ML20133M741

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 850613 Notice of Violation Re Failure to Evaluate Extremity Radiation Exposure Following 840816 Steam Generator Insert Handling Occurrence.Evaluation Will Be Reviewed W/Personnel Performing Exposure Investigations
ML20133M741
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/1985
From: Withers B
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
NUDOCS 8508130234
Download: ML20133M741 (2)


Text

..

.,i

. RECEIVED

- = HRC em DMMM

~

% M.17 m g;; g3 Ebrt D Weers Vce Presdent REGicyyg3p July 15, 1985 Trojan Nuclear Plant Docket 50-344 Lice'nse NPF-1 Mr. John B. Martin

- Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Creekside Oaks Office Park 1450 Maria Lane, suite 210 Walnut Creek CA 94596-5368

Dear Mr. Martin:

Response to Notice of Violation This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation forwarded by your letter dated June 13, 1985. The Notice addressed the failure to evaluate extremity radiation exposure due to nonpenetrating radiation following the steam generator insert handling occurrence of August 16, 1984.

During the transfer, 8 steam generator inserts were moved from inside the Containment biochield to a shielded cask in the Fuel Building. Due to possible inadequate monitoring, an exposure investigation was conducted to assign extremity and airborne radiation exposures.

The steam generator insert transfer exposure investigation included a time

. motion study of 7 individuals over a ono-hour period to determine radiation doses to the individuals' extremities and the airborne radioactivity levels to which the individuals were exposed.

Failure to explicitly include nonpenetrating radiation in the initial exposure investigation resulted from the manner in which the extremity exposures were determined. Ratios of contact to whole body radiation measurements were used in the evaluation to determine extremity radiation doses. These radiation measurements should include both penetrating and nonpenetrating radiation, therefore, accounting for nonpenetrating radiation in the exposure investigation.

8508130234 850715 PDR ADOCK 05000344 G PDR

' D 121 S W Sa' mon Sreet. Portard. Oregon 97204

. t Mr. John B. Martin July 15, 1985 Page 2 When questioned by your NRC inspector, it was determined that there was no documented proof that these readings included nonpenetrating radiation.

Therefore, as noted in the NRC report, a further evaluation was completed which explicitly includes a radiation dose attributable to nonpenetrating radiation.

Although the subject evaluation was deficient in not explicitly addressing the nonpenetrating radiation exposure, PGE considers the manner in which exposure investigations are conducted to be adequate. The omission addressed in the Notice of Violation was not due to programmatic or train-ing deficiencies. However, it is recognized that the persons performing the evaluation and those reviewing the evaluation should have identified this potential weakness in the evaluation. Therefore, the results of this evaluation will be reviewed with the Radiological Safety Branch and Trojan Radiation Protection personnel, who may perform exposure investigations in the future. This action will be completed by August 15.

Sincerely, WJ -

Bart D. Withers Vice President Nuclear Attachment c: Mr. Lynn Frank, Director State of Oregon Department of Energy

.