ML20133C910

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Suppl to 850516 Response to NRC 850220 & 0411 Ltrs Re Noncompliance Noted in Insp Repts 50-456/84-44 & 50-457/84-40.Response to Item of Noncompliance 3.6 Re Program for Cable Pan Separation Modified as Listed
ML20133C910
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/29/1985
From: Farrar D
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
0174K, 174K, NUDOCS 8507220037
Download: ML20133C910 (2)


Text

a IN Conunonwealth Edison one Fest National Plaza. Chicago, litinois Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 May 29, 1985 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Supplemental Response to Inspection Reports Nos.

50-456/84-44 and 50-457/84-40 NRC Docket Nos _50-456 and 50-457 Reference (a):

J.M. Taylor letter to C. Reed dated February 20, 1985 (b):

C.E. Norelius letter to C. Reed dated April 11, 1985 (c):

D.L. Farrar letter to J.G. Keppler dated May 16, 1985

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Reference (a) transmitted the results of the NRC Construction Appraisal Team inspection.

Reference (b) indicated that certain activities appeared to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements.

The Commonwealth Edison response to these concerns was submitted as Reference (c).

The purpose of this letter is to clarify a statement made in response to Item of Noncompliance 3.b.

The attachment to the letter provides that clarification.

If you have any further questions on this matter, please oirect them to this office.

Very truly yours, 85072 gog @$

p DR g

//[a,s,

//

D.L. Farrar t Director of Nuclear Licensing j

()/g{

Enclosure cc:

NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood Ol74K JUN - 41985

4

. Supplemental Response Inspection Report 456/84-44 and 457/84-40 Item 456/84-44-06 and 457/84-40-06 Item of Noncompliance 3.b Corrective Action Taken and Resielts Achieved In our Reference (c) response, we stated that " Prior to the CAT inspection and as referred to in the CAT report (page II-6),

Commonwealth Edison was formulating a program to assure that cable pan separation requirements have been met.

Currently, the program is being implemented in accordance with the requirements of Sargent

&.Lundy instruction PI-BB-77 which includes non-safety related cable pan raceway supports."

We wish to clarify the last sentence to read that "Sargent

& Lundy instruction PI-BB-77 includes separation between safety-related and non safety-related cable pan raceway."

Ol74K

~,- -,

.,. -