ML20132E019
| ML20132E019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 09/25/1985 |
| From: | Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY |
| To: | Johnson W, Rosenthal A, Wilber H NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| CON-#385-630 OL, NUDOCS 8509300363 | |
| Download: ML20132E019 (2) | |
Text
loN,
W 00CHETED l
September 25. 1985 USNRC I
Alan 5.
Rosenthol, Chairman Atomic Sorety and Licensing Appeal Board
'85 SEP 27 N0:40 U.S.
Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 0FFTE 0r SELRtiAn -
00CKETING & SERVIU.
Dr.
W.
Reed Johnson 3R AN :H o
Atomic Sorety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington.
D.C.
20555 Mr. Howard A. Wilber
' Atomic.Sorety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Re:-Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power t
Plant, Units 1 and 2), Docket Hos. 50-440 and 5 0-4 41C L-l Deor. Appeal Board Members:
On September 23, 1985-Intervenor Ohio Citi= ens for Responsible Energy (*0CRE') was notiried that the Appeal Board f
had' rejected 0CRE*s Motion for o Stoy Pendente Lite (filed September 19) as illegible and that OCRE would have until
~
Friday, September 27, 1985 to resubmit the motion.
l Because or the ten 1 pose limit on stay motions imposed by 10
~CFR'2.788(b), OCRE used a printer setting or 18 chorocters per inch horizontal spacing so that its orguments would be more than
'scottergun charges in the-most cursory form."
Duke Power 00 (Cotowbo Nuclear _ 5torion, Units 1 and 2). ALAB-794, 20 NRC 2
1630, 1632 (1984).
While resulting in print smaller than customarily used. this cction.does not violate the Commission's rules or practice, and the print in the motion is larger than
-that'round in newspapers.. telephone books, and the Federal g
negister.
i Because photocopying may have caused the illegibility. OCRE hos enclosed (but hos not served on the parties) original printouts or. the motion using'18 Chorocter per inch print.
In the event that this is still unocceptable, OCRE hos enclosed (and served.on the parties) o version or the motion in larger print.
Unfortunately,-much material had to be deleted to
' remain within the ten page limit with the lorger print.
OCRE Would-therefore respectrully request that, ir possible, the Appeal Board accept the smaller print versson or the motion as that version contains the most comprehensive and thorough analysis of the need for a stay.
8509300363 850925'~
{DR ADOCK 05000440 PDR cg 3
a o.
Page' 2-
.}
OCRE regrets any delay.or. inconvenience resulting from the small-print motion.
sincerely,
,.~,'
g Susan L.
Hiott.
OCRE Representative 8275 Hunson Rd.
Mentor, OH 44060 (216)'255-3158
Enclosures:
os stated
~
cc: service List e