ML20133D062
| ML20133D062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Carolina State University |
| Issue date: | 01/03/1997 |
| From: | Essig T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Alexander Adams NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| TAC-M97248, NUDOCS 9701080182 | |
| Download: ML20133D062 (3) | |
Text
. ,- . _ - - .- .. - . --
January 3, 1997 g, MEMORANDUM T0: Alexander Adams Jr., Senior Proj::ct Manager 4
Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Branch P[
Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Thomas H. Essig, Chief original s i g' n e d b y': 1 Emergency Preparedness and Environmental '
Health Physics Section Emergency Preparedness and l Radiation Protection Branch ;
Division of Reactor Program Management ,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I l
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F THE PULSTAR NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. 97248) {
In response to your request, the Emergcncy Preparedness and Environmental Health Physics Section (EP&EHP) has completed a review of Revision 4 of the Pulstar Nuclear Reactor emergency plan dated September 17, 1996. The plan was submitted in a letter dated November 6, 1996 from Pedro B. Perez, Associated :
Director, Nuclear Reactor Program, North Carolina State University. The !
licensee has stated in the letter that they have made a determination that the changes in Revision 4 did not decrears the overall effectiveness of their
- emergency plan, and that. it continues to meet the requirements of Appendix E to part 50.
This revision incorporates terminology changes related to wording in the EAL l table, the training of Mspital personnel, and a name change of the supporting ;
hospital.
- l The 50.54 Tan Group is looking into.'the question of handling, evaluating, and responding to_50.54 changes.: The Group has recommended certain language to be included in the response to a licensee. < Accordingly, the following language to be included in the letter to W licensee: .
' Based on your determination that the changes do not decrease the overall '
- effectiveness of your caergency,pla'n, and that it continues to meet the
}-
requirements of Appendix E to.part 50,' NRC approval is not required.
Our initial review of these changes
- indicates them to be in acordance l with 10 CFR S0.54(q).> Implementation of these changes will be subject to inspection to confirm that they did not decrease the overall ;
effectiveness of your emergency plan. l 1
InaccoNancewith10CFR2.790oftheCommission'sregulations,acopy '
of the letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
This completes our efforts on TAC No. 97248 Centact: Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923 111gi&438 TMartin ;
4 %cket N e- CMiller ;
0 PERB Reading File LCohen DOCUMENT NAME: G:\NCSTATE.REV Te sessium a empy of 1Ms h huesses le the bes: 'C' = Copy evitbut ettechment/ enclosure *E' = copy outth attachment /enceoevee "N* = No copy OFFICE NRR: PERO , l C SC:PERS p lc{ l l l NAME LCohen /WQ k TEssig 'M_ ~
DATE '/) /97 Lyf 1/3197 9701080182 970103 ^'ICIAL RECORD COPY cf7-cg PDR ADOCK 05000297 F PDR h h rgg SfBQ M 6 W kfl i i
f %q l l 3" 1 UNITED STATES g ,g NUCLEAR REGUL.ATORY COMMISSION o 's WASHINGTON, D.C 2065H001 January 3, 1997
% .. .. . [
MEMORANDUM T0: Alexander Adams Jr., Senior Project Manager Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Branch l Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i FROM: [ Thomas H. Essig, Chief i
Emergency Preparedness and Environmental p g Health Ph) lcs Section t Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F THE PULSTAR NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. 97248) ;
In response to your request, the Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Health Physics Section (EP&EHP) has completed a review of Revision 4 of the t
Pulstar Nuclear Reactor emergency plan dated September 17, 1996. The plan was submitted in a letter dated November 6,1996 from Pedro B. Perez, Associated Director, Nuclear Reactor Program, North Carolina State University. The licensee hs stated in the letter that they have made a determination that the changes N Sevision 4 did not decrease the overall effectiveness of their emergency pian, and that it continues to meet the requirements of Appendix E to part 50.
This revision incorporates terminology changes related to wording in the EAL table, the training of hospital personnel, and a name change of the supporting hospital.
The 50.54 Task Croup is looking into the question of handling, evaluating, and responding to 50.54 changes. The Group has recommended certain language to be included in the response to a licensee. Accordingly, the following language 4
to be included in the letter to the licensee:
Based on your deterninstion that the changes do not decrease the overall effectiveness of your energency plan, and that it continues to meet the requirements of Appendix E to part 50, NRC approval is not required.
Our initial review of the<e changes indicates then to be in acconiance with 10 CFR 50.54(q). Implementation of these changes will be subject to inspection to confirm that they did not decrease the overall effectiveness of your energency plan.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Connission's regulations, a copy of the letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
This completes our efforts on TAC No. 97248 Dcciet No. 50-297
Contact:
Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923
I January 3, 1997 i MEMORANDUM T0: Alexander Adams Jr., Senior _ Project Manager 1 ?
, Non-Power Reactors and l r -
Decommissioning Branch
! Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
! FROM: Thomas H. Essig, Chief original signed by:
i Emergency Preparedness and Environmental i- Health Physics Section
- Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection Branch i Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF THE PULSTAR NUCLEAR REACTOR EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. 97248) l In response'to your request, the Emergency Preparedness and Environmental i Health Physics Section (EP&EHP) has completed a review of Revision 4 of the l Pulstar Nuclear Reactor emergency plan dated September 17, 1996. The plan was i submitted in a letter dated November 6, 1996 from Pedro B. Perez, Associated l- Director, Nuclear Reactor Program, North Carolina State University. The j licensee has stated in the letter that they have made a determination that the
- changes in Revision 4 did not decrease the~overall effectiveness of their
[ emergency plan, and that it continues to meet the requirements of Appendix E to part 50.
1 This revision incorporates terminology changes related to wording in the EAL i table, the training of hospital personnel, and a name change of the supporting l hospital.
l The 50.54 Task Group is looking into the question of handling, evaluating, and
! responding to 50.54 changes. The Group has recommended certain language to be included in the response to a licensee. Accordingly, the following language to be included in the letter to the licensee:
Based on your determination that the changes do not decrease the overall 1
effectiveness of your energency plan, and that it continues to meet the requirenents of Appendix E ta part 50, NRC approval is not required.
i Our initial review of these changes indicates then to be in accortlance
- with 10 CFR 50.54(q). Inplea.entation of these changes will be subject 3
to inspection to confirm that they did not decrease the overall effectiveness of your energency plan.
1 In accortlance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Coneission's regulations, a copy l of the letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Roon.
This completes our efforts on TAC No. 97248
Contact:
Lawrence K. Cohen, NRR/PERB 415-2923 DISTRIBUTION TMartin Docket File- CMiller PDR TEssig PERB Reading File LCohen DOCUMENT NAME: G:\NCSTATE.REV
- v. m.. .:en w me mem c.c.=m .n wm r-cn.ani.n.e w m.m. n omca annw , l c. sessasn I c.- l l L maus Lc.h.n /v n A ra is m -
DATE 11)te7 Lg/ 1/ 3 /e7 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY