the containment penetration lo, ads from both sides, the following figures provide the time dependent is is load plottings for each penetration reactions: 20 21 Penetrations M3 Figures B2 through B7 22 Figures E2 through E7 l 23 Penetration M2 Figures B2 through B7 24 Figures E8 through E13 l 2s Penetration M4 Figures C2 through C7 as Figures E14 through E19 27 Penetration M1 Figures D2 through D7 rs Figures E20 through E25 [ n so Caution should be taken in combining the penetration loads because two 31 different global coordinate systems were used in modeling the main steam 32 lines inside and outside the containment building according to drawings as provided by the project. 34 35 The peak responses of the main steam piping systems are summarized below: as

[1 CALCULATION SHEET STP-MS CAL.C. NO kO O CHECKED DATE l SIGN ATUR E DATE \\ t SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PROJECT JOB NO. MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SUBJECT SHEET OF SHEETS 1 2 MS-01 and MS-02 Maximum displacement is.0434 inch in the -y direction at data 4 point CO2E, 5 Maximum pipe stress is 1860 psi at data point 54, Maximum support reaction is 24,434 lbs at data point 18A 7 e e MS-03 Maximum displacement is.043 inch in the -y direction at data point CO2E, l 12 Maximum pipe stress is 1382 psi at data point IB, f ,3 l Maximum support reaction is 18,445 lbs. at data point 33A. 18 g15 / 1e MS-04 17 Maximum displacement is.0446 inch in the -y direction at data point CO2E, 19 Maximum pipe stress is 1444 psi at data point IB, 3 Maximum support reaction is 20,064 lbs. at data point 33A. 21 22 23 MS - Common Maximum displacement is.831 inch in the -y direction at data / point 183, r ? 2s Maximum pipe stress is 7215 psi at data point 940,

s Maximum support reaction is 58,472 lbs. at data point 938.

/ The above maximum responses are considered to be within acceptable design so limits for the system; however, in order to get a complete evaluat'.on, 31 the results reported herein should be combired with other applica' ole 32 33 concurrent loadings being considered for the system in accordance with 34 the South Texas Project PSAR and FSAR. 35 U

LA3 9913 673 CALCULATION SHEET CALC. NO.STP-MS \\b CHECKED DATE M DATE SIGNATURE 14926-001 I SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. PROJECT ll MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET OF .__ SHEETS SUBJECT 1 Some selected response time-history plots of displacements, accelerations and support reactions are presented in Figures B8 through B13 for MS-01 3 and MS-02, in Figures C8 through C11 for MS-03, in Figures D8 through D14 for MS-04 and in Figures E25 through E29 for MS - Common. They all indicate that the maximum response occurs well within the time duration 6 for which the analysis was performed. y a From discussion with mechanical group, the cteam hammer transient loads I on branch lines from bypass line 24" MS-1013-HC on isometric Nos. ,o 1-R-0004-F and 1-R-0005-L are insignificant during the transient period under consideration. Therefore, those branch lines were not included in the time-history analysis. ,3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 e 28 30 31 32 33 34 O

n.n CALCULATION CHEET ~ CALC. NO-1 \\ \\O D CHECKED DATE SIGNATURE DATE 14926-001 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. PROJECT SUBJECT MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET 12 op 13 SHEETS 1 2 6.0 COMPUTER RUNS LOG 3 4 5 CALCULATION PROGRAM DATE 7 g 0 s 7 MS-01 & MS-02 Time-ME-101 NA 755 10/26/83 s Insida Cont. History e MS-01 & MS-02 Post Run ME-101 NA 771 10/27/83 'O Inside Cont. It MS-03 Time-ME-101 NA 756 10/26/83 2 Inside Cont. History 13 Post Run ME-101 NA 788 10/27/83 14 s de Cont. } 15 -101 M 778 10/27/83 '8 s e Cont. H tory 17 8 ~ ^ 1s s e Cont. 19 MS - Common Time-ME-101 X 7129 11/8/83 20 Cutside Cont. History 21 Post Run ME-101 X 9094 11/9/83 22 oe e, 23 24 25 26 i 27 28 29 30 31 32 - 33 34 35 3G

CALCULATION CHEET CALC. NO STP-MS \\O % CHECKED DATE SIGNATURE DATE g SOUDI TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO. PROJECT I3 MSL STEAM HAMMER ANALYSIS SHEET _ OF SHEETS SUBJECT 1 2

7.0 REFERENCES

3 4 1. Mechanical Discipline, LAPD, " South Texas Project Transient Analysis of Main Steam Line due to Valve Closure" dated October 20, 1983. s 6 1 2. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III. s Bechtel User's Manual ME-101 " Linear Elastic Analysis of Piping System", e 3. 1o Rev. J4-28, 6/20/83. it 12 4. Theoretical Manual ME-101 " Linear Elastic Analysis of Piping System", 13 Rev. 4, Nov. 1982, 14 T15 5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants", Ragulatory Guide 1.61, October 1973. / 16 11 is 6. South Texas Project " Criteria for Piping Design" 5LO19PS004, Rev. 2, dated 5/12/83. is e 20 21 7. South Texas Project " Piping Stress Analysis Criteria" 5L010RQ1002, Rev. 1, dated 9/2/83. 22 23 8. Memorandum from K. C. Chiang of Mechanical Group to S. A. Mohamed, dated 24 25 October 27, 1983. 26 27 28 = 29 3o 31 32 ) 33 34 3b 30

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO,14926 CALCULATION SHEET cai.c wo. 5lWUE EuME /Al ME 100 '72 M' "I& TR/P sunET No. sueenCT REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKfR OATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE Mt VN//f M 6It4 1 ?URPb5E To cAlcw ATE 'P/Evruke Succ+4 /AV MkdrM4M RAfE.C cspus&.h My' 574&4 h'M fM rcR P U E > % R E M /F M/7. ( M a C+c p tmlx C(+2 mu.), e K4Feki>lc c c/1Lcal/ tit =Al SS/a y H'c 56 A' 7, atJ. o, M4swJ7 e ,4A/4Ly. cts of Mhtd Ji?fH L ix/ E 2 0 E T o VALl/G 8/ CLOSUR E to 11 C/flCUL87/* Al.* 13 irgCE /M P/Frr /S J b$ a a. AE kf6X/HuAf AEeK o J*EET t[ is @ P!h? RotJ 16 . (RE? 7/4 J l m n .P/,ct-ab = 3 o -l = /. J 7T , J,n = 27. 2 3' ~ opetenug pa +sswte = ttoc Pct c 20 pgEJrdRG SUE 6E 3: ./.j P = A f p7.atf - I = 23 as tat 6L (P % C,) fM SSkRE v l 10 0 + dd l'44 PS r-P = ~ /a 3. ~ 30 31 32 33 34 as 3s STP 1310 (7/ eel

LAC 0983673 CAL.C'.)L./.T.0N CHECT u,(e, gg 95 f o ff,(c-f(7 CHECKED,f@J / sl:. [l2.i (* /,'l // [ A e,- /8- '#*# StG.'JATUI.E - DATE DATE ( $ 7 ;) j da,(,. c/ PROJECT JOB NO. i,',' '.' 'r. SUOJECT__ vs 1,. : 1 2 Co D e~ 4 ( s 5 4 y 6 ~ C ! (; 4 ? e k 3 7 .g / S 0 */ ? $~~ t e R 3 C J no ~ 4 II f 2? q w t. 12 s A g. 0 k 13 y g* '( b a w .( 4 Ql u (" i L 1 4 Em w qe.4 4 17 a ~ ? Q ~s = 1e 8 '8 w is u

s NT(s 30 j

2, .l EE .g. tri ,f s s M I N m' g 27 % I w. n N ~ G a N w N u' s ( f M N N

uo.eis e,a [ C,~ 1.C ULATION E'.iEET egqq,eg P - b DATE / ') - ' O - # I W DATE ' SIGN ATUR E CHECKED, ( .c - ) /.$ 0 7 (, - 0 O l PROJECT JOB NO. oenf,ee./ e,41/i/ I c / Ma u. 5 / c e e. - SitEET _ 70 OF //8 St!EETS SUBJECT ,,,,, n:,, s. w i, s < i. ..e 1 2 e. w 3

Y o,l b

A ,I / l k 4 &n ~' c l.' g s e. c. t 1 7-q C 'll ,a = t 4 ic Q ? e n s y <.S o 4, 34 e

k 5

i2 -t A_ x n qs a M D' sk I (a q'/ / u

x n t

k s 16 'O eD ^~ l r u g 1,/ r6 f g)j j 18 k y g( is S 4 20 [ M 21 .h s g 23 l 'N 24 \\ 25 e. 26 21

t.

L l.- i 29 Oc/ I 3a i l di s' ( 33 \\ = \\ \\ 3s

LAO M83&F3 C/.LCUL.ATai.. N E'.4'~'eT y p g pg7 g DATE 'I~#'- II CllECI'.ED l' ATE. # - SIGtlATUR E 3 # *.:. /./ 9 ?/ - o o / PROJECT JO B

0. -

7/ //2 SHEETS -" *" M! ' ' ' <' "/ / o ** - SHCET__ /I ' I' " #'t 7 ' * ' ' ' '. ' '#

in.

OF SUBJECT r ;,., t .s re P M6 2 er-eo n~ ..l s I g O 5 o Q R A$* k ~ 3 s e m 3 1 g pj ' Y e 5 n t l r u g l = 0 y e so 4 l 3 11 %i 5 A u% i l' 6'E. L *S % k U Q A ( is g " X k is % / C tm r; .s u~ Q1 17 \\ g u-4y t i.

s. es

.l ao +3S m 21 I 22 -s k 23 E" 25 N 27 M Y ,*c 2. 3o ~ ~., ' L 31 'O ~~ L ( 32 23 M M .~

, y, - s.ao eeis sra CALCUL?,TIOII SMEET cAn.c.No31/*VV'A7 SIGNATL/RE ! DATE /" '#~ # 3 I ~ CHECKED, D4TE PROJECT 5 Il' JOS NO. /#f70-O## h/t!I I'.,8 ' ' / d' " # A " '. / r IV fIf U

f#^'

' SHEET 78 OF- // 8 _ SHEETS SUBJECT I f f r.. .- f v.

/c-5 */L b

y s, a s' n$ 11 \\ j \\j f 5 l s, v / / t.- 6 w i ( s.si u g' %y 4.' \\ l , b,.. \\ 10 \\' '? s/ p- ' NIf ' l ~l;. ?' N- / - 's n y% p. -\\ e ~ '\\y n l s l't '\\~ ?s'. sa

y,,,

u b.'y y e , z r r 33 pj. p,g "cg C \\ i Z'N i ( i W V ,., 1/ = s t 4 P/,D NQ --- 3C j IN1 [ / > u w / .A - t is v'4 (- s ' s g a c. / k' ( \\,s M/ %., I M '/ p/ n. u o^ j4 (A t2. i7" % w g 21 l' 4' C f k I q j }\\ s.< 22 Q1 _2 '/ Z j , gg Q~% \\ N> b C 1 23

t t

~ 5; ~ su \\. p eg \\,' 25 N \\ 's?. h g l \\., * 'a / n d. \\ 3 Y / A l t g N \\- 4 }', s%* 3

3 v

\\ ,..a -.c oz i = m O P /

f.,

M W bb. -( l + 2, cA l ~ ( y tr p." 32 \\m g, 1 g T a, / > m ./

O 9 C. ( STP MAIN STEAM STEAMHAMMER m CASE =1 PIPE RUN NO. 16

c. O g9 LINKU618 (XRUNU=0.00 FT).

LINKO418 (XRUNDwl03.00 F T) O. w" o O'S z 5. om W O . C. 9 C. C. + .uz O 8 8 \\ g O U O O i tv- ? OO O- ? O O -V a,- 9 fg. Aff'fM7,g f., $4) M KuTuv p~)Jy.Jip SHEET ute.m f5 C C 8 a. ser10.7 s. n c.c-( mncr sro ,cer;a a s :.,,i vi,, y _ e, l 'l$ ,b".',?;' ' 'f f ' U' '- N'.to.i*<.Y. 0.00 2'O.00 4O.00 6'O.00 8'O.00 l'00 00 1'20.00 TIME IN MILLISECONDS

10' u

j t l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET cas.cmo. M__ /c; SEE THE COVER SHEET l ( mav. onioimaron oars cuscusa oars new. onioimaton oars cuscusa nave 4 Yki W 9lI1(W &n 10-V W i 8 4.8 SUPPORT JAIA.

SUMMARY

e 7His VALuE WAS es r/ud Tf D /'6@ PKELiw'H49 4al' pow f DCf(Gr/ CALCMiA Tisd. 3< 4 OATA. Uj PIPE PIPE OPER INS. MATERIAL STIFFNESS REF. 0 PT. DIR SUPT. MARK NO. k SIZE SCH. TEMP Tur tr.A 2 se Mbtf aso((, z 30 80 SC7 3 utn-ect-70 4.0E E *

7. Z 4 l

6.0 e 5 *

t. 24 e

gggg gg \\ 59 6 Ni l.366,

7. 5-e 84 stNeo EA9

-HL5co$ 7.83 4 0 5 7

f. f.4 S6 ML50c7 4

38A v,v, 2 M {S y 5PD wLTUo 8 a

f. 36f F. F ZSA LAT.

. 4 LED 0 6 d.38 5Z ef 7.74 62A Y M - +4L5 0 04 O dOA X fAP uLFooS f.3E6 f.F S 8 AfA y Sro HL5017 f.3$034164 2.Z4 0 4 (, )( EAP - +4 LS60 4 m A5 2 RAD ML5Do? 8 0 4 1 1 4

4. 3 6 G

2. T u[

AA 4.5G s 7..r e ' prss i. % G B '32 80 567 3" wrr-r es-70 / A c s s. u c m i ALL Auc ST. 'N. An f t ts LC s 1 C C-C 3 o t E. : r.O E S m i Ates !9EC 7 as t a f AA : f.5767 '/. f 5 m 45 s I.37E7 l m 30 f67 5" sAin.ns-704 a t ). %~7 G 7 a 60 A LL. Ant c.uT. Pe4. Mb Ae4:e.szc.e a AR6 8 blE$ = t at = g >ze o M, - M SEE. 6, A M F 4 AL Act J u# 77<W5 !478 6 3 (m liuusturu rtut ssue J INFOR dA MON ( NLY m $TD 440gR a sw awmeal

.tv 0 aci% svo.s I mvt C oal C er t a i O '+T E _/ d w aI dt h N//7/4# l MW 10 9 4 STRESSS CAL. NO.: M, SHT. CE .e Ic ar, e C e = > sp - e - t-n wneew*O en mene- ~ =*>-> N = Q nonco en* O e-eno e e-- n engen C. . m. O. O.. ~.

. N w* e m.

