ML20133G167
| ML20133G167 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/04/1985 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Heltemes C NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133B545 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8510150231 | |
| Download: ML20133G167 (4) | |
Text
r OCT 4 lu MEMORANDUM FOR:
C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCESS TO THE NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA (NPRD) SYSTEM NRR has reviewed your proposed response to Mr. Snierek regarding access to the NPRD System. As discussed with F. Hebdon of your staff, we believe that the allocation of two direct access passwords to NRR is insufficient for our needs and suggest that NRR be allocated six passwords.
The NRR reorganization will have five divisions, each of which has a need for access to the NPRD System. Examples of their needs and requesting branch include:
failure analysis statistics (Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch), maintenance related equipment failures (Maintenance and Training Branch), and operational related failures (Facilities Operation Branch - one in each of three licensing divisions). The Operating Reactors Assessment Staff (which is independent of the five divisions), will be charged with operating reactor events analysis in a manner similar to the current Operating Reactors Assessment Branch and will also require NPRD System Access.
NRR believes the restrictions imposed by the need for security can still be met and that degradation of system performance is unlikely with the additional individuals using the system. More importantly, the staff access to the NPRD System and the easy availability of information remains consistent with our understanding of the NRC goals when we agreed to the establishment of the NPRD System under the LER rule change in 1984.
We agree with the provisions for training, fees, and usage report proposed in your draft.
Please contact R. Wessman (28432) if you have any questions.
Original Signed by L H.R. Dentes Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
J. Sniezek F. Hebdon DISTRIBUTION _ *w/inco.ning
- Central. File :
HDenton DEisenhut PPAS HThompson/FMiraglia
- NRC PDR DCrutchfield HSmith PPAS GHolahan RWessman d
- NSIC ORAB Reading U
- Previ usly concurred
/k
), L
]@il ORAB/DL ORAB/DL/BC
/ L v/,
DD/> M D/
h i
- RWessman **GHolahan chfielde
) son DEis % hut HD n
10/1/85 10/1/85 10/4/85 10
/85 10/* /85 10/ /85 3
h015 1 Bbloog h'
85201$0231 I
pg t
~~
ptr 4 a.
MEMORANDUM FOR:
C. J. Heltomes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCESS TO THE NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA (NPRD) SYSTEM NRR has reviewed your proposed response to Mr. Sniezek regarding access to the NPRD System. As discussed with F. Hebdon of your staff, we believe that the allocation of two direct access passwords to NRR is insufficient for our needs and suggest that NRR be allocated six passwords.
The NRR reorganization will have five divisions, each of which has a need for access to the NPRD System. Examples of their needs and requesting branch include:
failure analysis statistics (Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch), maintenance related equipment failures (Maintenance and Training Branch), and operational related failures (Facilities Operation Branch - one in each of three licensing divisions). The Operating Reactors Assessment Staff (which is independent of the five divisions), will be charged with operating reactor events analysis, in a manner similar to the current Operating Reactors Assessment Branch, and will also l
require NPRD System Access.
NRR believes the restrictions imposed by the need for security can still be met and that degradation of system performance is unlikely with the additional individuals using the system. More importantly, the staff access to the NPRD System and the easy availability of information remains consistent with our understanding of the NRC goals when we agreed to the establishment of the NPRD System under the LER rule change in 1984.
l We agree with the provisions for training, fees, and usage report proposed in your draft.
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Contact:
R. Wessman, ORAB x28432 cc:
J. Snfezek F. Hebdon DISTRIBUTION
- Central File HDenton DEisenhut PPAS HThompson/FMiraglia
- NRC PDR DCrutchfield HSmith PPAS GHolahan RWessman
- NSIC ORAB Reading
- W/ incoming RAB/DL
)d AD/SA/DL D/DL DD/NRR D/NRR Wessman GHola an DCrutchfield HThompson DEisenhut HDenton i
10/g/85 10/I/85 10/ /85 10/ /85 10/ /85 10/ /85 l
o UNITED STATES g
f g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
W ASHINGT ON, D. C. 20555 5
%*****/
OCT 4 W MEMORANDUM FOR:
C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCESS TO THE NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA (NPRD) SYSTEM NRR has reviewed your proposed resoonse to Mr. Sniezek regarding access to the NPRD System. As discussed with F. Hebdon of your staff, we believe that the allocation of two direct access passwords to NRR is insufficient for our needs and suggest that NRR be allocated six passwords.
The NRR reorganization will have five divisions, each of which has a need for access to the NPRD System. Examples of their needs and requesting branch include:
failure analysis statistics (Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch), maintenance related equipment failures (Maintenance and Training Branch), and operational related failures (Facilities Operation Branch - one in each of three licensing divisions). The Operating Reactors Assessment Staff (which is independent of the five divisions), will be charged with operating reactor events analysis in a manner similar to the current Operating Reactors Assessment Branch and will also require NPRD System Access.
NRR believes the restrictions imposed by the need for security can still be met and that degradation of system perfonnance is unlikely with the additional individuals using the system. More importantly, the staff access to the NPRD System and the easy availability of information remains consistent with our understanding of the NRC goals when we agreed to the establishment of the NPRD System under the LER rule change in 1984.
We agree with the provisions for training, fees, and usage reports proposed in your draft.
Please contact D. Wessman (x28432) if you have any questions.
l n
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
J. Sniezek F. Hebdon
f'
' t. '. '.,...,'
g%f 3
./
UNITED STATES
,e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
2 e
w 0
4 g
g*
.E W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 e
S e
D
- '+,
,o 4 p "h LD[7 FROM:
C..
. '. HELTEr.E5. cR.
- n1U. o.. i L. n. -.
T i C. ET > -.
.v..
TO:
rA3OLD R.
LEtFON i.
.*.L.
<e YEtto,,; n FOR SIGNATURE OF:
DESC:
CC.
NRC ACCESS TO THE NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY PATA N it m t. d E,.
(NPRD) Sv' STEM PPs3 REFERRED TO: DL O'0455 CONTACT:
H.
THOMPI.N h b/
Telephone concurrence may be appropriate.
70{ 6hM.
- A tw,6 4 h V.9d /A, T/30 h % y+ el.
6.5( %
... g,
FLEASE REVIEW THE DUE DATE IhMEDIATE Y:
IF THE DUE I; ATE DOES t!OT ALLOW ADEDUATE RECUE5TE. FOh REVIG10A O.
VEcLGW TIME TO REr: Hor 40 TO THIT TIO:E.T, YCU MAY TICiE' io.!E liATES MAY E.E HALE. WITn REQUEST A REVISED D JE DATE. T H E R.E O. E l 'T c:1.;1.: M ATION, THRU THE
,J.E..Li
,,1 ~ 5 MU5T INCLUDE A vat.1D Jui.TIFIC ATION AND
- + 0AT E Ui T L-ONE WEEt; A 6 Tu.,
ALLii..-
BE MADE THROUGH YOUR CORRESPOt.DENCE CO--
EhT Di NR';'iAIL RO3h. ~i i a_
m: v.
- ..J E ORDINATOR TO THE NRR MAIL ROCh (LISA E.nii. IF AF. ROVED BY' 17. e eG ACvPI, MULLEY OR HAZEL SMITH).
WILL Li u;ED TO 1RACl. D1,1510i4
'Oh-c.c_.: :.,.,r_ ; :._...-..._.r,m.a.
v.
- c:.
PLEASE DG NOT HAND C ARRY CONCURREWOE PACtsAGES TO 01.ECT.~..T L 02:;1.:
WITHOUT F IRST GOING THRU THE NRR P. AIL i'.U r..
1
~..
1 l