ML20133H691

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-352/96-09 & 50-353/96-09 on 961022- 1216 & Notice of Violation
ML20133H691
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/09/1997
From: Pasciak W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Danni Smith
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20133H694 List:
References
NUDOCS 9701170260
Download: ML20133H691 (3)


See also: IR 05000352/1996009

Text

I

l

o

,

>o

s

January 9, 1997

Mr. D. M. Smith, President

PECO Nuclear

Nuclear Group Headquarters

Correspondence Control Desk

P. O. Box 195

Wayne, PA 19087-0195

SUBJECT:

NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-352/96-09,

50-353/96-09; NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Smitl..

On October 22,1996, through December 16,1996, the NRC completed an inspection at

your Limerick 1 & 2 reactor facilities. The enclosed report presents the results of that

inspection.

During the 8-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at

the Limerick 1 & 2 facilities was generally characterized by safe and conservative

operations. Operators responded appropriately to several plant transients. We noted that

the material condition of the emergency diesel generators was significantly improved during

this inspection period; however, it required the NRC pointing out the poor overall material

condition to plant management before action was taken to correct this situation.

Our review of selected procedures and records and personnel ".erviews found the

emergency preparedness prog'am, overall, to be directed tow 1 public health and safety.

Noted strengths were management involvement, relationships with offsite agencies, and a

well-defined self-assessment program.

The inspectors reviewed the applied radiological controls program including planning and

preparation for the Unit 2 outage. The inspectors found that applied radiological controls

were good including planning and preparation for the outage. However, weaknesses were

identified in the control of radioactive sources.

Also reviewed was the disposal of radioactive material at the new 10 CFR 20.2002

disposal area. The area proposed for disposal of slightly contaminated flowable solids

(soils, sediment, sludge) was found to be generally consistent with information provided to

the NRC, but not in all material respects. Consequently, a violation involving failure to

provide a complete description of the disposal area, as required by 10 CFR 50.9 and 10 CFR 20.2002, was identified. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation

j

(Notice) and the circumstances surrounding it are described in detail in the subject

/

/

inspection report. The violation is of concern because complete and accurate information

was not provided prior to the NRC's approval of disposal of radioactive materialin the

environment. You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

9701170260 970109

'

PDR

ADOCK 05000352

G

PDR

.

..

.

..

r

NORTH AMERICAN INSPECTION, INC.

,

MEMO

December 12, 1996

TO:

Robert K.

Shumway, President

,.

FROM:

Don B.

Shumway, RSO

1

As discussed during our meeting this date, you will assume all

duties of the Radiation Safety Officer, during my absence.

This

will include my current medical leave, vacations, and regular

scheduled days off.

.

-

,.

North American Inspection, Inc.

Page #3

Joel Guthrie - Operations Manager; manages lab services and

schedules all work for NAII's radiographers.

Also covers over

90% of all in-house radiography, with a small percentage of

field-site radiography in emergency cases.

Now, the communication problem, as we see it.

On August 7,

1996

NAII's RSO went on medical leave expecting to be out four to six

weeks.

Detailed instructions were given to the Assistant RSO by

the RSO, as to when field audits were to be done, sources to be

leak tested, and projectors needing quarterly maintenance to be

administered, during his absence.

Everything directed by the RSO

was completed as instructed, but unfortunately the RSO developed

complications, which extended his medical leave for cuer four

months.

On November 12 and 13, 1996, Sheri A. Arredondo and Eric

Reber of your office conducted a routine safety inspection.

The

two radiographers not named on their " Notice of Violation" were

the Assistant RSO and Operations Manager.

Needless to say, as

President of NAII I have asked myself many times, how could this

have happened?

During the absence of the RSO, his directives

were reviewed with the Assistant RSO by me on a regular basis to

assure all inspections were done as instructed.

These two

individuals' names were not on the original directive from the

RSO.

When the Assistant RSO was questioned as to why the

Operations Manager was not picked up for a field audit, it was

explained that the Operations Manager's work was mostly confined

to the in-house lab service with most of this work being with X-

ray machines, and that from a previous routine inspection

conducted by the NRC's Kathleen Dolce on September 1,

1995, the

RSO and Assistant RSO for NAII were told that in-house

inspections and/or staged inspections outside the laboratory in

the field were not acceptable.

Also, on the day the Operations

Manager was working in the field, which is the day picked up in

this noted violation, the Assistant RSO was also working in the

field and was unaware of the Operations Manager being out.

The

duties performed in the field by the operations Manager on the

day in question were to process film for the radiographer in

charge of his project.

The Operations Manager did not work with

nor was he near the source of radiation during exposures on this

day.

The missed inspection on the Assistant RSO, during this

same day, was due to the RSO not being back from his medical

leave.

The Assistant RSO assumed, that since he was the acting

RSO and no one was over him at the time, that he would be

exempted from a field inspection.

ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

A subsequent meeting was held with the RSO, Assistant RSO,

Operations Manager and myself on December 12, 1996.

The above

was discussed in detail and decided that until the RSO returns on

a full-time basis, that the President will assume all duties as

1