9. O. w.

. e. .n.o.n.o.. .. O. w -n = 2 n n n e

=

a e wo e e e e a e e e e e e e e e 4 w e4 >2> Mocacem e=>vne-een oma come>O= enwenn wo e knoc nc-mmme ne-nne NN w n r-e eOe-On O. u. O.e - e - e o. O. c. o. c. o. c. o. . m. o. m. O. O. O. . O. m e e e-e E. . n.. n. o... O. m. o. m. o. m. o. w w e e-e -e*. u enenene e*e-e-e 4 w a e - a e-e o e. Ow nnwee no owne ne ecke wm menn e eman O -en-n -m nnne -n enec -w Owom O cwOm .. O. n. n. e. e. O. w.. c. o. m. o. o s.. e. C. o. o. C... n. o. n. o. . o.. c. o. e. O. w e e e -e-e -e-e e e 4 Q C LAJ E =w w-Onkom C000000 0000000 0000000 000d000 E 3 ap. C%4 e -n >>nn CC =J CF3 >w ew0m e e-ecco gn 2, y a nn0 e= C3 v= w -en L&J CJ Z EE" O & + E/3 W = -

=
seg

'.s E On> wne OOOOOOO O O O 0' 0 O O O O O O O O O' O'O O O O O O W >= 2> a cem enn 3 enannOe 2 aen>neO CC - encon C .J eennn g p.- e e e an B m iE s o N Z E weeOecn O000000 0000000 0000000 0000000 = sc e>wo-w-N neOmwen ennecem OOOe --n e O. n ees e e e I N m enmogen COOmenn C000000 ecOweck OOOnnOO nwemene nn>> nn nn-- COwe ecken-n ecww Ce conc >>ce n. no-ne me>> n-e v an - e -- a --nn v 9 ec= e e - n. n n. E e e e e e .a. 2 e ens w y> am co-cO*> 0000000 0C00000 0000000 COOppec O O p e-O OzOeOO-Weem .O owne>> w e w e. m. m. o .we e -- e n a e 4 e e 8 t a, a o O C O O Ng ggowgn COOggCO g C000000 g g o c.; g 3 m e.e w e n wm Oh conc > >>ce E..- .enm meme n-e,c-e -- >w ,em-e a . ~# a -en-e e c 43 $9 N e 4 { W N ens

a n

N we8 l O2.nc4 0 M M 4m O-a E E O4=U* e E2&2 42&2 E2&2 E2&2 't2t2 ^ JE-n& O O&2>>>> 0& O4 > > > e-O& 0& > > > e-as a I N ens w.J.J k3 ens w J J a3 w w.J.J kI w w.J J aI w w.J.J 2 Na O CaameDD CaaeeDD DeaeeDD CameeDD CaaeeDD 4 and ens a >004&44 >00&&44 >00&&44 >00&&44 > 0 0 & 4 as as a 2 2 2 3 3enem 12233hm 2 2 2 3 3 en m Z2233ha 3 2 2 D D em a en ens ans en# U O O O O a en 2 4 4 as as >E 4 4 e e a a u ens u ens ens.J eJ 7 e a O 4 4 e w 4 > O O ens as e- > n n e

== a m e o da > & & D.J Q

SMY b NPS INDUSTRIES, INC. CORS Na {g,,g Q g* COMPONENT SUPPOtT PAGE_ ? OF 9 000 on npo group company CERTIFIED DESIGN REPORT SUVMARY rey 0 nATE 8-1-83 S Section ..Jucts covered by thio Certified Design Repht S mmary cr...c' ded in of N PS Industr)i s', hel g, g g 8p. ph 02 sign Level C/D e 1 g side load - snubbb sue - I d 'e L l1600 l 5500 12 LOO Size No. 40 70 150 500 Min. C-C 18-1/2 21-5/16 24-3/8 30-1/8 34-3/8

50-5/16 66-3/16 SMA*

(in) (in) 11-1/8 13-5/16 16-1/8 20-1/4 22-7/8 31-9/1 6 42-3/16 SMF C-C 1.995/ 10 .53/.6 .93/1.05 2.25 6.65/ 1.995/ j5 /.6 .93/1.05 7.25 7.5 21./24. 20 1.995/ 6.65/ 67.5/ 30 .53/.6 .93/1.05 2.25 7.5 21./24. 82.5 1.9! 5/ 6.65/ 67.5/ 163./ 40 ,53/.6 .93/1.05 2.25 7.5 21./24. 82.5 187.5 1.995/ 6.bb/ 67.5/ 163./ ~ 50 j.53/.6 .53/1.05 2.25 7.5 21./24 82.5 187.5 1.995/ TT6/ 67.5/ 163./ 60 ,.53/.6 .93/1.05 2.25 7.5 21./23.2/ 82.5 187.5 1.995/ 5.eb/ 163./ C6 53/.6 .93/1.05 2.25 7.5 187.5 63b/ 67.5/ 163./ 70 7.5 20.8 31.1 187.5 6.65/ 67.5/ 163./ l 6.7 17.8 1 79.2 187.5 80 163./ 83 5.70 IF7.5 ~ I il 14.7 g ' 5/ 163./ r t 12.3 I 73.8 '_112 4 } 100 67.5/ 163./ 70.9 _j 1p7.g f 110 !163./ 120 67.2 _ _ 1R7 A s 'I i d '\\ f rt IW n'a i'll I h n i;Ti tin;h l fsh JOB 1@26 cN cfc s %?oh l l I N l\\

A l-F e.

P/l 1 j

lbx. C-C QS-1/2 21- /16 Bi-3/8 30-1/8l 31-3/C 50-5/16 (6-M )SMF f

1 Length (in) 65 g 86 100 l 120 ~120 Ql'. ~ I

SitA Min. C-C diner sic.ns are wita r.c adjus. ment.

FOR INFOR,Ninilow ONLY I

CALCULATION SHEET sousi$.v' x***s'"2 2 25. cate.=o. #d45'/P'-c 41'- m44 c,. f1 on 8NP4 -n ,o., /4826-eo / S 79 ,,o... b ,,,,c, 2.D Se, ca re. Cove Sh. .ui, o, . 1. .o.,cy i Al.2A A'elief % Joe badiny f y thf $* W 7 [ L l o I f L s [*b TJ" ,) s,eL.w.m u ~ _t awA s -:r.r,We 'iQg,f (% = ~ <<L.we,nps ~~ = Y W,gjm** = = A 51ea d.y Sta.le: Siesdy shle blowdower loads due to hydraulic Forces a wi // fe vero. Thi:r & a. net lud neglecions terxtiert bsInnest s ppnoQ /wol Fereas ih both e f resa.Hoy from lefs e5 the. blewiewn p'opmy. Loads due fa fluid cenzia'ared ng/iph/r due the Frictk n are s/m senall la n3ths af pope irivolved a nd +he na4ure of* the fluid. iiscif (siearn). = B. Trennean Due +, the small Inesk of run poje annIved, a presrure sr wans would + ravel the length of fAe longer-leg sit = approxin,ately 3 milhseconds. 5thes fhs valve h.kes = openy ondiGns %rskle. censidernirly longer +han this to c = +o eren4iort of n. 4ranslenf tosdany ecn/o%sn d.o not eDst. m = wer.e rea.chex ja,n+Iy ws4 tAe MecAan><si (,rou, C Thazee.nelusan.s o a.s ssgnafue. ef +As fasposab/* fnjavere fe r-the wflected by ike = 8 d' ** 0, hkb u, (. L g4 N'"5 1 =

e. e.

no+eiet tiweis

h O e O l i DOCUMENT l-PAGE PU _ LED l l r

OVERSIZE DUPLICATE DRAWINGS SEE APERTURE CARDS APERTURE CARD N00 RE hE4(o6'M 4 PDR CF NMSS AVAILABILITY 11 UMBER OF PAGES.

l ADDITIONAL APERTURE CARD NUMBERS BELOW. i w -w i y w e g -- e -e- -ewy--gyng --^--" --* ^ - ^

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION COVER SHEET SHEET 1 CALC. NO. SLO 29 #c.994 4 N A l^' $ Y Go'rv9 5A #E TY VALVE 3 ~ TA kJ'E" Y LOAOS $- FILE NO. A $UBJECT P15 T C /v -"T* 415G.M dLY D G Sd4.N CN E C w. DISCIPLINE Pt A7 Jess / TMJJ RECORD OF ISSUE TOTAL REW OESCRIPTION NO.OF ORIG CKR GL GS CHIEF DATE O. SHEETS /.SSUS.D F<tr2 UJE O M//- ,}54 W M l'r* 7G.0 DS 1/ && INFORM ATION ENTERED IN THIS SP ACE: e SHOW PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STAMP. IF REQUIRED. e ENTER REFERENCE TO INCLUSION OF CHECKER'S ALTERN ATE C ALCULATIONS. lF USED. e PROVIDE ANY NOTES TO ASSIST CHECKING AND APPROVAL.

MAY LIST STANDARD COMPUTER PROGR AM (SCP) IOENTIFICATION INCLUDING VERSION AND OPTION USED.

FOR INFORMATION ONLY JOB 14925 STP 130017/84)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14026 CALCULATION SHEET cate No. AC. 9 9 sl> $NE 7'ME O O'/S's f " E A Y SHEET N0-A sueJECT REv. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O g.gg a 4-w d A <.-36-85' FOR INFORMATION ONLY JOB 14926 /. Za ritobve.Y/on : 0 Yt43 $$ceneb Arty $/DG. ct:- UCH.tfW $das4M4pt. /s fJ.a vobs.D tJoTW S CAF-A Y >' !% L vE.J /M.s YAL LLA.D ed ~kl.i C44 e ut 4 Y!eog f,4-c. M yr#vH.s~v& l16,4D 6tt.. t .vyase.ss I $4Le VID6 3 THE '*ftL%J Jo Kd '?" g P4/Y2.6.43 f= 0 A. 7/96 t/4' L L/ei* l^4 LG T (.Q) Mb VA L.VE D 1.5 Ch o+st. 6.E (Fy'), 9 z. Aewees : si 12 (1) Sims RePE Dresso 3 to F R Mobi Steam Sejpfs Valfe 8 R.-s D iG 13 AMel Iqs

849%-4054_cle52-AOI 10 DrcM'sdecament W G R -373 - (g Re/ o is (t) g,chtsl 's' Ms t4ata$tme drawir5 F is 5 di 369P-Ms-G46 su os PW2 i

17 (1) V atv, Dr win,g

g,,gg,g,, g,) y Dreasei.'s No.

is (o.) SPJ clol2 Sht4 R W 9 14 9 26-4034 -610o 4 - 5D1. 2' (,b) S N clot 7. Shb r. da 8 849264e34.cm o c A py, 33 23 24 (4) Q. L% Litt-S L2.29 P& ecol %9 39 ( 5.) AsIst d 3 1. / - / 1 7.3 AP/sa) x.Zi", pro arsA 19 73 M$M T o" E'* *** *.D Y N e r**/ c $ 6 >! Vm WyL a a, G, J. ' Jotta W1i.e y L so ~s zue. {7) l* **n s rs e n ~ n e ses. m ax. ^> o

10 M

35 38 STP 131017/941

l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. RO $ 9 b C 3 .5 E5 TNE **oVE/2. INS 4Y sHeaT NO. susJacT REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHEMER DATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE $ elf 6 M b' 6 16.M FOR INFORMATION ONLY 3. Dssim _De rA : JOB 14926 3 f4LVs a6 .6 /K6 $87 At63 SUd&- FLO LO dYRA A ffad& $greve n.k. l r (ttp.16) Palfr an *NE* ' lnt T6M/ i l o'b28455fo' 585'F I 4 WO 132.5 1 URep. b 6) s 2 l'h t S e 1 3~ l306 11 ( l 2.$8 13 V U 5 1 12.ss A/Org i f0 ACE ANALYA/S f*+t-VALVE d i l* JILL 4E.DossE. Fot eas ca rn.o~ns esen. rui.s w ALysi.s vius. de ussa fee. nLs. -rMe s tt*t H & 2 Tut 423 $ w A L / f!A. e VA& V6 s IN TMs pH A oH STEM ~ So A.. Ped c4 AMA LY$/.$ ; 33 YMS H *YML $AS$ Y/ VA" LV$ l$ $$ l.,gu) tel &, oh ZI 6 hei detf.HYL y

4. ArL& 8 A.&.eC 7iOH Fen.c4 (.s YsA)y 1-rATK)

fg, "

t.s s4 c.T t+1 & CN YMG bo$CHertkK f/fC. [e/ CA.bsd 70 A fbt.b U+4btstMMsfLG $7A&S$65 /N TML Aftnel.e t*H.b TMK /*t et^t d'*rRevvf MeehdA V4 L VK con HE e.Tro se, TWK 3 62/6.s/ S M et*f H O N T M d prett 0 W ow 4 fn ks t.s strit.rs.sb. Txis .D e st e At Has./1 YAM. sets T/rs Asseness em-es. *Fi 'fo rxe w tweroe*4 craucro a -rup u PtsYo M. n 30 i Yt4K pH E *rf40. DOL OGY U3KD M L A L 't.4/ L A T I ^' k 71*** sIEn 7 F**SS

fjr 4. &,

is aussa on sin os. oste,+ rio~ en -rus Ft0W !* * ** 13. fn 4 Fr a o no 7 AAA en twn.n isw vee Ar 7Me p.foteAE.V6A. p THEy WeL4 42 Genesi.DSAAD homovernHEsAtt l CAv"f "T/ Ms. /N CHK eoctet te.s r$61s ts hkK & Gt TAvssoa. STP 131017/841

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET cAtc NO. AC M M S T#d C8V I#EE SMEET NO. sueJECT R E V. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o two. g,-2s-sY p AAW' (,-as ss 1 FOR INFORMATION ONLY ME Txoio40 6.Y JOB 14926 3 4 $M67Y VALVS S Of't H 70'/o gF TM2 V l VALVE L./P7"/N 40 nitLLI C3CcN D, q F.) PA-4G d / dF 39 An*#en Dot A)* 1

n s*--- G s

J 'ys 7" f A ton. r o VA' LVB of6atM &, TME g g-g 6 7 3, H r1 FLEW A 7 l*DtNT'A $4, & s4HJ> C f.s LBAO /M Y'NR.Z) / A Se.7/cM SHoul^1 /slH24 ~ "Tha $4FETy vs+Lt/E lhP.s ofs.ss, 7pg a n n FL.0W A T TH333 ~!H'ttEE fois>YS INed& dss 2 <rrw <<<<<<<< (fr'$.*4.DUALL'l UNT/L. 372EADy 574YS Mt ets) fA l l lS AGA.cnK.D. ZT SH006D '3E ^Jo TIC & D i /40Ln.JB VGA., "YM A Y.DUS.!N dr T # d 'itt* H siE H 7' llA ? $ /g > h e,.. TH!$ /J 6x8V/ e LF3L Y.DUK TO TMG. "T//H E f & 80 tit.GJ /Csd ~!'MM WA F40W 4sa A7 A ' Srsem 70 vs.A vst t=,um n ro is 70 c.. & Flow #ATa o47 'B' $/^4 CK fcLosJ Vo+ rte s* TreH sJtTH Ttsv'!E /J suo7 s4WA/Lohtt E, 'Ytfa y' pg,.eW stA7s AT 'C.' fles<> $479 - T/sua $ 4 L A Trooq f1 fl&UAE $ )Q $$U'MKJ) 4 tN AAd. 'THt$ /$ Aff'LtcMtg A7 s+tL. T Hei6 G fot*V 7.C, st o+ mS LY A 13, 4-C., o

TMA VAd t A TIoH p 4lE's.osJ #A 7s is*) W17H 71ME t.,

19 7 TMas& L.ce.MY(CH$ /.s CHot/H & GL.e t J. 51'EA M TMonsosser smerg_ 1 FOR Tns /No.IY f/PE A-8 ' $TA TE

~44i' *Afg 3e L+a Q

btn a y f Y8 t

e V

Wtf RA E Lee is TM8 bl.svopocE y e 8ETast& Bel A A B..$tbetLetL1, fat. e l Ne t TMS.Dra cMoM. tem fl't/E B-C lL i 1 p. n $Iac u YtMK t 3E f~-/Gg)gg Q MILL e wb! STP 131017/04l

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926

OOG CALCULATION SHEET cal.C NO.

