ML20132E322
| ML20132E322 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1985 |
| From: | Brenner L Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), ROREM, B. |
| References | |
| CON-#385-038, CON-#385-38 NUDOCS 8508010774 | |
| Download: ML20132E322 (2) | |
Text
.
e
' 635 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD L
Before Administrative Judges:
DOLMETCP N
Lawrence Brenner, Chairman Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Dr. Richard F. Cole ag5 g _; g g L T F K E.. sw f 00CM. Tit #G a siiv, :,
l DocketNos.50khd*
In the Matter of 50-457 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (Braidwood Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2)
July 31, 1985 i
ORDER DIRECTING NEGOTIATIONS ON OBJECTIONS TO ROREM'S QA INTERROGATORIES The Applicant has timely served, by the required received date (Tr.
197,205-06) of July 30, 1985, its objections to Rorem's July 2, 1985 1
"First Set" of Quality Assurance interrogatories.
The NRC Staff, missing the received deadline by one day, has placed its own objections to some of Rorem's interrogatories in the express mail on July 30, 1985.
i
.l -
Applicant's pleading properly states (at 2), that it will attempt j
to negotiate its objections with Intervenors Rorem g al.
The Board i
l directs the Applicant, NRC Staff and Rorem to hold such negotiations, and agree on a date by which a report of agreement shall be received by the Board, along with, if still necessary, Rorem's answer (motion to compel discovery) to those ot'jections still in dispute. Unless the t
h
\\h 56 0
PH
- . o i
i parties otherwise agree, and advise the Board, that date shall be August 9, 1985. Discovery negotiations shall be governed by pragmatism i
on the part of all parties, rather than by technical legal rights and 1
posturing.
The NRC Staff's concluding paragraph (" Motion for a Protective Order") does not correlate fully with its preceding objections. No Staff objections were made to Rorem's interrogatories 52, 53 or 55, yet those three are listed in the Staff's concluding paragraph. Conversely,
(
.i the Staff did object to interrogatories 30 and 40, but did not include those two in its concluding paragraph.
This order was read to the affected parties on July 31, 1985.
IT IS 50 ORDERED.
FOR THE ATDMIC SAFETY 4
AND LICENSING BOARD 4
C4 bOM\\ %
Lawrence Brenner, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland July 31, 1985 i.
I l
i
}
l
__