|
---|
Category:ARCHIVE RECORDS
MONTHYEARML20204H1461999-03-11011 March 1999 Rev 0 to C-NOME-CALC-0107, Seismic Qualification of Hot Leg Rtd,Hot Leg Pdt & Hot Leg Sampling Mnsa Hardware ML20204H1821999-03-10010 March 1999 Rev 0 to C-PENG-CALC-021, Determination of Waterford 3 Hot Leg Seismic Response Spectra & Accelerations for Use in Analyses of Mnsas ML20203C2261999-02-0909 February 1999 Audit Rept on Implementation of GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Systems at Nuclear Power Plants, for Waterford Steam Electric Station,Unit 3 on 981214-17 ML20204H2141998-02-10010 February 1998 Rev 0 to S2-NOME-CALC-0085, Seismic Qualification of SG Pdt,Hot Leg Pdt & Hot Leg Sampling Mnsa Hardware ML20249C8001998-02-0505 February 1998 Rev 1 to Calculation EC-M96-002, Carbon Dioxide Generator/ Oxygen Depletion in Cr ML20204H1711998-02-0303 February 1998 Rev 0 to S-PENG-CALC-008, Nozzle Loads for Which SONGS Bottom Mounted Pzr Mnsa Was Qualified ML20141G7031997-07-0505 July 1997 Revision B to Required Submergence to Prevent Vortexing in Csp ML20148G6451997-05-0707 May 1997 Rev 1 to Minimum Pipe Submergence to Prevent Vortexing Calculation ML20147G1781997-01-29029 January 1997 Water Hammer Analysis:Lpsi 'B' ML20132H1541996-12-27027 December 1996 Press Release IV-96-63, NRC Proposes to Fine Waterford $50,000 for Design Error ML20134D2211996-10-17017 October 1996 Press Release 96-145, NRC Asks Utility Licensees for Info on Concrete Containment Foundations at Nine Nuclear Plants ML20148G6371995-12-0101 December 1995 Rev 0 to Minimum Pipe Submergence to Prevent Vortexing Calculation ML20058P1081993-08-31031 August 1993 Employee Concerns Programs Insp Questionnaire ML20086B4661993-08-20020 August 1993 Control Room Outside Air Intake Radiation Monitor Setpoint Calculation ML20079N1061990-07-19019 July 1990 Responds to NUMARC Survey in Support of NRC License Renewal Rulemaking Questions on 316(a) & (B) Demonstration Project ML20094F3521988-03-15015 March 1988 Calculation CENC-1805, Waterford Unit 3 Steam Generator Manways ML20114D1471987-08-31031 August 1987 Package Consisting of Chapters 9 & 11 to Facility USARs ML20128R1141985-07-0101 July 1985 Package of Nonconformance Repts & Drawings Re Facility ML20140G5341985-05-0202 May 1985 Package of Correspondence Re Harassment of QC Inspectors. Portions Deleted ML20127F8961984-12-31031 December 1984 Slide Presentation Entitled, Presentation of Operational Readiness ML20107J1411984-10-17017 October 1984 Rs Leddick Business Card ML20132F6651984-07-28028 July 1984 News Article Re Util Denial of Gap & Citizens for Safe Energy Claim That Util Cannot Be Trusted to Ensure Safety of Plant & That Independent Review Needed ML20137X1171984-07-27027 July 1984 News Article Discussing Gap Suggestion That NRC Require Independent Review of Util Program to Correct Problems at Facility ML20137X0811984-07-26026 July 1984 Press Release Discussing Gap Suggestion That NRC Require Independent Review of Util Program to Correct Problems at Facility ML20132G3361984-07-25025 July 1984 News Release Announcing Planned Commercial Operation in First Quarter 1985 & Sept Fuel Loading.Const Costs Not Expected to Exceed Present Estimates ML20132E2261984-06-0909 June 1984 Press Release Re NRC Receiving Pressure from Congressional Delegation Concerning Facility Licensing.Nrc 840609 Handwritten Notes Encl ML20125C2021984-01-0303 January 1984 Package of Interview Summaries Re Quality Concerns at Facility ML20062J5841980-10-24024 October 1980 Presentation Entitled Asymmetric Loads Slides. Related Documentation Encl ML20062J5801980-10-24024 October 1980 Slide Presentation, Piping Preoperational Vibration Test Program Slides ML20125C0051979-08-22022 August 1979 Viewgraph Presentation Entitled, Middle South Svcs,Inc Analysis Support Program for Arkansas Nuclear One & Waterford Unit 3 1999-03-11
[Table view] Category:PRESS RELEASE OR NEWS ARTICLE
MONTHYEARML20132H1541996-12-27027 December 1996 Press Release IV-96-63, NRC Proposes to Fine Waterford $50,000 for Design Error ML20134D2211996-10-17017 October 1996 Press Release 96-145, NRC Asks Utility Licensees for Info on Concrete Containment Foundations at Nine Nuclear Plants ML20132F6651984-07-28028 July 1984 News Article Re Util Denial of Gap & Citizens for Safe Energy Claim That Util Cannot Be Trusted to Ensure Safety of Plant & That Independent Review Needed ML20137X1171984-07-27027 July 1984 News Article Discussing Gap Suggestion That NRC Require Independent Review of Util Program to Correct Problems at Facility ML20137X0811984-07-26026 July 1984 Press Release Discussing Gap Suggestion That NRC Require Independent Review of Util Program to Correct Problems at Facility ML20132G3361984-07-25025 July 1984 News Release Announcing Planned Commercial Operation in First Quarter 1985 & Sept Fuel Loading.Const Costs Not Expected to Exceed Present Estimates ML20132E2261984-06-0909 June 1984 Press Release Re NRC Receiving Pressure from Congressional Delegation Concerning Facility Licensing.Nrc 840609 Handwritten Notes Encl 1996-12-27
[Table view] |
Text
..
I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Public Affairs, Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400 Arlington, Texas 76011-8064 RIV: 96-63 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Breck Henderson December 27,1996 OFFICE: 817/860-8128 PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)
NRC PROPOSES TO FINE WATERFORD
$50,000 FOR DESIGN ERROR The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has notified the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 nuclear power plant, operated by Entergy Operations, Inc., that it proposes to fine the company $50,000 for allowing the installed configuration of a plant system to vary from the design described in the plant's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
The FSAR describes all Waterford 3's safety systems and provides the basis for the NRC's decision to grant an operating license for the plant.
During inspections conducted from June 3 to July 10 and August 2' i9, NRC staff found that instrument lines which, during a loss-of-coolant accident, would . ry .
potentially contaminated air, exhausted into a room without filtration or controlled ventilation. This could have allowed plant control room operators or the public outside the plant to receive radiation doses in excess of federallimits. Waterford engineers have corrected this problem and are reviewing other similar instrument lines.
The violation is classified as Severity Level 111, with a civil penalty of $50,000. The NRC classifies violations on a four-level scale, with LevelI being the most severe. No one received an excess radiation dose because of the problem.
1 NRC Regional Administrator L. Joe Callan, caid, in a letter to Waterford Vice l President Michael B. Sellman, that the NRC was imposing tbs fine ". . . to emphasize the j importance of ensuring that the plant is operated in accordance with its FSAR and the ;
importance of prompt identification of non-conforming conditions . . ."
]
Entergy must respond to the NRC's Notice of Violation in writing within 30 days, during which time it may pay the civil penalty or protest it. If the protest is denied the company may ask for a hearing.
9 270034 !
9612270149 961227 PDR PRESS R RQ-IV-96-063 PDR f@Mg oh j