8 I6E-c eM SNEST SHEET NO. susJECT REV. ORIGIN ATOR OATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o y g.1s tr p sA%- s-u-se 1 Wns.ae Ls c. is THe.oisrn-ncs o s rWesn B 4.c.. Vs ' 3 15 'THG s oset C. VE b o C/ Ty AT ~T*/f2 OM ff /cG. Z r t.s 4 f Sht/es 6,b YHAf Vs t,.O CI T/ /AJ C./6 $0ZE. DUG Yo /^JCASASde SPEC.f/C. V O L. 0 />9 K /.9 />9 /N/ />1 AL, J.,,a sdKA VB 4 0 C o *F'f (Vs'.,) WeL4 GIVC cousan.vA r e vE Assutr.s. T E Fod.t.oyo/n & : d9r d & I VK AJ 8f M e A, g hb Ce 11 t Q = 40- At s Q .,,J Paras-r A. + x 4 o - stas A Z u t > 40-b%s W.p= Wm - Q 3 = c a t Forur 8 t 4.4o Se= 3 Wm g E; 1. t 3 4.o W. = wm ce s: C LL. 2 31 4 Was 82 Pe uT c. t < 4 o t ta c. We, = g,,,4 o C 6 >,, 4 o + t c. Ec., = Um gg, N I S T HE. STE. Ab y ST,4 73 p g cg.; jc,o 7 E tw T (' E1 A 98' k A THE Ft ou) Paces.ss os qs p AMWN O N. THE /H G L t. ILEdl. so 2-3 :

* * * ~ ' +

.D! As.W tu.Ftsvac S* Paetass 4 c$ sg THEPet**T.si,2,5,ug5 34 3*N E A*TY'*** fr ! An edia Er4TAar y $$ 6.Y t*L AesoE.D CRt THE ME$7 f %G e f/60t 6 *3 i .TP 1310 47/04)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET catcNO. SC 90$$ SEE CavdA 8#8'#7 SHEET NO. sueJEcr REV. ORIGIN A T OR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o twt.- s-x vr p PF-s,.ts sc 1 Pooe.,L ; It5Pnds.nrar s TME.srs.oru combi rioa ser rse 3 E.r4 7A.s+n cs sp-lHsar Pips o Paiu r 1.- Sream c.onarrion s* r res vs wa o,co pt ee i~Lsr. Tue o PM s.s uM D tt.c@ (. Pg - fg, ) 1.s b u E t o v n t FArc ross

t. osse.s in THE tMt sY PtrE st u D rMs YALVE P'412AsEf. Y& 4.0 e / r f W

? e $ rse.rvy Vc, is c Lt 48 7 LY LNL e KA THo+ w Vz.Dus To oue Arnssp sPEct eic. voto m a. 12 Posear 1 ; e s, THE s rA**r cowa rrie~.DrMEC.rL'y AF rRA' KwnH3/oM TAK.s s PL.ooes in rys vnwa rHgoer CerErpres) Wkses trasssuses is .Drt.o rs Fedes Pg ' 're S,.. ~TMc CA r r/ L

t.

Pne.s sues Pe,, s c.577 Pg' ,9 F s sArv**Ts> srs M ( WEA& M L G 4 h 373 Ad 13*yf.). Des is -ro ea rnnti y.pa.op, 7xs x w s roe awaAsy /n c ALsss.s nus rxt Ve, VSLe tt Y1 MY T His fotN T /2 21 Pole *T 4 R&PA& ssnTA 'THE ST*fe. en ATseer.Diru c.7LY 4/k M tr.K7M VJ 23 F t. o w e n & TMstu 7HE.bts enAese tite. Ale rc YHo*7 Tk&Ad is ^/o s n re ns ry.Dilo t. THE PAsssures.pter W Pea. T o Pe es sus n

r e

/Ne$6AsK cP Ft.cw sq,em.sq (,, TM AeT TLt " & fAaests).~rM Vs.L.o coYY ot= STsm t.s eau.s-now-r 4 Y VE soac6 THs tecAeAAr se swas in Ft.o s** n,esA t.s suos rt Tu vsD $Y,.s tw.e te oc

vocuMK, f\\oe04 T 5 * &Ser*F 4;*.o NDtvta N o47.Dl.b CM en 61

'YD TML s To4eM...$ L/6r* 7 32 pas ssuM..b g.at ( Pa.- Ps) .D ut. To Fate'no a L-oesas tu rns .htsexsere 4 s Pt/s s9up sLt&Hr s~cetpse in s*Laciry. bus t o ) as FOR INFORMATION OMLY y,+- , <, -tc. vow-. JOB 14926

Tv' tato mesi i

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926

" O $b b CALCULATION SHEET calc NO.

SEG_ cos/h sussy 7 suggy so, sueJEc7 REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O 6-n* * ** @ M L' 6-tG-35 FOR INFORMATION fonous ~ ev t f~ JOB 14926 3 Foa rns i~Lar piss A-d, rna rs+wsinr mes fy e r riswe t is 5 4,ve a ey rus e.st.e r/o n 1 fy = Ga Va _ dte Va + bP AL (o) t \\ t./nsse rus fins r nev> seewn Tw~.s wee ss rvr run was sc M.ca. Yne / H e n. tue m ra rc/nr se a.b Y H s T ulit D r} win is Fxicrion e 12 f e w. m u u re I.s d re s s a en pones pourt.orsitrum e>v n w rit et. Vol.vma in res tiv LG r Pt#G. 15 Vsq=.Vc N &c A A t. Vs = ba N ,v Na &t _, 15/a W N N Wp 20 Hore run r /rv rna o+rsa ve sa un rioa f 12 A ssumac edont. ro L9.. Snes & t.s sL/cr8rLy LHLcrEA YnM U%., ~ran 23 str$ DVS A b$tJrn A rt 0 N M.bU L.T1 iN Lest.4 64. Py, i E 6. 3 0 $. 85 Tus Asa s su,aE D 4 ys o Pa.g is 4.s van ny te .A P a, = o o o o oo n c. -(' l',ss LI/ WL (g,y,y3 n dt ls/HE.A& A, F k c.-ri o N P A c r ott 30 fy,:,ggUoVAL6HT L.tN 7dM W TM G./NJ.Kr/ log.Inoc M ino(e C 31 32 inw r Losse s, wh V.nve L-o ssa s, 33 />r n r ti"u m -r.en~1ts^o Y scwatet I^* TkL r"Le r fifd A 4a & ~THE e y b6 V6 L4YKD i+ T 't 4 O ~ b bss&. fV /$ JfL4*/nYJ /M IM Mt C'* L= .b o La* N WA*E-b .Do Ad e Yso no. STP 1310 t7/54)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO,14926 CALCULATION SHEET calc No. Ac. 9 9 4

8 K C*# M'7 suatt No.

1 susJact REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REL L ORIGINATOR l DATE CHECKER DATE o 6-3s-vW* ws FUH INFDRMLTinM na sv 1 JOB 14926 t & THE Hort./3'.0^tTM L P/PG B ~ C., T*H E Hartt ZeH YA l /C et G6, fy, ' sg e 4 c+ce.u n.n rsa o~ rne de u.s of wes ant,*~ct ou e s,a r n e u vowere tu rm.ars eunre as Pisa. Fe is

evs~ <1, 7

Fu = dt V[ M' d + Na p,,4,, _ Ec p.,g., + A Pec A. (z; ? A p.- A t y a io g O ii ~TEsm s s ~ D 94 Puss ~r C HH &* >~ me"E " ru"' 13 Yg.4.o**s /N & $4.$44$ BAe7 tlll*.MM d L /A/ //Ed13LM6 fON.SA Taw @ As.pp.s sa.~ r rum rmerrow per.as u wwEA.G. Ps is m ex

T P r*-s s s u ae

!~ '"* a 's c ~~ *

e' #e HD s.s e ne.c ut Arsa,

.%= /E F B' Mp !.s 6 wa~ 4y se n Wm (b-I) 1(.ha-A)J Pa. n Ae 6 pe, (,2 b-s) 32 L5/m 4evv4L. Moss re.ow tura /6*/sas ~ 8' = a xir sucs se. Daexuse Pine A e, c. m he srA sun rt*8 *~ rn et pt n r i~ " r l* 'v' 77g.ft u./gg y 3. n 7 - 32 z I S 4. WS."f".5Tm W (I E E. 5 3e 6 = 1: J 31 e bps c. ' = o co cco n6 f Lac Ws* lyr a di u u lp o.s res.es*sersie us.uo.,e 4r esor as fy W / 4 t,. $6 1998 F /Pt Ut% n *f-b :. 4 O M/LLI fm t e M5$ y STP 131017441

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET calc NO. I

5EE ce vs AL SNEs r swear no.

susanct REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O t-2.r-tf H4'$ G.za 0 \\ 1 V6HT s f $AFE TY YA $. VE YM*T" 2 '" l = 0 ~S ykex.Da rnit 5 // 376 /.; 4542T 0% \\ gr.: ... e< _e yh [0 h jn ---C 8 e 8 u6 Fa n RE F. $ P* 4 E 3 ***2 y__ $4 d.3 l n 5" l t 3 l ,2 u 12 n f 3 g ep pl.vroes_ d ED' A n to 1 ~ \\ +' M,s. tennsa. H 1. 17 ~ I O,,.u rs ceu.Ga ~~ t g _ b = 2,, 9 73 8 t=sF is g3 g to 0 94M f"\\t y g 57" 10 g- - 1.9 21 22

5UPPog r# M 0-P= II 18 8", E = 16 062."

s rauc rug.c 2 H = 60 56' n hee (s eat. cut A rsb PoA /Het. sEr PA6 31uMS. 27 $67 /Asssues P.s.:: 132s pli4 n tsoL6 7 $4863UAE TO skFSTv' VALVE, fi 31 1.o2r121C*n4 9 = 137.9 S t** . Pc =- I o s P.s + Pa = O.' ffA s in Lsr pe ss ung e r n%.'_E fo r ^* T 't i P.s : ss.r s.nves posssuoss,wn. 3*l,,. Ae.e.u o.e v u Art eso fa : h are2 **M Arts t fA.J !Ivsid.,f1iA STP 1310 (7/941

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. A" S O N-10 IM 4 V8/* W #f SHEET NO. sueJECT AE V. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHCCKER DATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O Afht-6.sr tf ;.! J&' 6-n-tf OF FV JA Le (,/L A T i c N W, Va,{ &n 4r t.= 4o-ing ta Ea.i 1 sus.srrrursua fa

b-W + APa 4L NA Vi hs*}+bPA$

Ab = f (40-bas 6P, Ac 4 (I A) ^ = j h AO' Y to = bm AT 6.= 40-tat 2 ,9 12 E F-hA : { Im = l-ll $ l'O S 3. f 45 % /O 3 f a, 13 to - w s u u-ju, s /PE 5/zE 0 lAIL. E T* j4i = E 6 2 /= /d

73 = 4 "

,,p n vuo ersb ) $ 7 n $m coro.orrece/ C Assumo so 21 Pt =. i n s. s e s

Ts 5857:

h i - ti 7s. 2 sta/u 24 3 l9o= O Sci 1 ft/g 38 i $ r w vst.eerry Ar s* eon r*L 0 '1*71 Y '"4 Vi, a fa &e 3t s. t.5 4 % sy, '3-6 36 ~ 38 14 30 = A,98 5 ft/nc. s1 t s a f,. 2, = hy toco 33 5 y too 5 6 N "E 3 l2-n 8254985 34 FOR INFORMATION ONLY J0814926 swsaiou m w _.------__,_y .m_.-.m__--

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 LE" OII*I" CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. SUEJECT 460- C civdA. tyggry SHEET NO. Il REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE D 6-sc-Yc pAU~ c.u.er 1 FOR INFORMATION -wa-n o -, 4,,,, JOB 14g26 3 A r P= 13 79.s psic<, r= srs 's JA = 0 04 7 esars Pese r-Arm R& f. 7 A-2. AsyMC L.D.s ^/o., ke_., he = $ 31 % A Yhb** f.,gg y ggg.ugp3soa .p 7 *56%IO g g = ,o 6 x o o4-7 . '. heOoa5 (pef.') A -15) 'hbh ENTs W c.E L.cssas 14 15 fE N IS 0 23 U !s/ M E A G. k z: o t.p t,t on YMG-AMt3 # 26*B 7S 001 18 (,9& F 7 A.- 11) K (SS.%'7 S-7) v16475 M Q 99 g 4 IS ft swa masA 21 12.Y,0 ors

0 3672. ft g 28 L9i B

l-e. + 5 = f5 + Y = / 7 7 9 ' / 2-- / 2-26 s p,, = 3 sc v. Io'% -f L.'s a ( S G e o C )* Y. L9 l A p,, S.y n di se l d, o.ols x (7 7 3 (34eo x alg.4 4j y x e 3o72 S 36 yto lbf 31 33 b'56 PSI as 34 38 as STP 131017/944 ~

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 ( SN l CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. IEb C4V M INE#7 SHEET NO. !L susJECT REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o 4->r n-p. >>4 - (,-u-w 1 N Vs = V$ = "213 (ho-a.)'l [ggp, (. 2 6-!) J l u b f 2132 l74 's 77 8./6 ( esso. ig-259 = 8 [ (2 2-s) I46 8 4 6 -f't/su. = VL BEnto9m S c,mys rw ps Edwasa w po,uy 4 11 p asoi-u rs.srs re c.

- "sts s s w.e s pa m r 4 13 P+ = $ y _b -!,f2](ho'*U N

g) b l f(.zh-1) pe (Il-!) x ~ 2 Y 77 8 !6 L "8 * ~ *

U 7 ?*-

1 als os x -ll 'b1 l1y ( 21 -1) a = 1e ~7 f.59 19 / 70 53 P.s/A a Ae. is 4Asao o n.ars e n ner.6 a pipe siaa s to*,t.o 36s* tss83psy f r5) Po - 14 7 Pe. 17o ss-/v 7 = =- = i l' At e ut trion avfac, n P = 17o.S5 psise, np sarussrs.O srawr 7= 34s*f ( Ar 4 n /A =

c. o IB 2-(P s>=. 7 A -2;)

f e., 4' 31 )C (5S* F 340* _, f.3l x 3/8 44 t 36ca a 4 7Syto 7 21 4(i. l^ fo o 2 y, o. ore 2 3, & c ott+ (. Gap. 'I A -25) u g%F0g10M OHJ W = 2 67 3r ft>/A STP 1310 (7/54)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 b0 II= CALCULATION SHEET cAtc NO. W C W8'4 M8K7 SHEET NO. /3 susJacT REV. ORIGih ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE ae**a' # io.- 6- **W H' 4-2G -15 Ust w & E Q.- 1 A e # E 6 8-7 Fv = % vc . tu J ] + 4Pu w4c cl

J-Ao s

~ o -S c}2. 318 H8 498 5 + 6 S 4 y, 2 f.2 (, = s 2. - l 1 L+ FORIMFD W N # j I 2. 8 4 8 4 -t-IblS. 7.9 ~* e = = 2.6 c / u, ,, ma tJse.b t f = 2 o 13 Fn =. 2 6 e l y. 2. =.s 2. o 2. A3

s CAL CU LA TloN OF FH is c~u se. 2. 6 ova s rws iceau t= a e.st euu rin 6 s

W.a Ve, _ @c.Ve. Wa PA Pe.Ae. + A Pac. A e Fg + = $~ 3-Wm st 23 fe, l$ CA L.CU LA TEb s4 7" 400 !NY k Vl Q. sea. e.xri.s~n reo~ m - ra<~ r +.srm m r<es fM l.$ 111s4 x /t M U M A7 f = kO MILLtfdcawpf 28 I &= A M 29 hc = A (5/m 64e.+4e 31 PA (l-U% + APMe Fu =

Ve*. [ /

4 + = W* F tae.+ +o Q.::. is ct..c.+ +o) ( NA V** + Ps A e} + b Pas J.A 2- = STP 131017/94)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 k E $95$ CALCULATION SHEET cAi.C NO. susJECT I M-UVM JMM7 M SHEET NO. REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE R E V. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o p s-sc-rry JH-g.u.w 1 /a ds. 625

2

-L Y- ' C'4 Y. Les X ( 3 6 o o y 3 8 W)1y,24736, 4 Pa = 3'3'Ylo 3 I2 Y Qo.oz)5 E 5 f. 2 *3, Ps/ S % ID o

45 415, toc o_

bye = = g Vd. l% //4 $$ 4tf f,,,4 5 z

2. * $$ MlLU SA L mb.$

11 SU (AS *T'i TU T 8 N dr iN E e. 2. A 2 SF Fn 3,3 4c y,43g. g ,g 155+40)

u. p 4 13 f.23y,78'.54 is 2.10 6 '] %s

= 17 to l A550M IN Cr L LF :- 2_. O Fn 3 =. 2.i es.7 s 2. = 4 21( Ab.s 2' 2 fVD .52o2 es 28 = ze 25 38 = la F0 3,34 a 33 34 35 as STP 131017/94)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. E #- 3 3bb l5 $b~8-CCVdA SMCGF SHEET NO. SUBJECT REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER OATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O ff ( bg.g h N' $*2$=W Qh c a t e v t oo-rr o n s M P/s 7o w - T 4.cs ararsLY Y 9gghgQ 4 5 $D 7 / / 3/g" x 26 "$ s rnex. u FA' 13 l FA = 27 813 L65 Jr!

