ML20133L880

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Supplemental Testimony of Ld Butterfield on Rorem Contention 1(a) Re Issues Arising Under Requirements for News Media Arrangements for Disseminating Info During Emergency.Related Correspondence
ML20133L880
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/1985
From: Copeland V
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
To: Brenner L, Callihan A, Grossman H
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20133L883 List:
References
CON-#485-877 OL, NUDOCS 8510240354
Download: ML20133L880 (2)


Text

'

i

  1. ggo80EH7s ~

ttggTED \,JJ_f 4,

  • ISHAM, UNCOLN & B AllE s e

COUNSELORS AT LAW [

fm -

1t20 CONNECTICUT AVENUE.N W = -- 2 WASHINGTON. D C W 202 833 9730

$DITE840 0CT 2310855 F EDWARD S ISHAM- 1872-1902 CHICAGO OFFICE ROBERT T. UNCOLN. 1872 1889 1 No& HREE FIRST NATIONAL PLAZA WILLIAM G. BEALE. 1885 1923 Q SERVICU LURCH g CHICAGO ILUNOIS60602

} CCN hO TELE NE 312 7500 October 22, 19 ,4

\\

Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Lawrence Brenner, Esquire Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge 102 Oak-Lane Atomic Safety and Licensing Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: In the Matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457)CL-

Dear Administrative Judges:

As stated in " Commonwealth Edison Company's Motion to Exclude Portions of Testimony of NRC Staff Witness", served October 17, 1985, Commonwealth Edison believes that Rorem Contention 1(a) does not include issues regarding the advance arrangements which are made with the news media for dissemina-tion of information during an emergency. Commonwealth Edison does not waive that view, nor does it withdraw the Motion to Exclude. However, in view of the short time remaining before the hearings on Rorem Contention 1(a) , Commonwealth Edison submits the enclosed " Supplemental Testimony of Lawrence D. Butterfield on' Rorem Contention 1(a)" which addresses issues arising under the requirements for news media arrangements. If the Licensing Board deems this subject to be within the purview of Rorem Contention 1(a), Commonwealth Ediaon intends to submit this testimony into evidence and fully litigate the issue at the hearings scheduled for October 29, 1985. Thus, this Supplemental Testimony is being provided so that the Licensing Loard and the parties may be familiar with Mr. Butterfield's I

8510240354 851022 PDR ADOCK 05000456 T PDR

( So S

o Adminictrativa Judgas

. Octobsr 22, 1985 Page 2 Supplemental Testimony in the event that its submission becomes necessary to fulfill Commonwealth Edison's burden of proof.

Very truly yours, UY Victor G. Copeland One of the Attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company VGC/mg cc: Service List I