ML20133K433

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Palladino 850116 Request to Reexamine Whether Economic Benefits Cause Any Problems Re Severe Accident Policy Criteria.No Objection to Deletion of Ref to Economic Benefits.Alternative Wording Proposed
ML20133K433
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/06/1985
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Asselstine, Palladino, Roberts
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20132C556 List:
References
FOIA-85-199, FOIA-85-A-15 NUDOCS 8508120230
Download: ML20133K433 (2)


Text

s w .u.

f  ![,..,Io,j UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g r WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 o  !

\.v... /

FEB 0 61985 p,

MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech FROM: William J. Dircks .

Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

STAFF RESPONSE TO CHAIRMAN PALLADIN0'S REQl'EST TO REEXAMINE WHETHER " ECONOMIC" BENEFITS CAUSE ANY PROBLEMS REGARDING SEVERE ACCIDENT POLICY CRITERIA

REFERENCE:

Staff Requirements Memorandum of January 16, 1985 from Chilk to Dircks on " Discussion /Possible Vote on Severe Accident Policy Statement" (M841203)

The reference memorandum requested staff response to the following item arising in the Commission meeting of December 3, 1984 to discuss the Severe Accident Policy Statement (SECY-84-370):

Chairman Palladino requested that staff reexamine the wording on page 5 of the policy statement concerning " economic" benefits realized by standard designs to determine whether this 'vork causes any problems in terms of criteria.

The matter in question is the underscored sentence in the third paragraph on page 5 of the revised Policy Statement as sent to the Commission by memo-randum of November 23, 1984:

It is assumed in this Policy Statement that, over the next 10 to 15 years, utility and commercial interest in the United States will focus on ad-vanced light water reactors that involve improvements but are essentially based on the technology that was demonstrated in the design, construction, and operation of more than 100 of these plants in the United States.

This policy should not be viewed as prejudicial to more extensive changes in reactor designs that might be demonstrated during or beyond that time period. Indeed, the Commission encourages the development and commercial-ization of any standard designs that realize safety and economic benefits, such as thow achieved through greater simplicity; slower dynamic response to upset conditions involving accident precursor events; passive heat removal for loss-of-coolant accidents; and other characteristics that promote more efficient construction, operation, and maintenance procedures to enhance safety, reliability, and economy. 4 k

Contact:

R. M. Bernero, NRR ---

492-7373

\

8508120230 850627 PDR FOIA DELAIRBS-A-15 PDR h

~

2 The staff has no fundamental objection to deleting the words, "and economic" in the underscored sentence. Although these words correctly characterize pre-sent regulatory practice in reviewing new standard plant designs, the staff recognizes that the wording might construe an improper regulatory emphasis.

Accordingly, the staff proposes to delete the reference to economic benefits and proposes the following sentence:

Indeed, the Comission encoura'ges the development and corrercialization of any standard designs that might realize safety benefits, such as those achieved through greater simplicity; slower dynamic response to upset conditions involving accident precursor events; passive heat removal for loss-of-coolant accidents; and other characteristics that promote more efficient construction, operation, and maintenance pro-cedures to enhance safety, reliability, and economy.

The staff recognizes that the traditional role of private investment enterprise is to develop technologies that are the most economical of resource utilization within such regulatory constraints as are provided by law. The principles of safety-cost tradeoffs and cost-effectiveness analysis of design options permit both safety and economic benefits to be achieved in new plant designs so long as the overall safety level meets the Atomic Energy Act and NRC regulatory criteria.

William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations cc: SECY OPE OGC ACRS