e r

y L ss a s MV T' ~ ~Q (2 7 h. " $ 7 ' "r"" ~ 20 c et.D SgG DSTA /L $ OPPSET ~L 22 23 ge 2< TYP. sg3V S, T #.# = 'ryr / VV n W 4 E / p l'19. {i g 2s r7 g 3, g I I d .,g 31 32 E.- )$ CHAMFER ' V5 CHAMFER (TYPI 4PLCS a DETAll th. \\=/ = = STP 131017/54)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. N O 9 0bS susJECT 6 M M Y SHEET NO. b REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE 1 O b kJ[b (y-tr-H" M' G-7G-Pi l 1 S YM.$ S && C K /~ov2. $/S 70 n) 2 3 PK =- 2 7 iYI3 usS I d o M / M 1.3! V C=- .S~ RAG.SS /s/ '7'tf6 P/s7osy a 7 (9. g 2 - l2.x Yg yI + CcrinP M 11tA5 NEEA = .99*2-2>Y2-l)yl is 947+867 12 [h* 3$ /M 13 14 2 7 E/2 & M :: W E.srM s5 = ,_g,,g,5 p,, ss /8 W

s

=. ISl7 m 4 129bb Gr-. (,Se55HT.4) W 20 r 21 23 $ NWMf--* $M PrYZ l YM/ C fC $ 7/1 % do *r Ty Q A 75 23 l+l+l+ %i.f. ( g.f"7 )( 4] K l 24 J n .384 a ~ ' .i t,,. cryo =. t 29 Q. 47 " (T//') so ~ $/f$412 C 7tV=. S 3 ::~ i4 3 38 4y FOR INFORMATl0N ONLY = m ^' < 'owy - <m o "' as JOB 14926 o R, x STP 131017/04)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALC N3. kO b b SI CALCULATION SHEET Sk WM VES T suntr uo. /1 sue >Ecr REV. ORIGtNATOR DATE CHECKER 4 ATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o 4& Pat <dw 6.sS 15 p.-L 4 US-h-ts' h N ~ +O O + . Mki f . AR 7 f 1 5 i, 4 s h. f. db 10 l' 1' 3 ~2 ^ 4'Y 3, t s)( 9.g g) 12 /2 13 ft ga4 95 + o.7e </t.7 2 It 2 3 (t )(4 34Yn 't + ! x 4*14 X(Ah* F 0 ] * * '& D ' { 'N = zy .A. (ip + 6t.87 + o.et) =r7c 18 21 = J7' '1 2.os 93gj18.s4 = rn = 1 u IS 38 $ Lmy & Of [*wf 0$) fotblih { h* l ) I? 0eb f f* Y Y'h

W
27 Ann e w h o.n as w iilwer

= /(, 2 ~./ s =$ 2.1 X G f, G.7S n gt . _gt. 2.o 3 e. M YW = 38 STP 131017/ Sal

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET Cate NO. EC 9 %S 19 SEE Cov6A-GMY sung, no. sueenCr REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE O J*/ ? Alto)N f 3[.f f f* $*ELW 1 o rf-, s / -3 4 S /,7;. t FOR INFORNiAnon uraLY = JOB 14926 8 j ASSu"n e 3to F y for kJ/, a 6 72 fn, 18 84 m 15z \\ atow. c.1< \\ 7 = 1 car cK fj esinent aucAzian 12 f 1 - (Q )~ 1 pg Q 1- @ 7sf n t.s s Fa e t e

M ** ') ~

L 2 cs' J xii xs; = 9'3 {t . cots ] x 31.g. 21.oqp.11 i

x.

C,, 2 11,E, gy9,1y,ygyggo ,,g,,, FY yi. g N .i Ik' P8 " ] at We l D Dest M

n

\\I so. rs u wsid belwm th # Haijo,,la $ & Ver/ sed i Pb = 4 ,C = force fg s 27813 p = lemyIkofsacida 9x4 if a 34 72 = .,f,1cefer?$ch= 27'82., e.g = af 13 a + b'$$.T1P ll M W fiJe vep/ = g,g4x 3 f,g = 4 0 43 ,I = = ey Ho4e101 tie /s ti

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 cAi.cNo. N N N CALCULATION SHEET A SSE UWA SHMY SHEET No. sueseCT REv. ORIGIN AT OR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE o wyjae i,-29tw kJ-s u..sc

8 e.* S 3 w say 194

'7o7 ytt s USe Skc P iled *m r*m, 1 4d NY ATSG o ~ 7 Wald' b. l wee.n f verkesf Pl. %y i e.f speld' 4x G, t4 /< 27 8 13 8 fnce. tramf{ errs / IEfogyhhiSwWds s + ,</ii I?

Esce / orf. !.h1 =.o.St

., / 4x6 we, [8 8 D fm$$ of We, n I

ta! 4 e ye.tyd = o.58707xz/. o.OV w

3 21 6Y

dlP
h

o. o #' s ve+r,s 23

4MI8 u

m U$t [tbf.ib Nidk sr m doNcoustorus a l. 'THs .sy,qe,e.o ssiw 1.s s te ep c aress e n y m 2* fripb &p CH CUl.D r$G C e **.C l DW S/M UL *fo9e+Cov5L Y /H a Cs*L CALL AT*/ 0r4s Fe<- p+9rera s~r m pmg 38 FOR INFORMATION ONLY Ho4etet tietet

St.TalOWfsom 70; PO.. Rev0.3 sepO. . as. Cua.sCA L .ALA C..P PLA ? ( . L.., ..,W,,L.,... .Pi.A=v .C v ...v... ED, (2W

e. DU.,

., A v.. C.Av.. . CIVIL /.T.UCTW. A L . WCL.A. ..v a. . A. Cult.CTW.AL ..TA. TUP . Co v.WC,. . C,...., S AFM/EA lo f / NTIFYIpse TITLE Of f.gl. 00CLme.IIT ft**[ d.3.1//-A EaD R1Ls2 e Alb ( AS.I. E. Ca/E AdAhns - ht / 'l Pw:q.*k t'437 l l495 -4f022.-0/0/f-8H1~ a.s, t an.. l 149x u -fo11 -oioif ru r W O.? ANT ME.$f,.,...,,

.5-y,,p Ita.O so /r / n 1

fil E _ A P fl.C.. }

- "")

Yl*l[ .E____ A ,p emme copeansissue //p f3 c M....W iv. cEV.iiUTJ.E.C...E*' E** ,. Wo E.e.8 ATI.P.t.T ae ut e.e...s.Lv. h8Av to.P

e..e j

i m tp 3fy.) I.

' Hayward Tyler 2.= ~ PUMP COMPANY c.:

(

a.,..(narch 31, 1 ENGINEERING STANDARDS sr. o.g. u :8#- AT. v v-A ft& Mob PUMP g C] O AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVI ,/ j gr>. ISSUE PAGES REVISED SUPERSEDES , ISSUED BY APPROVED DATE O Initial Issue gg gg 3 / 3 1 / 71 S209YOXEll0 BRO'.','N & ROOT. INC. AM-ROVAl. PRINT J NO. CR-0241 A7.T.0VED ',!:".l2.d'.'d.'."""'"' O APPROVED AS NOTED .f. 8.. 88,1. p. age it. O NOT APPROVED 884 4, f . t.4 (, .s = 3-1/17 s:m an

-l: ::::::

...............=.,s.,.:m:':o:::: 9-r

ow g

Roosived by STP RMS 3-4 B7 OAYS ~ yOb j.3 % _ v.4 l = 1 TURNOVER t T 'lN Db-401.2. o g o g 1 N @ DISTRIBUTION: A' ' S / M%(.,-%on.- o g o i t T ""' '" *n en en O mennen 88 Standard issued by: Approved by: 4' //a/ ~ /Dn l ,/ w w~

I ' Ha3 xard Tyler ym"' PUMP COMPANY o~i ( so,m.s.c ENGINEERING STANDARDS om PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS _1. 0 Object To show that structural integrity and operability will not be impaired during or after a seismic event. 2.0 General Approach 2.1 Horizontal Pumps On all horizontal pumps, the pump and motor are separately analysed. the motor being analysed by the motor vendor. The only interface between the pump and the motor is the coupling. It is realized that the only time any load, other than torshnal can be carried across the coupling, is if there is permanent set in some component. Thus by assuring there is no permanent set in any componen,t we can assure there will be no axial load interaction between the pump and the motor. ( All pump and support component stresses are calculated per 8.) section 5.0. . All pump and support component deflections are calculated per section 5.0. The motor supports are modelled as pump supports and analysed per section 5.0. 2.2 Vertical Pumps . Vertical pumps are modelled as beams and analysed by finite element methods using the NASTRAN program. The motor is analysed as a beam mounted above the pump. The pump is assumed to be rigidly attached at the mour. ting plate and to be simply supported at the radial supports. The stiffness is based on only the outer shell minus the ~ corrosion allowance. The mass is based on the total weight including the corrosion allowance, shafting, enclosing tubes and water. The NASTRAN analysis is not duplicated here as it is publically available. (,) I Standard issued by: Approved by:

Hayward Tyler jn!,'a"' PUMP COMPANY ou, sue.ri.e ' ENGINEERING STANDARDS o. no.: .~ \\ ~ PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS 3.0 ) _,_ Structural Integrity 3.1 Criteria 3.1.1 Allowable Stress -If the specified material is an A.S.M.E. Code material. allowable stresses are taken from the A.S.M.E. Code Section -III Appendix I. If the specified material is not a Code material, the allowable stress is taken as 60% of yield. ) The allowable stresses for half and full earthquake loadingr. are modified only as stated in the customers specification. 3.1.2 Code Criteria khere applicable all parts are analysed to the A.S.M.E. Code Section III. See section 5.0 below for specific references. ( 3.2 Loadinos J All nozzle loads are as given in the customers specification or greater. If the loadings are greater, a comparison of the specified load to the loads used in the calculations is given in section 6.3.0. If the direction of the nozzle load is uncertain, the most conservative direction is assumed. Flange loadings are calculated based on an equivalent press ure as given in section 5.1.7. Seismic loadings are as given in the customers specification, or greater. If the loadings *are greater a comparison of the specified load to the load used in the calculation is given in section 6.0. NOTE: Any modifications of the specified loads are always done in such a way as to produce conservative results. 3.2 Methods 3.3.1 Nozzle Stresses Nozzle stresses are calculated according to the A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article A 2212 and the methods shown in section 5.2.1 below. The nozzles are.modelled as cylinders and an equivalent pressure is used to calculate the load, as calculated in sections.l.7 below. ["y siano ro isiv.o by. Afproi.a 6y: e

' l HayxardTyler y%,'2"' l PUMP COMPANY om:. (( superswe : ENGINEERING STANDARDS %. ne.: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIO ? 'b -T ,.,5. A - 3.3.2 Casino Stresses 3.3.2.1 Horizontal Pumps .T.he minimum casing thickness is calculated by the methods of A.S.M.E. Code Section III NB 3442 as is shown in section i 5.2.2.1. below. The casing flange stresses are calculated by the methods of A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article ND 3442 as is shown in section 5.2.2.1 below. The casing is modelled as a cylinder and analysed by the methods of the A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article A 2212 as shown in section 5.2.1 below. _3.3.2.2 Vertical Pumos ( ,_...__ The casing is modelled as a cylindrical beam, fixed at one / end. The stresses are analysed according to the A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article A 2212 and using the methods shown' in section 5.2.2.2.below. 3.3.3 Flange Stresses The suction and discharge flange stresses are calculated, by the methods of section 5.2.3 below, according to the A.S.M.E. Code Section III Appendix XI and, an equivalent pressure, according to the A.S.M.E. Code Section III NB 3647 as is shown in section 5.1.7 below. _3.3.4 Backcover and Gland Stresses Since the calculations involving these two items are identical they are both listed together. These items are analysed in accordance with the A.S.M.E. Code, Section III NC 3325 and ND 3325 by the methods shown in section 5.2.4 below. .. w.. standard losved by: Approved by: h a a

Harxard Tyler JM" PUMP COMPANY on. '( ENGINEERING STANDARDS l l PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVIS i 3.3.5 Bolt Stresses 3.3.5.1 Horizontal Pumps i There are six different sets of bolts which are separately 8 analysed by four different programs. The bolts are analysed according to the following sections of the A.S.M.E. Code Section III: Casing Bolts ND 3442 Gland Bolts ND 3325 Flange Bolts NB 3647 The attachment, pedestal and foundation bolts are analysed I according to the methods outlined in section 5.2.5 below. 3.3.5.2 Vertical Pumps All bolts are analysed according to DESIGN OF MACHINE ( ELEMENTS, V. M. Faires, using the methods shown in section i 5.2.5 below. J 3.3.6 Shaft Stresses The pump shaft is modelled as a simply supported beam with concentrated masses for hydraulic loads, impeller weight and coupling weight; and uniform loading for the shaft weight. It is analysed by the methods shown in section 5.2.6 below. All the hydraulic loads are calculated in accordance with CENTRIFUGAL & AXIAL FLOW PUMPS _, A. J. Stepanoff. Keyway stress concentration factors are taken from STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS, R. C. Peterson. 3.3.7 Pedestal Stresses The pedestals are modelled as vertical beams with all loads acting at the centroid of the attachment bolts. The pedestals are analysed by standard beam analysis using the equations for stress from FORMULAS FOR STRESS AND STRAIN, R. J. Roark, and the methods shown in section 5.2.7 below. =

a..............

9 n

! Hayward Tyler

y.11,W"'

PUMP COMPANY o.<.; i t .e [( ENGINEERING STANDARDS ~ o% PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 3.3.8 Weld Stresses The welds are modelled as beams with cross-sectional areas equal to the effective area across the weld throat. / / \\ / i y / /y s / h,,,,,,. e Y A///// \\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ The welds are analysed according to the methods of section 5.2.8 below. _4. 0 Operability 4.1 Criteria The reed natural frequency and the critical speed shall not be within 225% of the operating speed. The deflections of pumps and components will he deemed acceptable if they are such that no permanent set remains after a seismic event; as calculated in section 5.2. The missalignment of the coupling will be deemed to be acceptable if the missalignment does not exceed manufacturers specifications for the coupling in use. Shaft deflections and wear ring clearances will be deemed to be acceptable if it is shown that no interference occurs before or during a seismic event and that no permanent set ( remains after a seismic event; as calculated in section 5.2. ) " Standard lasved by: e Approved by: s

Ha.3 ward Tylzr ??'e"?

