ML20132F895
| ML20132F895 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1985 |
| From: | Brey H PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| GL-85-07, GL-85-7, P-85223, NUDOCS 8508020431 | |
| Download: ML20132F895 (4) | |
Text
,
e O Public Service ~
Companyof Colorado P.O. Box 840 j
Denver, CO 80201 - 0840
" ~ "
2420 W.
26th Avenue, Suite 100D, Der.ver, Colorado 80211 July 12, 1985 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-85223 i
M @ B OW/ B 7 h
Regional Administrator Region IV g
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission JUL 2 A BBS 4
I 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000
,j Arlington, TX 76011 S
Attention:
Mr. Eric H. Johnson Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
Integrated Living Schedule Between PSC and NRC
REFERENCE:
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This letter responds to Generic Letter 85-07 regarding the implementation of integrated living schedules for plant l
modifications.
We are developing as part of the Perform nce Enhancement Program, planning and scheduling procedures for internal use by PSC management.
These procedures would be used to prioritize and schedule plant modifications and other nuclear activities.
A Master Planning and Scheduling (MP S) function will be established to prioritize and monitor key nuclear activities.
Planning and scheduling functions will be established to handle divisional activities and interfaces with MP & S.
The short and long range schedule for plant activities will be
-developed and maintained by the Nuclear Production Division.
The schedule will show planned surveillance and refueling outages and the plant modifications and major maintenance items scheduled in the various windows.
Items scheduled will include, among other items, mandated changes, and plant-initiated modifications.
/
0 l
Our implementation of the above mentioned planning and scheduling h0 functions is just beginning.
If you wish to discuss the integrated g g i
living schedule concept further, we would be happy to meet with you.
d 8508020431 850712 gy ?~\\
gef
[-la 75L DR ADOCK 0 27
- i:.
. A meeting would be more appropriate in October when our planning and-scheduling functions will be better defined.
Sincerely, h
H.
L. Brey Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division' sme I
I r
.,.,,.,a-
.,..n,.
.n-.,ww-.
,w,na.-,,-,
-w
...,.. ~ -
a ENCLOSURE 2 RESPONSE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-PLANT NAME:
Fort St. Vrain UTILITY:
Public Service Cmpany of Colorado I.
INTENTIONS A.
Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS 8.
Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C.
Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff x
- 0. -Plan to implement an infomal ILS only II.
STATUS A.
If you, answered I.A above:
1.
Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant (s)?
Circle One:
Yes No If yes, select best description:
Engineering judgement Analytic Hiearchy process Risk based analysis Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)
If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:
Date of If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:
2.
What is your estimated date for making a submittal to the NRC-or if not presently available, planned date for I;n NRC
je
- e' t
6, i
8.
If you answered I.B above:
1.
Please explain your reservations on separate sheet (s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet (s) or Separate submittal scheduled for (Date) 2.
If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can mak1 arrangements Contact / Time Frame Phone Number C.
If you answered I.C 1.
Would you be willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility (s)?
Circle One:
No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.
Contact Torrv nroy Time Frame October,1985 Phone Number 303) 571-8404 If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.
III.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS Please make any suagestions you may have as to how a utility sponsored availability / reliability pro.tect might be credited for plant safety enhancement. Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.
.