7 PUMP COMPANY o.s.:

( ENGINEERING STANDARDS so.me. : PUMP SEISMI'C AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 1 4.2

Loadings (as 3.2)

_4. 3 Methods 4.3.1 Natural Frequencies 4.3.1.1 Shaft Natural Frequency The shaft is modelled as a simply supported beam anc the critical speed is calculated using an energy-balance method. Calculations are done in accordance with,the methods shown in section 5.3.1.1. 4.3.1.2 Pedestal Natural Frequency If there are two pedestals in the axis of concern the pedestal is modelled as a guided cantilever witt a concentrated mass on top. Otherwise it is modellt ( as a simple cantilever with a concentrated mass on top. .3 v I. _7..! g Guided Cantelever i Simple Cantelever [ l I t i \\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\ \\ The natural frequency is calculated by the methods of: ' MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS, J. P. DenHartog and usin the equations of FORMULAS FOR STRESS AND STRAIN, R. S. Roark as shown in section 5.3.1.2. k) ,t' si.e.... i......,: 4,,,.....,. y '*4.4

Ha.s' ward Tyler

M

~... l PUMP COMPANY om; ,( ENGINEERING STANDARDS superseen, % m: l PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REV 4.3.1.3 Vertical Pump Columns The column is modelled as a cylindrical beam which is rigidly attached at the mounting flange and simply suppo: at the radial stiffeners. Credit is not taken for the included, along with the water, in calculation of thco e ma The pump natural frequency is calculated using the "NAST) general finite element computer program, _4.3.2 Shaft Def1'ections The shaft is modelled as a beam with static and operating loads superimposed. accordance with" The hydraulic loads are calculated i Stepanoff. CENTRIFUGAL & AXIAL FLOW PUMPS, A. J. ( integration as partThe deflections are calculated by ndmerical G. H. Martin. _ KINEMATICS AHD DYNAMICS OF MACHINES, .) Q.3 Bearing Analysis For anti-friction bearings the B-10 bearing life is , calculated according to the specifications listed in the manufacturer's manual. For sleeve bearings the load is calculated by a simple summation of forces and moments by the methods of section 5.3.5. A,3,4 Fatique Analysis Evaluation of fatigue life and safety factors for shafting follows the methods outlined in: i DESIGN, J. E. Shigley. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING O S

,gi si..... a....,

4,,,.....,: 1

Ha" ward T.#vlsr 511L;" 1 c.; 9 PUMP COMPANY am: .( ENGINEERING STANDARDS w Y. ' PUMP SETSMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSU 5.0 Calculation Methods All calculations are based on the following co-ordinate system except cylindrical stresses which are based on the system as illustrated in section 5.2.1. Z A X o G Y ( 1_f 5.1 Loadino Generally, the following loads are given: 1. Nozzle Loads 2. Seismic Loads 3. Nozzle Loads for Seismic Conditions '4. Shaft Horsepower 5. Design Pressure 6. Hydrostatic Test Pressure These loads must then be converted to the appropriate values such that they are useful for calculations. This is done by the methods illustrated in this section. a a 0 Standarc teeuen by: Appga,,g gy

Harvard Tyler jylla" PUMP COMPANY o~; m. m.o.. I( ENGINEERING STANDARDS % m: PUMP $EISMICA$DA.S.M.E.CODEANALYSIS-ISSUE & R 5.1.1 Nozzle loads For calculation of bolt loads, the forces and moments are tranformed by the following equations: i Fx = 2 Fxg c Fyc " #YY1 l p. Fzc ".E Fz; Mx = I Mx + T(Fyj (Ze - Zi) + Fzc(Yc-Yi)) c %c = E % + E(Fxy (Ze - Zi) + Fzc(Xc-X1)) ,( Mz = I Hz + E(Fxy(Yc-Yt)+Fyc(Xc-Xi)) e Where i = 1, 2, 3. etc. for each loading point, i.e. nozzles, C. of G., etc. e 5.1.2 Seismic Loads Seismic loads are calculated by the following equations: Fx = Horizontal Acceleration J)i.* Weight 1b. Ib.f Fy = Horizontal Acceleration

Weight f

F2 = Vertical Acceleration

Weight Ib.f Note that these forces are assumed to act at the centre of gravity of the pump.

=. a............. x.........

1 HaywardTyler ?111? l' PUMP COMPANY o*! l i( ENGINEERING STANDARDS sopm.4.s, i o% PUMPSEISMICAff0A.S.M.E.CODEANALYSIS-IS 5.1. 3 Nozzle Loads for Seismic Conditions When stated in the Customers specification. all nozzle loads are multiplied by the multipliers for seismic conditions. 5.1.4 Shaft Horsepower with the only nozzle load being Mx.In the motor ped The moment. Mx. is by 'the standa,rd conversion equatien shown below h -8 C. of G. [ t x m 1 NNNNNN\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\ \\\\\\ y. Horsepower x 550 x 60 _ft.-lbs. t 27*N 5.1.5 Desion Pressure The design pressure is calculated as the ma pressure plus the maximum suction pressure.ximum shut off _5.1.6 Hydrostatic Test Pressure The hydrostatic te'st pressure is calculated as 1.5 times the design pressure times the ratio of the code allowable stress cold over the code allowable stress at design temperatures. PHYD TEST = 1.5

PDES * (o' allow cold U" hot p

=.-........... /

Hayward Tyler j;m"

PUMP COMPANY ou

~( ENGINEERING STANDARDS m.,.w.e.. %. n : PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REV 5.1.7 Equivalent Pressure In the an:1ysis of flanged joints the nozzle loads must be combined with the pressure to form an equivalent pressure. This is done by the following equation from A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article NB 3647: equiv. = p + 16 M + F 4F p 7/ g3 7/ CA' az 6 [} x ov 5 n, Where: F is the force perpendicular to the face of the flange H is the bendino moment in in-lbf. H aiky2,g,2' G is the diameter at the effective gasket load 5.2 Integrity calculations 5.2.1 Stress in'a cylinder This analysis applies to nozzles, vertical pump columns, and casings. e a Standard issued by: Approved by: a

! HayvardTyler 5.27i3 "' l PUMP COMPANY am! f ENGINEERING STANDARDS so,., o,t o n :: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REV Ref Article A2212 AS!!E III 2 2 6t P(1+Z )f(y,3) = 2 j P/(Y-1)+F/A+

,x2,,,y '

6 = 2 g ,gjg 6 II"ZIIIY-l) ~ r

T1t "

M

R/J z

L F .J-4 R Radius to test ooint = [ I tioment of inertia about transverse axis = J Torsional ffoment of inertia = A = Area of nozzle P Z, Y, 6 ' U ' U are as defined in Article 2000. t 1 r T is shear stress across the face of the nnzzle. 1t From these principal stresses are calculated 0'0 U+U 1 2 t 1 [ t - "I +T1t 0 3 r The maximum shear stress is the creater of SS O-0 U*# U-U = g 2 2 3 3 1 2 2 2 This is compared to the cod 6 allowable stress divided by 2 to obtain a safety factor. SAF 2,ilow Sa =

, *'8 si.no.ra s u o.4 ny

app,...o e :r

! HarvardTyler l).2"' i } PUMP COMPANY om: -( ENGINEERING STANDARDS w; wm PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIO 5.2.2 Casino Stresses 5.2.2.1 Horizontal Pumps The casing minimum wall thickness is: Ref: ASME III NB 3442 Fillet A Rad. 4 t f i i m -- ( tg /r t,/ h ,/' b s s y,,,,,, 3 5.,,,,,, s/mw/" Q Casing wall minimum thickness t, 0.63 x P x A = 5, Minimum Volute and Casing flat wall t, = Crotch radius t 0.3 x t, = e Cutwater and splitter radius t 0.05 x't, = s Fillet Radius O.I t, or.25 in. The casing is analysed per section 5.2.1. g*' si.nasce inwea ny: Approved e :r /

~ Mayriard Tyler l.P "' PUMP COMPANY c" s w.d .[ ENGINEERING STANDARDS o.s. m.: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 5.2.2.2 Vertical Pumps The cylindrical sections of a vertical pump are analysed per section 5.2.1. The stress in the pressure loaded top plate is analysed as shown below. The pump column is inodelled as a beam and analysed by the "NASTRAN" finite element computer program. The column is assumed to be rigidly attached at the mounting bracket 2 and simply supported at the radial supports. Any corrosion allowance is not included in the calculation of the rigidity but is included in the calcu-1ation of the weight. The applicable loads include weight, nozzle loads and seismic loads. These are then combined by the "NASTRAN" program to obtain the internal forces and ( moments. These internal loads are then used to calculate column stresses by the methods of section 5.2.1 and flange stresses by methods of 5.2.3. Flat plates used as closure for cylindrical walls such as-suction covers and top covers are analysed in accordance with A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article NC 3225.

s 5.2.3 Flange Stresses

' Flange stresses are calculated according to A.S.M.E. Code Section !!! Appendix XI based on an equivalent pressure calculated according to A.S.M.E. Code Section III Article NB 3647. i i Nozzle loads are taken into account by calculatthg an equivalent 1 pressure in accordance with NB 3647.1 p ,p4 16M _, 4F 89 3 2 w"G 7t"G M = 8ending Homent in in-lbs. F = Axial force in Ibs. G = Diameter of Effective Gasket Load [' sierwiers issued by: Approved by:

Hayvard Tyler ei[2" ~ PUMP COMPANY i on. ENGINEERING STANDARDS son. des: o,. u: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE l 4 The bolt loads are calculated as For Operating Conditions 2 W,) =.785 x G x P + 2 x b x 3.14 x G x m x P i For Gasket Seating Wm2 = 3.14 x b x G x y The bolt area required is the greater of: kl " W [3 m1 b 42 - %2/S. i The flange bolt load is the greater of: i W=Wm1 (. W = (Am + Ab) Sa 2 The stress is given by: Longitudinal hub stress SH = f x Mo +PxB Lxgl'xB 4xgo Radtal flange strer.s Sg=(1.33xtxex1)xMo Lxt2xs Tangential flange stress S=yxMo t t' x B -ZxSg Ref. NB 3647.1 (d) The design safety factors are: e Longitudinal Hub Stress SFg = 1.5 x Sm Sg Radial Flange Stress SFa = 1.5 x S m ( Sg T Tangential Flange Stress SFT = 1.5 x S m Si stenearn reeuen sy: Appro,ee sy:

l Hayward Tyler

i&!

PUMP COMPANY om: ENGINEERING STANDARDS (( I PUMP SEISMIC #fD ASME CODE #iALYSIS t 5.P.4 Backcover and, Gland Stresses

Reference:

The calculations are done in accordance with articles NC 3325 a ND 3325. Since the analysis is identical for the covers in questions the nomenclature of NC 3325 will be used. l l I r COVE R GUND Pa'fE l I' / i zzz r //)fV4 ////j,f ,d j -.- tt- =............... I\\

~ ' Heyuard Tyler 'w Pw 18 PUMP COMPANY o.s.: f( ENGINEERING STANDARDS f PUMP SEISMIC AND ASME CODE ANALYSIS For Operating Conditions: t =.d / C*P/S = 1.78

W*hg/S*d3' (j) where C =.3 (Fig. NC 3325-1-d and e)

P = design pressure 'S '= allowable stress at Design Temp. (Table'l - 7.0, Appendix I) W = total bolt load (XI-3223 (3) and (4)) = W,g (for operating conditions) For a grooved peripheral gasket, the minimum cover plate thickness under the groove or between the groove and the outer edge shall be, [ 1. 78&W*hg/S*d3 tm a d For gasket Seating: .Eq"(I)aboveshallbeused and P = design pressure = 0 S=allowablestressatatmosphericten.(TableI-7.0, AppendixI) W=(k+A)Sa/2, b Where S, = allowable stress of bolts at atmospheric temp. Ab = total basic min. minor area of bolts (in.2) 2 Wm! =.785

G P + 2b
G
m
P
3.4 Where P = design pressure H = gasket factor (Table XI - 3221.1-2)

Q' smeare suuce sy: m,,,,,,. /2

j Hay.vard Tyler liAc"' i PUMP COMPANY l c*; (( ENGINEERING STANDARDS suomenes: %n :

Pl#P SEISHIC AND ASME CODE ANALYSIS b, = basic gasket " seating width (Table XI - 322'1.1-2)

For b, 6.25 in. b = b, and G = d For b, >.25 in. b = b, and G = d - 2b "T ^ WM - 3.14 b*G*Y = the greater of W or W mt m2 W Sa where Y = gasket seating pressure (Table XI - 3221.1-1) S,= allowable stress of bolts at atmospheric temp. S = allcwable stress of bolts at design temp. b Note - tables XI-3221.1-1 and XI-3221.1-2 l I and II. are attached as Appendix =a-.,....... /

Hayyard Tyler fi,'2" PUMP COMPANY w.L g( ENGINEERING STANDARDS sva m.on.' % w.: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS 5.2.5 Bolt Loading (Attachment, Pedestal & Foundation) Foundation and attachment bolt loading is analysed by the methods shown below. It is assumed that the baseplate is rigid with respect to the attachment bolting. The load absorbed by each bolt is directly proportional to the distanca from the axis of the resultant bending moment. (M R Where: MR "i N* Mx is the resultant moment in the x-direction as calculated in section S.i Therefore: the for*ce in the bolt is: Fi = K h g Where: h of the res,ulting bending moment.is the perpendicular distance form t 2 K = M 2 hj Therefore: t e vertical reaction is: ( Fz9 = -fz,- K

h

./ g 4 .6 .\\ y e P 0 4 ( For circular bolt distribution, i.e. mounting flanges, this load becomes: ) Fi = 4 MR + E2 3 NR N g,]8 standard esivea e :r Approveo ny:

Hayverd Tyler ym" PUMP COMPANY ca. /( ENGINEERING STANDARDS so,.w... %. m.: PUM'P SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANAL.YSIS To calculate the horizontal reactions it is assumed that plane horizontal forces are shared equally by each' bolt and that the reaction to the vertical moment is proportional to the distance from the centroid to the bolt. This reaction acts in a direction perpendicular to the line from the centroid to the bolt. V2 , ['y F,, 8 N,. \\ F,, \\.: 'g NM 4 e, ~ ( ,\\ y $F Fi = KDi = K (x[-x) + (Yi - Yc) c 2 Where: K =,M /01 g FXtotal = Fi + Fx/N ) = 2 standard issued by: Approved by:

l ! HayyardTyler jm"' l PUMP COMPANY I om: t,( ENGINEERING STANDARDS suo m. des I PUMPS'EISMICAhDA.S.M.E.CODEANALYSIS-ISSUE & REVISIONS f 5.2.5.1 } Bolt Stress (Attachment, Pedestal and Foundation Bolts) Ref: Faires, Desian o' 'tachine Elenents l:ac!!1llan, 'TeliTork,1TGE Load Fx,Fy, F, where Z is alonn the axis of the bolt, Initial Bolt Force F9= 1.5 * (l'n/(K + K ))

F, S

p f I'here K=EA L Uhere E Younq's ffodulus = i A Bolt or part stress area = L Effective lenqth = K, K for part = ( Kb K f r the bolt = Initial Torcue T = 2

Bolt Size
F /12.

ft.-lbs. 9 [ Bolt size = !!ominal size in inches. Bolt Axial Stress S = (F9+F

K /IEb + E ))/A osi 7

b p Shcar Stress 55 = F 2,p 2' /A x y Note for naskets present K = 1 P L L,p E A p g g Principal Strcsses "I ' 2 f. [.....(f-)2 f 332 ( Hax. Shear Stress (E max) = 0{ - Y ) 2 Safety Factor = S YEx 2 8 Standard lasued by: Approved by: s.

Harvard Tyler y.?a"' 1 PUMP COMPANY w.u ([ ENGINEERING STANDARDS [ f PUMPSEISMICANdA.S.M.E.'CODEANALYSIS-ISSUE & REVISI NOTE: The allowable bolt stress is as given in the A.$.M.E. Code Section III Appendix XI for all code bolting and in 60% of yield for all other parts as specified in the A.S.M.E. Code Section III NF. 5.2.6 . Shaft Stress ~ The pump shaft analysis is based on modelling the rotating shaft as a simply supported beam under the influence of static and operating loads, and applie's to all pump types. The loads applied include: static weight, hydraulic thrusts - radial and axial, and seismic loads. For conservative results the seismic loads are taken to act in ( the same direction as the resultant of the static and hydraulic loads. Calculations made include: bearing loads, shaft deflection, critical speed, and stresses. For.all of these the hydraulic load on the impellers are calculated in accordance with: A. J. Stepanoff. - Centrifugal & Axial Flow Pumos, ~ John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1967. i Shaft stresses include axial stress due to thrust and hendina, tangential stresses rfue to keyways, and shear stress due to torque. standard fasued by: Approved by: S

4 Hayward Tyler MM"} i PUMP COMPANY s o.w ,{ ENGINEERING STANDARDS Supersedes:; Ong. No.: PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS 1 i Multistage Vertical Pump shafts may be analysed by the NASTRAN" finite element computer pro the bearings are modelled as springs. gram, in which case The allowable stress for shafts is 60% of the yield' stress. _5.2.7 Pedestal Stresses This applies to pumps with centreline support. .u 4 i Nx h Fy 7 g L E F Dy - i (a) The pump is assumed to be rigid. (b) Misalignment in the pump axis is neglected. (c) When two pedestals are in the axis of deflection, the pedestal act as a guided centreline. (d) When only one pedestal is in the axis of deflection, the pedestal act as a simple cantilever. 'i.e. for 2-pedestal systems the deflections in the x-direction are as simple cantilever and those in the y-direction are as guided cantilevers. l deflections are guided cantilevers.For 4-pedestal systems all ho l ( T> T' l-Simple i, Guided 1, Cantelever l Cantelever a 8 I t. ( ,S ) P l= s -..,........,. D

T ^ Hay xard Tyler y,'a" ~ ~ PUMP COMPANY o.s.: ENGINEERING STANDARDS ~ PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANAL.YSIS 5.2.8 Weld Stresses The weld stress is calculated the same as the pedestal stress; that is O' = Mxx Y + MAY +F Ixw*N Iyw*N WAREA*N where Ixw the weld moment of inertia per pedestal (x-direction) = Iyw the weld moment of inertia per pedestal (y-direction) = WAREA the effective cross-sectio,nal area of the weld = ~ (> $v a h ' /. H y'"Q .- / r \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ l l k ) 8 Standard Issued by: Approved by: m

I ~ ' Hayward Tyler }M PUMP COMPANY W ,(j $gpersedes: ENGINEERING STANDARDS % wo.: PUMP SEIfiMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 5.3 Operability calculations 5.3.1 Natural Frequencies 5.3.1.1 Shaft Natural Frequencies The pump shaft is analysed by numerical integration using the " SHAFT" program assuming stiff bearings. Multistage vertical pump shafts may be anslysed by the "NASTRAN" finit element computer program, in which, case the bearings are modelled as springs. The critical speed is calculated using an energy balance method in accordance with: KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS OF MACHINES, G. H. Martin. The effect of axial thrust is not taken into account. The general equation used is: g[ Wy 2 y c Rad /sec [W Where W is the concentrated weight and y is the deflection at this reight. l l l 1 k) 8 Standard issued by: Approved by: a,

\\ Haywerd Tyler jjM"' I PUMP COMPANY o~i !( ENGINEERING STANDARDS

-.s

w. No.:

PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 5.3.1.2 Pedestal Natural Fr'equency The pump is modelled as a rigid mass mounted on top of the pedestal. (a) When two pedestals are in the axis of deflection the pedestals act as guided cahtelevErs.- (D) When only one pedestal is in the axis of deflection, the pedestal acts as a simple cantilever. t ~~ j 7-Tr I i 8 I srriete I culoco cNJTEttvER !8 cuayc tcyct: lI l. .,I ( .,I I L_... f i.e. for 2-pedestal systems the deflections in the x-direction are l as simple cantilever and those in the y-direction are as guided cantilevers. For 4-guided cantilevers. pedestal systems all horizontal deflections are as Natural frequency for simple cantilevers is given by: Wn _1 [3Ela' 2 Y / WL4 cps Where I is the total moment of inertia. Natural frequency for guided cantilevers is given by: WA=W 12EIq' 1 WLJ cps Natural frequency in the e-direction is given by: 1 /A Eo' Wn = WV W L Where A is equal to the total cross-sectional area of the pedestals. g"j siendara assued by: Approved by: A

r

Ha" ward Tyler Na"9 W

l PUMP COMPANY 'om:. Page: 28 ,. ( ENGINEERING STANDARDS Supersedes: o we.. NUMPSEISMICANDA.S.M.E.CODEANALYSIS

5. 3.1. 3 Vertical Pump Columns The casing is modelled as a beam, fixed at one end and simply supported at the radial stiffeners.

The corrosion allowance is not included in the calculation of the rigidity but is included in the weight along with the water and the enclosing tube. The natural frequency is calculated by use of the "NASTRAN" finite element computer program. The mo' tor is modelled as a cantelever supported above the pump. It is also assumed to rigidly attached at the mounting flange and analysed by the "NASTRAN" program. 'The stiffness of parts with equally spaced radial stiffeners is calculated by: I=Icylinder+N(bh3 + bh

R )

2 Where: R is the distance from the centre of the cylinder to the centroid of the radial stiffeners. N is the number of radial supports. 5 O.@' 9 ( ) 2 Standard Issued by: Approved by: a

l HaywardTyler n 74?" ~ Pas *: 29 PUMP COMPANY o t.9 I g( ENGINEERING STANDARDS PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVIS 5.3.2 Shaft Deflections The loads applied include: static weight, hydraulic thrusts - radial and axial, and seismic loads. For all of these the hydraulic load on the impe11ers are calculated in accordance with: A. J. Stepanoff, CENTRIFUGAL & AXIAL FLOW PUMPS, John Wiley & Sons New York 1 1967. [q i Shaft deflection is calculated by a double intenration method. l y 7 J.1.dx = lEl sa Mhere M is the aprilied bendinn moment and is a function j of X. y is the deflection at point X l I is the shaft moment of inertia in'bendinn I i I For this integration axial loads intermediate bushing and wear ring support are not taken into account. 5.3.3 Coupling Missalignment i i Pedestal deflections are calculated as shown below: Two pedestars The deflection at the pump centreline in the x-direction is given by: Yx = (Fx + Mr/(Dy/2))L3.. My L3 3 EI 2 El ~ The deflection at the pump centreline in the y-direction 1s given by: vy s .k e) Four pedestals The deflection at the pump centreline is given by: L" steno.ra : u.a br: Approved by:

r Hayward T m "; ^' r.se: 30 PUMP COMPANY o.td ENGINEERING STANDARDS PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS 5.3.3 Coupling Misalignment (Cont'd) V= Fi L3 12 E I' I Where Fi is the sum of the appropriate horizontal force (Fx or Fy) and the force due to the vertical moment (Mz). I Fx Ay 2q - i s n Fmn -y-py x 3 M, I ~ j [ 'Two oedestals The horizontal angle of rotation of the pedestals is given by: 0 = (Fx + Hz/(Dy/2))L2 + My L 2 El EI The vertical angle of rotation of the pedestals is given by: 9 = ARCTAN (2 Vx/(Dy/2)) The total misalignment is given by: Misalignment =/(HTAN9)2+(Vy+HTAN9)2' a GNa s ,x / \\ ~ ,s 'v s 's /,s 1 '% / na 5Q[ ~ [Q "' \\ ) n' l ,,k N r 2 i Standard lasued by: Approved by: a

( Haywerd Tyler w PUMP COMPANY l a.<.8 ([, ENGINEERING STANDARDS Supersedes:- PUMP SEISMIC AND'A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS - ISSUE & REVISIONS Four Pedestals The horizontal angle of rotation of the pedestal is given by: ARCTAN [Fxt.3 9 = Dy)/, ARCTAN/FyL3 11 1 \\12 Ely \\12 EI Dx/ x This creates a displacement equal to: Displacements = H TAN 9 The vertical displacement is given by: _L' My_

H displacement

= y Ox EA 0x/2 The total misalignment equals: / displacement 2 + displacement 2' misalignment = y g NOTE: Motor pedestals are analysed similarly and the coupling misalignment due to the shaft deflection. 5.3.5 Bearing Analysis Bearing loads are the reactions at two support points to the loads applied to the shaft, and are calculated by a simple summation of forces and moments. ~ The B - 10 bearing life ls calculated in accordance with the bearing manufacturers manual based on all normal operating loads, and based on peak loads including the Design Base Earthquake. 5.3.6 Fatigue Analysis For shafts a system of alternating and mean stress components is assumed and a safety factor based on an endurance limit is calcualted using method outlined in: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN, J. E. Shigley. ) 2 Standard lasued by: Approved by: C

~ Hay vard Tyler 2 M"' ~ l PUMP COMPANY o~: -(- ENGINEERING STANDARDS i sup m.o.c PUMP SEISMIC AND A.S.M.E. CODE ANALYSIS ' 6.0 Report The Seismic Analysis Report shall contain the following: 6.1 Issue and Revision Sheet plus table of contents using the form of Appendix I. 6.2 Sumary of Analysis using the form of Appendix I. 6.3 Summary of Loadings using the form of Appendix I. 6.4 Detajled calculations including Computer input / output. 6.5 Computer program description including a sample run plus parallel verification calculation.

6.6 Any other required support Engineering Standards.

(' s t 1 t 4 e 9 8 Standard Issued by: Approved by:

Hayyard Tyler n%M"' N': PUMP COMPANY Appendix 1 p ce Supededes; i ENGINEERING STANDARDS

w. u.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS REPORT REPORT No. l _ Revision Issue Date Replaces Pages Revised Issued By Approve t (# TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 i 9 I I ) a.. 2 Standard issued by: Approved by: 1 s

l Haytyard Tyler SECTION: 23+ Pas *: Appendix 1 pag I PUMP COMPANY c='*n f[. ENGINEERING STANDARDS s,..: 5 %. u : . SEISMIC ANALYSIS REPORT 1.0 Sumary of Analysis Results 1.1 Structural Integrity The unit has been shown to satisfy all the Structural requirements of A.S.M.E. Section III and the Contract Specification under the defined loading conditions. All stress levels are within the allowable limits. Details of results maybe found in,section 6 4 1.2 Operebility The pump has been shown to maintain operability through all the operational and environmental events defined in the contract specification. (, Maximum Coupling Misalignment j Running OBE DBE Pump Misalignment Motor Misalignment Shaft Misalignment Total Misalignment Allowable Misalignment Safety Factor Minimum Wear Ring Clearances Clearances at wear rings (Unloaded) Deflections at wear rings Running OBE DBE .1 2 Standard issued by: Approved by: I W

C- ! HayvardTyler $!?,,, ~ PUMP COMPANY

*t j

suom. des: ENGINEERING STANDARDS o.s. no.: SEISMIC ANALYSIS REPORT Bearing Loads Location Running OBE DBE The bearing B-10 life has been shown to be The maximum bearing load pressure has been shown to be ~ r PSI. Shaft Stress I Axial Alternating ( Endurance Limit 2.0 Loading Sumary Load Specified Load Load Used in Calculation Running OBE DBE Running OBE DBE Suction Fx i Fy l Fz Mx y Mz Discharge Fx Fy Fz Mx ~ W Mz Accelerations OBE H V DBE h V 4 a2 Standard issued by: Approved by:

Hayward Tyler n % "' T ~ Pase: Appendix 1 pai PUMP COMPANY o.s.: ~ w a: o s *: SEISMIC ANALYSIS REPORT Load Specified Load Load Used in Calculation Running OBE DBE Running OBE DBE Design Pressure Gland Pressure Test Pressure Design Temp. Q-Rated Q-BEP Suction Pressure TDH BHP RPM ( Pump Weight ~' Base Weight Motor Weight C1 ass G (), 2 (o g a ~..

s @l872CW180413 F00 CE A INF O e e est Cuate* CAL e SALANCEetP6awT S e 90stlereesss PLANT UTs6ef tf 3 e P4 ANT 988#04 e COavTm06 Systtees e 8 LE CT## Cat grimets C O** Du s? G uCS e # AlesteNG & COATsaveS

CovskiST AuCTumat e eeuCLlam oSTRESS e A aCasTECTumAt eStamfur e Cows? muCT80es 2

...T.a....Ts... . Ci.it T IDENTIFY 18e6 TITLE OF Teoll DOCWhetNT Peq.e \\m 14c7.:Z-Q1055 ART d e 1492(a -i:'so2.2 O\\oES AWT" Bhr D atasef l o -....... .e.. e

".#...in.8..

'.'M. 't.. g.3. L.1'".,'.f.*- t t. ~ 5 -.W v. t.w..f t %* *.::.':,,J ~.e?,1 C G i rvso 6 - N ' O D. I Wies 15T ATUE i womawafemettro. M y' atvist anse atsweestT wens esa, enOCIED f 3u044CT TO teeCo#*D Ad, ~l 44Teces De Coeanssas i ,y seed *C &Te p. 3C atvist ames attutesif. i wennesavesetooOcets aQ at vita engt at cuint e woes esa, peoCtt D 8seergoesaf aces Des 6v DistmitwTeese #4O'S m006019 t3 /191 1 ._.._~_._..._..,_....._.._.,__.._ _ _ _ _ _ _

hic-( & OO lk,) Q-)& { hD i.. .f!ST' H' 20 STATIC I TEST CERTIFICATE f$$-/05/ ~ CONTRACT L o / 7 3 - fr d 9 ( EQUIPMENT / ASSEMBLY SERIAL NUMBER DATE C c. i GdL 9o44 o 1 3/gl76-PROJECT NAME PART NUMBER /t-y 2 c v. u-u y n -) o / - S oD - o 9-/ CUSTOMER P.O. TEST PROCEDURE DATE

9. 3. '7/2-/ wy J/3h >

ITEM PARTS INCLUDED PART NUMBER BATCH / SERIAL ff1f -C d f. Mt% wp a b I ron -n 2./

9 7r - o o JL oi e F7/- o ct-Cdwt '

Qw d 3 0 - /J // 1 t

m.a. t.

YL., e t lLJ -hi i hr. O s ~ Sc o - o y G o ;I l i ni D ~~D N.' 70 START TIME FINISH TIME ' DURATION - /o i o g-AM F / o l 3 f A. g 3q_Af MIN. p' TEST MEDIUM TEST # dSfDRE R-c,o / -) k'ATER@ ' Y[ DEGREES F -h PSIG N GAUGE NO. 5 RANGE CALIBRATED BY M hts D I-n r I or 4t o o 3 /.t h tr .RP-i ' EVIATIONS NOTED DURING TEST y D 3 h]ON& 1, .--.- m....... <_, a., _ 3;g. ~ l l stnevision atd p q EPTANCE,OF THE ABOVE PARTS TO THE ABOVE PROCEDURE v[km, pg ^ CUSTOMER DATE 3 l ? Y.,A Y/7r '"E'UQO- $,,h e l J4 9aL 4-on,oioss Anr l -1 "~Y

3R209NS011-D O Maximum A11ownble [ Nozzle Loads \\ 1 Force (lbs.) Moment (ft.-lb.) ) Nortle Conditions Fx Fy Fr Mx My l Mz Suction Normal 8000 8000 8000 20,000 20,000 20,000 l Discharge Normal 6500 6500 6500 16,000 16,000- 16,000 Suction Faulted 10,000 10.000 10,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Discharge Faulted 8000 8000 8000 20,000 20,000 20,000 l 6, I G 4 en O k e 8-1 ,re- ,,,n,_.,,--_,_,-,_

pump Suc77ed SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 [' g 1 CALCULATION COVER SHEET SHEET C ALC. NO. 5R 2 o9 R c o o 34 STRELs AwAby st s Wom. CoM Po*JmW coo ti N m wAv mR. sysvam N/A SugJECT AS*' A u c u "$ D c " - ' a c ' ' ' G o o A 'o PN" u-2 4 M-h ND FILE NO. c c w t-UMP t A. FRoM s o cc -id E S HE.ADEM To C cvJ PuM P IB 6 s c. Ano e...,=

M.* p u > =. u.= 9 d w AB DISCIPLINE RECOROOFaSSUE TOTAL REV.

DESCRIPTION NO.OF ORIG CKR Gi. 05 CHIEF DATE NO. SHEETS COM MITTED CAL.C. 4 5hJ EL O

sue Micae mi c w n N/A o

h[ gjl[f Co M m i--T sii.D cA L,C. M EN i S E.O DUE p5 p N/A f/y To Rt:LocAview on suppe=vs 3ll ' j/ 6.2 g fir! 95 ' (I N/A l INFORMATION ENTERED IN THIS SPAct:

SHOW PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEER STAMP. lF REQUIRE.D.

e ENTER REFERENCE TO INCLUSION OF CHECKER'S ALTERNATE CALCULATIONS. lF USED. ~ e PROVIDE ANY NOTES TO AS$lST CHECKING AND APPROVAL e M AY LIST STANDARD COMPUTER PROGR AM (SCPI IDENTIFICATION INCLUDING VERSION AND OPTION USED. This calculation is for Dunit 1;O unit 2: sunits1.s2 ME 101 Version: K2 Date Released: March 21, 1985 SNUM Nos.: v)(o G o

/X153B Date of Run: 5/as/Ss, 5/25/B5 7'

1. $ rF 1308 87/84) e

l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT { JOB NO.14926 1 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. RC-oo 34-SEE THE COVER SHEET ice f SUSJECT SHEET NO. REV. ORIGtNarom DATE CMECKER DATE R Ev. omiciNATom DATE CHECKER OATE l .s{nltt! $/ 5/2RGS G 2. G//W s / // ' 41 a 3 5.2 Nozzle Ioad Stmnary p cc PUMP t A C 3 st a.o i N P A t o t A ) gyj IQUIPMENr/TPNS 9 su.W e, se o a i 4 1 PIPE SIZE & NOZZ2 DESCRIPTICN 2o" 5 t e REFERINCE ICR NOZZE ALT.ORBLES S st 2.oe M S o I t - D

}

M-x ) DA3A POINT 2e5 MEETS THE ALID&BLE (YES/NO)_ cam / FAB ISO NO. 5Mu.e 972 EYUL$ me a "cc-'" -w^s Teral Axis orientaticn i FT E ES (LB) PO ETPS (PT-LB) ~ e I to IDAD CASE Fa Ib Pb FV or Fr Ma 2 m mew is AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR TORSION BENDING BENDING in NORMAL (P) NORMAL (N) is UPSET (P) 34 UPSET (N) [ FAULTED (P) FAlfi TFT (N) popggt carc _ 4ie 2 co 8 i 1954-

2. I S 5 5 2.t (o 7451 l

Arrry Boco Pccc Boca 2c. co e, 2 o. c e c. 20.c o c> CALC-P CPSEr so i N/t\\- nr.rrw 37os 72.4.o To t 4-9244 15240 18 e fo t m FAUL e enre-1 ss nrrru /ocoo sr. coc to, oco 25,cco- ?g. oco -~ r;. coo CATf. og Aum l. I as i a NOTES: so 1. Fv = SRSS of two shear cxznpcnents so N = SRSS of two banding w % sits g I 31 2. Fr = SRSS of all three force ccmponents a Mr = SRSS of all three mcrnent cmponents i 3. Iccal'a'is tsards GDBAL - X ( Nosavuj as 4 NO GLW i. Ay o FA u ti'E:.D LOAD coM ONA7 io"S E 6EE MEXT fAGE STP 1310 (744) .. _ ~

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 -oo b4 CALCULATION SHEET cal.C ND. 'O' SHEET NO. $USJECT $E C TH S: N U **

9 M U -T

' REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE btluf51SMP/PS G Z. S//5 tlV? t l5. P_ # odzth LCAO SUMM ARy Q ow r' D ) N 1 2 DATA Po'suT L 2."D 5 3 FORc EtS ( Le ) MoME.NTS C vT-LB > LoAo case. Fe Fw 1 c_ M a-Mb M e. AxtAL SWEAR. SHEA R ToRSicM BEuoNG BEwome f G7 - GIS -2 e 5 -27o 8 31 18 WE.t G wT BS ~2 oat -i t G 4- -i t i 7 35G2 -7124 8 344-2e2 385 2234 as S t -GSS TwRug TH RM 2 327 95 457 2o85 24c2 -i s G -'t rwa u g SD -t 8 29 -i G 5e -iG r7 d 38 s -6845 rHRM A GG -2 e G 2 -4577 -5 8 GS 3868 -T + G *) THRMS 352 3 G eo 3ss EacG 2eG 7 -4AG Twe n G N ""A' 413 2681 19 54 at35 52 i co 7451 14 1s ~4 -2526 -2 s 4.o -3Gos STA4 -9231 ( THRM T 17 1e to MRS2(s.g.e)* 3 2. 9 o Aces 3879 53G9 8 6 To-9648 S AM 2 ( s. s. iE 3 1 r 5 t 4 t co 3 'l O 9 -{240, T o t 4-92.4 a-152 A9 i 88GJ FAu t7 E D 23 %I E.i G H"1-

== T H E R M A L -t 24 N OT E: 1. N o R.M A L as (D S.E-)t -t 26 E. F AU L T E.D = THERNA L -f h/El G MT s A M 2 C. S. s. E 73## -t-2e 2uwe v x ie 5 e, D ATE.o 5/2 5 /s3 29 Meioi -p, y mem so 31 32 e4 38 38 STP 1310 (7/94)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ( JOB NO.14926 l CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. RC-co34-SEE THE COVER SHEET i o 2. s susJact sHa rt wo. REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CMECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE /.,& j fee SbHPS G 2. 6lu/8f / I 1 't/ / ' ~(/ 2 3 5.2 Nozzle Icad Simnary EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT /b # f.?2 fyP n e5 ( 3R 2.0iN PA 6 oi B ) BEY) a 4 s PIPE SIZE & NOZZLE DESCRIPTICN 2 o" s REFERINCE IDR NOZZLE AIJIEABLES 3 sR 2e9 MS o I i -- n -ZI N-x) 7 DA2A POINF 435 MEEIS THE ALICWABLE (YES/NO) CAD / FAB ISO NO. 7T,#43 P%.5. 2 t.wa uo. ao"cc-i2i o-wA b ICCal Axis Orientation e FO N (LB) Kymrs (Pr-LB) to ICAD CASE Fa 7b FC PV or Fr Ma Mb Mc Ma er M,- 11 AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR 'IORSICN BDDING Ba' DING 5 NORMAL (P) is NORMAL (N) UPSET (P) i4 UPSET (N) [ FAUl_TED (P) ,y FAlf! TFT (N) go. NORMAL cAfr-CB 2 5 2os2 3 o 7.5 2o82 to55o 2.6 E 2 se Artrw Booo Scoo Scoo 2 coco 2oooo 2 coco CALC. ~ a UPSET 'Mi n as artru FAUL2ED chT - 3951 5 7 't S 9073 8 t i3 2 % 33 e 13 5 attrw Iocoo Iocoo I0 ooo 250oe 25eoo 25000 M-34 N as as NOTES: 1. Fv = SRSS of two shear upw.nts M, = S.SS of - - e. n 2. Fr = SRSS of all three force ccr:Ements as Mr = SRSS of all three mcznent ccrnpanents ( 3.- Ideal'a'is towards CEcBAL -x(Mogrs) 4-NORMAL AND FAULfE.O LOAD Co Mr3 m ATioeJ5 as SEE NEXY PAGiE ) sTe isto me4:

I SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CAi.C ND. RC-oO S4- __ CALCULATION SHEET D - SHEET No. - 5"EEF T I DATE__ S E': TH F tov " R CHECKER DATE ORIGIN AT OR sus.iscT I DATE / REV. CHECKER DATE G Z- , f.{tspf ". E ORIGINATOR }.dn/[E/ rM'/?s l summary ( c.owv'o ) i y

<v: 5. 2. N o z z t. e.

LoAo ~435 DATA Po'"T : s M cme.M%C F T-LB ) 5 FORCES ( LB 3 Mc Fa_ F6 Fc M a_ togo casa SHEAR. TOR 5sOM BFfdDiNG BOJDih1 l AXi AL SHEAR 9D ( G:> -Sa7 -729 t o i co 14TS SG 1910 34 81 994 w si c, HT -GS2 220 -3915 -928 -210 8 -2o69 -918 rG71 THRmi 48 14 6 aso2. ~l 4 ) TwnMa -505 i Co l -l o 24 -1495 -2498 -7 2 *> e554 -24o7 7HRMS 81 20o8 3625 iite 7 sam & -G47 Soi -zTo6 -841 -1565 -2548 -1553 8681 -r H R M 5 l Ta mm G toS5o 2G52 925 2o92 3oT5 2o82 16 [ NORMAL I) -i i 4 a --t e o co -assa -irre iae33 - z e i 7_ TwRm 7 is to -r o e 1 I 4rSA SGoS 9684 MR.s ?_ C s. s. E )

20o8 3Gei 59 35__

So S 18 at SAM 2 C S. S. E ) 5 r t 3 J eo r 3, e i i 5 2.sGs3 ei35 J 395t FAu tT Eo L 34 wet C, H r

==. TH E RMA t._ % NOT E - 1 N o R m L, 3e wdt e s-r -a-@S. S. Ef Ta e.R N A L. t 4 = n

2. FAutTED

-t-s A M 2. c. e.s. a f n n ~ s/as/ as M re u w = v x i s s e, wao u s. t e t 31 + F=om ~ l \\., 3e 38 L STP 1310 (7/94)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. RC- 0034 susJEc7 sHE ET NO. I O 4" ( REV. ORiciNATOR CATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR CATE CMECKER CATE l ,Jlv/m 5) daPA's &<Z-W/V8f~ 1 W (/ ' (/ 3 2 5.2 Nozzle Icad SurTnary ~ ECUIPMENT I 4 EQUIPMENT /TPNS i c c, Py P i C (, S R 2 o l N P A t o i c.) b(. Y 3 a s PIPE SIZE & NOZZLE DESCRIPTICN ' 2o" s REETRENCE EUR NOZZLE ALIOGELES 3R 2c3NS o i t - D c C-Z ) ll(.- x ) 7 DA2A POINT r5o MEEIS DIE ALIOGBLE (YES/NO)- im1 Axis orientation cAa/ FAB ISO NO. R13%S 'hc af7 t.ius uO.2o'cc -isio_ m 3 s FOPCES (LB) foMENrs (PT-LB) to IDAD CASE Fa Eb FC W or Pr Ma Mb M-Ma e !^- gi AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR 'IORSICN BH; DING BH DING NORMAL (P) in NORMAL (N) 13 UPSET (P) ja UPSET (N) y FAULTED (P) sh FAtHTEC (N) kasan caf e. Sol 3762-is3o 2 o ro i 4728 G seen is ATT m Boco B'o00 A' coo 2ocoe 2o000 2oooo 1 CALC. o UPSEr ,y 3, ati m 2 FAUL e enTc 4544-9825 5focoo 7252 14 fos 2 20089 arrm tocoo 10000 tocoo 25 coo' 2 c; o c c' 25000 CAIf. / 34 ALIOf as 1 l s NOTES: l 1. Fv = SRSS of two shear w w 4ents t so ,M = SRSS of two bending cxrponents B 2. Fr = SRSS of all three force canponents at Mr = SRSS of all three mcznent wwients ( 3.' Iccal'a'is tcwards coBAL -xCMoRTH) j N O% %, AND FAutTE.o LOAD c o M rostv A Ti o N S a j S E E N Epc r p A G g s M I l sTP 131o (7/54) T

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 2 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. NI

Oo Ob Io 5 b E E W A-COUGO EWFAP SHEET NO.

SU5 JECT 4 REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REV. ORIGINATOR DATE CHECKER DATE \\ 4 skn &j S/.38/85 6t. WJ85 s/ ( ' 6'

5. 2 NozztE. LOAD

SUMMARY

( CONT'D ) 3 J DATA PoIMT : T50 3 1 FOR c.Es C LB ) McMarJr5 C FT-LB ') LOAD c.A S E. R Fd F c. M o. M io Mc AX1AL SHEA R. SW2.A R. TORSteM E6JDMG 6-NDt NG w=.sswT io3 -s7 _G a 3 -758 i s T 2. s a. s o 7 -I AT 3ee -a 3 3 n d 2. s te S is o9 TsRMg - G 2. 514 - S oc3 -88 toS7 i278 TaRM2 Ts RM 3 2. -3G T 5 -11 3 ) -is 2 3 264. r -T 8 2.9 I rHRM4 -15 2. G29 -3n5 2GI sGGo iG S8 TH RM 5 - G o 4- -3 ggt -t 2.1 7 -iSib 33SG tG et TH R M (o l 9 8 -3528 -t So 7 -t G o '5 SoA G r s t 2. 14 N 501 S7G2 19 3 o 2SGI 4728 G5BB is THRM 7 -7i5 -4 7e sl-tee 4 -2o 2.\\ 512.9 -tois5 /r j is 19 M ks 2 (.s.s.E ) # 3932 A.e 4 6 3e4 3 .44rS 8151 i n z o.3 SAM 2 C 5. S. E ) 15 52. 18 18 58 ido FAU LTED 4 5 4 4-9825 S GGo,7 2 52 14.652 2c oB9 23 33 3s N OT E. : l. N O R. MAL.==. TH E.R. MAL. -t-Vd E t Cw HT ss ws.s a v +$s.*o. s. ~

2. F^u t_T es.o = raa mm A t

-t-S AM 2 C 5. E. E [3 #- + Jo 31 4 FRcM M G. t o t RUN4 V X 15 S ES, D ATG o 5 /2.5/S5 l 32 38 STP 1310 (7/54)

( \\ PLLKP bIscWRs C r SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 SHEET 1 ] {- CALCULATION COVER SHEET CALC. NO Elt 7e9 RClb3 5 4 N/A i < tress AN ALV SI S O F: CoupoMr-4T %otl4C W A f N FILE NO. Sus;ECT F R ou h" H E-Att+ -re H C4f Entc H N a ws t A IR IC h A t> >19 4 1 A. M d IC DISCIPLINE RECORD OF ISSUE TOTAL "V* DESCRIPTION NO.OF ORIG CKR GL OS CHIEF DATE NO' SHEETS C OMMITTED CALC. SEE M icf.os:t cwE gjg f 0 Issuen FoR USE i co mmittem calc. RE AMAufsED 4.T. 4 N/A 'g 4 85 l tus To steLotA-riom OF 200 4 sw eet s c omi re e nc. y g sners 54 782u 58 4crask zers & c,z. 4 njg 5 i ) l i j i INFORMATION ENTERED IN THIS SPACE: e SHOW PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STAMP.lF REQUIRED. ,h

ENTER REFERENCE TO INCLUSION OF CHECKER'S ALTERNATE CALCULATIONS,lF USED.

t-e PROVIDE ANY NOTES TO ASSIST CHECKING AND APPROVAL. ~

MAY LIST STANDARD COMPUTER PROGRAM (SCP) IDENTIFICATION INCLUDING VERSION AND OPTION USED.

This calculation is for Ounit 1; unit 2: E units 1 a 2 J. ME 101 Version: K1** 2! Date Released: April 15. 1984 4 1 ..O SNUM Nos.: Vx Gc,i 4 OcGG3 v b Date of Run: 2l14l85 ( afisfas Resp 7 ' :6 l Y: ~\\ 1 Version K1 was loaded on univac System B on July 10, 1984 ~ f, . 'l .TP =. nmi S. ... )

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CALC NO. hC-o3 s SEE THE COVER SHEET 4g REV. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CH5CKER DATE REv. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE I Mdu2.- Lluiss W ol!!/of 2 ygymn f s 5.2 Nozzle Ioad Sisunary b ,o IQUIPME2C/IPNS 4 3 R ze t NPA q ot A. /R toq x c o t E441 h PIPE SIZE & N0ZZ2 DESCRIPTICN g 3, " pomp wemu s REFIRENCE FOR NOZZ2 ALICHA1EES i!n ieq ys eg,-t>

e E

y DMA POINI' Cl I o NEE'IS ' DIE AIICHAB2 )_ Incal Axis orietatim ce/ FAB ISO NO. ss369Pec.to7sw.toLi a we. inicc-tioi-wAs Fui-w (IB) KEENTS (P'r-IE) .e ~ ?w IDAD CASE Fa Ib Fe PV or Fr Ma Mc-E er m- $g AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR 'IORSICN BEND'NG EENDING NORMAL (P) 51 o 69 0 Igiv 0 sso

,u

$.3 NORMAL (N) 13 248o o als 3B49 2.7 51 .4,fy UPSET (P) 1359 f (s,59 2G44 4567 3635 5762 0, UPSET (N) 139 2 4772 Iqos 37os goss a244 4 FAutTED (p) 1914 22.99 3131 stT3 sGqv 7439 ,I FAutTEC (N) 1947

5412, 1494 So ll lpeqq qq4l 7,.

gmnt, e aTc 23 Z48o 69e 16 r7 sg49 27st ATTed c.5oo 65eo G,5ee 16 coo I r., e e.

(Gooo ]% i CALC. m 'gg nTTtL7 I947 5412 3132 5873 I I o99 994l h g caTc 6000 8000 8000 20000 2000o Loooo nTTru 38 ^

b Atuu

.as ? i NOTES: J m n

se 1.

Fv = SRSS of two shear ww.snts N = SRss f tw bendimJ cartsments B ~ .st '-2. Fr = SRSS of all three force ccatponents Mr = SRsS of all three mcznant ccrpenents 3. Iccal'a'is tsards GtreAL_ 'X g l = 1 as l 4 . sw taie(7m

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHEET CA!.C NO. RC-o s s SEE THE COVER SHEET susmer ,,,,,,, 4 9 b _ mav. onscisavon cars cuscusa cars nav. onioiwaron oars cuscusa oars l JSPeW2. 2fults R& 3ptis5 1 a a 5.2 Nozzle Ioad Samnary w o EQUIPMENT /2PNS 6 3R to t MPA lot B /R 2o9 x 00 t E M b h s PIPE SIZE & NOZZI.E IESCRIPTICN 11" PuM9 w n44er a RE2IRENCE ICR N0ZZZZ ALTCHEES 3R 2e4 Ns oi1 -D y DMA POINT 645 MEETS THE ALIDHEE )- A cas/ FAB 150 NO. ss sr;q eccto7 so1Liwar nao. iB"-ec itoi-wAs Tm1 Axis orientaticn e N (IB) KEENTS 0:'P-IE) w IIRD CASE Fa Pb Pc Pv or Pr m m m-m w m. 11 AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR TORSIN BENDING BENDING 'g ta NORMAL (P) 5 o 133*t rq 54 o 371 ,' sa NORMAL (N) 114 Sioo o o f485 scas (y UPSET (P) IGIS 2o1% loS7 IcGo& 46e2. Sco7 A,g UPSET (N) -1717 5471 8640 2s75 So48 1o32t c FAULTED (p) 19 31 2527 5529 1445 5999 giql FAU1TEr (N) -2019 5979 2.111 3412. G437 lisos ' ta ICRMAL r are. 11 4 sleo 1339 i954 285 5685 r . is Arrew G5eo Gsoo G5cc 14eco 16 coo 16ooo i m _ CALC. a, arrew -.m FAtle r arr. Zo29 5979 1529 11445 G437 ll ros -g arTrw Booo 8o00 8000 2 coco < F coco 20000 y cntr. .E as l lst as NOTES: 1. Fv = SRSS of two shear wi@sts

So M, = SRSS of e m bending m. w e ts 2.

Fr = SRSS of all three force cmponents ar A Mr = SRSS of all three mcnent empcnents 3. Iccal'a'is twards GIDBAL X - m. M as STP 1310 (744)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT JOB NO.14926 CALCULATION SHE. 7 CALC NO. RC-o 3s SEE THE COVER SHEET suener g.3 REv. ORIGIN ATOR DATE CHECKER DATE REv. ORIGIN ATOR OATE CHECKER tiATE l R&uL 111rlor it.cd;ew sprisi 1 5: a a 5.2 Nozzle Ioad Stamary EQUIPMENT i' 4 EQUIPMENr/2PNS 4 Sit tol MPA t of C /R.2.e9 Xool EHT b 1 n s PIPE SIZE & NOZZ2 IESCRIPTICN I g

PU Mp D15eM4eE e

RE2ERENCE FOR NOZZ2 AIIDHABES '3R.2c9 u s ot1 n - y Dn'R POINT 4iO MEE'IS THE: AIICHAB2 h)_ A cas/ FAB ISO NO. 4H369Pecto7 m.9 Liwa No.181ce-non -kr43I-1 Ms orientatica r - (I m mens n_rm ,. to .IDAD CASE Fa Ib 7t Fv or Fr Ma 2 Mc-m&w ! .11 AXIAL SHEAR SHEAR TGielut9 BENDING BENDING '.l. ts' NORMAL fP) 45 0 87o ' 4562. 576 3co e- ' ! - is NORMAL (N) o 1623 0 0 449 28o8 'y tJPSET (P) lo7G 1407 1825 Go98 19 21 G3G4 I];.', UPSET (N) 998 4395 823 1450 23 4 8873 'A FAlltTED (P) 1419 '3237 223o GG24 4 o79

192

.g, FAlnTEt (N) 13 4l 5225 112.8 197G - M72. 1070o , is

ICHMAI, f'17/'-

49 162 ~-1 87o 4582. 57G 2.B o g .fie Arirw 6'$co G5 0 0 650e 1600o ICooo 16 000 9 UPSEr CALC. y ..l s, nr.iru h' hAuuIED 4 37, r aTr-l 419 E225 223o 6624 4o79 1o70 0 aryru Sooo geoo gooo ao coo zo ooo 2 c eo. .A. carr. [88 N -.w ~.i3y .' as NOTES: 1. Fv = SRSS of two shear wpEts ~m n, = SRSS of two benaing - p e ts '2. Fr = SRSS of all three force WWsts ~ m Mr = SESS of all three ament ocmponents ~ ( r 3. Iccal'a'is tsards GEDBAL X . I. = P. N ~~ sTP tale (7441

non weno <vur>es.ac.'89 89:33 No.6 PAGE 1 h.: 25, M05 TO: Bill Guerin, Licensing f REF: Conversation with Mr. E. Radobaugh on 6/25/85 regarding faQlted stresses in the TGX RCP casing suction nozzle, Table I of E.M. 5003, Rev.1. REPLY: We repeated the calculation performed by Mr. Rodabaugh and have resolved the diffic'ulty as follows: 1. E.M. 5003, Rev. 1 Table VII, does not contain the footnote (2) on safe-end evaluation found in Table V of Interim Rev. 2 to G-952342-2, ~ Rev. 2, which defines the nozzle loads. This was not clearly defined in the report, which has the effect of eliminating the pipe rupture cases {1abeled "a" and "b" in Table VII) from consideration at the safe-end. Therefore, the stresses reported in Table I of E.M. 5003, Rev.1, do not include.any contribution from the safe-end Elements 1 and 2 for rupture cases "a" and "b."$e hook nde, dsc.ussed abode,it R b e cLeided &c E N16 co3 in 4 S ub > th v e v. s son \\ 2. The reported 33,000 psi stresses in E.M. 5003, Rev.1, are generated from tije remaining case "a" blowdown. We generated, manually, for Elment'1, the same values generated by the computer after 1) combining the applied moments and forces per the rules of specifications (or Table V of E.M. 5003, Rev.1) and 2) calculating tensile and shear stresses. We used the 3099 in.3 section modulus obtained by treating the nozzle safe-end (Element 1) as a simple pipe. Combining all the tensiles and shears, the loading generates, approximately, a 29,000 psi stress intensity. The reported 33,000 value is obtained by combining casing hoop stresses (generated by pressure in the casing) with the shear stress due to loading on the nozzle. Our conclusion is:that there is nothing wrong with the reported values. Admittedly, the report is unclear on the treatment of the safe-end of the nozzle. We trust that this explanation will be sufficient at this time. I can be reached at 412/963-5565 if there are any question.

I WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CIYlSION [ JdEFT / OF / MOTOR OPERATFD GATE VALVE TESL AEPORT PAGE 1 WEMD VALVE ID A N CO G N

8dPA26*W 000/

CUSTOMER ILFNTIFICATION_yAl # T_.Q B

77/CA ASME PRESSURE CLASS.

Va LV E S I Z E.__._f __. _nj_ /_E_ __DE C. I G N PR E S S UR E 6 00 PSI Al f_#9 "F INCHES Siic" ORDER N O4/2' A_SM_ f C NO.al.Y_4 *JAS% ! MOT OR OP MFG.,.f e ma te**W W Br_. ML DE L

E' S IV TESTED IN ACCORCANCE Wl7H TEST SPECIFICATION 7'5099 REV. N TEST INSTRUCT!0l.S FER: 5 ROUTihG O VTP No. 10 REv.

O __. _ TEST GAGE INSTRUMENT #sT N / CALIBRATION DATE//-7-77 iE'iT FRESSURE /A 2 0.lPSIG).TFST DURATION d @ s7 H OSTAT:C ZED INSI'ECTOR [ h,. _/'I /// '/- // I AUT40P: SnEL.L TEST GNA RE DATE

D E '4 T. STAMD $

TEST COMP'_ETED B _URE ^ -M~ d*f* 77 g _j DATE l EACKSEAT TEST DURATION /# MINUTES MINIMyM li ' ' C D E ',5 UR L /M_"JLO. _. __ ( PS I G J LEAK RATE O 0 (CC/HR) LEAKAGE TEST TE ST COMPLETED BY b MM==lY // 7-7 ~/ / l Il@JWTURE DATE l PACklNG Ti1T CUGAT10N /d t'INUTES MIN!!qM TEST CDESSORE f,If.. _(PSIG7 LEAK RATE O 0 (CC/HR) LEAFArE TFST T'ST t,0MPLETED BY 2-- ^ ^rd /#* T *)? 194#TURE / DATE d g TEST C AGE INSTd Jr*f NT #/Y_ E./____ C ALIBRATION DATE/8/ph7 hO Tf*>T LURAllON_ /0. sMINUTES EACH SEAT) I fi ST MFSSOREf,7d (PSib) LEAK ..m t R A T E 'B "S E A T_/tf_L__.__ C C /H R ) DISC TE ST PAESSURE7sf# (FSID) LEAK HY') DOS e AT I C / s LEAAAT.E TEST Auto M i n t IN g y,.(. f_ '.{. / '7 l fg, I ,iGNA M E Cf.TE <.j ,/ l$g g IDENT. S T A*dp 1 Ts.ST COMPLETED BY b-2 ~8~ /t/ f.-7_?_ $15 4TURE DATE COMMENTS VDP Pm. 6 n.__ i l VTD 3 - REVISION 3 (AETS 078) s r gasynw: +

= CALCULATION COVER SHEET 41a?M% )* '%Q,eeT Se: rA h hos Pro ;ect i+'rzt-to) i ,0, N O. SN,,7 O, EuE Cer /nhimumt %u Nixs Bdhsm k in k , Ora,.NO.0 k, C,, h& F,Le NO ORIGIN ATOR SIG. A -DISCIPLINE DATE C A LC. NO. OO/I CHECKERStG. b YYe DATE 7A2/92-QUAUTY CLASSIF. O-RECORD OF ORIGIN AL ISSUE AND REVISIONS " V REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE ORIG CKR GL GS CHIEF NO D 1esu ed ree u.re. 7/>zkz A9/ t.t%ld ?C WP% I '2ensed s' issaed w uoc. 5/2h/n Wbt I(LdrA L.6y) WPf '2 Peaial % wnswa.L L r-w. \\*H'l% Mit'L W-L& W 'Na,1vs1,NN,blndm.eJU n,e,o er1 ek>,u.: 4}l2!(s 4./dBA__ W5. ' Sl5 81f ~' s I RESULTS OF CHECKER REVIEW REVISION NO? g fSSUE ITEM DESCRIPTION I 2. 1 h gg, [g. { J, 8 FINAL RESULT NUMERICAL DIFFERENCES INITI A L 4 ARE ti_Q.T SIGNIFIC ANT; NO CORRECTIONS 7[IlhL g/gg fe[g,fg 9gM N E CESS A R Y DATE O H FIN AL RESULT NUMERICAL DIFFERENCES INITI A L y .63,X SIGNIFIC ANT, N ECESS AR Y CORREC-y T40NS HAVE BEEN MADE* DATE '"' I^L CHILCK M ADE BY ATTACHED ALTERNATE C A LCUL ATIONS. DME T h s's calculaiian is Fo r-lA.n11s l

2-.

M6 /OI Versan 36 /fe. lea. sed I2.//5/P3 i SNitM X 2 oc2y xzozy thn Me: 4/1/M,4/zleq C pe n.Tf^ent s : Se c Sh et 2 h ) '.C O M M I T T E D uo-"n.a.

CALCULATION SHEET HousToNxAs5252 21ss calc.NO. N CHECKED DATE \\ 3 DATE SIGNATUR E SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ,o uo. 14926-001 pro;Ecr o f- [A /c. d,u r- [d, h or ~ SHEET SHEET susaEcr 5.7 PIPING END LOADS FOR ACTIVE VALVES - (WESTINGHOUSE VALVES ONLY) Valve No. /o S 001 A. Pipe Size, 00 =

f. l,26 '

IN 2 Data Pt. 25,42 Metal Area, A = f, E IN 3 Piping Mat. SA5/2.7FIo4L. Section Modulus, Z = /4.N IN Yield Strength e = 1997 B A/2,// Thickness, t = 0. T & Z - IN (at sn. ce TEMd 7 FORCES (LB) MOMENTS (IN-LB) ^ Fa Fb Fc Ma Mb Mc Axial Shear Shear Torsion Bending Bending (t) Thermal /2.25 //7 -2 N, 43&2. -4sn 7 -22 /S(. (1) Gravity. -lo -144 O //7/ //3 Iffyg ia (2) SSE

334, 25'1

/P5 22/9 4/z1 //97/ is (3) SAM (SSE) //,6 .20 loi @/O /2.</ 0 7 25'tf ,e (4) DBA l'6 -l 3 -7 -/t/l -1J5 o 23/3 Other (Not ) i. is T6tal * /,opg(/ //6 f t/ F (5) (Note: 3), }{pD3 }72l ll90 79)) WMb' + Mc'= 76 2 S 3 N (6) g gabgs /47,000 /67,000 22 Maximum r max = 7IDO Ratio = (r' max /.75 c-) = 6 IO . (7)$0Es38I as 2' Notes: (1) Torsional Moment = 0 5 g Z (IN-LB) (3) Load combination in accordance with Table 4 of piping stress as Bending Moment

0.5 g Z (IN-LB) as Design Pressure P

l/OO PSIG n (2) Other: (Specify) Water Hammer, Steam Hammer, Thrust Load, etc. db+Fc2 d.b+Mc'[Z 2 A Ma/2Z PD/4t o~=(a)+(b)+(e) T=(c)+(d Fa/A l (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (h) (j)

o l

l$/ 453b 2/3 23 6 2h74 790(o 5357 VW s' 2 =0.5 Br,+ r ) dr-#) +4T 3 g3=P 3 Principal Stresses r, r ' #' 1 2 g a 6 g 2 3 ] r,x= Max oF(op, a ' 5) q = 7500 , q = E2 63 og = l100 2 MO40101 (10/51)

Attachment C

ST-HL-AE-1316 Page 1 of 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES N. P. Kadambi USNRC Project Manager Y. C. (Renne) Li USNRC MEB E. Rodabaugh USNRC MEB Consultant S. E. Moore USNRC MEB Consultant M. R. Wisenburg HL&P Manager, Nuclear Licensing C. A. Ayala HL&P Licensing J. G. White HL&P Engineering G. D. Purdon HL&P Engineering C. R. Allen HL&P Engineering A. B. Poole HL&P Engineering S. D. Antonio HL&P Engineering R. A. Witthauer Bechtel Engineering R. Singh Bechtel Engineering J. Shiu Bechtel Engineering M. V. Contaoi Bechtel Engineering R. Qasha Bechtel Engineering C. Chern Bechtel Engineering M. Kha11afallah Bechtel Engineering D. Getman Bechtel Engineering M. Jante Bechtel Engineering G. Borden Bechtel Engineering W. F. Guerin Westinghouse A. T. Paterson Westinghouse T. Matty Westinghouse D. Tome Westinghouse C. Boyd Westinghouse D. J. Roarty Westinghouse W2/NRC1/v

}}

ST-HL-AE-1316, Forwards Corrected Notes from Portion of 850626 Meeting W/Mechanical Engineering Branch Re Review of ASME Documentation & Compliance for Selected Mechanical Features. W/One Oversize Drawing.Aperture Card Available in PDR

Contents

Text

Dear Mr. Knighton:

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

=.

<

D. PROCEDURE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

7.0 REFERENCES

7.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

=

0 3672. ft g 28 L9i B

Reference:

SUMMARY

0.5 g Z (IN-LB) as Design Pressure P

Navigation menu

ST-HL-AE-1316, Forwards Corrected Notes from Portion of 850626 Meeting W/Mechanical Engineering Branch Re Review of ASME Documentation & Compliance for Selected Mechanical Features. W/One Oversize Drawing.Aperture Card Available in PDR

Text

Dear Mr. Knighton:

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

=.

<

D. PROCEDURE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

7.0 REFERENCES

7.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

=

0 3672. ft g 28 L9i B

Reference:

SUMMARY

0.5 g Z (IN-LB) as Design Pressure P

Navigation menu

Search